Social Security retirement timing question - December 2026 vs January 2027 to avoid tax issues?
I'm planning for retirement and trying to figure out the best timing for Social Security. I earn about $87,000 annually right now. If I start collecting Social Security benefits in December 2026, will the government count my entire year's wages for 2026 when determining if I exceed the earnings limit? Or would it be smarter to wait until January 2027 to start collecting? I'm specifically concerned about the tax implications and don't want to lose benefits if I can help it. I'll be 65 in November 2026 if that matters. Any advice would be appreciated!
39 comments


Sean Murphy
Great question about Social Security timing! First, understand that the earnings test only applies if you're below your Full Retirement Age (FRA), which is likely 67 if you're turning 65 in 2026. For 2025, the annual earnings limit is $21,240 for those below FRA (this increases yearly). If you start in December 2026, they'll count your entire 2026 earnings, but there's a special rule for the first year of retirement. In your first retirement year, SSA will use a monthly test instead of annual when it benefits you. This means even if your annual earnings are over the limit, they'd only reduce benefits for months where your earnings exceeded 1/12th of the annual limit. So if you fully retire in December 2026, only your December earnings would matter for that calculation.
0 coins
Anastasia Popov
•Thank you! Does that mean I could potentially receive my full December benefit even though my annual income was $87,000? I'm not sure I fully understand the monthly test. Would they look at how much I earned specifically in December?
0 coins
Zara Khan
The gov't always takes our money no matter when u file!!!! I started my SS in Febrary and they still counted ALL my income from January. It's a TRAP!!! The whole system is designed to make us wait longer.
0 coins
Luca Ferrari
•That's not accurate. They use something called the grace year provision when you first retire. Sounds like you might have earned over the monthly limit even in the month you claimed.
0 coins
Nia Davis
To clarify what others are saying - when you first retire, Social Security applies what's called the "Grace Year Rule" or "First Year Rule." Here's how it works: If your 2026 total earnings are over the annual limit, but you RETIRE and start benefits in December, SSA will pay full benefits for December IF you earn under the monthly limit for that month. For 2025, the monthly limit is $1,770 (again, this increases yearly). So if you stop working at the end of November, and have little or no earnings in December, you'll get your full December benefit even though your annual earnings were $87,000. However, if you continue working in December and earn over the monthly limit, that month's benefit would be affected. Either way, January 2027 starts a new year for earnings test purposes.
0 coins
Anastasia Popov
•This is exactly what I needed to know! So basically I need to make sure I don't earn more than the monthly limit in December 2026 if I want to collect for that month. If I'm still working in December though, it sounds like waiting until January would be better. Thank you!
0 coins
Mateo Martinez
I had the same question last year! Called SS like 6 times and got 6 different answers lol. Ended up starting in January just to be safe.
0 coins
QuantumQueen
•I tried calling Social Security about something similar last month and spent 3 hours on hold before getting disconnected! So frustrating.
0 coins
Aisha Rahman
I went through this exact situation. The biggest thing nobody mentioned yet is that we're talking about TWO separate issues: 1. The earnings test (which can reduce benefits if you're under FRA) 2. Taxation of Social Security benefits For the earnings test, the grace year rule others mentioned applies. For TAXATION of benefits - your 2026 Social Security income will be part of your 2026 tax return regardless of whether you start in December or January. Up to 85% of your SS can be taxable depending on your combined income (AGI + nontaxable interest + 1/2 of SS benefits). So if tax planning is your main concern, starting in December vs January makes little difference tax-wise for just one month of benefits.
0 coins
Anastasia Popov
•Oh wow - I didn't realize those were two separate issues! So even if I pass the earnings test and get my December benefit, that benefit could still be taxed based on my whole year's income? That's really helpful to understand.
0 coins
QuantumQueen
Has anyone used Claimyr to get through to SSA? I've been trying to get specific answers about this exact situation for weeks but can't get anyone on the phone. Just saw a video about it (https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU) and wondering if it's worth trying? Their website claimyr.com says they can get you connected to a real person at Social Security without the wait. Considering how important this retirement timing decision is, might be worth it to get the official answer.
0 coins
Zara Khan
•Never heard of it but let us know if it works!!! I gave up after 2 weeks of trying to call them about my missing COLA increase.
0 coins
Aisha Rahman
•I actually used Claimyr last month when I needed to sort out an issue with my direct deposit. It worked surprisingly well - had me connected to SSA in about 20 minutes when I'd previously wasted hours on hold. For something like retirement timing where you need specific answers about your situation, it's probably worth it to speak directly with an SSA rep.
