Understanding RSU Tax Reporting: Net Settlement vs. Forced Sale on My Company Stock
Hey everyone, I've been trying to figure out how I need to report my RSU vestings on my tax return and could use some advice. My company gives me restricted stock units through Fidelity. Here's what happens: I'm granted 130 RSUs from my employer. When they vest, Fidelity automatically uses the sell-to-cover method to cover the tax obligations. So out of the 130 shares, about 104 actually end up in my account and 26 are sold for taxes. I never actually get to see or touch all 130 shares - I only have control over the 104 shares after they're released to me. Fidelity also puts some small cash amounts into a separate account after the sale, but I have to manually transfer that money to actually use it. I was looking online and found some confusing information about whether this type of transaction needs to be reported on taxes. It seems like it depends on whether it's considered a "net settlement" or a "forced sale" but I'm not really clear on the difference or which one applies to my situation. Can anyone explain if I need to report this on my tax return, and if so, how? Thanks in advance!
22 comments


Danielle Mays
The key difference between net settlement and forced sale is how the transaction is structured, and yes, it absolutely impacts your tax reporting! In your situation, it sounds like you're experiencing a sell-to-cover method, which is typically considered a forced sale rather than a net settlement. Here's why this matters: With a forced sale, the entire vesting amount (all 130 RSUs in your case) is reported as income on your W-2, and the sale of the 26 shares becomes a separate reportable transaction on Schedule D (though typically with minimal gain/loss since they're sold immediately). Your company should already be including the full value of all 130 RSUs in your W-2 income on the vesting date. You'll need to report the sale of those 26 shares on Schedule D, but since they're usually sold immediately at vesting, there's typically little to no capital gain/loss to report. The remaining 104 shares are now yours with a cost basis equal to the fair market value on the vesting date. When you eventually sell these, you'll report that transaction with any gain/loss calculated from this basis.
0 coins
Roger Romero
•Thanks for this explanation! I'm in a similar situation but I'm confused about the basis reporting. Fidelity is showing some weird numbers on my 1099-B that don't match what I expected. Does the 1099-B already account for the W-2 income, or do I need to adjust the basis myself when I file?
0 coins
Danielle Mays
•The 1099-B reporting can definitely be confusing. Depending on when your RSUs vested, your broker might not be reporting the correct basis. Prior to 2014, brokers weren't required to report the correct basis for RSUs, but many do now. If your 1099-B shows a basis that doesn't match the fair market value on the vesting date, you'll need to make an adjustment when filing. Use Form 8949 and check box "B" to indicate you're adjusting the basis. This ensures you don't pay tax twice on the same income.
0 coins
Anna Kerber
I went through exactly the same issue last year and nearly paid tax twice until I found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai). Seriously, this tool was a lifesaver for my RSU situation. I uploaded my Fidelity statements and W-2, and it automatically identified the incorrect basis reporting on my 1099-B for the shares that were sold to cover taxes. The tool explained that my company had already included the full RSU value in my W-2 income but Fidelity reported a zero basis on the 1099-B, which would have resulted in double taxation. It generated the correct Form 8949 adjustments and even provided a detailed explanation I could reference if audited. If you're dealing with RSUs, especially with multiple vestings throughout the year, I'd highly recommend checking it out. It saved me hours of confusion and potentially thousands in incorrectly reported taxes.
0 coins
Niko Ramsey
•Does it work for other brokers too? I have RSUs through E*TRADE and they're completely messing up my basis reporting. I'm about ready to pull my hair out trying to figure this out.
0 coins
Seraphina Delan
•I'm skeptical about using third-party tools for tax stuff. How does it actually verify the calculations are correct? My situation involves RSUs with multiple vesting dates and some partial selling throughout the year.
