< Back to IRS

Hattie Carson

Understanding the Difference Between Employee (EE) and Employer (ER) Taxes on Paychecks

I'm really confused about something on my recent paycheck. Just received my quarterly bonus and I noticed something weird with the tax withholdings. It looks like my net pay is reflecting both my employee taxes AND my employer taxes being taken out. For instance, I see that my gross pay was reduced by $1950 total for Medicare - $975 labeled as "Medicare employee" and another $975 labeled as "Medicare employer". I thought the employer portion wasn't supposed to come out of my check? I've been comparing notes with my husband, and his bonus checks don't seem to have the employer portion of taxes taken out of his pay at all. Can someone explain what's happening here? Is this normal or is there an error in my payroll processing? Should I be talking to HR about this?

This definitely sounds like a payroll error. Your employer's portion of taxes (the ER taxes) should NEVER reduce your gross pay. The employer portion is supposed to be paid by the company separate from your wages. Here's how it should work: For Medicare tax, employees pay 1.45% of their gross wages (the EE portion), and employers separately pay a matching 1.45% (the ER portion). Only the EE portion should be deducted from your paycheck. The ER portion should be invisible to you as an employee since the company pays this directly to the government. What you're describing suggests your payroll system is incorrectly deducting both portions from your pay, which is absolutely not correct. Your husband's paycheck reflects the proper handling of these taxes.

0 coins

Is it possible that the paycheck stub is just showing both amounts for informational purposes, but only actually deducting the employee portion? Sometimes companies do this to show the "total compensation package" including what they pay on your behalf.

0 coins

That's a good point - some payroll systems do display both the employee and employer portions for informational purposes. The key is to check if your actual take-home pay reflects only the employee portion being deducted. You can verify this by calculating 1.45% of your gross bonus amount - that should be the only Medicare amount actually reducing your pay. If the reduction is double that (2.9%), then you're definitely having both portions deducted incorrectly.

0 coins

After dealing with a similar issue last year, I found this amazing service called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that helped me sort out payroll tax discrepancies. I was getting really frustrated trying to figure out why my withholdings seemed off compared to my colleagues. The tool analyzed my pay stubs and immediately identified that my employer was incorrectly withholding both EE and ER portions of FICA taxes from my checks. They even generated a detailed report I could take to HR to explain exactly what was wrong and how to fix it.

0 coins

How exactly does this work? Do you just upload your paystub and it tells you if there are errors? I've been suspecting issues with my withholdings too but didn't know where to turn.

0 coins

I'm a little skeptical... couldn't you just calculate the percentages yourself? Medicare is 1.45% for employee portion and Social Security is 6.2% up to the wage base limit. Why pay for a service to tell you what you can figure out on your own?

0 coins

It's super simple - you just upload your pay stub and the system analyzes all withholdings, not just FICA taxes. It checks everything from federal and state income tax to retirement contributions and specialized deductions. While you can certainly calculate basic percentages yourself, the system catches nuanced issues that aren't obvious - like supplemental wage withholding errors, incorrect state tax applications, or misclassified deductions. It's especially helpful when you have complex scenarios like bonuses, equity compensation, or multi-state income. The report it generates explains everything in plain English with specific references to tax codes.

0 coins

I have to admit I was wrong about taxr.ai. After our discussion here, I decided to give it a try with my last three paystubs since I switched departments at work and my withholdings seemed weird. Turns out they identified that my employer was applying the wrong state tax rate after my transfer and incorrectly calculating my supplemental income tax on my quarterly incentive pay. The report made it super clear what was happening and I was able to get HR to fix it right away. Already got a corrected check with about $430 more than I would have received. Sometimes it's worth using the right tools rather than trying to figure everything out yourself!

0 coins

If you do confirm this is an error, you'll probably need to contact your company's payroll department. When I had a similar issue last year, I spent WEEKS trying to reach someone at the IRS for help with no success. Eventually I found https://claimyr.com which got me through to an actual IRS agent in less than 24 hours. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. They basically hold your place in the phone queue and call you when an agent is about to answer. The IRS agent was able to confirm exactly how employer vs. employee taxes should be handled and gave me documentation I could take to HR.

0 coins

Wait, how does this actually work? I don't understand how a third-party service can somehow get you to the front of the IRS phone queue when I've been waiting on hold for hours multiple times.

