Received W2 and 1095-C from wife's previous employer for 2018 when she quit in 2017 - what should we do?
My wife left her job as a bartender at a popular restaurant chain on November 21, 2017. I remember the date clearly because it was the Tuesday before Thanksgiving and we had a big argument about her quitting right before the holiday rush. Fast forward to tax season, and we just received a W2 showing $650 in earnings for 2018, plus a 1095-C showing health insurance coverage options for January and February 2018. The 1095-C doesn't show she was actually covered (thank goodness since she's been on my employer's plan since we got married). When she called their HR department, they claimed it was leftover pay from her final shifts in 2017. But today she got an email from their payroll team saying her "last official day" was January 4, 2018, showing she supposedly earned $73 that day. This is absolutely impossible - she was with me at my parents' house in another state that entire week. I'm wondering if someone was using her employee number to log hours after she left (she mentioned this happened sometimes), or if the company is just really sloppy with their record-keeping. Either way, how do we handle this for our tax filing? Should we push back on the company to correct the W2? Is this even worth fighting over for $650? And why would they send a 1095-C for two months after she supposedly left - were they just slow to process her departure paperwork? Any advice would be appreciated before we file our taxes. This whole situation is giving me a headache!
19 comments


Diego Fisher
This is actually a pretty common issue with restaurant and retail jobs. The timing makes perfect sense - your wife quit in 2017, but her final paycheck wasn't processed until 2018, which means that income is officially 2018 income for tax purposes. When it comes to income taxes, what matters is when the money was actually paid to your wife, not when she earned it. This is called the "constructive receipt" rule. If she received her final paycheck in 2018 (even for work done in 2017), it counts as 2018 income. As for the discrepancy with the specific day worked (January 4th), that could simply be payroll coding the final check. Your wife should check her final pay stub to see exactly what period it covers. If someone else was actually using her employee number, that's a separate issue you'd need to address with the employer. Regarding the 1095-C for two months - employers typically continue health insurance eligibility for a short period after employment ends, especially if the termination happens near the end of a month. They may have kept her in the system as eligible through February for administrative reasons.
0 coins
Henrietta Beasley
•But if she didn't work that day at all like OP says, isn't that technically fraud? Should they still report this income on their taxes if she never actually earned it? Couldn't they get the employer to issue a corrected W2?
0 coins
Diego Fisher
•You're right to be concerned about potential fraud, but from the IRS perspective, if she received the money, she needs to report it regardless of how the employer coded it. Fighting this might be more trouble than it's worth for $650. The most straightforward approach would be to report the income as shown on the W2. If she truly believes someone else worked under her number, she should formally request (in writing) that the employer investigate and issue a corrected W2. However, this could potentially trigger an internal investigation at her former workplace that might affect former coworkers.
0 coins
Lincoln Ramiro
I dealt with almost this exact situation last year with my previous employer! I found that https://taxr.ai was super helpful for figuring out how to handle these weird payroll timing issues. I uploaded both my W2s and the explanation letter from my former employer, and they broke down exactly how to handle it on my return. The system even created a custom letter I could keep with my tax documents explaining the situation in case I ever got audited. Much better than the confusing advice I was getting from different people online. Basically, they confirmed I had to report the income exactly as shown on the W2 even though there was a discrepancy about when I actually worked.
0 coins
Faith Kingston
•How exactly does uploading these documents help? Wouldn't you still have to pay taxes on money you didn't earn? Did taxr.ai help you get a corrected W2 or something?
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•I'm a bit skeptical. How is some website going to resolve an issue with the actual employer? Did you still have to contact your former company or did this somehow fix everything without you having to deal with HR?
0 coins
Lincoln Ramiro
•The main benefit was getting clear documentation about how to handle the situation correctly. The system analyzed the dates on all my documents and explained exactly what was happening with the pay periods, which helped me understand why the W2 was showing what it did. No, they don't contact your employer for you - you'd still need to do that yourself if you want a corrected W2. But in my case, after understanding how payroll timing works with tax years, I realized the W2 was actually correct even though it seemed wrong initially. The documentation they provided would have been helpful if I ever got audited about the discrepancy.
