< Back to IRS

Dylan Cooper

Why are there pre-tax funds showing up in my Roth 403b rollover?

I recently helped my sister transfer her 403b from her previous employer to an IRA. Both accounts are managed by Vanguard. During the rollover process, I was confused to see that the system showed she had pre-tax contributions in what should be a Roth account. The breakdown looked something like: * Pre-tax traditional funds $24,500 -> traditional IRA * Pre-tax Roth funds $810 -> Roth IRA * After-tax Roth funds $1,150 -> Roth IRA I went ahead with the transfer since it seemed like the system knew what it was doing, but I'm planning to call Vanguard after everything settles to figure out what's going on with those "pre-tax Roth funds" (which sounds contradictory). Might need to move them to traditional, but I'm concerned about potential pro-rata issues? Or maybe convert to Roth properly? Not really sure what the best approach is. Has anyone dealt with this situation before? I thought Roth accounts were always after-tax by definition, so I'm confused why there would be pre-tax money in there.

This is actually more common than you might think! What you're seeing is likely a result of how the plan administrator tracked contributions. In a 403b, sometimes employers will miscategorize contributions or there could be matching funds that went into the Roth portion that weren't properly designated. Here's what's probably happening: The "pre-tax Roth funds" are likely employer contributions that were deposited into the Roth portion of the 403b. Since employer matches are always pre-tax, even when they go into a Roth-designated account, they need to maintain their pre-tax status. You're right to be cautious about this. Once the rollover completes, your sister should definitely contact Vanguard to clarify and ensure proper handling. The pre-tax portion in the Roth account should ideally be moved to the Traditional IRA to maintain its tax status, otherwise she might face tax complications later.

0 coins

Wait, I thought all money in a Roth account had to be post-tax? How can you have pre-tax money in a Roth? Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of having separate account types? Also, if her employer was adding matching funds, wouldn't those automatically go to the traditional side rather than the Roth side?

0 coins

Ideally, all Roth money should be after-tax, you're right about that. The purpose of separate account types is indeed to distinguish between pre-tax and after-tax contributions. However, in reality, record-keeping isn't always perfect, especially with employer plans. Regarding employer matches, most employers do direct matching funds to the traditional pre-tax side of a 403b. But some plan administrators have systems that don't properly segregate these funds, especially if the employee is primarily contributing to the Roth portion. In these cases, the matching dollars might go into the Roth bucket but must maintain their pre-tax characterization for tax purposes.

0 coins

After struggling with almost the exact same issue last year, I discovered https://taxr.ai which totally saved me from making a costly mistake with my retirement accounts. I uploaded my statements and it analyzed the different tax treatments for each portion of my 403b rollover. The system identified that I had both pre-tax and after-tax funds mixed in my Roth 403b (which sounds exactly like your situation) and showed me the optimal rollover strategy that would minimize my tax burden. It explained that the pre-tax portion in the Roth account would trigger taxes if kept in a Roth IRA, but moving it to a Traditional IRA would preserve the tax-deferred status. The guidance was super clear on handling the different tax characteristics and even explained the pro-rata rule implications I needed to consider.

0 coins

That sounds helpful, but I'm curious how it works with rollovers specifically. Does it just tell you where to move the money or does it actually give you step-by-step instructions for your specific situation? I've got a similar issue with my 457 plan that has some weird tax treatments.

0 coins

I'm skeptical that an online tool could accurately handle something this complex. Wouldn't you need a tax professional to look at the specific details of your plan documents? How does it know the rules for your specific employer's 403b when every plan seems to have different rules?

0 coins

It gives detailed step-by-step instructions tailored to your specific situation. For my 403b rollover, it generated personalized guidance that accounted for my specific plan's rules and tax implications. It even provided a script of what to say to the plan administrator to ensure the different tax portions were handled correctly. The tool actually examines your specific plan documents and statements. You upload your actual 403b documentation, and their system analyzes those specific documents to identify the unique rules of your plan. It's not just using general rules - it's reading your actual plan details, which is why it can handle the complexity that varies between employers.

0 coins

I was initially skeptical about online tax tools, but I ended up using https://taxr.ai for my retirement account issues last month. I couldn't believe how accurately it pinpointed the tax treatment discrepancies in my 403b rollover! What impressed me most was that it identified a similar pre-tax amount in my Roth 403b (about $1,200) that I had no idea was there. The system explained it was from a specific period when my employer's payroll system had miscoded some contributions. It then provided me with specific instructions for how to properly roll this amount to a Traditional IRA to avoid unexpected taxes. The detailed explanation about the pro-rata considerations saved me from making what would have been a costly tax mistake. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with this confusing rollover situation.

0 coins

I had an absolute nightmare trying to get Vanguard on the phone to explain a similar issue with my retirement accounts last year. After waiting on hold for nearly 3 hours across multiple attempts, I finally discovered https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c They basically wait on hold with Vanguard for you, then call you when a representative is actually on the line! I was connected to a Vanguard retirement specialist in about 30 minutes (while I just went about my day), and got my complex 403b rollover questions answered without the endless hold music. The retirement specialist explained that the "pre-tax Roth" designation happens fairly often when plan administrators don't properly code certain contributions or when there are special circumstances like employer matches going into Roth accounts. Having a real person walk me through the proper handling of these differently-taxed portions saved me from major headaches at tax time.

