Can I claim spousal SS benefits at 62 while delaying my own until FRA?
I'm turning 62 in March and trying to figure out my best Social Security strategy. My husband started collecting his retirement benefits when he reached his full retirement age (66 and 2 months) last year. His monthly benefit is around $2,800. I've worked most of my life but had several years as a stay-at-home mom, so my benefit at full retirement age would be about $2,100. I've heard conflicting advice about whether I can apply ONLY for spousal benefits at 62 and then switch to my own higher benefit when I reach my full retirement age (67). This would give us some extra income now but still let me get my maximum benefit later. Is this possible or am I confused about how spousal benefits work? Would really appreciate hearing from anyone who's navigated this successfully!
18 comments
Reina Salazar
Unfortunately, that strategy won't work for you. The law changed after the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. Now when you file for any benefit (including spousal) before your FRA, you're deemed to have filed for ALL benefits you're eligible for. This is called 'deemed filing.' If you apply at 62, SSA will automatically give you whichever is higher: your own reduced retirement or your reduced spousal benefit. And your benefit will be permanently reduced because you claimed early. The only way to get only spousal benefits and delay your own is if you were born before January 2, 1954. For everyone born after that date, deemed filing applies.
0 coins
Dallas Villalobos
•Oh no, that's disappointing! I was born in 1963 so I guess that strategy is off the table. So if I understand right, if I apply at 62, they'll just automatically give me whichever is higher between my reduced benefit and the reduced spousal benefit? And I'll be stuck with that reduced amount forever?
0 coins
Saanvi Krishnaswami
This is one area where the SSA rules can be REALLY confusing. I spent hours researching this exact situation when my wife and I were planning our retirement. The rules used to allow what you're describing (it was called a "restricted application") but Congress eliminated that option for most people. Basically, if you file for ANY benefit before your FRA, you're deemed to have filed for ALL benefits. And once you file early, those reductions are permanent. The only exception is if you were born before Jan 2, 1954. It's frustrating because financial advisors and outdated articles still mention this strategy, but it doesn't work anymore for most of us.
0 coins
Demi Lagos
•right my sister tried to do this last yr and got a big surprise when she went to the office!!! they said nope cant do that anymore have to take both at same time
0 coins
Dallas Villalobos
Thank you all for the responses. This is really helpful but also disappointing. I have another question then - if I wait until my full retirement age (67), could I take JUST the spousal benefit then and let my own benefit continue to grow until 70? Or does that "deemed filing" rule still apply at full retirement age too?
0 coins
Reina Salazar
•Unfortunately, deemed filing now applies at any age for people born after January 1, 1954. Even if you wait until your FRA, you'll still be required to file for all benefits you're eligible for. The SSA will pay you the higher of the two, but not both. In your case, since your own benefit ($2,100) is already higher than the maximum spousal benefit you could get (50% of your husband's $2,800, so $1,400), you would never receive spousal benefits - you'd always receive your own retirement benefit. You could still choose to delay until 70 to maximize your own benefit, which would grow by 8% per year from your FRA to age 70.
0 coins
Mason Lopez
My wife tried to do this same thing! Such a bummer when we found out it doesnt work anymore. The old rules let u do exactly what your wanting but now they make u take both at once and just give u the higher amount. government always changing things.
0 coins
Vera Visnjic
•Social Security has become a nightmare to navigate! The rules keep changing, the website is confusing, and good luck trying to get someone on the phone. I spent THREE DAYS trying to reach a human at SSA about my spousal benefits question.
0 coins
Jake Sinclair
Since your own benefit at FRA ($2,100) is higher than what you'd get as a spouse (50% of $2,800 = $1,400), focusing on maximizing your own benefit probably makes the most sense anyway. Here are your basic options: 1. Claim at 62: You'd get your own benefit reduced by about 30% (so around $1,470/month) permanently 2. Wait until FRA (67): Get your full $2,100/month 3. Delay until 70: Get 124% of your benefit (about $2,604/month) If you need income now, option 1 might make sense. If you can wait and expect to live past about 80-82, waiting will likely give you more lifetime benefits. The spousal benefit doesn't really come into play here since your own benefit is higher.
0 coins
Dallas Villalobos
•Thank you for breaking this down so clearly. I think I can actually wait until my FRA, so option 2 seems like the best middle ground for us. My mom lived to 94 so I should probably factor in longevity. Really appreciate everyone's help on this!
0 coins
Vera Visnjic
Trying to call Social Security to ask questions like this is IMPOSSIBLE!!! I spent 5 hours on hold last month trying to get answers about my spousal benefits and kept getting disconnected. By the time I finally got through to someone, they gave me contradictory information from what I was told before. SO FRUSTRATING!!!!
0 coins
Brielle Johnson
•I finally found a service called Claimyr that got me through to SSA in under 30 minutes when I had a similar question about spousal benefits. They basically call and wait on hold for you, then connect you when a rep answers. Saved me hours of frustration. There's a video showing how it works at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU and their website is claimyr.com if anyone's interested. Made dealing with SSA so much less painful.
0 coins
Demi Lagos
u should just take it at 62 and enjoy the money now imo. who knows what will happen in 5 years? my neighbor waited til 70 to get bigger payments and then died 8 months later. all that money he could have been enjoying! just my 2 cents.
0 coins
Saanvi Krishnaswami
•This is the classic dilemma with Social Security planning, and there's really no perfect answer. Statistically, about 40% of people would benefit from waiting, but you never know what group you'll fall into. I personally split the difference and filed at my FRA instead of waiting until 70 or filing early.
0 coins
Dallas Villalobos
Thanks everyone for all the helpful information! I had no idea the rules had changed so much. I'm thinking I'll probably wait until my FRA (67) to claim my own benefits since they're higher than what I'd get as a spouse anyway. I wish I could've used that restricted application strategy, but at least now I understand how it works. One last question - will my husband's benefit amount change at all when I file for my own benefits? Or are our benefits completely separate?
0 coins
Reina Salazar
•Your benefits are separate - your husband's payment won't change when you file for your own. The only time benefits are affected by other family members is when you reach the family maximum limit (which usually only happens when there are multiple dependents or survivors on one worker's record). You're making a solid choice by waiting until your FRA if you can afford to. It's generally a good financial decision if you're in good health.
0 coins
Mason Lopez
my cousin said she was able to do what ur talking about but she must have been born before that cutoff date everyone mentioned. the rules r so confusing!!
0 coins
Jake Sinclair
•Exactly - if your cousin was born before January 2, 1954, she was grandfathered under the old rules. Anyone born before that date could still file a restricted application for just spousal benefits at their FRA while letting their own retirement benefit grow. It was a great strategy for those who qualified!
0 coins