Does pension count as income for Social Security survivors benefits or ex-spouse benefits?
I'm turning 62 next month and trying to figure out my Social Security options. I receive a monthly pension of $3,250 from my former employer (state government job). I'm trying to understand if this pension counts as "income" in two scenarios: 1) If I apply for survivor benefits based on my late husband's record (he passed away 3 years ago) 2) If I eventually apply for benefits based on my ex-spouse's record (we were married 12 years before divorcing in 2010) I know there's an earnings limit if you work while collecting SS benefits before your full retirement age, but I'm confused about whether my pension counts toward this limit. I've heard about WEP and GPO but don't fully understand how they apply to my situation. I'm not collecting any Social Security benefits yet, but need to make decisions soon. Any insights would be really appreciated!
29 comments


Chloe Green
The pension itself doesn't count toward the earnings limit for Social Security, but it does matter for different reasons. Your situation involves two different rules: 1. For survivor benefits: The Government Pension Offset (GPO) will likely reduce your survivor benefits by 2/3 of your government pension amount. So if your pension is $3,250/month, your survivor benefit would be reduced by about $2,167/month. 2. For ex-spouse benefits: The same GPO rules apply here too - any spousal or ex-spousal benefits would be reduced by 2/3 of your pension. The earnings limit you're thinking of only applies to wages or self-employment income before you reach full retirement age, not to pension income.
0 coins
Logan Scott
•Thank you for explaining that! So my pension doesn't count for the earnings limit (if I decided to work part-time), but it DOES trigger the GPO reduction for both survivor and ex-spouse benefits. That's really important to know. Do you know if this GPO reduction would also apply if I claimed my own retirement benefits based on my own work record? I did work about 15 years in non-government jobs that paid into Social Security.
0 coins
Lucas Adams
pension doesnt count for earning limit but watch out for the gpo thing the other person said. my mom got hit with that and barely got anything from dad's ss when he died because of her teacher pension. really messed up her plans
0 coins
Harper Hill
Your pension won't count toward the annual earnings limit, but since it's from a government job where you didn't pay Social Security taxes, you're going to face both potential WEP and GPO issues. WEP (Windfall Elimination Provision) will likely reduce any retirement benefit based on your own Social Security record. GPO (Government Pension Offset) will reduce any survivor benefits or spousal benefits by 2/3 of your government pension. You should definitely schedule an appointment with SSA to go over your specific situation before making any decisions. These offset provisions can dramatically change what you'll actually receive.
0 coins
Caden Nguyen
•This is sooooo unfair!!!! I paid into BOTH systems and now they're going to reduce BOTH benefits?? Why should we be penalized for working government jobs? The whole WEP/GPO thing feels like theft of benefits we earned. I'm in the same boat and it makes me FURIOUS every time I think about it.
0 coins
Harper Hill
•I understand your frustration. The reasoning behind WEP/GPO is to prevent what SSA calls "double-dipping," but many people feel it unfairly punishes public servants. There are periodic attempts in Congress to reform or repeal these provisions, but nothing has passed yet. The calculations are complex and depend on your specific work history, so definitely get a personalized analysis from SSA before making any decisions.
0 coins
Avery Flores
I was in a similar situation with my state pension and wanting to claim on my late husband's record. Let me tell you - trying to get accurate information from SSA was IMPOSSIBLE. I spent months calling, getting disconnected, and receiving conflicting information. Finally someone told me about Claimyr (claimyr.com) which got me connected to an actual SSA agent within 20 minutes instead of the hours I was spending on hold. They have a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent I spoke with was able to run calculations showing exactly how GPO would affect my survivor benefits with my specific pension amount. Turns out I was still eligible for about $450/month in survivor benefits even after the reduction, which I wouldn't have known without getting the exact calculation.
0 coins
Logan Scott
•Thanks for the tip! I've been dreading the phone calls. Did they need specific information about your pension to calculate the GPO reduction? I wonder if I should gather my pension award letter and statements before calling.
0 coins
Avery Flores
•Yes, definitely have your pension award letter ready showing the monthly amount. They'll also need your late husband's SSN, your marriage certificate, and his death certificate. Having all that ready speeds things up considerably. The agent will run several calculations to show you different scenarios based on when you claim.