0 coins

How exactly does this work? Do they just call and then transfer the call to you? Seems like they would need personal info to get through the automated systems. Not sure I'm comfortable with that.

0 coins

This sounds like snake oil to me. I've never heard of a service that can magically skip hold times. If it was possible to jump the queue, everyone would do it. Vanguard probably has systems in place to prevent this kind of line-cutting. I'll stick with waiting on hold like everyone else.

0 coins

They have a system where they navigate through the initial automated menus for you using the basic account info you provide (just the same info you'd enter yourself), then they stay on hold. When a real representative answers, you get a call and are connected immediately. There's no transfer - they literally just wait on hold so you don't have to. I was skeptical too, but it's not about "cutting the line" - they're just handling the hold time on your behalf. Everyone still waits their turn, but you can go about your day instead of being stuck listening to hold music. The representatives at Vanguard had no idea I wasn't the one who had been waiting on hold - the transition is seamless. It saved me hours of frustration when dealing with my complex retirement account questions.

0 coins

I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it with Vanguard regarding my own 403b rollover questions that included pre-tax amounts in a Roth account. The service worked exactly as described - I provided my basic account info (the same stuff I'd enter in the phone tree anyway), and they navigated the initial menus and waited on hold. About 45 minutes later (which I spent having lunch instead of listening to hold music), I got a call connecting me directly to a Vanguard specialist. The specialist spent nearly 30 minutes explaining the nuances of my situation, confirmed that the pre-tax amounts in my Roth needed special handling, and helped me complete the proper paperwork to ensure everything was allocated correctly for tax purposes. Saved me both time and potentially thousands in tax complications!

0 coins

Something that no one has mentioned yet - check if your sister's previous employer had a special setup where after-tax (non-Roth) contributions were allowed in the 403b plan. Some plans permit what's called "after-tax non-Roth contributions" which are different from both traditional pre-tax and Roth contributions. These after-tax non-Roth contributions have their own unique tax treatment during rollovers and can sometimes appear confusing in the system. The earnings on these contributions would be pre-tax, while the contributions themselves would be after-tax. This might explain what you're seeing, especially if the plan documentation wasn't super clear about the different contribution types.

0 coins

That's an interesting possibility I hadn't considered. How would I be able to tell if her plan had this feature? And if that's what's happening, would the rollover still work the same way the system is suggesting?

0 coins

You can determine if her plan allowed after-tax non-Roth contributions by looking at her plan summary document or calling the previous employer's benefits department. Sometimes it's also listed on contribution election forms as a third option beyond pre-tax and Roth. If that's what's happening, the system's suggested rollover approach is likely correct, but I'd still verify. The pre-tax portions (which could be earnings on after-tax contributions) should go to Traditional IRA, while the actual after-tax contributions could either go to Roth (essentially converting them) or to a separate after-tax portion of a Traditional IRA if you want to maintain their distinct tax status for future planning.

0 coins

Has your sister checked her contribution statements from when she was working at the previous employer? One possibility is that she accidentally made pre-tax contributions to the 403b for a period of time, then switched to Roth contributions later. If the plan administrator kept everything in one bucket but tracked the tax status separately, that could explain what you're seeing. Another possibility is that there were some employer contributions (like matches) that got lumped into the Roth account but maintained their pre-tax status.

0 coins

This happened to me! I realized after almost a year that my contributions were going in as pre-tax instead of Roth because I checked the wrong box on a form. The plan kept everything together but tracked the tax basis separately.

0 coins

I dealt with this exact same situation when I rolled over my 403b from my previous job at a nonprofit. What you're seeing is likely a combination of a few factors that are more common than you'd think. First, some 403b plans allow what's called "in-plan Roth conversions" where employees can convert pre-tax balances to Roth within the plan. However, the recordkeeping doesn't always cleanly separate these conversions, especially if they happened over multiple years or in partial amounts. Second, your sister may have had periods where she was making both pre-tax and Roth contributions simultaneously, and the plan administrator lumped everything into account buckets that don't perfectly align with tax treatment. The key thing is that Vanguard's system is designed to handle these mixed tax treatments correctly during rollovers. The pre-tax portions will maintain their tax-deferred status regardless of which "bucket" they were sitting in at the old plan. I'd still recommend calling Vanguard after the rollover settles, but in my experience, their rollover team is very knowledgeable about these situations and the automated system usually gets it right. Just make sure to keep all the rollover documentation for your records in case there are any questions down the road.

0 coins

This is really helpful context! I'm wondering though - if the system is designed to handle these mixed tax treatments correctly, why does it seem like so many people run into confusion during the rollover process? Is it just that the interface could be clearer about what's happening, or are there actual cases where the automated system gets it wrong? Also, when you mention keeping documentation "in case there are any questions down the road" - are you thinking more about IRS questions during tax time, or potential issues if you need to do another rollover later? I want to make sure my sister is prepared for any follow-up that might be needed.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today