Why was our partnership denied relief under Rev Proc 84-35 for late 1065 filing?
First-time partnership owner here and we're dealing with a mess. My business partner and I started our small consulting firm last year and had no idea about all the filing requirements. We were completely focused on getting clients and making the business work. Fast forward to April this year - we realized we needed to file a partnership return (Form 1065) but were already late. We immediately hired a tax professional who helped us file the partnership return and our individual 1040s before the April deadline. As expected, we received a CP162A notice with the late filing penalty. Our tax pro drafted a response letter requesting relief under Rev Proc 84-35 exactly as instructed on the CP162A notice itself. We included all the required information showing we're a small domestic partnership with 10 or fewer partners who are individuals, that all partners reported their share of income on time, etc. But about two months later, we just received a CP504B notice! It seems like our request for penalty relief was denied, but we don't understand why. We followed all the requirements exactly. Has anyone dealt with this before or know why relief wouldn't be granted even when we qualify?
28 comments


Aisha Ali
The most common reason Rev Proc 84-35 relief gets denied is that something in your submission didn't fully meet all the requirements, even if you think it did. For valid relief under Rev Proc 84-35, you need to meet ALL these conditions: 1) Your partnership must have 10 or fewer partners, all of whom are natural persons (individuals, not businesses or trusts), 2) Each partner timely filed their returns and reported their share of partnership income, 3) The partnership itself must be domestic, and 4) You need to provide documentation proving all these points. My guess is your penalty relief request might have been missing some documentation that clearly showed all partners reported their share of income on their timely filed returns. The IRS needs proof each partner actually reported the income, not just a statement saying they did. Did you include copies of all partners' tax returns or at least the schedules showing the partnership income? Don't panic - receiving a CP504B doesn't mean you can't still fight this. You can call the IRS directly (though that's challenging) or request a reconsideration with complete documentation of how you qualify for Rev Proc 84-35 relief.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•How exactly do you prove all partners reported their income properly when responding to these notices? Do you literally have to include full copies of everyone's tax returns?
0 coins
Aisha Ali
•You don't need to submit full tax returns, but you do need to provide evidence that each partner properly reported their share. The best documentation is copies of Schedule E from each partner's Form 1040 showing the partnership income was reported. You can redact most personal information but leave the name, SSN, and the line showing the partnership income amount. For the reconsideration, I'd also include a cover letter clearly stating how you meet all Rev Proc 84-35 requirements and reference IRM 20.1.2.3.3.1 which gives the IRS procedures for this relief. Make sure you're extremely specific about meeting each point of the revenue procedure.
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
I went through almost this exact situation with my partnership last year! After tons of frustration and hours on hold with the IRS, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which helped me analyze all our notices and prepare a proper reconsideration request. The site helped me understand I needed certain specific language in my request letter and showed me exactly what documentation to include for each partner. Their system basically analyzed our CP162A and subsequent CP504B notices, then created a customized response template that cited all the relevant IRS procedures. The key thing I learned was that the IRS often denies Rev Proc 84-35 relief initially because they want very specific proof and particular language in the request. Generic requests get auto-rejected a lot of the time. With the properly formatted response from taxr.ai, our relief was approved within 3 weeks after the previous rejection.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•Does this service actually work for responding to penalty notices? I've never heard of it before and I'm hesitant to try something new when dealing with the IRS.
0 coins
Carmen Reyes
•How long did it take you to get the analysis back? I'm dealing with a CP504B right now and getting nervous because this notice threatens levy actions if I don't respond quickly.
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
•I got my analysis back the same day - in about 4 hours actually. Their system is pretty automated for common notices like CP162A and CP504B. The service definitely works for penalty responses. That's actually what it specializes in - analyzing IRS notices and creating proper responses that cite the exact internal revenue manual sections and procedures. It identified that my original request was missing specific documentation needed to prove we qualified for the 84-35 relief.