0 coins
Zoe Gonzalez
my friend just went thru this! the pension only matters for the WEP/GPO stuff not the earnings limit. the earnings limit is only for actual work income like if u have a job or business. but ya the GPO will probably wipe out most of ur survivor benefits sadly
0 coins
Ashley Adams
I had to figure all this out last year. Soooo confusing! What no one tells you is that you should look at your PRIMARY INSURANCE AMOUNT on your own record versus what you'd get as a survivor after the GPO reduction. For me, my own benefit was actually higher even after WEP reduced it! The only way to know for sure is to ask SSA to run both calculations.
0 coins
Logan Scott
•That's really helpful! I hadn't thought about comparing my own benefit (with WEP) against the survivor benefit (with GPO). I'll definitely ask them to run both scenarios. I guess I need to find out if my 15 years of SS-covered work is enough to give me a decent benefit after WEP is applied.
0 coins
Chloe Green
To address your follow-up question: Yes, the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) would likely affect your own retirement benefits based on your SS-covered work. However, since you mentioned working 15 years in jobs that paid into Social Security, you might qualify for the "substantial earnings" exception that reduces the WEP penalty. The formula is complex, but the good news is that having 20+ years of "substantial earnings" under Social Security can significantly reduce the WEP reduction, and having 30+ years eliminates it entirely. Your best approach is to: 1. Create a my.ssa.gov account if you haven't already 2. Download your complete earnings record 3. Schedule a consultation with SSA to calculate your potential benefits under all scenarios (own record with WEP, survivor benefits with GPO, ex-spouse benefits with GPO) 4. Compare these options to determine the best filing strategy The timing of when you claim each type of benefit can make a significant difference in your lifetime total.
0 coins
Logan Scott
•Thank you so much for the detailed advice. I'll create that account today and download my earnings record. I didn't realize the "substantial earnings" exception could help reduce the WEP penalty - that gives me some hope! I'll definitely schedule that consultation to get actual numbers for all my options.
0 coins
Lucas Adams
Just wondering did ur government job let u pay into medicare? Sometimes people with government pensions still have to figure out medicare separately which is another headache
0 coins
Logan Scott
•Yes, I did pay Medicare taxes even in my government job, so at least I don't have to worry about that part. Small blessing I guess!
0 coins
Keisha Williams
Just want to add another perspective - if you're considering working part-time after 62, remember that your pension income won't count toward the earnings limit, but any wages will. The earnings limit for 2025 is $23,400 if you're under full retirement age. So you could potentially work part-time AND collect reduced Social Security benefits without your pension affecting that calculation. However, as others mentioned, the GPO will still reduce any survivor or spousal benefits regardless of whether you're working or not. It's worth running the numbers on all scenarios - sometimes claiming your own benefit early plus working part-time can be better than waiting for survivor benefits that get heavily reduced by GPO.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
•This is really helpful - I hadn't considered the strategy of taking my own reduced benefit early plus working part-time. That could potentially give me more income than waiting for survivor benefits that get hit with GPO. Do you happen to know if there's a break-even point where working part-time income plus reduced SS benefits might exceed what I'd get from survivor benefits after the GPO reduction? I'm trying to think through all the angles before I turn 62 next month.
0 coins
Seraphina Delan
The break-even calculation depends on several variables, but here's a rough framework to think about it: Let's say your survivor benefit before GPO is $2,000/month. With your $3,250 pension, GPO reduces it by $2,167, leaving you with potentially $0 (GPO can't reduce below zero, but it often eliminates the entire benefit). Now compare that to: - Your own reduced SS benefit at 62 (maybe $1,200-1,500/month depending on your earnings record and WEP) - Plus part-time earnings up to $23,400/year ($1,950/month) - Plus your $3,250 pension That combination could give you $6,200-6,700/month total versus potentially just your $3,250 pension if GPO wipes out survivor benefits. The key is getting SSA to calculate your actual numbers. Also remember that if you take your own benefit early, it's permanently reduced, but you can potentially switch to higher survivor benefits at full retirement age if they end up being more beneficial after GPO. Definitely worth modeling different scenarios with actual SSA calculations rather than estimates!
