Social Security earnings limit confusion at 65 - will my $36,000 income reduce my SS benefits?
I'm turning 65 in August and planning to claim Social Security while still working part-time as a consultant. My estimated annual earnings from work will be around $36,000, and I know there's some kind of earnings limit before Full Retirement Age. I've heard it's $24,300 for 2025 (the year I'm turning 65), but I'm confused about how this actually works. Will my entire SS benefit be reduced because I earn over the limit? Or is it just reduced by a certain amount for every dollar over? And does this earnings limit apply to the entire year I turn 65, or just the months before my birthday? I'm trying to decide if I should wait until I turn 66 and 2 months (my FRA) to avoid any reductions, but I really would prefer to start getting some benefits sooner. This is making my head spin! Any advice appreciated.
24 comments


Yuki Yamamoto
You're right to be concerned about the earnings test. For 2025, if you're under Full Retirement Age for the entire year, the limit is $24,300. But since you're turning 65 this year, you'll be subject to a different rule. In the year you reach FRA, the earnings limit is much higher (around $65,000 for 2025), and it only applies to earnings in the months BEFORE you reach FRA. So if you turn 65 in August, only your earnings from January-July count toward the limit. If you do exceed the relevant limit, SSA reduces benefits by $1 for every $2 earned over the limit for people under FRA for the full year, or $1 for every $3 earned over the higher limit in the year you reach FRA. Remember though, this isn't a permanent reduction. Once you reach your Full Retirement Age, you'll get the money back gradually through increased monthly benefits.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Thank you for explaining this! So if I understand correctly, since I turn 65 in August, I'd only count my January-July earnings toward the limit? That would be roughly $21,000 of my annual $36,000, which is under the $24,300 limit. Does that mean I wouldn't face any reduction at all?
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
no no no the other reply is wrong. 65 isnt FRA for you if your turning 65 this year! FRA is 66 and 2 months for people born in 1960. so you'll have the lower limit until you hit your actual FRA next year. my brother got caught by this and lost a ton of$$
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•You're partially right - I should have been clearer. The higher earnings test limit applies in the year you reach your FRA (66 and 2 months for someone born in 1960), not when you turn 65. So the OP would indeed be subject to the $24,300 annual limit for 2025 since they won't reach FRA until 2026. Thanks for the correction.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
Just to clarify exactly how the reduction works if you earn over the limit: if you earn $36,000 in 2025 while collecting Social Security before your FRA, you'll be $11,700 over the $24,300 limit. That means SSA will withhold $5,850 of your benefits ($1 reduction for every $2 over the limit). The withholding isn't spread evenly - they'll actually withhold full monthly checks from the beginning of the year until the withholding amount is satisfied, then resume your regular payments. Also important - any benefits withheld are not lost forever. Once you reach your Full Retirement Age, SSA will recalculate your benefit amount to credit you for the months when benefits were withheld.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•This is so helpful! I didn't realize they'd withhold entire monthly checks. So if my monthly benefit would be about $2,500, they might withhold the first 2-3 months of payments entirely? That changes my planning quite a bit. Maybe I should wait until I reach 66 and 2 months after all...
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
I went through this EXACT same situation last year. Yes, they hold ENTIRE checks at the beginning of the year if you're going to be over the limit! It was a huge shock when I didn't get my first 3 months of payments. No one warned me about this!!! Btw after spending days trying to reach someone at SSA to explain this to me (kept getting disconnected or waiting HOURS), I found this service called Claimyr that got me through to a real person at SSA in under 20 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU and their site is claimyr.com. Seriously saved my sanity when trying to figure out my benefit situation.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Thanks for the tip! I've been trying to reach someone at SSA for days and keep getting disconnected. Will definitely check out that service if I can't get through soon. I really need to talk to someone to understand exactly how this will affect me before making my decision.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
My 2 cents - just wait until your full retirement age!!! I tried getting benefits at 65 while still working and it was a NIGHTMARE dealing with SSA and their complicated rules. The amount you lose with the earnings test plus the permanently reduced benefit from claiming early just isn't worth the hassle.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•Completely agree. A lot of people miss that the earnings test is just ONE factor. Even if you manage the earnings test, starting at 65 instead of your FRA of 66+2mo means you're taking a permanent reduction of about 7.8% in your benefit amount. That's FOREVER. With your earnings level, waiting those extra 14 months to reach FRA would likely be the financially optimal choice, especially if you're in good health and expect to live past your early 80s. The math simply works out better in most scenarios.