0 coins
Emma Johnson
Just wanted to follow up - I checked out that taxr.ai site after my skeptical comment. Honestly, it was pretty helpful. I uploaded my documents from a similar situation (worked in December but paid in January), and it actually explained exactly why my W2 showed what it did and how the pay periods work across tax years. The explanation made it clear I didn't need to get a corrected W2 after all, which saved me from several more frustrating calls with my old company's HR department. They also gave me proper documentation to keep with my tax records explaining the situation, which gave me peace of mind for potential future audits.
0 coins
Liam Brown
After reading through your situation, I think you need to speak directly with the IRS to sort this out properly. I tried calling them for a similar payroll issue last year and it was IMPOSSIBLE to get through. I spent hours on hold only to get disconnected repeatedly. Then I found this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that actually got me connected to a real IRS agent in about 20 minutes instead of waiting for hours. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. The agent I spoke with explained exactly how to handle discrepancies between work dates and pay dates on tax documents, and helped me understand what documentation I needed to keep.
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
•Wait, how does this actually work? The IRS phone lines are notoriously awful. Are you saying this service somehow jumps the queue? That seems too good to be true.
0 coins
Noah Lee
•Sounds like a scam to me. I've heard of people waiting 3+ hours to talk to the IRS. No way some random website can magically get you through faster than everyone else.
0 coins
Liam Brown
•It uses a technology that continuously redials and navigates the IRS phone tree for you until it gets through to an agent. When an agent is reached, it calls you and connects you. It's not cutting any lines - it's just automating the frustrating process of calling, getting disconnected, and calling again. No, it's not a scam. I was skeptical too until I tried it. The difference is you don't have to personally sit on hold for hours - their system does the waiting for you and calls you when an actual human agent is on the line. I was honestly surprised it worked so well.
0 coins
Noah Lee
OK I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I was still fighting with my own tax issue and getting nowhere with the IRS phones. I decided to try it out of desperation and... it actually worked exactly as advertised. I got connected to an IRS agent in about 35 minutes (which is LIGHT YEARS faster than my previous attempts). The agent was able to pull up my records and confirm how I should handle a similar situation with income reported in the wrong tax year. They even gave me specific instructions on what documentation to keep with my return. Definitely worth it for the time saved and the stress reduction!
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
Something similar happened to my husband. His company had a policy where final paychecks are held for two weeks after the last day to make sure all equipment is returned and accounts are closed properly. His last day was Dec 27, 2023 but his final check came Jan 10, 2024. His employer explained that for tax purposes, income is counted in the year it's paid, not necessarily when it's earned. For the 1095-C, most companies continue benefits until the end of the month when you terminate, and sometimes offer COBRA for a month or two after. That's probably why your wife got the form showing coverage availability for January and February.
0 coins
Evelyn Kim
•Thanks for sharing your experience. Did your husband just report it as 2024 income then? Did he have to provide any special documentation with your tax return to explain the situation? I'm mostly concerned about the day they're claiming she worked when she definitely didn't.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
•Yes, he reported it as 2024 income since that's when the payment was received. We didn't need any special documentation - we just filed according to what was on the W2. For your specific concern about the day they claimed she worked when she didn't - that's trickier. If it's just a clerical error in how they coded the final payment, it probably doesn't matter for tax purposes. But if you're concerned someone else was using her employee number, that's worth addressing with the employer directly. Ask for detailed records of that specific day they claim she worked.
0 coins
Isabella Martin
I'm an accountant and see this issue constantly. Here's what's happening: 1) The $650 was probably her final paycheck from 2017 work, but it was issued in 2018, making it 2018 income for tax purposes. 2) The specific date they're claiming she worked in January is likely just their payroll system requiring an "event date" to process a payment, and someone just picked that date. 3) The 1095-C for two months is standard - companies typically extend COBRA eligibility for a period after termination. My advice: Just report the W2 as is on your 2018 taxes. The amount is small enough that trying to get a corrected W2 will be more hassle than it's worth. If you're really concerned about the January date showing work she didn't do, request your wife's complete time records from 2017-2018 to see what's actually recorded.
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
•is there any downside to just reporting it as is? like could this cause problems with unemployment benefits or something if they think she was employed longer?
0 coins
Isabella Martin
•Great question. There could potentially be an impact on unemployment benefits if she filed for them immediately after leaving in December 2017. If the system shows she was employed into January 2018, that might have delayed eligibility. However, if she didn't file for unemployment, or if that period has already passed without issues, then there's likely no downside to reporting it as is. Social Security credits and other benefits are based on total annual income, not the specific timing of employment within the year.
0 coins