0 coins
Anna Kerber
•Yes, it works with all the major brokers including E*TRADE. It's specifically designed to recognize the transaction patterns from different platforms and standardize them for tax reporting. For verification, it actually compares the vesting date FMV from your broker statements with what's reported on your W-2 and 1099-B. It flags discrepancies and explains which values should be used. For your situation with multiple vesting dates and partial selling, that's exactly where it shines - it keeps track of each lot separately and properly accounts for the adjusted basis.
0 coins
Seraphina Delan
I want to follow up about taxr.ai that I asked about earlier. I decided to try it with my complicated RSU situation (had 5 vesting events last year and sold shares at different times). Wow - it actually sorted everything out correctly! It identified that my broker was using a $0 basis for the shares sold for tax withholding, which would have resulted in me paying tax twice on the same income. The tool created the correct Form 8949 with all the adjustment codes and explanations. What really impressed me was that it compared the income reported on my W-2 to the RSU values and confirmed everything matched properly. It explained which transactions were already covered by my W-2 income and which ones needed separate capital gains reporting. Definitely worth using if you're dealing with RSUs.
0 coins
Jabari-Jo
For anyone still struggling to get through to the IRS about RSU reporting issues (I spent WEEKS trying), I finally had success using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes when I'd been trying for days on my own. The agent confirmed that my company's RSU program was using the forced sale method, not net settlement, which affected how I needed to report it. They also explained exactly how to correct my prior year return where I'd messed this up. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. Basically, it keeps redialing and navigating the IRS phone tree until it gets a human, then calls you to connect. Saved me hours of frustration and hold music.
0 coins
Kristin Frank
•How does that actually work though? Doesn't the IRS just disconnect you if you use automated systems to get through? I thought they had protections against that kind of thing.
0 coins
Micah Trail
•Sounds sketchy tbh. The IRS will eventually answer if you call at the right time. Why would I pay a third party just to sit on hold for me? Has anyone else actually used this service or is this just marketing?
0 coins
Jabari-Jo
•It's not an automated system that tries to trick the IRS or anything like that. It's actually just a service that handles the waiting and navigating the phone tree for you. The IRS has no way of knowing you're using it - when they pick up, it's just connecting you directly as a normal call. The biggest value is that it keeps trying different IRS departments until it finds one that's accepting calls, which is why it works better than just calling yourself. And yes, you definitely could sit on hold yourself instead, but I personally wasted about 6 hours across multiple calls trying to get through before using this.
0 coins
Micah Trail
I need to eat my words about Claimyr from my earlier comment. After another frustrating morning trying to reach the IRS about my RSU reporting situation, I decided to try it out of desperation. It actually worked exactly as advertised. I got the text that they were calling the IRS, and about 15 minutes later I got connected to an IRS representative who specialized in stock compensation. She explained that in my case, because my broker was using the "sell to cover" method, I needed to report the full vesting value on my W-2 (which my employer had already done) and then separately report the "sell to cover" transaction on Schedule D with an adjusted basis. What would have been days more of frustration turned into a 30-minute call that completely cleared up my confusion. Consider me converted.
0 coins
Nia Watson
Does anyone know how to determine if your company is doing true net settlement vs. forced sale? My company literature says they do "net issuance" of shares but I'm not sure if that's the same thing. With net settlement, I understand you never legally own the withheld shares, while forced sale means you technically owned them for a split second before they were sold. How do you tell which one your company does?
0 coins
Alberto Souchard
•Check your brokerage transaction history. If it shows that all shares vested and then some were immediately sold in a separate transaction, it's likely a forced sale. If it only shows the net shares being deposited directly into your account without a separate sale transaction, it's probably net settlement. Also, your RSU agreement should specify the method. Sometimes it's called "net share withholding" for true net settlement.
0 coins
Nia Watson
•That makes sense! I just checked my Schwab account and I can see two separate transactions on vesting day - one for all shares vesting, and another for the sale of some shares. Sounds like I'm dealing with a forced sale situation, which means I do need to report those sold shares on Schedule D. The frustrating thing is the cost basis reported on my 1099-B doesn't reflect this, so I'll need to make the adjustment. Thanks for the tip!