0 coins
Mei Liu
Does anyone know if 401k withdrawals count as "earnings" for the Social Security earnings limit? I'm in a similar situation and trying to figure out if I can take some 401k distributions without affecting my benefits.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•No, 401k withdrawals don't count toward the earnings limit. The earnings test only applies to wages from employment or net earnings from self-employment. Pensions, annuities, investment income, interest, 401k/IRA withdrawals, and other government benefits don't count toward the limit. Only actual work-related earnings matter for this purpose.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
After reading all your responses, I'm leaning toward waiting until my Full Retirement Age now. The combination of the earnings test withholding whole checks plus the permanent reduction for claiming early doesn't seem worth it. I'm healthy and both my parents lived into their 90s, so maximizing my lifetime benefits probably makes more sense. One last question - if I do decide to claim at 65 despite the earnings limit, do I need to notify SSA about my expected earnings when I apply? Or do they just find out when tax returns are filed?
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•You should definitely tell SSA about your expected earnings when you apply. They'll use that estimate to determine if any benefits should be withheld upfront. If you don't, and then they discover later (after tax returns are filed) that you earned over the limit, you could end up with an overpayment that you'd have to pay back. You can also contact them during the year if your earnings estimate changes. Being proactive helps avoid surprises. If you work with an employer, SSA will eventually get your actual earnings information through payroll tax reporting.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
why is this system so COMPLICATED??? I swear they make it confusing on purpose so people mess up and lose money. i'm 63 and give up trying to understand when i should file. probably just gonna wait till 70 and avoid this headache!!!
0 coins
Jamal Carter
•Same! I don't trust myself to figure this out correctly and every time I call SSA I get a different answer. Waiting till 70 simplifies everything (and gets you the most $).
0 coins
Leila Haddad
I'm in a very similar boat - turning 65 next month and trying to navigate this maze! Reading through everyone's responses has been incredibly helpful. It sounds like the consensus is that waiting until Full Retirement Age makes the most financial sense, especially if you're healthy and expect to live a long life. One thing I'm curious about - has anyone here actually gone through the process of having benefits withheld due to the earnings test? I'd love to hear more real-world experiences about how SSA handles the communication and whether they give you advance notice before withholding checks. Also, @Ethan Brown, have you considered reducing your consulting work to stay under the $24,300 limit instead of stopping work entirely? That might be a middle ground that lets you claim benefits while still earning some income.
0 coins
William Schwarz
•Great question about reducing consulting work to stay under the limit! I hadn't really considered that option, but it might actually be worth exploring. If I could cut back from $36,000 to say $23,000, I'd avoid the earnings test entirely while still getting some work income plus my Social Security benefits. The tricky part would be managing client expectations and potentially turning down some projects, but the math might work out better than either working full-time with withheld benefits or waiting until FRA. I'll need to run the numbers on what my total income would be with reduced consulting plus SS benefits versus waiting 14 months for full benefits. Thanks for suggesting that middle ground approach - sometimes the obvious solutions are the ones we overlook!
0 coins
Connor O'Reilly
As someone who works in retirement planning, I'd strongly recommend running the actual numbers before making your decision. While waiting until FRA is often the "safe" answer, your specific situation might be different. Here's what I'd calculate: Compare your total benefits over 10-15 years under each scenario - claiming at 65 with earnings test vs waiting until 66+2. Don't forget that even with the permanent reduction for early claiming, you'd be receiving 14 months of payments that you wouldn't get by waiting. The break-even point isn't always as far out as people think, especially if you factor in the time value of money. If you can invest those early Social Security payments, the math can shift in favor of claiming early even with the earnings test. That said, given your consulting income puts you significantly over the limit, @Leila Haddad's suggestion about reducing work to stay under $24,300 is definitely worth exploring. You might find that sweet spot where total income (reduced consulting + full SS) exceeds what you'd make waiting for FRA.