0 coins

This sounds like a scam. Why would I pay someone else to call the IRS for me? And how would they possibly have special access that regular people don't have? The IRS doesn't give priority to certain callers.

0 coins

It's not about getting to the front of the line - they use an automated system that continuously calls the IRS and navigates the phone tree until they reach a human agent. When an agent is about to answer, their system calls you and connects you to that agent. They don't have special access or priority - they're just using technology to handle the frustrating wait time for you. It's basically like having someone else sit on hold for hours so you don't have to. I was skeptical too until I tried it and was connected to an IRS agent within about 20 hours instead of spending days repeatedly calling and getting disconnected.

0 coins

I have to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I kept trying to reach the IRS about a notice I received claiming I owed $3200 in back taxes. After 5 days of failed attempts and hours wasted on hold, I broke down and tried the Claimyr service. I received a call back the next morning connecting me directly to an IRS agent who confirmed the notice was sent in error due to an incorrectly processed form. Saved me thousands and resolved in minutes once I actually reached someone. The peace of mind was absolutely worth it. Consider me converted from skeptic to believer.

0 coins

Ev Luca

You should check if your bonus payment is being processed through a Professional Employer Organization (PEO) or some kind of co-employment arrangement. Some companies use these services for payroll, and they sometimes show both employee and employer tax contributions on the pay stub. In those cases, it might LOOK like both are being deducted, but if you do the math on your actual net pay, only the employee portion is actually being taken out.

0 coins

That's a really interesting possibility I hadn't considered! Our company did recently switch to a new payroll provider, so maybe that's part of the confusion. I'll check the actual dollar amount being deducted against what would be just the employee portion. How would I tell if we're using a PEO arrangement though?

0 coins

Ev Luca

Look at the company name listed on your actual pay stub - if it's different from your employer's name, that's a strong indication you're being paid through a PEO. Also check if there's any mention of "co-employment" in your HR documentation. If your company did recently switch payroll providers, that's even more reason to carefully check the math. During transitions like that, configuration errors are common. Calculate 1.45% of your gross bonus amount and see if that matches what was actually deducted. If the deduction is 2.9% instead, then you're definitely having both portions taken out incorrectly.

0 coins

Are you sure you're reading the pay stub correctly? Sometimes they show the breakdown of both EE and ER taxes for informational purposes, but only the EE portion actually gets deducted from your pay. Can you check if the total deductions in the summary section match up with just the employee portions?

0 coins

This happened to me too. My paystub showed both amounts but when I checked the math, only the employee portion was actually being subtracted from my gross pay. The employer portion was just shown for transparency.

0 coins

I'd definitely recommend doing the math yourself first before assuming there's an error. Take your gross bonus amount and multiply by 1.45% for Medicare and 6.2% for Social Security - that should equal what's actually being deducted from your pay if it's correct. If the deductions are double those amounts, then you have a real problem that needs to be addressed with payroll immediately. But like others have mentioned, many pay stubs now show both the employee and employer portions for transparency, even though only the employee portion is actually taken out of your check. You can also look at your year-to-date totals on the pay stub - those should help clarify whether this is a one-time display issue or if you've been getting double-charged all year.

0 coins

I went through something very similar when I started getting bonuses at my current job. The key thing to check is whether your actual net pay reflects both deductions or just the employee portion. Here's what I did to figure it out: I took my gross bonus amount and calculated what the employee-only taxes should be (1.45% for Medicare, 6.2% for Social Security up to the wage base). Then I compared that to what was actually subtracted from my gross pay to get my net pay. In my case, the pay stub was showing both portions for informational purposes, but only the employee portion was actually being deducted. The employer portion was just displayed to show the "total tax burden" but wasn't reducing my take-home pay. If you find that both portions are actually being deducted from your pay, that's definitely a payroll error that needs immediate correction. You should also be able to get reimbursed for any previous incorrect deductions. I'd suggest doing the math first, then if there's truly an error, document it clearly before approaching HR - it'll make the conversation much more productive.

0 coins

This is exactly the approach I would recommend too! I had a similar situation a few months ago where I was panicking about what looked like double taxation on my pay stub. Turns out it was just a display issue - the payroll system was showing both employee and employer portions for transparency, but only deducting the employee portion from my actual pay. The math check you described is the quickest way to figure out what's really happening. If @Hattie Carson finds that her net pay calculation shows only the employee portion being deducted 1.45% (for Medicare ,)then it s'just a confusing pay stub format. But if the full 2.9% is actually being taken out, that s'definitely a payroll error that needs fixing ASAP. Either way, at least she ll'know exactly what she s'dealing with before having that conversation with HR!

