< Back to Social Security Administration

Social Security question: Can I claim 50% of spouse's SSDI at 62 while my own SS benefit grows until 70?

Hi everyone! I've been researching SS benefits for months and am still confused about my options. I'll be turning 62 this December and thinking about retirement. My wife (we've been married 40+ years) has been receiving SSDI for the past 5 years due to a chronic health condition. She won't turn 62 until April 2025. I'm trying to maximize our household benefits and wondering: Can I claim half of her SSDI benefit when I turn 62 but delay claiming my own retirement benefits until I'm 70 to get the maximum amount? Has anyone successfully done this type of strategy? I'm getting conflicting information about whether spousal benefits work with SSDI the same way they do with regular retirement benefits.

Diego Rojas

•

Yes, you can apply for spousal benefits based on your wife's SSDI record when you turn 62. However, you need to understand a few key points: 1. You won't get the full 50% - at age 62, your spousal benefit will be reduced to about 32.5% of your wife's primary insurance amount because you're claiming early. 2. More importantly, due to the "deemed filing" rules that took effect in 2016, when you file for spousal benefits, you are AUTOMATICALLY deemed to be filing for your own retirement benefits too. This means you CANNOT let your own benefit grow until 70 while collecting spousal benefits unless you were born before January 2, 1954 (which doesn't seem to be the case based on your current age). So unfortunately, the strategy you're describing (claiming spousal now, switching to your own at 70) is no longer allowed for people your age.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

Thanks for the quick response! This is disappointing. I was born in 1963, so I guess that rule change definitely affects me. So if I understand correctly, once I file for ANY benefit, I'm stuck with the reduced amount forever? Can I still get the higher of the two amounts (my reduced benefit vs. reduced spousal benefit)?

0 coins

Just to add to what the previous commenter said - you're absolutely right to be thinking about maximizing your household benefits! But unfortunately, the "file and suspend" and "restricted application" strategies were eliminated by Congress in the 2015 Budget Act. For someone born in 1963 like yourself, when you file for ANY benefit, SSA will give you the higher of: 1. Your own reduced retirement benefit (reduced because you're claiming before your FRA of 67) 2. The reduced spousal benefit (which as mentioned is about 32.5% of your wife's PIA at age 62) You don't get both - you just get whichever is higher. And once you file, you cannot switch strategies later. One option to consider: if your own benefit at 70 would be significantly higher, it might be worth waiting to file anything until then, especially if you're still working.

0 coins

Sean O'Donnell

•

my frend tried what ur talking about and got denied. ssa told him he HAD to take his own benifit first. big mess

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

THE SSA IS ALWAYS CHANGING THE RULES TO KEEP US FROM GETTING OUR MONEY!!! My brother was able to do EXACTLY what you're asking about 10 years ago, but then they changed everything in 2015!!! It's SO FRUSTRATING they keep moving the goal posts. I filed at 62 thinking I could switch later and NO ONE at the office warned me I was permanently reducing my benefit. They should have to EXPLAIN these things better!!!

0 coins

StarStrider

•

I feel your pain. The rules are incredibly complex and they don't exactly go out of their way to educate people about all the nuances. I spent hours researching before making my decision and still missed some important details.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

Have you considered continuing to work until your FRA? That's what I did, and it boosted my benefit quite a bit. If your health is good and you enjoy your job, might be worth it.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

I hadn't really thought about that angle. My job is pretty physically demanding, but maybe I could switch to part-time or find something less strenuous. That's a good point about increasing my benefit amount if I keep working longer.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

I went through something similar last year with my husband's SSDI. You absolutely should call SSA directly to confirm how this applies to your specific situation. But be prepared - I spent 3 days calling and never got through. The busy signals and disconnections were maddening! I finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to a real person at SSA in about 15 minutes. They have a video demo at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU showing how it works. Honestly, it was worth it just to get definitive answers about my specific situation instead of general advice. The agent I spoke with was able to look at both our records and tell me exactly what would happen if I filed at different ages.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

That sounds really helpful. I've been trying to get through to SSA for weeks with no luck. Either busy signals or being on hold forever. I'll check out that service - I really need to talk to someone who can look at our specific records.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

One more thing to consider - you mentioned your wife has been on SSDI for 5 years. If she was disabled before age 56, her SSDI benefit might be lower than if she had worked until retirement age. This could mean that your spousal benefit (even at 50% of her PIA) might be lower than your own reduced retirement benefit anyway. The best approach is to request a benefit verification letter from your wife (showing her exact SSDI amount) and your own Social Security statement (showing your projected benefits at different ages). Once you have those numbers, you can make a more informed decision.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

That's excellent advice. Her SSDI payment is around $1,850/month. From my last statement, my benefit at 62 would be about $2,100, and at 70 it would be around $3,700. It sounds like taking my own reduced benefit would be better than any spousal benefit I could get from her record. But I still need to confirm all of this with SSA directly.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

When I was researching my options, I found that the BEST strategy depends a lot on life expectancy and immediate cash needs. If you think you'll live well into your 80s and don't desperately need the money now, waiting until 70 to file for your own benefits will maximize your lifetime payout (plus it provides inflation protection). But if you need income now OR have health concerns that might affect longevity, taking reduced benefits earlier could make more sense. Also remember that once either of you passes away, the surviving spouse will receive the higher of the two benefit amounts you were receiving. So maximizing at least one benefit (usually the higher earner's) can be a good survivor planning strategy.

0 coins

Sean O'Donnell

•

ya this is important! my mom got dads benefit when he died cause it was bigger than hers

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

Thank you all so much for the helpful responses! Based on everything here, I think my best option is to: 1. Get the exact benefit amounts for both of us 2. Use that Claimyr service to actually speak with someone at SSA about our specific situation 3. Probably delay taking any benefits until at least my FRA (67) if not 70, since my benefit would be significantly higher than any spousal benefit I'm disappointed that I can't use the strategy I was hoping for, but I'm glad I asked before making a mistake! This forum has been so much more helpful than the confusing SSA website.

0 coins

That sounds like a solid plan! And don't feel bad - the Social Security rules are incredibly complex and constantly changing. Even financial advisors sometimes get the details wrong. Good luck with your decision!

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,714 users helped today