0 coins
Sean O'Brien
•This is such valuable advice! As someone just starting to learn about Social Security planning, I really appreciate seeing the actual strategic thinking behind these decisions. The point about break-even analysis is something I hadn't considered - it's not just about which option gives you the highest monthly payment, but about total lifetime benefits and opportunity costs. @Connor O'Reilly, when you mention factoring in the "time value of money" with early payments, are you suggesting that receiving $2,500/month starting at 65 (even with some months withheld) could potentially outweigh waiting for a higher amount at 66+2 if those early payments are invested wisely? I'm nowhere near retirement myself, but threads like this are helping me understand that Social Security timing isn't as black-and-white as "wait as long as possible." Thanks to everyone sharing their experiences and expertise!
0 coins
Jacob Smithson
Reading through this thread has been eye-opening! I'm 62 and was planning to file at my FRA, but seeing all the complexity around the earnings test makes me grateful I have a few more years to plan this out properly. One resource that might help everyone here is the Social Security Administration's online Retirement Estimator tool. You can plug in different scenarios (claiming at 65 vs FRA vs 70) and see projected monthly benefits. While it doesn't factor in the earnings test complexities, it gives you a baseline for running those break-even calculations @Connor O'Reilly mentioned. @Ethan Brown, given all the great advice here, have you been able to narrow down which direction you're leaning? The reduced consulting work option seems like it could be a real winner if the numbers work out. And definitely agree with getting professional help to run the calculations - this is way too important (and complicated) to wing it!
0 coins
Theodore Nelson
•Thanks for mentioning the SSA Retirement Estimator! I just discovered this community and I'm amazed by how helpful everyone is being with such a complex topic. As someone who's still years away from retirement, I'm realizing I should start educating myself about all these rules now rather than scrambling to figure it out later. @Ethan Brown, I'm curious - after reading all these responses, are you leaning toward any particular strategy? The idea of reducing your consulting work to stay under the earnings limit seems really smart, but I imagine it's not always easy to control your income that precisely as a consultant. One thing that strikes me from this discussion is how much the "right" answer depends on individual circumstances - health, family longevity, financial needs, investment opportunities, etc. It really seems like there's no one-size-fits-all solution, which probably explains why this system feels so overwhelming to navigate!
0 coins
Keith Davidson
This entire discussion has been incredibly educational! I'm turning 64 next year and was completely unaware of how complex the earnings test could be. The idea of having entire monthly checks withheld upfront rather than just a proportional reduction each month was particularly shocking - that's definitely not how I imagined it working. @Ethan Brown, I hope you don't mind me jumping in, but I wanted to add one consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet: the impact on Medicare Part B premiums. If you're planning to enroll in Medicare at 65, your Part B premiums are based on your income from two years prior, but future income changes could affect IRMAA surcharges down the road. Since you're earning $36k from consulting, this probably won't push you into higher premium brackets, but it's worth factoring into your overall financial planning. The suggestion about reducing your consulting work to stay under the $24,300 limit really does seem like it could be the sweet spot. Even if you had to turn down some projects, the combination of partial consulting income plus full Social Security benefits might exceed what you'd get from full consulting with withheld SS payments. Has anyone here actually tried to precisely manage their income to stay just under the earnings limit? I'm curious how difficult that is in practice, especially for consultants whose project income can be unpredictable.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Great point about Medicare Part B premiums! I hadn't thought about how income changes might affect IRMAA surcharges later on. Regarding managing income to stay under the earnings limit - I'm not quite there yet myself, but I have a friend who's been doing consulting work while collecting Social Security and she says it's definitely doable but requires careful planning. She tracks her income quarterly and starts declining new projects once she's approaching the limit. The key for her was building relationships with clients who understand she may not be available year-round due to the earnings restrictions. One strategy she mentioned was front-loading her work earlier in the year when possible, so she has more flexibility to turn down projects later if needed. She also keeps a small buffer below the $24,300 limit since project payments don't always come exactly when expected. It sounds like having some income predictability as a consultant would make this approach much more manageable than trying to hit an exact target with completely variable project income.
0 coins