Should we marry at 66/63 for Social Security spousal benefits with teacher pension (WEP/GPO impact)?
I'm turning 66 this June (my FRA) and still working, while my partner (63) already retired with a teacher's pension. We've been in a committed relationship for 10 years with no particular rush to marry, but now I'm wondering if there are Social Security advantages we're missing. My estimated SS benefit will be about $3,100 monthly when I eventually claim (probably taking it year by year before fully retiring), while my partner would only qualify for around $1,050 on his own record due to having fewer earning years in Social Security-covered employment. He currently receives his teacher pension of $2,700/month but hasn't claimed SS yet. If we got married, would he be eligible for spousal benefits that would "top up" his own smaller Social Security amount? And would marriage make him eligible for survivor benefits if I die first? I know teacher pensions complicate things (something about GPO/WEP?), but I can't figure out if marriage would provide any meaningful financial benefit in our situation. Any insights from those who've navigated this?
14 comments
Serene Snow
You've hit on a complicated area of Social Security with the teacher pension involved. Your partner's pension will trigger the Government Pension Offset (GPO), which typically reduces spousal/survivor benefits by 2/3 of the pension amount. Here's how it breaks down: 1. Spousal benefits: Normally, a spouse can receive up to 50% of your PIA (Primary Insurance Amount). In your case, that would be about $1,550. BUT with the GPO, they would subtract 2/3 of his pension ($2,700 × 2/3 = $1,800) from that potential spousal benefit. Since $1,800 > $1,550, he would receive $0 in spousal benefits. 2. Survivor benefits: If you pass away first, he could normally be eligible for your full benefit amount (the $3,100). But again, the GPO would reduce that by $1,800, leaving about $1,300 in survivor benefits. So marriage would provide no immediate spousal benefit, but could provide survivor protection worth about $1,300/month (more than his own $1,050 benefit). Whether that's worth it depends on your overall financial situation and other considerations beyond Social Security.
0 coins
Asher Levin
•Thank you for breaking this down! I had a feeling the teacher pension would complicate things. Just to clarify - the GPO only affects benefits received as a spouse/survivor, not his own earned Social Security, right? So he could still receive his own $1,050 regardless of our marital status? And if we did marry, he'd receive whichever is higher: his own $1,050 OR the GPO-reduced survivor benefit of $1,300 if I predecease him?
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
my sister married her partner at 65 just for the ss benefits and it was worth it for them!! but neither had a government pension so totally different situation than yours
0 coins
Romeo Barrett
•This is EXACTLY why the system is so messed up!!! The GPO (Government Pension Offset) and WEP (Windfall Elimination Provision) PUNISH public servants like teachers, firefighters, etc. They worked hard for BOTH benefits but get penalized!!! My husband lost nearly 60% of his SS after 22 years as a state employee. The whole system needs to be overhauled!!! People should get EVERYTHING they earned!!!!
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
You're right to consider this carefully. Since you're reaching your Full Retirement Age (FRA) soon, here are some important facts to consider: - Your partner is subject to both the WEP (Windfall Elimination Provision) which affects his own Social Security benefit calculation AND the GPO (Government Pension Offset) which affects any spousal/survivor benefits he might receive. - The marriage requirement for spousal benefits is 1 year, but for survivor benefits it's 9 months (with some exceptions). - If you marry, your partner would NOT be able to receive both his own benefit AND spousal benefits - he would get the higher of the two (which based on the previous comment's calculation would be $0 for spousal benefits due to GPO). - For survivor benefits, the GPO reduction would still apply, but the starting amount is higher (your full benefit rather than 50%), so there would be some financial advantage if you predecease him. Have you considered consulting with a financial advisor who specializes in Social Security planning? The decisions around WEP/GPO can be quite complex.
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
•ya thats good advice - my cousin used a financial advisor for ss planning and they found like an extra $700/month she was eligible for!!
0 coins
Justin Trejo
Has your partner checked if their specific teacher pension is exempt from GPO? Some older state pension plans ARE exempt if the teacher also paid into Social Security. My husband taught in California for 18 years but his pension is exempt from GPO because he also paid SS taxes during those years (rare but possible in some districts). If I were you, I'd check his Social Security statement to see if there's a note about WEP already being applied to his estimated benefits. The statement usually shows this. And you might want to call SSA directly to ask about your specific situation. Good luck getting through to them though - I spent TWO WEEKS trying to get a human on the phone about my widow benefits question!!! I finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to a SS agent in under 20 minutes. They have a video showing how it works at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. Totally worth it for complicated questions like yours that need a real agent's help.
0 coins
Asher Levin
•That's a really good point about exemptions! I'll ask my partner to check his pension details. I know he did pay into Social Security during his teaching career in our state, but I'm not sure if that qualifies for any exemption. And thanks for the Claimyr suggestion - I've been dreading making that call to SSA, but you're right that we probably need specific answers about our situation.
0 coins
Alana Willis
Wait so if your not married yet why would his teacher pension even matter to your SS? I thought GPO only applies if your married??
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•You're right that GPO only affects married couples (or those who were married) - that's exactly what the original poster is asking about. They're trying to decide WHETHER to get married and want to understand if there would be Social Security advantages or disadvantages due to the teacher pension. GPO doesn't matter to them now because they're not married, but it would become relevant if they decide to marry.
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
i was a teacher for 31 years and let me tell u, that GPO is a KILLER!! married my hubby for 22 years and cant get A PENNY of his social security now that hes gone. all because of my teacher pension. if I knew then what I know now, I would have chosen a different career!!! be very careful with your planning
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
•im so sorry for your loss! that seems so unfair after you worked so hard teaching our kids :
0 coins
Serene Snow
To answer your follow-up question: Yes, the GPO only affects benefits he might receive as a spouse or survivor, not his own earned Social Security. He will always be eligible for his own $1,050 regardless of your marital status. If you marry and you predecease him, he would receive whichever is higher between: 1. His own benefit ($1,050) 2. The GPO-reduced survivor benefit ($3,100 - $1,800 = $1,300) So in this case, marriage would provide an additional $250/month in income if you pass away first. Whether that's worth it depends on your overall financial situation, estate planning goals, health considerations, and how long you expect the survivor situation might last. Also worth noting - if you continue working past your FRA, your benefit amount will continue increasing, which could increase the potential survivor benefit as well.
0 coins
Asher Levin
•Thank you for this clear explanation. It sounds like from a pure Social Security perspective, marriage would provide a modest financial benefit, but only in the survivor scenario. We'll need to weigh this against other financial and personal considerations. I do plan to work at least another 2-3 years, so my benefit will likely increase somewhat. Really appreciate everyone's insights on this complicated topic!
0 coins