0 coins

This is a great example of why it's so important to look beyond the surface of pay stubs! I work in payroll administration and see this confusion frequently. Modern payroll systems often display both employee and employer tax contributions for transparency and compliance reasons, but it can definitely be alarming if you're not expecting it. The good news is that in most cases, this is just a display issue rather than an actual double deduction. However, given that you mentioned your husband's bonus checks don't show this same format, it's worth doing that math check everyone's suggesting. One additional thing to look for: check if your pay stub has a section labeled something like "Employer Contributions" or "For Information Only" - this is where legitimate employer tax portions would typically be shown without affecting your net pay. If the employer taxes are listed in the same deduction section as your regular withholdings, that's more concerning. Also, since you mentioned this was a quarterly bonus, make sure to check if supplemental wage tax rates are being applied correctly. Bonuses are often taxed at different rates than regular wages, which can make the calculations look different than expected.

0 coins

This is really helpful insight from someone who works in payroll! I think you've hit on something important about supplemental wage taxation that others haven't mentioned yet. As a newcomer here, I'm curious - when you say bonuses are "often taxed at different rates than regular wages," are you referring to the withholding rates being different, or the actual tax liability? I always thought the tax liability was the same but the withholding might be calculated differently for supplemental wages. Also, for someone like @Hattie Carson who s'trying to figure this out, would you recommend she look for any specific language or codes on her pay stub that would indicate supplemental wage treatment? That might help explain why her bonus stub looks so different from her regular paychecks.

0 coins

Thank you all for the detailed advice! I followed @Daryl Bright's suggestion and did the math myself first. Turns out everyone was right - my pay stub is just showing both portions for informational purposes, but only the employee portion (1.45% for Medicare) is actually being deducted from my net pay. I was getting confused because the layout is different from my regular paychecks, and seeing both the $975 EE and $975 ER amounts listed under what looked like "deductions" made me panic. But when I calculated backwards from my actual net pay, only the employee portion was taken out. @Oliver Wagner - you were spot on about the supplemental wage taxation too. My bonus stub does show "SUPP" next to several line items, which explains why it looks so different from my regular paychecks. The withholding rate on the bonus was higher than my normal pay, but that's apparently standard for supplemental wages. Crisis averted! Though I do think my company could make their pay stub format clearer. Thanks everyone for helping me avoid an awkward conversation with HR over a non-issue!

0 coins

I'm so glad you were able to figure this out without having to go through the stress of a potentially awkward HR meeting! This is actually a perfect example of how confusing payroll systems can be, even when they're working correctly. As someone new to understanding all these tax details, I really appreciate how this thread broke down the difference between employee and employer portions so clearly. The step-by-step math approach that @Daryl Bright suggested seems like such a practical way to verify what s'actually happening rather than just panicking about what the pay stub appears to show. It s'also interesting to learn about the supplemental wage taxation - I had no idea that bonuses could be withheld at different rates than regular pay. That SUPP "designation" is definitely something I ll'watch for on my own pay stubs now. Thanks for sharing the resolution - it ll'probably help other people who run into similar confusion!

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread for anyone dealing with payroll confusion! As someone new to understanding tax withholdings, I really appreciate how everyone broke down the employee vs employer tax portions so clearly. What strikes me most is how this situation highlights the importance of actually doing the math rather than just assuming something is wrong based on how a pay stub looks. The fact that modern payroll systems show both portions "for transparency" but can end up causing panic instead is pretty ironic! I'm curious - for those of us who might face similar situations in the future, are there any other common payroll display quirks we should be aware of? It seems like understanding these formatting differences could save a lot of unnecessary stress and awkward HR conversations. Also, @Douglas Foster, thanks for following up with the resolution! It's so satisfying when these threads come full circle with a clear answer.