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
•This breakdown is incredibly helpful! I hadn't thought about the potential to switch to survivor benefits later if they become more advantageous after GPO. That flexibility could be really important. One thing I'm wondering about - if I take my reduced benefit at 62 and then try to switch to survivor benefits at my full retirement age, would the survivor benefit amount be based on what my husband would have received at his full retirement age, or does it get reduced because I'm claiming it as a "switch" rather than an initial claim? I want to make sure I understand all the moving pieces before making this decision.
0 coins
Hannah Flores
I'm also dealing with government pension and Social Security questions, so this thread has been incredibly helpful! One thing I wanted to add that might help you - when you're calculating the potential scenarios, don't forget to factor in COLA (cost of living adjustments). Social Security benefits get annual COLA increases, but many government pensions have limited or no COLA adjustments. Over time, this can make a significant difference in your purchasing power. For example, if your state pension stays flat at $3,250 while Social Security benefits increase 2-3% annually, that gap widens every year. Also, if you do decide to work part-time while collecting Social Security, remember that those earnings will continue to add to your Social Security earnings record, potentially increasing your future benefits through what SSA calls "recomputation of benefits." The strategy of taking reduced benefits early plus part-time work that others mentioned could actually help boost your long-term Social Security benefits while giving you more current income than waiting for GPO-reduced survivor benefits. Definitely something to discuss when you get those SSA calculations done!
0 coins
Omar Zaki
•Great point about COLA! I hadn't thought about how the lack of pension adjustments could really hurt over time. My state pension is fixed with no COLA, so you're absolutely right that Social Security's annual increases could make a huge difference in 10-20 years. The recomputation benefit from continued part-time work is also something I didn't know about - so those earnings could actually help offset some of the WEP reduction over time? That makes the strategy of taking reduced benefits early plus working part-time even more attractive. Thanks for adding that perspective - it's helping me see the long-term picture beyond just the immediate monthly amounts.
0 coins
Emma Taylor
This is such a complex situation, and I really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences! I'm in a similar boat with a teacher's pension and trying to navigate these same decisions. One thing I learned from my financial planner that might help - when you're comparing all these scenarios, also consider the tax implications. Your government pension is likely fully taxable, while Social Security benefits might only be partially taxable depending on your total income. This could affect which strategy gives you the most after-tax income. Also, if you're considering part-time work, think about whether you could do contract or consulting work related to your government experience. Sometimes that type of work pays well enough that even with the earnings limit, you might come out ahead compared to traditional part-time employment. The suggestion about using Claimyr to actually get through to SSA sounds like a lifesaver - I've been putting off those phone calls because I know how frustrating they can be. Has anyone else used that service successfully?
0 coins
Aisha Hussain
•Yes, I actually used Claimyr a few months ago when I was trying to get through to SSA about my own pension/Social Security questions! It really does work - I got connected to an actual agent in about 15 minutes instead of the 2+ hour hold times I was experiencing. Cost me $19 but honestly worth every penny for the time saved and frustration avoided. The tax angle you mentioned is really important too. My CPA helped me realize that depending on your total income, up to 85% of Social Security benefits could be taxable, but the calculation is different from regular income tax. When you're modeling all these scenarios, definitely factor in the after-tax amounts rather than just the gross benefit numbers. Your point about consulting work is spot-on - if you have specialized government experience, you might be able to earn more per hour than traditional part-time work, which could make hitting that earnings limit more worthwhile. Plus consulting income gives you more control over the timing, so you could potentially manage it to stay under the limit while maximizing your hourly rate.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
This is such a valuable discussion! I'm currently helping my mother navigate similar pension/Social Security decisions, and the complexity is overwhelming. One thing I want to emphasize that I learned through our experience: the timing of when you file for different benefits can be just as important as which benefits you choose. For example, you might be able to file a restricted application for survivor benefits while letting your own retirement benefit grow with delayed retirement credits until age 70, then switch if your own benefit becomes higher. However, this strategy depends on your specific birth year and the rule changes that took effect in 2016. Since you're turning 62 next month, you may still have some of these options available that younger people don't. Also, something to keep in mind - if your late husband had already started collecting Social Security before he passed, your potential survivor benefit is based on what he was actually receiving (including any reductions if he claimed early). But if he hadn't claimed yet, it would be based on his full benefit amount. This could significantly impact your calculations. The GPO reduction is harsh, but sometimes there's still a small survivor benefit left after the 2/3 reduction. Even $200-300/month could be meaningful over time with COLA increases. Don't assume it will be completely eliminated without getting the actual calculation from SSA. Good luck with your decision - this is one of the most complex areas of Social Security law!
