< Back to IRS

Kristin Frank

K-1 Conflicting Advice - Do I Report Line 1 or Line 19 for Royalty Partnership?

I'm getting totally different answers from two people I trust completely and I don't know who to believe. My CPA who does my taxes says one thing, but my business partner (who I've trusted with ALL financial decisions for like 12 years) swears my CPA is reporting way too much income. Here's the deal - I get a K-1 from this business that sold its assets back in 2019. It only exists now to collect and distribute royalties to the owners. I own 11.53% of the partnership, but I only get 3.060% of the royalties because we used this formula to convert another owner's IRA loan into a percentage on the cap table for partner distributions. So my K-1 shows $24,863 on Line 1 (Ordinary business income) but Line 19A Distributions only shows $6,851. I didn't have any expenses for this business in 2022 and got a check for exactly $6,850.74 in February 2022. My question is: Do I need to report the $24,863 on Schedule E or am I only supposed to report the actual money I received which was $6,851? What I really want to know is if I should hire a different CPA to look at my 2022 taxes to see if I need to file an amended return. This is driving me crazy! Thanks for any help you can give me!

Micah Trail

•

You need to report the amount on Line 1 ($24,863) on your Schedule E. The K-1 is reporting your share of the partnership's income based on your ownership percentage (11.53%), regardless of how much was actually distributed to you. The distribution amount on Line 19 ($6,851) represents what you actually received, but partnerships are "pass-through" entities, meaning you pay tax on your share of earnings whether they're distributed or not. The difference between your share of income and your distribution is likely being retained by the partnership for various reasons.

0 coins

Kristin Frank

•

But if my ownership percentage is 11.53%, why am I only getting 3.06% of the distributions? That's what confuses me. Shouldn't my reported income match what I actually received since this partnership doesn't really operate anymore except to distribute royalties?

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

Your ownership percentage (11.53%) determines your share of the partnership's profits and losses reported on Line 1. This is what you're taxed on regardless of distributions. The distribution percentage (3.06%) is based on a special allocation formula you mentioned involving an IRA loan conversion. Partnership agreements can legally establish different allocation methods for distributions versus profit sharing. So while you're responsible for 11.53% of the profit for tax purposes, the agreement dictates you only receive 3.06% of the distributions. This is actually fairly common in complex partnership structures.

0 coins

Nia Watson

•

After struggling with a similar K-1 situation last year, I found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it was a game-changer. I uploaded my partnership K-1 and it immediately identified that I needed to report Line 1 amount on Schedule E but also showed how the distributions on Line 19 affect basis calculations. The tool explained that partnerships often have different allocation percentages for profits versus distributions - exactly like your situation. The algorithm analyzed my entire K-1 and showed me exactly where each number needed to go on my return. Saved me from making a costly mistake!

0 coins

That sounds useful but how does it handle situations with multiple K-1s? I get K-1s from three different partnerships plus an S-corp and trying to track all the basis calculations makes my head spin.

0 coins

I'm skeptical. Does it actually give advice specific to your situation or just generic explanations? Because K-1s can get complicated fast and I've found most tools just give basics anyone could Google.

0 coins

Nia Watson

•

It handles multiple K-1s seamlessly - you can upload all of them and it processes each one individually while also showing how they interact on your return. It even flags potential issues between them that might trigger IRS scrutiny. The advice is definitely situation-specific, not generic. It analyzes the actual numbers on your forms and explains how they apply to your specific scenario, including special allocations and basis calculations. It's like having a partnership tax specialist looking over your documents but without the $300/hour fee.

0 coins

I was skeptical about taxr.ai but decided to try it with my complicated K-1 situation. Wow - what a difference! It identified that my CPA had been incorrectly reporting my rental real estate income from a partnership for YEARS. The tool showed exactly how my special allocation percentages affected my tax liability and explained why Line 1 reporting is mandatory regardless of distributions. The analysis even showed how the retained earnings affected my basis calculations, which my previous accountant had never properly tracked. Ended up filing amended returns for the last three years and got back nearly $8,700! Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with partnership K-1 questions.

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

•

If your CPA isn't explaining things clearly, you might want to talk directly with the IRS. I spent weeks trying to get through on their helpline about a similar K-1 issue last year - it was impossible. Then I found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and watched their demo (https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c). They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes! The agent confirmed I needed to report Line 1 from my K-1 on Schedule E regardless of distributions received and explained exactly how the partnership's special allocations work for tax purposes. This was after my own CPA gave me incorrect advice that would have resulted in underreporting income. Getting direct confirmation from the IRS gave me peace of mind.

