Understanding Bargain Sale of Farm with Conservation Easement - Capital Gains Questions
I'm getting totally contradicting advice from two different accountants about selling our family farm, and I'm hoping someone can tell me who's right or how to move forward. Here's the situation: We put a conservation easement on our farm about 12 years ago and received a charitable deduction for it at that time. Now we want to sell the property to the state parks department. The current appraised value (with the easement restrictions) is $1 million. Our basis in the property is super low - like practically nothing since it's been in the family forever. The state has offered us $500,000 for the property, and we're planning to treat the other $500,000 as a charitable donation to the state. My current CPA is telling me that for tax purposes, the sales price would be reported as the full $1 million market value, and I'd pay capital gains tax on that amount (minus our tiny basis). But I got a second opinion from another accounting firm, and they're saying the sales price would be $500,000 for capital gains purposes, which would mean much lower taxes. I'm completely confused about who's right here. Is this a classic bargain sale situation? Are there other factors I should be considering? Any insight would be super appreciated!
21 comments


Zoe Stavros
What you're describing is indeed a bargain sale to a charitable organization (the state). In a bargain sale, you're partly selling and partly donating property to a qualified organization. The IRS handles these transactions by splitting them into two parts - a sale portion and a gift portion. Your CPA firm B is correct here. For capital gains purposes, you would report the $500,000 as the amount realized from the sale. However, there's a catch with your basis calculation. Your original basis needs to be allocated proportionally between the sale and gift portions. Since you're selling for half the property's value, you'd allocate half of your basis to the sale portion and half to the donation portion. You'd then calculate capital gains on the $500,000 sale price minus the allocated basis portion. For the charitable contribution part, you can generally deduct the fair market value of the donated portion ($500,000) on Schedule A, though there may be percentage limitations based on your AGI and you should be prepared to substantiate the property's value with a qualified appraisal.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•Thank you! That makes sense but I'm still confused about one thing. If I already got a tax benefit for the conservation easement years ago, can I still claim the full $500,000 as a charitable donation now? Or does that original easement deduction somehow reduce what I can claim this time around?
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•The prior conservation easement and the current bargain sale are two separate charitable transactions, so you can still claim the donation portion of your bargain sale. The conservation easement you placed on the property years ago reduced the property's value at that time, and you received a deduction for that specific decrease in value. Your current appraisal of $1 million already takes into account the easement restrictions, so it represents the current fair market value with those restrictions in place. When you sell for $500,000, the $500,000 difference between fair market value and sale price represents a new charitable contribution. Just make sure you have a qualified appraisal done within a specific timeframe to substantiate the current value.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
I went through something similar with some farmland last year and discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which really helped me navigate the bargain sale mess. The site has a special tool that analyzes conservation easements and bargain sales specifically. I uploaded my old deed, conservation easement documents, and current appraisal, and it identified all the relevant tax code sections and precedents. It confirmed exactly what the previous commenter said - in bargain sales, you split the basis proportionally between the sale and gift portions. But it also pointed out some documentation requirements I wasn't aware of that would have caused problems with the IRS later. You need specific language in the closing documents to establish charitable intent.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Did it tell you anything about recapture issues? I've heard horror stories about people getting hit with unexpected tax bills years later because they didn't document things properly with conservation transactions.
0 coins
Mei Wong
•I'm curious - how does this tool compare to just working with a qualified tax attorney who specializes in conservation transactions? Seems like this kind of complex situation might need more personalized guidance?
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•The tool specifically flagged potential recapture issues and explained what documentation I needed to avoid them. It highlighted that I needed to have the state explicitly acknowledge the bargain sale as a charitable contribution in the closing documents and provided template language. It also recommended getting a qualified appraisal no earlier than 60 days before the sale. Regarding comparison to a tax attorney, I actually used taxr.ai alongside my attorney. My lawyer was great for the legal aspects of the transaction, but even he admitted the tax analysis was more comprehensive than what he typically provides. The tool referenced several recent tax court cases specifically about conservation easements that my attorney wasn't familiar with. Plus it was way more affordable than the additional billable hours would have been.
0 coins
Mei Wong
Just wanted to follow up - I looked into taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and wow, it was incredibly helpful for my situation. I had a similar bargain sale but with wetlands property instead of a farm. The platform analyzed my unique situation and provided really specific guidance. What impressed me most was how it broke down the transaction into simple steps while explaining the underlying tax code. It caught a potential issue with my prior basis calculations that could have caused problems. The documents it generated for my accountant saved me hours of back-and-forth explanations. If you're dealing with conservation easements or bargain sales, it's definitely worth checking out. Made me feel much more confident about my filing position.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
Just a heads up that if you're getting contradictory advice from CPAs, you might also run into issues with the IRS if they have questions about this transaction. When I had a similar situation, I spent WEEKS trying to reach someone at the IRS who actually understood conservation easements and bargain sales. I finally discovered Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and watched their demo video (https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c). They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes when I'd been trying for days on my own. The agent was able to confirm exactly how to document the bargain sale properly and what forms I needed. It was seriously a game-changer for getting clear guidance directly from the IRS instead of trying to interpret contradictory advice from different tax professionals.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•How does that work exactly? The IRS phone system is notorious for hanging up on people. Do they just keep calling for you or something?