0 coins
Katherine Shultz
I'm getting super confused about the tax reporting across different vesting dates. Let's say I have RSUs vesting quarterly. Do I need to track and report each vesting event separately? My broker statement shows different FMV for each vesting date.
0 coins
Danielle Mays
•Yes, you need to track each vesting date separately since each batch of RSUs has its own cost basis based on the FMV on the specific vesting date. When you eventually sell shares, you'll need to identify which specific shares you're selling (FIFO is default unless you specifically identify otherwise). This is especially important if some of your shares are long-term and others are short-term based on their vesting dates. Each vesting creates a new tax lot with its own holding period starting from that date.
0 coins
Austin Leonard
This is a great breakdown of the RSU tax reporting requirements! I wanted to add one important point that might help others avoid a common mistake I made last year. Even though your company reports the full RSU value (all 130 shares in your example) as income on your W-2, make sure you're not accidentally reporting this income again elsewhere on your tax return. I initially thought I needed to report the RSU vesting as "other income" in addition to what was on my W-2, which would have been double-counting. The W-2 income reporting handles the compensation aspect entirely. The only separate reporting you need to do is for the actual stock transactions (like the 26 shares sold for tax withholding) on Schedule D. Also, keep good records of your vesting dates and fair market values - you'll need these for calculating your cost basis when you eventually sell the remaining shares. Most brokers provide annual summaries that make this easier, but it's worth downloading and saving the individual transaction details as backup.
0 coins
Brian Downey
•This is such a helpful clarification! I almost made the same double-reporting mistake when I was doing my taxes. It's really confusing because you see the RSU income on your W-2 but then also get all these brokerage statements showing transactions, so it feels like you should be reporting everything separately. One thing that helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet tracking each vesting event with the date, number of shares, FMV per share, and what portion was sold for taxes versus what I kept. This made it much easier to reconcile everything when tax time came around. For anyone using tax software, most of the major programs now have RSU-specific interview questions that help walk you through this properly, but it's still good to understand the underlying logic like Austin explained.
0 coins
Javier Morales
Great question, Derek! I went through this exact same confusion with my RSUs from Microsoft last year. Based on what you're describing with Fidelity automatically selling shares to cover taxes, you're definitely dealing with a "forced sale" situation rather than net settlement. Here's what you need to know: Your company should already be reporting the full fair market value of all 130 RSUs as ordinary income on your W-2 for the year they vested. This covers the tax on the compensation aspect. However, you'll also need to report the sale of those 26 shares that were sold for tax withholding on Schedule D. The tricky part is that your 1099-B from Fidelity might show an incorrect cost basis (often $0) for those sold shares, which would make it look like you have a big capital gain when you actually don't. Since you already paid ordinary income tax on the full value through your W-2, the cost basis for those sold shares should equal the fair market value on the vesting date. If the 1099-B basis is wrong, you'll need to use Form 8949 to make the adjustment. Most people miss this and end up paying tax twice on the same income. The remaining 104 shares you keep have a cost basis equal to their FMV on vesting date, so when you eventually sell those, any gain/loss is calculated from that point. Hope this helps clarify things!
0 coins
Rachel Clark
•This is exactly the clarification I needed! I was getting so confused looking at my Fidelity statements because they show two separate transactions on the same day - the vesting and then the immediate sale. I kept wondering if I was supposed to report both somehow. So just to make sure I understand correctly: the W-2 income from my employer covers the tax on receiving the RSU compensation, and then I only need to report the actual stock sale (those 26 shares sold for taxes) on Schedule D with the adjusted basis you mentioned? And the 104 shares I kept don't get reported until I actually decide to sell them later? I'm definitely going to need to use Form 8949 because my 1099-B is showing zero basis for those tax withholding shares. Thanks for breaking this down so clearly - it's way less complicated than I was making it in my head!
0 coins