0 coins
Nia Davis
One last important point - your age matters tremendously here. You mentioned being 65 in November 2026, but Full Retirement Age for Social Security is currently between 66-67 depending on your birth year. If you start Social Security at 65, you're taking it early, which means: 1. Permanent reduction in benefits (about 13.3% less than your full benefit) 2. Subject to the earnings limit until you reach FRA If your FRA is 67, you might want to consider working the extra two years or at least understand the permanent reduction you're accepting by starting early.
0 coins
Anastasia Popov
•That's a really good point I hadn't fully considered. My FRA is indeed 67. I knew there was a reduction for taking it early, but I didn't realize the earnings limit would continue to apply until I reach 67. Definitely gives me more to think about - maybe working a bit longer makes more sense financially.
0 coins
Mateo Martinez
my sister started in december last year and said the SSA people told her for the FIRST year only they do a monthly test not yearly. She made like $75k that year but didnt work in december so got her full check
0 coins
Sean Murphy
•Your sister got the right information! That's exactly how the "grace year" provision works - in your first year receiving benefits, they'll apply the monthly test if it's to your advantage.
0 coins
Luca Ferrari
Just to add my two cents - I retired end of October last year, started SS in November. Had already made $65K for the year, but because I truly retired (no more work income), I got both November and December payments in full. The monthly test saved me! Just make sure you're actually stopping work, not just reducing hours.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
This is such a helpful thread! I'm in a similar situation but turning 62 next year. Reading through all these responses, it sounds like the key factors are: 1) Whether you're below Full Retirement Age (which affects the earnings test), 2) The grace year rule for your first year of benefits, and 3) Understanding that the earnings test and taxation are separate issues. For someone like Anastasia who's taking benefits before FRA, it seems like the December vs January timing mainly matters if you're still working in December. If you can truly stop working by November and have minimal December earnings, the grace year rule would let you collect that December benefit even with $87K in annual earnings. But as others pointed out, taking benefits at 65 means a permanent reduction compared to waiting until 67. Might be worth running the numbers on two more years of work + delayed benefits vs. starting early with the earnings test complications.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•This is exactly the kind of summary I needed! You've really clarified the key decision points. I think I'm leaning toward stopping work in November 2026 and starting benefits in December if I can keep my December earnings minimal. The grace year rule seems like it would work in my favor that way. But you're absolutely right about the permanent reduction - that's the part I need to think about more carefully. Working two more years to get my full benefit at 67 might make more financial sense in the long run, especially if I'm healthy and can keep working. Thanks for helping me see the bigger picture!
0 coins
Kayla Jacobson
This is such valuable information for anyone facing this retirement timing decision! I'm a newcomer to this community but found this thread incredibly helpful. From reading through all the responses, it seems like the key takeaway is that the "grace year rule" can really work in your favor if you plan it right. The fact that Social Security will use whichever test (monthly vs annual) benefits you more in your first year of retirement is something I didn't know about. One thing I'd add for anyone else reading this - it might be worth creating a simple spreadsheet to compare scenarios. Factor in: 1) Your current salary and when you'd stop working, 2) The permanent reduction for taking benefits early vs waiting until FRA, 3) The monthly earnings limit for the grace year rule, and 4) How Social Security benefits get taxed as part of your overall retirement income. The taxation piece that @Aisha Rahman mentioned is really important too - even if you pass the earnings test, those benefits still count toward your taxable income for the year. Thanks to everyone who shared their real experiences! It's so much more helpful than trying to decode the official SSA publications on your own.
0 coins
Sofia Rodriguez
•Welcome to the community @Kayla Jacobson! Your spreadsheet suggestion is brilliant - I wish I had thought of that when I was going through this decision process myself. You're absolutely right that comparing all the scenarios side by side would make the choice much clearer. I'm also new here but have been lurking and reading threads like this for weeks trying to understand Social Security timing. The real-world experiences people have shared here are so much more valuable than the confusing official documentation. It's amazing how the grace year rule can really change the math if you plan your retirement timing carefully. Thanks for the great summary of all the key factors to consider!