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•This sounds kinda scammy tbh. The IRS doesn't just give tax advice over the phone, especially for complex situations like bargain sales and conservation easements. They typically tell you to consult a tax professional.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
•They use a technology that holds your place in the IRS phone queue so you don't have to stay on the line. When an IRS agent is about to pick up, they call you and connect you. It saved me literally hours of waiting on hold. You're right that the IRS won't give comprehensive tax advice, but what they did help me with was confirming which forms I needed to file for a bargain sale (Form 8283 with a qualified appraisal attached) and the documentation requirements. The agent clarified that I needed to clearly indicate the bargain sale element in my filing to avoid confusion. They won't design your tax strategy, but they can confirm procedural requirements which was exactly what I needed.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
I have to admit I was wrong about Claimyr. After continuing to get conflicting advice about a similar conservation transaction, I finally tried it out of desperation. Got connected to an IRS representative in about 15 minutes when I'd previously given up after being on hold for over an hour. The agent was actually quite helpful regarding the procedural aspects of documenting a bargain sale. They confirmed I needed Form 8283 with a qualified appraisal and pointed me to specific IRS publications that address bargain sales. While they couldn't give me tax planning advice, they did clarify how to properly document the transaction which was crucial. Even more valuable - they noted my transaction in my account so there's a record of me seeking clarification if there are ever questions later. That alone was worth it for such a complex transaction.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
I think there's something everyone is missing here. If you've already taken a deduction for the conservation easement years ago, that might affect the charitable deduction you can take now. The IRS could view this as trying to "double dip" on the same decreased value. Have either of your CPAs mentioned anything about that? You should check if the original easement value has any impact on the current transaction.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•This is actually a common misconception. The prior conservation easement and the current bargain sale are completely separate transactions with separate charitable elements. The conservation easement deduction years ago was based on the reduction in property value at that time due to the development restrictions. The current appraised value of $1 million already takes into account those restrictions. The bargain sale charitable element is the difference between current fair market value and the amount received. As long as the current appraisal is accurate and reflects the property's value with the easement already in place, there's no double-dipping concern. This is well established in IRS guidance.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•Thanks for clarifying! That makes sense. So the key here is that the $1 million appraisal already factors in the reduced value from the easement, and now they're donating half of THAT value. I was thinking about it wrong.
0 coins
StarStrider
One thing nobody's mentioned - have you considered the character of the gain? If this was actively farmed land that you used in a trade or business and held for many years, it might qualify for Section 1231 treatment which could give you more favorable tax rates than regular capital gains.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•That's an interesting point! We have been leasing the land to local farmers for about 15 years. Would that count as being used in a trade or business even though we weren't doing the farming ourselves?
0 coins
StarStrider
•Yes, that generally counts! If you've been reporting the rental income on Schedule F or Schedule E, and taking appropriate deductions related to the farm operation, the IRS would typically view this as property used in a trade or business. Section 1231 gains are treated as long-term capital gains (eligible for the lower tax rates) but Section 1231 losses are treated as ordinary losses - it's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation that benefits taxpayers. Given your very low basis, this could make a significant difference in your tax liability on the gain portion.
0 coins
Molly Hansen
This is exactly the kind of complex transaction where having proper documentation and expert guidance is crucial. From what I've read here, it sounds like CPA firm B is on the right track with the bargain sale treatment. One additional consideration - make sure you coordinate the timing of this transaction carefully. Since you're dealing with both capital gains and a substantial charitable deduction, you'll want to consider whether it makes sense to complete this in the current tax year or defer to next year based on your overall tax situation and AGI limitations for charitable deductions. Also, given the complexity and the contradictory advice you've received, you might want to consider getting a third opinion from a tax professional who specifically specializes in conservation transactions and bargain sales. The nuances around basis allocation, documentation requirements, and potential Section 1231 treatment (as mentioned above) really benefit from specialized expertise. The stakes are high enough here that the cost of getting it right the first time will likely be much less than dealing with IRS issues later if something is handled incorrectly.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•This is really helpful advice! I'm definitely leaning toward getting that third opinion now, especially after reading about all the potential complications with Section 1231 treatment and the specific documentation requirements. One question - when you mention coordinating the timing, are you thinking about the AGI limitations on charitable deductions? We've had a pretty good year income-wise, so I'm wondering if the $500,000 charitable deduction might get limited and whether we'd need to carry some forward to future years anyway. Also, does anyone know roughly what percentage of AGI the limit is for this type of charitable contribution? I want to get a ballpark idea before we meet with the specialist.
0 coins