Social Security math dilemma: Taking survivor benefits at 62 vs waiting until FRA - breakeven analysis
Hi everyone - I'm trying to figure out the best claiming strategy for my situation and could use some number-crunching help. I'm currently 62 and weighing my options. According to my most recent statement, if I start my own retirement benefits now, I'd get about $1,520/month. If I wait until my FRA (67), it would be $2,165/month, and at 70 it jumps to $2,685/month. Where it gets complicated: I'm also eligible for survivor benefits from my late husband. If I claim those now at 62, I'd receive $4,027/month, but waiting until my FRA at 67 would increase them to $5,034/month. Everyone tells me I should take my own reduced benefit at 62, then switch to the higher survivor benefit at FRA. But I've been playing with spreadsheets, and it seems like I might be leaving significant money behind. My calculations show my breakeven age would be somewhere in my mid-80s if I take survivor benefits now instead. Would love some insights from those who enjoy analyzing these numbers. What would maximize my lifetime benefits? And are there other factors I should consider that I'm missing? Thanks in advance!
21 comments
CosmicCommander
I think you're approaching this correctly. The general advice to take your own benefit at 62 and then switch to survivors at FRA works best when your own benefit is significantly lower than the survivor benefit. In your case, the gap is substantial. Let me run some quick math: If you take survivor benefits now ($4,027 × 12 × 5 years = $241,620 before FRA). Then subtract what you'd get from your own benefit during that time ($1,520 × 12 × 5 = $91,200). That's a difference of $150,420 in your pocket before even reaching FRA. Yes, you'd get a higher survivor benefit by waiting ($5,034 vs $4,027), but that difference of $1,007 monthly would take about 12.5 years to make up that $150K difference. So your breakeven would indeed be in your 80s. For most people, taking the larger amount sooner makes mathematical sense unless you have very strong reasons to believe you'll live well into your 90s.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Thank you so much for breaking down the numbers! That's exactly what I was calculating too. I'm in good health, but my family doesn't typically live past mid-80s, so maybe taking the survivor benefit now is the smarter move. I just kept second-guessing myself because it goes against the conventional wisdom I keep hearing.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
my mom did this exact thing took her own at 62 then switched to dads at her FRA she says SSA never explained this option to her she only found out from a friend!!! make sure u get everything in writing when u decide
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•That's really good to know - and concerning that they didn't explain all her options! I'll definitely make sure to document everything. Did your mom find the process of switching at FRA complicated?
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•not really they just made her fill out some paperwork but she had to CALL them to start it they didnt automatically switch her!!
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
Have you considered the tax implications though??? If you take the higher survivor benefit now, you might push yourself into a higher tax bracket where up to 85% of your SS benefits become taxable. The calculations aren't just about the raw SS numbers - it's about the NET after tax that matters. Also, do you have other income sources? Investments? Part-time work? All this would affect your optimal strategy.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•That's a really excellent point I hadn't fully considered. I do have about $24,000 annually from a small pension and maybe $15,000 from investments. I should probably talk to a tax professional to see how this would all interact. Thank you for bringing this up!
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
Just wanted to say THANK YOU for posting this question! I'm in almost the exact same situation (61, deciding between my benefit or survivors from my wife). I've been so confused but seeing your math helps clarify things. Following this thread closely!
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
I'm a retired financial planner who specialized in Social Security strategies. Here's what most people miss: it's not just about the break-even age, it's about TOTAL lifetime benefits maximization AND risk management. The mathematical optimal choice depends on: 1. Your health/longevity expectations 2. Current income needs 3. Other income sources and their timing 4. Tax brackets now vs. later years 5. Inflation expectations (COLA affects larger benefits more) One strategy to consider: If you don't need all the survivor benefits immediately, you could take them now but invest the difference between what you need to live on and the full amount. This creates a personal reserve that might outperform the implied return of waiting. Personally, I tend to favor taking the higher amount earlier unless there's a compelling reason not to (like significant tax issues). Money in hand now has utility and options that theoretical future money doesn't.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Thank you so much for this comprehensive perspective! The idea of investing the difference is intriguing. I don't need the full amount to live on right now, so I could potentially invest quite a bit of it. Are there any particular investment vehicles you'd recommend for someone in my situation?
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
•For the investment portion, consider a balanced approach appropriate for your age - maybe 40/60 or 50/50 stocks/bonds. I'd suggest avoiding anything too aggressive since this is essentially your safety net money. Municipal bond funds might be worth exploring for tax efficiency if you're concerned about tax brackets. The key is maintaining liquidity while getting some growth to offset inflation.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
Has ANYONE been able to actually reach SSA lately to discuss these kinds of complex situations?? I've been trying for WEEKS to talk to someone about my widow benefits and keep getting disconnected or waiting 2+ hours only to get someone who doesn't understand my situation! It's INFURIATING! How are we supposed to make these important decisions without proper guidance?!!
0 coins
StarSeeker
•I had the same problem last month when trying to sort out my benefits. After getting nowhere with the regular SSA phone line, I tried a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that someone recommended. They got me connected to an SSA agent in about 20 minutes instead of the hours I was spending before. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU It helped me finally get my questions answered about my survivor benefits timing. Might be worth checking out since you need to discuss something complicated that can't really be handled through the website.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
Another factor to consider: If you take your own benefit at 62 and plan to switch to survivor benefits at FRA, what would you do with your own benefit after switching? Many people don't realize it simply stops - you don't get both. So when calculating the lifetime value, remember that the survivor benefit completely replaces your own benefit at whatever point you switch. This is why running a full lifetime projection to at least age 90 is important. You need to map out the total benefits under different scenarios: 1. Your benefit at 62, then survivor at FRA 2. Survivor now, never taking your own 3. Your benefit at 62, never switching 4. Waiting to take either until FRA or later The best financial choice is the one that maximizes the area under the curve of the lifetime benefit graph.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•That's an excellent point. I did understand that I'd only get one benefit (whichever is higher) at any given time, but I appreciate you highlighting it since it's a common misunderstanding. I've actually mapped out scenarios to age 90, which is why I'm leaning toward taking survivor benefits now, since scenario #2 seems to win unless I live to 87+.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
Does anyone know if there's a penalty if you're still working while collecting either benefit? I heard something about an earnings limit but don't understand how it works
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•Yes, there's definitely an earnings limit if you're collecting ANY Social Security benefits before your Full Retirement Age. For 2025, if you're under FRA for the full year, you lose $1 in benefits for every $2 you earn above $22,320. In the year you reach FRA, the limit is higher - about $59,520, and you lose $1 for every $3 above that limit. After you reach your FRA, there's no earnings limit whatsoever. This applies to retirement AND survivor benefits equally, so it's an important consideration if you're still working or planning to work part-time.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
•Thanks! That's really helpful. I'm still working part-time making about $30k so I guess I'd lose some benefits. Another thing to consider...
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
my neighbor waited till 70 for everything and then died at 72 just sayin
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•This is anecdotal and not particularly helpful for making a mathematical decision. Anyone can cherry-pick stories to support either position. Statistical analysis of life expectancy and break-even points is what matters for financial planning, not individual stories.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•well SORRY for sharing a real experience!!! not everything is about MATH some people care about ENJOYING LIFE while they can
0 coins