0 coins
Carmen Reyes
Just wanted to update! I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and it was super helpful for our CP504B response. The analysis showed we were missing a crucial element in our original relief request - we hadn't specifically certified that "all partners reported their share of partnership income on timely filed returns" using that exact language. The site generated a complete reconsideration package with the proper certifications and showed us exactly which partner documents to include. We submitted everything last month and just got confirmation that our penalty has been removed! Saved us over $2,000 in penalties. Honestly wish we'd known about this when preparing our original response to the CP162A - would have saved a lot of stress and the second notice.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
Having gone through multiple frustrating IRS penalty situations, I've learned that sometimes the fastest way to resolve these issues is to speak directly with an IRS agent who can review your case on the spot. Problem is, actually reaching a human at the IRS is nearly impossible these days. After several failed attempts to get through, I tried using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and was actually connected to an IRS representative in about 15 minutes. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with explained that Rev Proc 84-35 relief requests are frequently denied when the taxpayer doesn't include specific documentation proving each partner timely filed. She walked me through exactly what needed to be included in a reconsideration request and even noted in the account that we had discussed the issue. Being able to speak directly with someone made all the difference rather than waiting months for written responses.
0 coins
Zoe Christodoulou
•How does this actually work? I thought it was impossible to get through to the IRS these days. Their hold times are like 2+ hours whenever I've called.
0 coins
Jamal Thompson
•This sounds too good to be true. I've literally spent entire days on hold with the IRS. If this service actually works, why isn't everyone using it? I'm skeptical.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•It works by maintaining connections with the IRS phone system and essentially holding your place in line. When they get through to a representative, they call you and connect you directly to the IRS agent. The service definitely works - I was skeptical too until I tried it. I think not everyone knows about it yet, and some people probably don't want to use an intermediary service when dealing with tax matters. But it's just a connection service, they don't participate in your actual call with the IRS. It saved me literally hours of hold time.
0 coins
Jamal Thompson
I have to admit I was wrong in my skepticism about Claimyr. After posting my comment, I decided to try it since I had another IRS issue that needed resolving and I was desperate. It actually worked exactly as described. I was connected to an IRS representative in about 20 minutes versus the 3+ hours I spent on my previous attempt. The agent I spoke with was able to review my Rev Proc 84-35 situation and explained that my relief was denied because I hadn't included Schedule K-1 information that matched what each partner reported on their returns. I now have a clear path to filing a reconsideration request with the right documentation. Being able to ask questions directly and get immediate answers was worth every penny. No more waiting months for letters back and forth!
0 coins
Mei Chen
From my experience, the trick with Rev Proc 84-35 relief is being extremely detailed in proving ALL partners timely filed. Just saying they did isn't enough. Here's what worked for me: 1. Create a table showing each partner's name, SSN (last 4 digits), filing date, and exact amount of partnership income reported 2. Include a notarized statement signed by all partners certifying timely filing 3. Attach the relevant pages (just Schedule E) from each partner's return 4. Specifically reference "Relief under Rev Proc 84-35 as outlined in IRM 20.1.2.3.3.1" 5. Use certified mail with return receipt This approach worked when my first attempt was rejected. The key is being super organized and giving them no reason to deny based on "incomplete information.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
•Thanks for the detailed breakdown! Did you also have to deal with a CP504B, or were you able to get this resolved at the CP162A stage? I'm concerned about the escalation to a CP504B and what that means for potential collection actions.
0 coins
Mei Chen
•I dealt with it at the CP162A stage, but the process for reconsideration is the same regardless of which notice you're at. The CP504B is definitely more serious as it's threatening levy actions, so you'll want to act quickly. I'd recommend calling the number on your CP504B notice immediately to request a hold on collection while you prepare your reconsideration package. Make sure to document the call - get the ID number of whoever you speak with and follow up with your complete package within a week. Speed is definitely important at this stage.
0 coins
CosmicCadet
Is this your first year filing a 1065? If so, you might qualify for first-time penalty abatement instead of or in addition to Rev Proc 84-35 relief. First-time abatement can be easier to get approved since it doesn't require as much documentation - just a clean compliance history before this incident.
0 coins
Liam O'Connor
•First-time penalty abatement typically doesn't apply to partnership late filing penalties (IRC 6698). The IRS specifically excludes these from the normal first-time abatement policy. That's why Rev Proc 84-35 exists as a specific relief provision for small partnerships.