0 coins
Grace Johnson
As someone new to this community, I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm approaching a similar decision myself. The collective wisdom here has been incredibly helpful! One additional resource I'd recommend is the Social Security Administration's online retirement estimator at ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/estimator.html. While it doesn't give you the nuanced advice about timing that everyone has shared here, it can help you see the actual dollar impact of claiming at different ages. What really stands out to me from this thread is how the grace year rule seems to be one of Social Security's best-kept secrets. I had no idea that they would apply whichever test (monthly vs annual) works better for you in your first year of retirement. That's actually quite generous compared to what I expected from the government! For Anastasia and others in similar situations, it seems like the decision tree is: 1) Can you afford to wait until FRA for the full benefit? 2) If not, can you time your actual retirement to take advantage of the grace year rule? 3) Have you factored in the tax implications of adding SS income to your existing income? Thanks to everyone who shared their real experiences - it's made this complex topic much clearer for those of us still figuring it out!
0 coins
Aurora Lacasse
•Thank you so much @Grace Johnson for that additional resource! I just checked out the SSA retirement estimator and it s'really eye-opening to see the actual dollar differences between claiming at different ages. You re'absolutely right that the grace year rule seems to be a well-kept secret - I ve'been researching Social Security for months and this is the first time I ve'seen it explained so clearly. Your decision tree summary is perfect and really helps organize all the factors we need to consider. As someone new to retirement planning, threads like this make me realize how much nuanced knowledge exists that you just can t'get from reading the official government materials alone. The real-world experiences everyone has shared here are invaluable for understanding how these rules actually work in practice. It s'encouraging to see such a supportive community where people share their knowledge to help others navigate these complex decisions!
0 coins
Melissa Lin
As a newcomer to this community, I want to thank everyone for such an informative discussion! I'm 63 and facing a similar decision in the next few years, so this thread has been incredibly valuable. One thing that strikes me is how much the timing strategy depends on your specific situation. For someone like Anastasia earning $87k annually, the grace year rule could be a game-changer if she can truly stop working by November 2026. But I'm curious - has anyone here dealt with the situation where you have irregular income or consulting work after "retirement"? I'm wondering how the monthly earnings test works if your December income varies significantly from month to month. For instance, if I get a large consulting payment in December that puts me over the monthly limit, would that wipe out the benefit for that month even if my other months were low? Also, I noticed several people mentioned the challenge of getting through to SSA on the phone. Has anyone had success using their online services or local field offices for these kinds of detailed timing questions? Sometimes face-to-face might be easier than phone calls. Thanks again for sharing all your real-world experiences - it's exactly what someone new to retirement planning needs to hear!
0 coins
Ian Armstrong
•Great question about irregular income @Melissa Lin! I'm also new here but have been researching this extensively. From what I've learned, the monthly earnings test does look at each month individually, so yes - if you get a large consulting payment in December that pushes you over the monthly limit ($1,770 for 2025), that specific month's Social Security benefit could be affected even if your other months were low. This is actually one of the trickier aspects of retirement planning with consulting income. You might want to consider timing any large payments to fall in months when you're not collecting benefits yet, or in the year after you start (when the annual test would apply instead of monthly). As for getting answers from SSA, I've heard mixed results about local field offices - some people say they're more helpful for complex questions, but others report long wait times there too. The online services are great for basic information but probably won't help with nuanced timing strategies like what we're discussing here. Welcome to the community! It's refreshing to find a place where people actually share practical experiences instead of just repeating the official rules.
0 coins
Ashley Simian
As a newcomer to this community, I've been following this fascinating discussion about Social Security timing! I'm 58 and starting to think seriously about my own retirement strategy, so this thread has been incredibly educational. What really impressed me is how everyone here has shared such practical, real-world experiences that you just can't find in the official SSA materials. The grace year rule discussion was eye-opening - I had never heard of this before, and it seems like it could be a crucial factor in timing decisions. For anyone else reading this thread, I think the key insights are: 1) The grace year rule can be incredibly beneficial if you can truly stop working in your claiming month, 2) There's a big difference between the earnings test and taxation of benefits, 3) Taking benefits before Full Retirement Age has permanent consequences that need to be weighed carefully, and 4) Getting specific answers from SSA can be challenging but may be necessary for complex situations. @Anastasia Popov - based on everything discussed here, it sounds like if you can genuinely retire by November 2026 and keep your December earnings minimal, starting benefits in December could work well with the grace year rule. But the permanent reduction for claiming at 65 vs 67 is definitely something to calculate carefully. Thank you all for creating such a helpful resource for those of us navigating these complex decisions!
