Why can't I claim capital loss on selling a car for less than I paid, when I'd owe capital gains tax if I sold it for more?
I'm trying to understand how the IRS logic works here. If I sell my personal vehicle for more than I originally paid, I understand that I'd owe capital gains tax on that profit. But what about the opposite situation? Why can't I claim a capital loss if I sell my car for way less than what I paid for it? For example, I bought a car three years ago for $32,000, and now I'm selling it for $21,500 due to some mechanical issues. That's over a $10K loss, but apparently I can't deduct it on my taxes? Meanwhile, if I'd somehow sold it for $35,000, the IRS would be quick to collect taxes on that $3K gain. It just seems completely illogical. Wouldn't it make more sense to either tax both situations consistently or just exempt personal vehicles entirely from capital gains/losses? The current system feels like the IRS wants it both ways - taking their cut when you win but giving you nothing when you lose.
20 comments


Clarissa Flair
This is actually a really common question! The reason stems from how the IRS classifies different types of property. Cars and other personal-use items (furniture, boats, etc.) are considered personal-use property, not investment or business property. The tax code specifically disallows losses on personal-use property while still requiring gains to be reported as taxable income. The reasoning behind this is that personal items typically decline in value due to personal use and enjoyment rather than market forces, so the government views that decline as a personal expense (like food or entertainment) rather than an investment loss. If you were using the car for business purposes (like a taxi or delivery service), then you could potentially deduct a portion of the loss when you sell it, because it would be classified as business property rather than personal-use property.
0 coins
Caden Turner
•But that still doesn't make much logical sense? If I buy a car and it goes UP in value - which is rare but has happened a lot recently with the car shortage - that's somehow not considered a result of my "personal use and enjoyment"? Seems like the government just wants rules that benefit them no matter what happens.
0 coins
Clarissa Flair
•It may not feel fair, but the tax code is built on certain principles rather than pure symmetry. When an item increases in value beyond its normal trend, that's considered a windfall gain that should be taxed regardless of why you owned the item. The idea is that personal consumption items are expected to lose value - that's their normal pattern. When you buy a car, you're essentially "consuming" its value through use. When one happens to gain value instead, the government views this as unexpected income that should be taxed like other income.
0 coins
McKenzie Shade
After dealing with this exact situation last year when I sold my Honda at a $7K loss, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which helped me understand what was going on with all these weird tax rules. I was so frustrated trying to figure out why I couldn't deduct my loss! The tool analyzed all my documents and explained everything in plain English - including that cars are considered personal property and the IRS has specific rules about capital losses on personal items. They even suggested some alternative deductions I qualified for that helped offset some of the pain from the car loss. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with any confusing tax situations like this.
0 coins
Harmony Love
•Is this actually helpful for understanding vehicle-related tax issues specifically? I'm in a similar situation with a boat I'm selling at a loss and getting conflicting advice from friends.
0 coins
Rudy Cenizo
•Sounds interesting, but how does it work with unusual tax situations? I have a classic car that I partially used for business (photography backdrop) and partially for personal use, and I'm completely confused about what I can deduct when I sell it.
0 coins
McKenzie Shade
•The tool is extremely helpful for vehicle-related questions because it can analyze your specific situation based on the documents you upload. It walks you through all the rules around personal vs. business property, which apply to boats the same way they do cars. For mixed-use property like your classic car, it breaks down the percentages of business vs. personal use and calculates exactly what portion of a gain or loss would be deductible. It asks about things like logs of business use, documentation, and then explains how the IRS views these partial business use cases. Much more reliable than getting advice from different friends!
0 coins
Rudy Cenizo
Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai that the previous commenter mentioned. It actually cleared up my classic car situation completely! I uploaded my vehicle logs and initial purchase documents, and it explained exactly how much of my potential loss would be deductible based on my documented business use (about 40%). The tool explained that I needed to have been depreciating the business portion of the car on my previous tax returns to claim the loss - something my previous accountant never mentioned! Saved me from making a potentially costly mistake on my taxes this year and possibly triggering an audit. Definitely recommend it for anyone dealing with these weird capital gains/loss rules.
0 coins
Natalie Khan
I ran into this same issue with my RV last year and spent HOURS trying to reach someone at the IRS to explain these confusing rules. Could never get through on the phone after trying for literal weeks. Then I found this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that actually got me connected to a real IRS agent in less than an hour. You can see how it works in their demo: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent I spoke with explained the whole capital gains/loss thing with personal vehicles and confirmed I couldn't take the loss on my taxes. But she did point me to some other deductions I qualified for that I had no idea about. Definitely worth the time saved compared to endless busy signals and holds with the IRS.