0 coins
PaulineW
•This is really excellent advice about timing strategies! I hadn't considered that I might still have options for restricted applications based on my birth year. My late husband actually started collecting his Social Security at 65 (his full retirement age), so at least I know the survivor benefit would be based on his full amount rather than a reduced early benefit. That's helpful to know for the calculations. The point about even a small survivor benefit being meaningful over time is encouraging - I was getting discouraged thinking GPO might wipe it out completely, but you're right that even a few hundred dollars monthly could add up significantly with COLA increases over the years. I definitely need to get SSA to run the actual numbers rather than trying to estimate everything myself. The timing aspect adds another layer of complexity, but it sounds like having more options could work in my favor. Thank you for sharing your experience helping your mother through this - it's reassuring to know others have successfully navigated these decisions!
0 coins
Theodore Nelson
I've been following this thread closely as someone who works with Social Security claims regularly, and I want to emphasize a few critical points that could save you thousands of dollars in the long run. First, regarding the timing strategy mentioned - you're absolutely right that birth year matters for restricted applications. If you were born before January 2, 1954, you still have access to some claiming strategies that were grandfathered in. This could allow you to claim survivor benefits first while letting your own retirement benefit grow until age 70. Second, I want to stress the importance of getting multiple calculations from SSA. Ask them to show you: - Your own retirement benefit at 62, FRA, and 70 (with WEP applied) - Survivor benefits with GPO reduction at different claiming ages - Ex-spousal benefits with GPO reduction - The "break-even" ages for each strategy Third, don't overlook the Medicare implications. Since you mentioned paying Medicare taxes in your government job, you're covered there, but the timing of when you claim Social Security can affect Medicare Part B premium costs due to IRMAA (Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount) thresholds. The strategy of taking your own reduced benefit at 62 plus part-time work could indeed be optimal, especially given that your pension has no COLA while Social Security does. Just make sure any part-time work won't push you over the IRMAA thresholds for Medicare premiums. This is definitely a situation where getting professional help - either through SSA directly or a fee-only financial planner who specializes in Social Security - could pay for itself many times over.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
•This is incredibly thorough advice - thank you! I was born in January 1963, so I'm guessing I don't qualify for those grandfathered restricted application strategies, but I'll definitely ask SSA to confirm. The multiple calculations approach makes perfect sense - I need to see all the scenarios laid out with actual numbers rather than trying to piece together estimates. I hadn't even thought about the Medicare IRMAA implications! That's another variable to consider when looking at part-time work income combined with my pension and Social Security. It sounds like there are so many interconnected pieces that could affect the optimal strategy. Your point about professional help is well taken. Given how much money is potentially at stake over the rest of my lifetime, paying for expert guidance upfront seems like a smart investment. Do you happen to know if there are financial planners who specialize specifically in Social Security optimization for people with government pensions? The WEP/GPO complications seem to add a whole extra layer of complexity that not all advisors might be familiar with.
0 coins
William Schwarz
I've been working as a Social Security disability attorney for over a decade, and I can tell you that cases involving government pensions are some of the most complex I see. Your situation is actually more common than you might think, and while the WEP/GPO rules are frustrating, there are still strategies to optimize your benefits. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of understanding exactly how your pension is structured. Some state pension systems have portions that DID pay into Social Security (like if you had any federal employment or if your state system changed over time). If any portion of your pension comes from SS-covered employment, that could affect the GPO calculation. Also, regarding your ex-spouse benefits - make sure to verify that your ex-spouse is still living and hasn't remarried before age 60 (which would affect your eligibility). The 12-year marriage length is good since it exceeds the 10-year requirement, but there are other eligibility factors to confirm. I'd strongly recommend bringing copies of ALL your pension documents, marriage certificates, divorce decree, and your late husband's death certificate to your SSA appointment. The more documentation you have upfront, the more accurate their calculations will be. Given the complexity and the significant financial impact over your lifetime, this might also be worth a consultation with a Social Security attorney who handles retirement planning, not just disability cases. Many of us offer free consultations for retirement benefit optimization.
0 coins