0 coins
Noland Curtis
•Welcome to the community @Ashley Simian! You've done an excellent job summarizing all the key insights from this discussion. As another newcomer here, I've been amazed at how much practical knowledge everyone has shared. Your point about the permanent reduction is so important - I think sometimes we get caught up in the timing strategies around the earnings test and forget that claiming at 65 vs 67 means giving up about 13% of your benefit forever. That's a significant amount over a 20+ year retirement! I'm also struck by how the grace year rule seems to be this hidden gem that can really help people if they plan their retirement timing carefully. It makes me wonder what other Social Security provisions exist that aren't well-publicized but could be beneficial. For those of us still in the planning stages, this thread has been like a masterclass in real-world Social Security strategy. The combination of technical knowledge and personal experiences shared here is invaluable. Thank you to everyone who took the time to share their insights - it's exactly what newcomers like us need to make informed decisions!
0 coins
Omar Fawzi
As a newcomer to this community, I've been reading through this incredibly informative discussion and wanted to add something I learned from my own recent experience. I'm 66 and just went through the Social Security claiming decision last year. One aspect that hasn't been mentioned much is the importance of getting your earnings record correct BEFORE you claim. I discovered several years where my earnings weren't properly credited, which would have significantly reduced my benefit calculation. The SSA website lets you create a my Social Security account where you can review your entire earnings history - I'd strongly recommend doing this well before your planned claiming date. Also, regarding the challenge of reaching SSA by phone that several people mentioned - I found that calling right when they open (8 AM ET) gave me much better success than calling later in the day. It still took about 45 minutes on hold, but that was much better than the 3+ hours others have experienced. For @Anastasia Popov and others considering the December vs January timing, another factor to consider is that if you claim in December 2026, you'll receive your first payment in January 2027 anyway (there's typically a one-month delay). So the practical difference in when money hits your account may be smaller than it appears. This community has been such a valuable resource - thank you all for sharing your real-world experiences!
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
•Welcome to the community @Omar Fawzi! Your point about checking earnings records before claiming is absolutely crucial - thank you for bringing that up. I hadn't thought about how missing or incorrect earnings could impact the benefit calculation, and it's something that probably takes time to resolve if there are errors. The timing detail about the one-month delay is also really helpful. So even if you claim in December 2026, you wouldn't actually receive that payment until January 2027 anyway? That definitely changes the practical impact of the December vs January decision. Your tip about calling SSA right at 8 AM is gold - I'll definitely remember that when I need to contact them. It's amazing how much practical knowledge gets shared in communities like this that you just can't find in official publications. As someone new to retirement planning, threads like this make me realize how many small details matter in Social Security strategy. The combination of technical rules, timing considerations, and real-world logistics is more complex than I initially thought, but discussions like this make it much more manageable to understand.
0 coins
Mason Davis
As a newcomer to this community, I've been following this incredibly detailed discussion and wanted to share something that might help others in similar situations. I'm 64 and facing my own Social Security timing decisions soon. What really stands out to me from this thread is how the grace year rule seems to be the key factor for people like @Anastasia Popov who are considering claiming before their Full Retirement Age while still having significant annual earnings. The fact that SSA will apply whichever test (monthly vs annual) benefits you more in your first year is remarkably helpful. However, I keep coming back to the point several people made about the permanent reduction. At $87k annually, Anastasia is clearly still earning good money - and giving up 13%+ of her Social Security benefit forever by claiming at 65 vs 67 could mean tens of thousands of dollars over a full retirement. For anyone reading this thread, I'd suggest running the numbers on: 1) Two more years of $87k salary, 2) Two more years of 401k/retirement contributions, 3) Starting SS at 100% vs ~87% of full benefit, and 4) The difference in lifetime benefits. The grace year rule is great for timing, but the bigger question might be whether early claiming makes sense at all with that income level. That said, everyone's situation is different - health, other savings, family circumstances all matter. This discussion has been invaluable for understanding all the moving pieces!
0 coins
StellarSurfer
•Welcome to the community @Mason Davis! You've really hit on what I think is the most important consideration here. As another newcomer who's been learning so much from this discussion, your point about running the full financial analysis is spot-on. I've been doing some rough calculations based on what's been shared, and you're absolutely right - the difference between claiming at 65 vs 67 with an $87k income could be substantial over a 20+ year retirement. Even with the grace year rule helping with timing, that permanent 13%+ reduction is significant. What's been so valuable about this thread is seeing how all these pieces fit together - the earnings test, grace year rule, taxation, and the early claiming penalty. It's made me realize that while timing strategies are important, the fundamental decision of WHEN to claim may matter even more than HOW to time it within a given year. For those of us still planning, this discussion has been like a masterclass in Social Security strategy. The real-world experiences everyone has shared, combined with the technical explanations, have made these complex rules much clearer. Thank you to everyone who's contributed - this is exactly the kind of practical guidance newcomers need!
