K-1 for Profits Interest Units shows way higher capital gains than my distribution - what's going on?
So I got awarded some PIUs (Profits Interest Units) at my workplace about 3 years ago. Last year my company decided to split off their federal division and sell it. This triggered what they called a "liquidity event" and I got a payout of around $27k based on the profits from that sale. In January, I received an estimated K-1 form that showed capital gains matching my payout amount, which made perfect sense. The company didn't withhold any taxes from this distribution by the way. But then in April, I got the final K-1 and I'm completely shocked - it's showing capital gains that are nearly TRIPLE what I actually received in cash! Like $75k in capital gains when I only got $27k in my bank account. Has anyone dealt with this before? I'm freaking out because I obviously don't have enough set aside to pay taxes on phantom gains I never received! How can they report I made three times what they actually paid me?
18 comments


Emma Davis
This is actually a common issue with Profits Interest Units (PIUs) that many people don't anticipate. What's likely happening is that your K-1 is reporting your proportional share of the total capital gains from the sale transaction, not just the cash distribution you received. When a company sells off a division, the total sale value often includes non-cash considerations like debt assumption, future earnouts, or retained equity. As a PIU holder, you're typically entitled to a percentage of the total transaction value, but the actual cash distributed immediately might be only a portion of that total value. The remaining difference between your reported gain and your cash distribution could be: 1. Held in escrow to cover potential future claims 2. Part of an earnout structure based on future performance 3. Distributed as equity in the new entity rather than cash 4. Used to pay transaction expenses before distribution You should contact your company's finance department immediately to get a detailed explanation of the discrepancy. They should provide documentation showing how they calculated both your total capital gain and your cash distribution amount.
0 coins
Javier Torres
•Thanks for the detailed explanation. I'm still confused though - if I'm being taxed on the full capital gain amount, shouldn't I have received that full amount? Or at least have some documentation showing where the rest of "my money" went? Also, how am I supposed to pay taxes on money I never received? Is there any way to only pay taxes on the actual cash distribution?
0 coins
Emma Davis
•You're absolutely right to be concerned about paying taxes on money you haven't received yet. Unfortunately, with partnership interests (which is how PIUs are typically structured), you're generally taxed on your allocated share of income/gains regardless of whether distributions were made. For the documentation question, your company should absolutely provide a reconciliation showing the full transaction value and how your reported gain was calculated. They should also explain the timing and conditions for any additional distributions you might receive in the future. Regarding tax payment on undistributed gains, you do have a few potential options: 1) Request a tax distribution from the partnership specifically to cover the tax liability, 2) Confirm whether future distributions related to this same transaction would be tax-free since you've already recognized the gain, or 3) See if the gain can be reported under an installment method if future payments are conditional.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
I went through something similar with my PIUs last year and found that taxr.ai was incredibly helpful sorting through this mess. I was getting completely different answers from my company's HR department versus what the K-1 showed. I uploaded my K-1, employee equity documents and the distribution statements to https://taxr.ai and their system analyzed everything to show me exactly what was happening with the discrepancy. Turns out in my case, a portion of my gains were being held in escrow for 18 months, but I was still required to pay taxes on that amount now. The platform also showed me exactly how to report this correctly on my taxes and what documentation I needed to request from my company to substantiate everything in case of an audit. Saved me a ton of headaches when dealing with something most accountants don't handle very often.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•How does this service actually work? Do they connect you with a tax professional or is it all automated? I'm in a similar situation but with RSUs instead of PIUs and I'm completely lost with how to handle it on my return.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•I'm skeptical about online services for something this complex. Did they actually help reduce the tax amount you owed or just explain why you were getting screwed? Because understanding why I'm paying taxes on money I didn't receive doesn't actually solve the problem...