0 coins

Great question about other payroll display quirks! As someone who just went through this learning experience, I can think of a few things that might cause similar confusion: Year-to-date vs. current period amounts can be really confusing, especially early in the year when they're still close together. I've seen people panic thinking they were being over-taxed when they were actually looking at YTD totals. Pre-tax vs. post-tax deductions is another big one - things like 401k contributions, health insurance premiums, and FSA contributions reduce your taxable income, so they appear as deductions but actually save you money on taxes. The order these appear on pay stubs can make it look like you're paying way more than you actually are. And like @Oliver Wagner mentioned, supplemental wage treatment can make bonus paychecks look completely different from regular ones - not just the tax rates, but sometimes even the layout and terminology changes. I think the key takeaway is exactly what you said - do the math first before assuming there s'an error. It s'amazing how much confusion can be cleared up with a simple calculation!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I found this entire discussion incredibly educational! It's fascinating how something that initially seemed like a serious payroll error turned out to be just a confusing display format. This thread really demonstrates the value of this community - not only did multiple people provide practical advice on how to verify the actual deductions, but we also got insights from someone who actually works in payroll administration. The step-by-step approach of calculating the percentages yourself before jumping to conclusions seems like such valuable life advice that extends beyond just payroll issues. I'm also grateful for all the follow-up comments about other potential payroll quirks to watch out for. Coming from someone who gets anxious about financial matters, knowing that pre-tax deductions, YTD vs. current period amounts, and supplemental wage treatment can all make pay stubs look confusing helps set realistic expectations for when I eventually encounter these situations myself. Thanks to everyone who contributed to making this such a comprehensive learning experience!

0 coins

I completely agree with you about the educational value of this thread! As another newcomer, I was initially overwhelmed by all the tax terminology and percentages being thrown around, but seeing how @Hattie Carson worked through the problem step-by-step made it so much more approachable. What really impressed me was how the community didn t'just jump to contact "HR immediately but" instead provided practical tools to verify the situation first. The advice about calculating 1.45% for Medicare and 6.2% for Social Security, then comparing that to actual deductions, gives such a clear framework for troubleshooting similar issues. I also appreciate how people shared their own similar experiences - it helps normalize what could otherwise feel like an embarrassing mistake. Now I know that if I ever see confusing pay stub formatting, I m'not the first person to be puzzled by it, and there are concrete steps I can take to figure out what s'actually happening before panicking!

0 coins

As someone who's relatively new to understanding payroll taxes, this entire thread has been incredibly enlightening! I had no idea that employer portions of FICA taxes could even appear on pay stubs for informational purposes - I always assumed if it showed up on your stub, it was being deducted from your pay. The methodical approach everyone recommended here (calculate the expected employee portion percentages and compare to actual deductions) seems like such a practical skill to have. I'm definitely bookmarking this for future reference since I suspect many of us have probably looked at confusing pay stubs and just assumed they were correct without doing the math. It's also really reassuring to see how supportive this community is - providing concrete steps to verify the issue rather than just saying "call HR." @Hattie Carson, thanks for sharing your follow-up! It's so helpful when OPs come back with the resolution, especially since this seems like a situation many people could encounter. One question for the group - are there any red flags on pay stubs that would definitely indicate you should contact payroll immediately, versus things that might just be confusing display formatting?

0 coins

Great question about red flags! As someone who just went through this learning experience myself, I think there are definitely some situations where you'd want to contact payroll right away rather than just assuming it's a display issue. The most obvious red flag would be if your actual net pay calculation shows that both employee AND employer portions are being deducted - like if you're losing 2.9% for Medicare instead of just 1.45%. That's never correct and needs immediate attention. Other red flags might include: negative year-to-date amounts, withholdings that seem way out of proportion to your income level, or sudden major changes in deduction amounts without any explanation (like a big jump in health insurance premiums when you didn't change your plan). I'd also say trust your gut - if you do the math and something still doesn't add up, or if your take-home pay suddenly drops significantly without any obvious reason, it's worth asking questions. The worst case scenario is that payroll confirms everything is correct and explains why it looks confusing. The key seems to be doing that basic verification first (like the percentage calculations everyone mentioned) so you can have a productive conversation with specific numbers rather than just saying "this looks weird.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm really impressed by how thoroughly everyone worked through this issue! This thread is a perfect example of why it's so valuable to have knowledgeable people sharing their expertise. What really stands out to me is how this situation demonstrates the importance of financial literacy - understanding basic tax percentages and how to verify payroll calculations. Before reading this discussion, I honestly wouldn't have known that employer portions of FICA taxes could appear on pay stubs for informational purposes, or that supplemental wages like bonuses can be withheld at different rates. The systematic approach everyone recommended (calculate expected employee percentages, compare to actual deductions, check for "SUPP" designations) seems like such a practical framework that could apply to so many payroll questions. It's also reassuring to know that even confusing pay stub formats usually have logical explanations rather than being actual errors. Thanks to @Hattie Carson for sharing the original question and following up with the resolution - and to everyone who contributed their knowledge and experience. This is exactly the kind of community support that helps people navigate complex financial issues with confidence!