0 coins
Alice Pierce
As a newcomer to this community, I've been following this incredibly thorough discussion and wanted to add a perspective that might help others facing similar decisions. I'm 59 and starting to plan my own Social Security strategy, so this conversation has been incredibly educational. What strikes me most is how this thread perfectly illustrates the complexity of Social Security timing - there's no simple "one size fits all" answer. The grace year rule discussion has been eye-opening, and it seems like it could be a powerful tool for people who can genuinely retire in their claiming month. However, I keep thinking about the math that @Mason Davis outlined. For someone earning $87k annually, the opportunity cost of claiming early might outweigh the benefits of strategic timing. Two additional years of high earnings plus starting benefits at 100% instead of ~87% could potentially be worth hundreds of thousands over a lifetime. That said, I understand there are other factors - health concerns, job security, family needs, or simply wanting to enjoy retirement while you're healthy enough to do so. Money isn't everything. For @Anastasia Popov specifically, based on everything discussed here, it seems like your decision tree might be: 1) Can you realistically work until 67 and is it worth the extra money? 2) If you do claim early, can you structure your retirement to take advantage of the grace year rule? 3) Have you factored in all the tax implications? Thank you to everyone who shared their real experiences - this has been incredibly valuable for those of us still planning our retirement timing!
0 coins
Tyler Lefleur
•Welcome to the community @Alice Pierce! As another newcomer, I've been incredibly impressed by the depth of knowledge and real-world experience shared in this thread. Your decision tree summary is excellent and really helps organize all the complex factors involved. What's been most valuable to me as someone new to Social Security planning is seeing how the grace year rule can work in practice, but you're absolutely right that it needs to be weighed against the bigger picture of early vs. full retirement age claiming. The personal stories shared here - like @Luca Ferrari's experience retiring in October and getting full November/December benefits, or @Mateo Martinez's sister's situation - really bring these rules to life. I think for many of us reading this thread, the biggest takeaway is that Social Security timing involves multiple layers of strategy: the earnings test, grace year provisions, permanent reduction penalties, and tax implications all working together. It's no wonder people get different answers when they call SSA - there are so many variables! Thank you @Anastasia Popov for asking the original question that sparked such an informative discussion. And thanks to all the experienced members who shared their knowledge - this thread will definitely be a reference for many of us as we navigate our own retirement decisions!
0 coins
Ryder Ross
As a newcomer to this community, I've been reading through this incredibly comprehensive discussion and wanted to share some thoughts that might help others in similar situations. I'm currently 63 and will be facing these same Social Security timing decisions in the coming years. What's been most enlightening about this thread is how it demonstrates that Social Security strategy isn't just about one rule or provision - it's about understanding how multiple factors interact. The grace year rule that several people explained is fascinating and seems like it could be a real game-changer for people who can truly stop working in their claiming month. However, I keep coming back to the fundamental question of whether claiming at 65 makes financial sense when you're still earning $87k annually. The permanent reduction of roughly 13% that @Nia Davis and others mentioned could represent a significant amount over a 20+ year retirement. Sometimes the best timing strategy is simply waiting. For anyone else reading this who might be in a similar boat, I think the key questions are: 1) What's your health situation and family longevity? 2) Do you have other retirement savings to bridge the gap if you work longer? 3) Are you burned out and ready to retire regardless of the financial optimization? 4) Have you run the actual numbers on lifetime benefits? @Anastasia Popov - your original question about December vs January timing has sparked such a valuable discussion! Based on everything shared here, it sounds like if you do decide to claim at 65, the grace year rule could definitely work in your favor if you can structure your retirement properly. But the broader question of whether to claim early at all with your income level might be worth additional consideration. Thank you to everyone who has shared their real-world experiences and technical knowledge. This is exactly the kind of practical guidance that makes these complex decisions more manageable!