0 coins
Daryl Bright
•How does this actually work? There's no way to skip the IRS phone queue - I've tried everything and always end up waiting hours or getting disconnected.
0 coins
Sienna Gomez
•Yeah right. Nothing can get you through to the IRS faster. Their phone system is deliberately designed to be impossible. This sounds like some kind of scam that will just take your money and tell you "sorry, couldn't get through.
0 coins
Natalie Khan
•It uses a technology that continuously dials and navigates the IRS phone tree for you. When it reaches a human agent, it calls you and connects you directly. You don't sit on hold - you just go about your day until your phone rings with an actual IRS agent on the line. I was incredibly skeptical too - I thought nothing could possibly work after spending so many frustrating hours trying myself. But it actually works exactly as advertised. The difference is they have systems constantly dialing instead of a single person getting frustrated and giving up. Definitely not a scam - they don't charge if they can't get you through, and the time I saved was absolutely worth it considering I was about to pay an accountant hundreds of dollars for the same information.
0 coins
Sienna Gomez
I need to eat my words about Claimyr from my comment above. After remaining skeptical, I decided to try it anyway since I was desperate to figure out if I could partially deduct the loss on a jet ski I used occasionally for business entertainment. I literally had an IRS representative on the phone within 45 minutes of signing up. They confirmed exactly what others here said - personal property losses aren't deductible, but the portion used for documented business purposes potentially could be. They walked me through exactly what documentation I'd need to substantiate the business use percentage. The time saved was incredible - I had been trying for nearly two weeks to get through on my own. Weird to admit I was wrong on the internet, but this service actually does what it claims.
0 coins
Kirsuktow DarkBlade
There's one exception worth mentioning - if your car was destroyed or stolen and you received an insurance payout that was less than your basis (what you paid), you might be able to claim a casualty loss. The rules around casualty losses have changed in recent years though, so you'd need to check the current regulations.
0 coins
Abigail bergen
•If my car was totaled in an accident that wasn't my fault, and insurance paid me less than what I paid for it originally, would that qualify as a casualty loss? Or does it have to be something like a natural disaster?
0 coins
Kirsuktow DarkBlade
•A car accident could potentially qualify as a casualty event, regardless of fault. The IRS defines casualties as damage from a sudden, unexpected, or unusual event. For tax years 2018-2025 though, personal casualty losses are only deductible if they're attributed to a federally declared disaster, which a standard car accident wouldn't qualify for. There's an exception if you receive insurance reimbursement in excess of your adjusted basis, in which case you might have a taxable gain. Unfortunately, the TCJA (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act) severely limited personal casualty loss deductions until 2026 when the provisions are scheduled to expire.
0 coins
Ahooker-Equator
This whole system makes me so mad! I sold a truck last year for $12k less than I paid for it just 3 years earlier, and I get zero tax benefit. But my friend sold her vintage Mustang for a $9k profit and immediately got a tax bill. How is this fair??
0 coins
Anderson Prospero
•It's not fair, it's taxes. My accountant says the tax code is designed to maximize revenue, not fairness. Personally I think cars should just be exempt from capital gains entirely - nobody buys a regular car expecting it to increase in value.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashimi
I completely understand your frustration! This asymmetric treatment has bothered me for years too. What makes it even more maddening is that the IRS essentially treats your car purchase as "consumption" rather than an investment, so any decline in value is just considered normal wear and tear that you "consumed" through use. But here's something that might help: if you're planning to replace that car, consider whether you might use the new vehicle for any business purposes at all. Even small amounts of documented business use (like driving to meet clients, picking up supplies, etc.) can allow you to deduct the business portion of depreciation and eventual losses. You'd need to keep detailed mileage logs, but it's one of the few ways around this unfair rule. The key is establishing that business use pattern BEFORE you sell, not after. I learned this the hard way when I couldn't deduct a loss on a car I occasionally used for work but never properly documented.
0 coins
Jessica Suarez
•This is really helpful advice about establishing business use patterns ahead of time! I'm curious though - what counts as "detailed enough" mileage logs for the IRS? I drive to client meetings maybe once or twice a month, but I've never kept formal records. Would a simple spreadsheet with dates, destinations, and business purposes be sufficient, or do they require something more elaborate? Also, do you know if there's a minimum percentage of business use required to claim any deduction at all? I'm probably looking at maybe 15-20% business use at most.
0 coins