0 coins

Absolutely agree with you about the value of financial literacy! As another newcomer, I was initially intimidated by all the tax percentages and terminology, but this thread really broke it down in an accessible way. What I found most helpful was seeing how @Hattie Carson s'panic turned into a learning opportunity that benefited everyone. The progression from something "s'wrong with my paycheck to" let "me do the math myself to" crisis "averted, it was just confusing formatting is" such a great model for approaching financial concerns. I m'also grateful for the insights about supplemental wage taxation - I had no idea that bonuses could be handled so differently on pay stubs. The SUPP "designation" is definitely something I ll'watch for on my own paychecks now. It s'amazing how much confusion can be avoided just by understanding what different codes and formatting mean! This community really seems to prioritize teaching people to fish rather than just giving them fish, if you know what I mean. The systematic verification approach everyone recommended feels like a skill I can apply to so many other financial situations beyond just payroll issues.

0 coins

As someone who's new to both this community and understanding payroll complexities, this entire discussion has been incredibly valuable! What started as a concerning tax withholding issue turned into a masterclass on how to systematically verify payroll calculations. I'm particularly grateful for the practical framework that emerged here - calculating expected employee tax percentages (1.45% Medicare, 6.2% Social Security) and comparing them to actual deductions before assuming there's an error. This seems like such an essential life skill that I wish someone had taught me earlier in my career. The insight about modern payroll systems showing both employee and employer portions "for transparency" is fascinating - it's ironic that attempts at transparency can actually create more confusion! I also had no idea about supplemental wage taxation differences or that bonus pay stubs could look so different from regular paychecks. What impresses me most about this community is how everyone provided tools for self-verification rather than just saying "call HR." Teaching people to confidently assess their own situations first seems so much more empowering than immediately escalating every concern. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise and experiences - this thread will definitely be my go-to reference if I ever face similar payroll confusion!

0 coins

This thread really has been an amazing educational resource! As someone completely new to understanding payroll intricacies, I was initially overwhelmed by all the tax percentages and technical terms being discussed. But seeing how @Hattie Carson worked through the problem methodically - from initial panic to systematic verification to resolution - made the whole process feel much more manageable. What really resonates with me is the emphasis on doing your own calculations first before assuming something is wrong. The simple framework of calculating 1.45% for Medicare and 6.2% for Social Security seems so straightforward once you know it, but I never would have thought to verify my pay stub that way before reading this discussion. I m'also fascinated by how many different factors can make pay stubs confusing - the informational display of employer portions, supplemental wage treatment, pre-tax vs post-tax deductions, YTD vs current period amounts. It s'reassuring to know that apparent errors "often" have logical explanations, and there are concrete steps you can take to figure out what s'really happening. Thank you to everyone who contributed their knowledge and experience here - this community s'approach of teaching practical problem-solving skills is exactly what I was hoping to find when I joined!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I've learned so much from reading through this entire discussion! What started as @Hattie Carson's concerning payroll question turned into an incredibly educational thread about understanding tax withholdings and pay stub formatting. The systematic approach everyone recommended here - calculating the expected employee portions (1.45% for Medicare, 6.2% for Social Security) and comparing them to actual deductions - seems like such an essential skill that I wish I'd learned earlier. I had no idea that modern payroll systems often display both employee and employer tax portions for transparency, which can definitely be confusing if you're not expecting it. I'm also grateful for the insights about supplemental wage taxation and how bonus pay stubs can look completely different from regular paychecks. The "SUPP" designation is definitely something I'll watch for on my own pay stubs now. What impresses me most about this community is how everyone provided practical tools for self-verification rather than immediately suggesting to escalate to HR. Teaching people to confidently assess their own financial situations first feels so much more empowering. This thread will definitely be my reference guide if I ever encounter similar payroll confusion!

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today