0 coins
Isaiah Thompson
@Mateo Gonzalez - I went through something very similar with my partnership last year. The CP504B is definitely concerning since it escalates to collection threat, but you still have options. Based on what you described, it sounds like your original Rev Proc 84-35 request may have lacked specific documentation the IRS requires. They're very particular about proof that ALL partners actually reported their partnership income on timely filed returns - not just a statement saying they did. Here's what I'd recommend doing immediately: 1. Call the number on your CP504B and request a Collection Due Process (CDP) hearing or at minimum ask for a temporary hold while you submit additional documentation 2. Prepare a reconsideration request with much more detailed proof: - Include copies of each partner's Schedule E showing the partnership income - Create a detailed chart showing each partner's name, filing date, and exact partnership income amount reported - Include a signed statement from each partner certifying they timely filed and reported their share 3. In your cover letter, specifically reference "reconsideration of penalty under Rev Proc 84-35 and IRM 20.1.2.3.3.1" The good news is that if you truly qualify for the relief, persistence usually pays off. The IRS often denies these requests initially due to incomplete documentation, but approves them when you provide everything they need. Don't let the CP504B scare you - just act quickly and thoroughly document your qualification for relief.
0 coins
Luca Ferrari
•This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the Collection Due Process hearing you mentioned - how long does that typically give you to prepare your reconsideration request? I'm worried about timing since the CP504B seems pretty urgent about potential levy actions. Also, when you say "signed statement from each partner," does this need to be notarized or is a simple signature sufficient? I want to make sure I don't miss any formalities that could cause another rejection.
0 coins
DeShawn Washington
•A Collection Due Process (CDP) hearing typically gives you 30 days from when you request it to submit your case, but the IRS will often work with you on timing if you show good faith effort. The key is to request it immediately when you call about the CP504B - don't wait. For the signed statements, simple signatures are usually sufficient, but I'd recommend getting them notarized if possible since you're already dealing with a rejection. It shows extra formality and removes any question about authenticity. If notarization isn't feasible, make sure each partner signs and dates their statement clearly. One thing I forgot to mention - when you call about the CP504B, also ask them to note in your account that you're preparing a reconsideration request for Rev Proc 84-35 relief. This can help prevent any automatic collection actions while your request is being processed.
0 coins
Lily Young
Based on my experience dealing with partnership penalty issues, the CP504B escalation after a Rev Proc 84-35 denial is unfortunately common but definitely fixable if you act quickly. The most likely reason for your denial is that the IRS didn't receive sufficient proof that all partners actually reported their partnership income on timely filed returns. They need concrete evidence, not just statements. Here's what probably went wrong and how to fix it: **Immediate action needed:** 1. Call the CP504B number TODAY and request a temporary hold on collection actions while you prepare a reconsideration 2. Ask them to note in your account that you're submitting additional documentation for Rev Proc 84-35 relief **For your reconsideration package:** - Include Schedule E from each partner's Form 1040 showing the partnership income was reported - Create a summary table with each partner's name, SSN (last 4 digits), filing date, and exact partnership income amount - Have each partner sign a statement certifying they filed timely and reported their share of income **Critical details:** - Reference "Rev Proc 84-35 relief per IRM 20.1.2.3.3.1" in your cover letter - Send via certified mail with return receipt - Be extremely specific about meeting each requirement of the revenue procedure I've seen partnerships get relief approved on reconsideration even after CP504B denial when they provide complete documentation. The key is thoroughness and speed - don't let the collection threat intimidate you, but do act immediately.
0 coins
Ella Lewis
•@Lily Young This is excellent advice! I just wanted to add that when calling about the CP504B, it s'also helpful to ask for the specific reason code why your Rev Proc 84-35 request was denied. Sometimes they have internal notes that aren t'obvious from the notice itself. Also, if you re'having trouble getting through to the IRS which (is common ,)don t'let that delay your written reconsideration request. You can submit the complete package even while trying to reach someone by phone. Just make sure to include a cover letter explaining that you re'responding to the CP504B and requesting both a hold on collection actions and reconsideration of the penalty under Rev Proc 84-35. One more tip - if your tax professional prepared the original request, consider having them review what might have been missing. They should be familiar with the common reasons these requests get denied and can help ensure your reconsideration package is complete this time.
0 coins
Luis Johnson
I've been through this exact situation with my partnership and can tell you that Rev Proc 84-35 denials are frustrating but very fixable if you know what the IRS is actually looking for. The biggest mistake people make is thinking that simply stating "all partners filed timely and reported their income" is enough proof. The IRS wants documented evidence, not just your word. Here's what likely happened with your request: **Common reasons for denial:** - Missing specific partner documentation (Schedule E copies) - Vague language that doesn't precisely match Rev Proc 84-35 requirements - Incomplete partner information (missing filing dates, exact income amounts) - Not properly certifying each element of the relief requirements **What to do now with your CP504B:** 1. Don't panic - this is still very resolvable 2. Call immediately to request a collection hold while you prepare proper documentation 3. Prepare a much more detailed reconsideration package **Key documents for reconsideration:** - Schedule E from each partner's 1040 showing partnership income reported - Signed certification from each partner with their filing date and income amount - Cover letter specifically referencing "Rev Proc 84-35 relief under IRM 20.1.2.3.3.1" - Table summarizing all partner information in one place The good news is that partnerships who truly qualify for this relief almost always get it approved on reconsideration when they provide complete documentation. The IRS just wants ironclad proof you meet the requirements - give them that and you should be fine. Time is critical with a CP504B though, so start gathering documents immediately while you call about the collection hold.