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
•The service works by using AI to analyze your tax documents and compare them against the tax code and similar situations. It identified the specific sections of my equity agreement that explained the escrow situation and pointed out a provision for tax distributions I didn't know about. For your question about reducing taxes, they didn't magically eliminate my tax liability, but they did identify that about 15% of the reported gain qualified for installment sale treatment in my specific situation, which allowed me to defer some of the tax. They also showed me exactly what documentation I needed to request from my company to properly substantiate everything.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
Just wanted to follow up - I was the skeptical one about taxr.ai above, but I decided to try it out of desperation. It was actually super helpful! I uploaded my documents and the system immediately identified that my company had incorrectly calculated my basis in the PIUs. After following their recommendations and contacting my company with specific language they suggested, my finance department acknowledged the error and issued a corrected K-1 that reduced my capital gains by about $18K. The system also showed me exactly which sections of my equity agreement to reference when talking to the company. Would have NEVER figured this out on my own since the error was buried in how they calculated my initial grant value. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with this PIU nightmare.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
After dealing with a similar issue and spending weeks trying to get through to the IRS for guidance, I finally discovered Claimyr. I used https://claimyr.com to get through to the IRS Partnership department in about 15 minutes instead of waiting for hours or getting disconnected. The IRS agent was able to clarify that I needed to request specific documentation from the partnership (Form 8275 and a supplemental statement) to properly explain the discrepancy between my distributions and my reported K-1 gains. You can see how the service works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c They basically call the IRS for you and then connect you once they've navigated through all the hold times and automated systems. Saved me literal hours of waiting on hold. The IRS partnership specialist I talked to actually knew exactly what was happening with my PIUs situation and walked me through the proper reporting.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
•How long did it actually take to get connected? Every time I've called the IRS myself I've waited 2+ hours only to be told they can't help with partnership questions and I need to call a different number.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
•This seems too good to be true. You're saying they can just magically get you to the front of the IRS phone queue? I'm guessing they charge a fortune for this "service" and you're probably just better off hiring a CPA who can figure this out without needing to call the IRS.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•It took about 15 minutes to get connected to an IRS specialist who handles partnership questions. The system keeps trying multiple IRS numbers simultaneously until it gets through, then it calls you to make the connection. You're right to be skeptical, but it's not about getting to the "front of the queue" - they're just constantly redialing and navigating the phone tree until they get through. I spent 3 separate days trying to call myself and kept getting disconnected after waiting 1-2 hours each time. For me, paying for the service was worth it because I needed answers before the filing deadline, and the advice I got saved me thousands in improper tax payments.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
Alright, I need to eat some humble pie here. After being skeptical about Claimyr in my previous comment, I tried it this morning out of desperation since my tax filing deadline is next week. It actually worked exactly as advertised - I got connected to an IRS partnership specialist in about 20 minutes. The agent confirmed that I should only be reporting my economic gain (the actual cash received) on my personal return if the partnership is using the installment method for the sale, and she explained exactly which box on the K-1 to look at to confirm this. Turns out my company had checked box 6c on my K-1 indicating installment sale, but I had completely missed its significance. This means I only need to report the actual distribution I received this year, and I'll report the rest when (if) I actually receive those payments in the future. Would have been paying thousands in unnecessary taxes without this clarification!
0 coins
AstroAce
I'm a corporate accountant (not a tax professional) and see this issue frequently from the company side. One thing to check is whether your company is treating this as an "installment sale" under section 453 of the tax code. If it is an installment sale, the K-1 should have box 6c checked, and there should be an attached statement explaining the installment aspects. This means you'd only recognize gain as you receive the payments, instead of all at once. However, many companies don't properly communicate this to their PIU holders. Also, check if any portion of your PIU payment went to recapture previously allocated losses - those wouldn't technically be distributions but would reduce your capital gain amount.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Would the installment sale thing be obvious on the K-1? Mine has so many attached statements and codes that I can barely make sense of it. Is there a specific form or attachment I should be looking for?
0 coins
AstroAce
•The installment sale election would be indicated on your K-1 with box 6c checked (it's labeled "Net section 1231 gain"). Then there should be an attached statement with "Form 6252" or "Installment Sale" in the title that breaks down the gross profit percentage. If your K-1 doesn't have this, ask your company specifically whether they're reporting the transaction as an installment sale. If they're not, you unfortunately will have to recognize the full gain in the current year. In that case, you should request a "tax distribution" to cover the taxes on income you haven't actually received yet - most partnership agreements have provisions for this.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
Has anyone actually gone through a full audit with PIU issues? I'm in a similar situation but also received a CP2000 notice from the IRS questioning the gains reported on my return vs what was on my K-1. I'm worried the IRS won't understand these complex PIU structures.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•I went through an audit last year because of exactly this situation. The key was having detailed documentation from the company explaining exactly how they calculated the reported gain and why the distribution was lower. The IRS actually understood the concept pretty well once I provided the paperwork. Make sure you get: 1) The original PIU agreement, 2) Documentation of the sale transaction, 3) Calculation of your proportional interest, and 4) Explanation of why distributions differed from allocated gain. With those four things, my audit was resolved in my favor.
0 coins