Social Security at 66 vs waiting until FRA (66 and 10 months) - any downsides to filing now?
I just reached 66 last month and I'm currently working part-time (about 25 hours a week). I understand my Full Retirement Age is 66 and 10 months, which would be in November 2025. I'm considering applying for Social Security benefits now instead of waiting until November. I'm wondering if there are any significant downsides to starting my benefits now rather than waiting until I hit my official FRA? Will my benefit amount be permanently reduced? I've heard about earnings tests but I thought those don't apply after age 66? My part-time job brings in about $24,000 annually. Any advice would be appreciated - I'm trying to make the smartest decision for my situation!
18 comments
Malik Thompson
Yes, there is a downside. If you file before your FRA of 66 and 10 months, your benefit will be permanently reduced by approximately 0.56% for each month before your FRA that you claim. So filing at 66 means you'd take about a 5.6% permanent reduction in your monthly benefit amount. You're correct that the earnings test no longer applies once you reach age 66, so your work income won't cause any benefits to be withheld. But the reduction for filing early still applies until you reach your exact FRA. If maximizing your monthly benefit is important, waiting until November would be better. If you need the money now, you need to weigh if that 5.6% reduction for the rest of your life is worth getting payments sooner.
0 coins
Emma Anderson
•Thank you for explaining this! So it sounds like I'll lose almost 6% of my benefit permanently if I file now instead of waiting just 10 months. That seems significant over the long term. Do you know approximately how much that would be in dollars for an average benefit?
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
i filed at 66 exact and my FRA was 66 and 8 months. nobody told me about the reduction and i was SHOCKED when i got my first payment. about $120 less per month than what the SSA estimate said id get. wish i had waited those extra months!!
0 coins
CosmicVoyager
•That happened to my sister too! The SSA statements don't make it clear enough that the estimated amount is only if you wait until EXACTLY your FRA. She thought turning 66 was enough but didn't realize her actual FRA was 66 and 4 months. Now she's getting less forever. The system is so confusing!
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
If you're trying to maximize your lifetime Social Security benefits, you should consider a few things: 1. The reduction for filing before your FRA is 5/9 of 1% per month for the first 36 months and 5/12 of 1% for months beyond that. In your case, filing 10 months early means approximately a 5.6% permanent reduction. 2. With an average retirement benefit around $1,900 in 2025, that 5.6% reduction could mean approximately $106 less per month for the rest of your life. 3. The earnings test doesn't apply after FRA, but it also doesn't apply in the year you reach FRA for earnings after the month you reach FRA. Since you're already 66, you're correct that the earnings test no longer applies to you. 4. If you're still working, consider whether you need the money now. If not, waiting even those 10 months will give you a higher monthly benefit for life. 5. Don't forget that your benefit amount will still receive COLA increases regardless of when you file.
0 coins
Emma Anderson
•This is really helpful - thank you! The $106 less per month puts it in perspective. That's over $1,200 a year for potentially 20+ years of retirement. I think I'm leaning toward waiting until November now.
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
wait till november!!! i didn't wait and regret it every month when i see my deposit. once you take the cut its FOREVER
0 coins
Omar Mahmoud
I was in a similar situation last year and wanted to share what I learned. The reduction is permanent if you file before your exact FRA. For me, waiting those extra 8 months meant about $90 more per month for the rest of my life! The problem is, the SSA is nearly impossible to reach by phone to ask these questions. I spent DAYS trying to get through. Finally found a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to a real SSA agent in under 15 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent confirmed everything about the reduction and helped me calculate exactly what I'd lose by filing early. Made my decision much easier. If you need specific numbers for your situation, I'd recommend trying to actually speak with SSA.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
•Has anyone else used this service? I've been calling SSA for THREE DAYS and keep getting disconnected after waiting for 2+ hours. It's absolutely infuriating! I need to talk to someone about my application status.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•ya i used it when i was trying to figure out why my payment was lower than expected. works as advertised. got thru to SSA in like 10 min when i had been trying for a week on my own
0 coins
Chloe Harris
For what it's worth, I was in EXACTLY your position last year! My FRA was 66+8 months but I started at 66. I figured "close enough" LOL. I didn't realize it would reduce my benefit at all since I was past 66. No one explained this to me! Now I'm getting $137 less EVERY MONTH than if I'd just waited those 8 months. That's over $1,600 a year I'm missing out on. AND IT NEVER GOES AWAY! Even when they do the COLA increases, it's a percentage on my already-reduced amount. WAIT THE 10 MONTHS! Future you will thank you!!!!
0 coins
Emma Anderson
•Thank you for sharing your experience. This is exactly what I needed to hear - real examples from people who've been in the same situation. I think I've made up my mind to wait until November now. Those 10 months will pass quickly enough, and I'd rather not have that regret for the next 20+ years.
0 coins
CosmicVoyager
What if you need the money NOW though? Everyone's saying wait wait wait, but what if you actually need the income right now? Sometimes we don't have the luxury of waiting for the "perfect" time. I filed 7 months before my FRA because I had unexpected home repairs. Yes, I'm getting less, but I NEEDED that money then. Just saying that sometimes the mathematically perfect answer isn't the right one for everybody's situation.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
•You make an excellent point. The mathematically optimal solution isn't always the best for everyone's personal situation. If someone truly needs the money now, taking a reduced benefit could be the right choice. The key is making an informed decision while understanding the tradeoffs. In the original poster's case, they're still working part-time, which might give them flexibility to wait. But your situation demonstrates why these decisions are highly personal.
0 coins
Malik Thompson
One more thing to consider: if you wait until your FRA in November, you'll also have the option to file a restricted application for spousal benefits only (if you're married and your spouse is already collecting), while letting your own retirement benefit continue to grow until age 70. This strategy isn't available if you file before your FRA. It could potentially be worth tens of thousands of dollars over your lifetime if you're in a position to use it.
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
•wait this is still a thing?? i thought they got rid of this loophole years ago?
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
guys wait what about delaying past FRA?? nobody mentioned that yet. doesnt your benefit grow 8% per year until 70? maybe OP should consider waiting even longer than just til november??
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
•Yes, you're absolutely right. After FRA, benefits increase by 8% per year (or 2/3 of 1% per month) until age 70. No increases apply after 70. For someone with an FRA of 66 and 10 months, waiting until 70 would increase their benefit by approximately 26% compared to claiming at their FRA. This can be a excellent strategy, especially for someone who: 1. Is still working 2. Has other sources of income 3. Has longevity in their family 4. Wants to maximize survivor benefits for a spouse It's ultimately a personal decision based on health, finances, and goals.
0 coins