0 coins

Wait how does this actually work? Do they just call the IRS for you? I don't get it. Why can't I just call myself?

0 coins

Cedric Chung

•

Yeah right. Nobody gets through to the IRS in 15 minutes. I've spent literal DAYS on hold with them. This sounds like a scam to get people's money who are desperate for tax help.

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

•

They don't call for you - they navigate the IRS phone system and secure your place in line, then call you when they're about to connect with an agent. It works because they've figured out the optimal times to call and how to navigate the phone tree efficiently. You absolutely can call yourself, but the average wait time is over 2 hours (if you get through at all). Most people get disconnected multiple times before ever reaching a human. With Claimyr, I was doing other work and just got a call when my spot came up. Totally understand the skepticism - I felt the same way until I tried it.

0 coins

Cedric Chung

•

I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting that skeptical comment, I was so frustrated with my own K-1 situation that I decided to try it anyway. I've literally never gotten through to the IRS after dozens of attempts, but with them I was talking to an actual IRS tax specialist within 20 minutes. The agent confirmed exactly what others here have said - Line 1 of the K-1 is what goes on Schedule E regardless of distributions. He explained that partnerships can have different allocation percentages for profits vs distributions based on the partnership agreement. Getting this straight from an official source saved me from filing incorrectly. I hate admitting I was wrong, but this service actually delivered.

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

I'm a retired accountant (not giving professional advice here) but wanted to mention that the partnership agreement is the key document here. It should specifically outline how profits, losses, and distributions are allocated among partners. If the agreement states you get 11.53% of profits but only 3.06% of distributions, then your CPA is correct. The tax law requires you to report your share of the partnership's income regardless of distributions. This is why partnerships can sometimes be tax-inefficient - you can end up paying tax on "phantom income" you never received in cash.

0 coins

Would it be better tax-wise to restructure as an S-Corp instead of a partnership for situations like this? I've heard S-Corps can be more tax efficient but don't know the details.

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

S-Corps can provide certain advantages, particularly regarding self-employment taxes, but they wouldn't necessarily solve this specific issue of disproportionate allocations. S-Corps must generally allocate profits proportionally based on share ownership, while partnerships have much more flexibility to create special allocations like what the OP is experiencing. If the goal is to have different percentage allocations for different purposes, a partnership structure actually offers more options. The downside is exactly what we're seeing here - partners can end up paying tax on income they haven't received.

0 coins

PaulineW

•

Just wondering... did you ever ask the partnership itself for an explanation? When I was in a similar situation, I emailed our partnership's accountant directly and they sent me a detailed breakdown of how my K-1 was calculated and why the distributions were different from my share of income. Sometimes going directly to the source is the fastest way to understand what's happening.

0 coins

This is the best advice here. The K-1 preparer should be able to explain exactly why there's a discrepancy between ownership percentage and distribution percentage. They might even have a calculation worksheet they can share.

0 coins

Kristin Frank

•

That's a really good suggestion! I didn't think to contact the partnership accountant directly. I've been trying to figure this out through my business partner but maybe I should just go straight to the source. I'll reach out to them tomorrow and see if they can provide a calculation worksheet or explanation.

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

Your CPA is correct - you need to report the $24,863 from Line 1 on your Schedule E. This is a classic partnership taxation issue where your share of profits (11.53%) differs from your distribution percentage (3.06%). The key thing to understand is that partnerships are "pass-through" entities, meaning you're taxed on your allocated share of the partnership's income whether you receive it in cash or not. The partnership agreement clearly established different percentages for profit allocation versus distributions (likely due to that IRA loan conversion you mentioned). Think of it this way: the partnership earned income, and 11.53% of that income is legally "yours" for tax purposes even though the distribution formula gives you a smaller cash payout. The $17,012 difference between your taxable income and distribution is essentially being retained by the partnership, increasing your basis in the partnership. This might feel unfair since you're paying tax on money you didn't receive, but it's completely legal and common in partnership structures with special allocations. Your business partner may not fully understand the tax implications of the partnership agreement that was set up. I'd stick with your CPA's advice on this one - reporting only the distribution amount would likely trigger IRS issues down the road.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today