0 coins
Caden Nguyen
•@Luis Johnson This is really comprehensive advice! I m'dealing with a similar situation right now and your breakdown is super helpful. One question - when you mention getting a collection "hold while" preparing the reconsideration, is this something they routinely grant or do you need to make a specific argument for why they should hold collection actions? I m'worried they might say no and proceed with levy actions while I m'still gathering all the partner documentation. Also, roughly how long did your reconsideration process take once you submitted the complete package with all the proper documentation?
0 coins
Danielle Mays
•@Luis Johnson @Caden Nguyen I can answer the collection hold question from my experience. When you call about a CP504B, you don t need'to make a complex argument for a collection hold - just clearly state that you re preparing'a reconsideration request for penalty relief under Rev Proc 84-35 and need time to gather the required documentation. The IRS representatives are generally familiar with this process and will typically grant a reasonable hold usually 30-60 (days when you) re actively'working on penalty relief. The key is to be specific about what you re doing'- don t just'say I need "more time but rather" I m "preparing'a reconsideration package with partner documentation for Rev Proc 84-35 relief. As for" timing on the reconsideration, mine took about 6-8 weeks from submission to approval once I included all the proper documentation. Make sure to send it certified mail and keep tracking - you can follow up if you don t hear'anything within 60 days. One tip: when you call, ask them to put a note in your account about the collection hold and your pending reconsideration request. This helps if you need to call back or if different IRS departments are reviewing your case.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
@Mateo Gonzalez - I completely understand your frustration with this situation. As a fellow small business owner who went through something very similar, I can tell you that Rev Proc 84-35 denials are incredibly common on the first attempt, but they're usually fixable with the right approach. The CP504B escalation sounds scary, but don't let it panic you into making hasty decisions. Here's what I'd recommend doing immediately: **Step 1: Call the IRS today** Use the number on your CP504B notice and specifically request a collection hold while you prepare additional documentation for Rev Proc 84-35 relief. Be clear that you're not disputing that you owe penalties, but that you believe you qualify for statutory relief and need time to provide proper documentation. **Step 2: Identify what went wrong** Most Rev Proc 84-35 requests get denied because the IRS didn't receive adequate proof that ALL partners actually reported their partnership income on timely filed returns. They want concrete evidence, not just statements from your tax professional. **Step 3: Prepare a bulletproof reconsideration package** - Get copies of Schedule E from each partner's Form 1040 showing the partnership income was reported - Create a detailed table with each partner's name, filing date, and exact partnership income amount - Have each partner sign and date a certification statement - Reference "Rev Proc 84-35 relief per IRM 20.1.2.3.3.1" in your cover letter - Send everything certified mail with return receipt The good news is that partnerships who genuinely qualify for this relief almost always get it approved on reconsideration when they provide complete documentation. You just need to give the IRS ironclad proof you meet every requirement. Time is critical with a CP504B, but this is absolutely resolvable if you act quickly and thoroughly. Don't give up on the relief you're entitled to!
0 coins
Amara Eze
•@Juan Moreno This is exactly the kind of step-by-step guidance I needed to see! I m'actually in a very similar situation - just received my CP504B after our Rev Proc 84-35 request was denied and I ve'been feeling completely overwhelmed by the whole process. Your breakdown makes it feel much more manageable. I was particularly worried about the collection hold part - I wasn t'sure if they would actually grant that or just tell me to pay up. It s'reassuring to know that requesting a hold while preparing proper documentation is a legitimate and commonly granted request. One quick question - when you mention having each partner sign a certification statement, is there specific language that should be included in those statements, or is it sufficient for them to simply certify that they filed timely and reported their partnership income? I want to make sure we don t'get denied again for missing some technical requirement. Thanks for taking the time to share such detailed advice. It s'really helpful to hear from someone who has actually been through this process successfully!
0 coins