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
•Welcome to the community @Ryder Ross! As another newcomer, I've been amazed by the wealth of practical knowledge shared in this thread. Your summary really captures the complexity of these decisions perfectly. I'm 61 and just starting to think seriously about Social Security timing, so this discussion has been incredibly valuable. What really resonates with me is your point about how this isn't just about one rule - it's about understanding how all these different factors work together. The grace year rule, earnings test, permanent reductions, and tax implications all interact in ways that aren't immediately obvious from reading the official SSA materials. Your four key questions are excellent and really help frame the decision-making process. I think sometimes we can get so focused on optimizing the timing strategies that we lose sight of the bigger question of whether early claiming makes sense at all given someone's specific circumstances. Like you, I keep coming back to the math on that permanent reduction. For someone earning $87k, those two extra years of work plus the higher lifetime benefit could be substantial. But as others have noted, there are quality of life factors too that pure financial optimization doesn't capture. This thread has really opened my eyes to how much nuance exists in Social Security planning. Thank you @Anastasia Popov for starting such an informative discussion, and thanks to all the experienced members who ve'shared their knowledge and real-world experiences!
0 coins
Madison King
•Welcome to the community @Ryder Ross! As a fellow newcomer, I've found this thread to be incredibly educational as well. Your point about running the actual numbers on lifetime benefits is so important - it's easy to get caught up in the timing strategies without stepping back to look at the bigger financial picture. I'm 60 and have been researching Social Security options for my own upcoming decision, and this discussion has really highlighted how individualized these choices need to be. While the grace year rule is definitely a valuable tool for timing, you're absolutely right that the fundamental question of whether to claim early with a high income deserves careful consideration. What I've found most valuable about this community is how people share their real experiences alongside the technical explanations. It's one thing to read about the grace year rule in SSA publications, but hearing from @Luca Ferrari about actually using it successfully, or @Omar Fawzi s tip'about calling at 8 AM - those practical insights are invaluable. For @Anastasia Popov, this thread has really evolved into a comprehensive guide for anyone facing similar timing decisions. The collective wisdom here has covered everything from the technical rules to the practical considerations to the bigger strategic questions about early vs. full retirement age claiming. Thanks to everyone who has contributed their knowledge and experiences - this is exactly the kind of supportive community that helps people navigate these complex financial decisions with confidence!
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
As a newcomer to this community, I've been thoroughly impressed by the depth and quality of this discussion! I'm 62 and will be eligible for Social Security in just a few years, so this thread has been incredibly timely and educational for me. What really stands out is how this conversation has evolved from a specific timing question into a comprehensive masterclass on Social Security strategy. The grace year rule explanation was particularly eye-opening - I had never heard of this provision before, and it seems like it could be a crucial factor for anyone considering early retirement while still having significant earnings. However, like several others have mentioned, I keep coming back to the math on that permanent reduction. For someone earning $87k annually, the financial impact of claiming at 65 vs 67 could be substantial over a lifetime. It makes me wonder if sometimes the best timing strategy is simply patience. @Anastasia Popov - your question has sparked such a valuable resource! Based on everything discussed here, it seems like you have a solid understanding of your options now. If you do decide to claim at 65, the grace year rule could definitely work in your favor with proper planning. But the broader strategic question about early vs. full retirement age claiming with your income level might warrant additional consideration. Thank you to everyone who has shared their real-world experiences and technical knowledge. This is exactly the kind of practical, supportive community that helps people navigate these complex financial decisions with confidence. As someone new to retirement planning, I feel much better equipped to handle my own Social Security timing decisions thanks to this discussion!
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•Welcome to the community @Giovanni Mancini! As another newcomer, I completely agree that this thread has become an incredible resource for anyone facing Social Security timing decisions. I'm 58 and just starting to seriously think about these choices, so seeing such detailed real-world experiences alongside technical explanations has been invaluable. Your point about the "masterclass" evolution of this discussion is spot-on. What started as a specific December vs January question has really become a comprehensive guide covering the grace year rule, earnings test, permanent reductions, taxation implications, and the bigger strategic considerations. It's amazing how much practical knowledge exists in this community that you just can't get from official SSA materials. Like you, I keep thinking about that permanent reduction math. The grace year rule is clearly a powerful tool for timing, but for someone with $87k in annual earnings, those two extra working years plus the higher lifetime benefit could be worth hundreds of thousands over a full retirement. Of course, there are quality of life factors too that pure financial optimization doesn't capture. What I love most about this community is how supportive and informative everyone has been. @Anastasia Popov asked a great question that has helped so many of us understand these complex rules better. Thank you to all the experienced members who took the time to share their knowledge - this is exactly what newcomers like us need to make informed decisions!
0 coins