Is the IRS right about taxing me for automatic ORCL acquisition of CERN stocks? (CP2000 Notice Question)
So I just got a CP2000 notice in the mail and I'm confused about what's going on. A while back I worked for a company with the ticker CERN and participated in their employee stock purchase plan that automatically bought CERN shares from a portion of my paycheck (all managed through Morgan Stanley). Well, ORCL acquired CERN last year and as part of that acquisition, all my CERN shares were automatically converted to ORCL shares. I didn't do anything - no selling, no buying, nothing manual at all. Morgan Stanley just converted everything automatically as part of the acquisition. Now the IRS sent me this CP2000 notice saying I owe taxes on this conversion? It's treating the whole thing like I sold all my CERN shares and then bought ORCL shares, but that's not what happened at all. It was just an automatic conversion because of the acquisition. Has anyone dealt with something similar? Am I actually supposed to pay taxes on this even though I didn't actually sell anything? The CP2000 is showing a pretty significant amount due and I'm not sure if I should dispute this or not.
18 comments


Zara Malik
This is actually a common misunderstanding with stock acquisitions. When one company acquires another and shares are converted, it's considered a "taxable event" even though you didn't manually sell anything. It's treated as if you sold your CERN shares at the acquisition price and then immediately purchased ORCL shares. The IRS system automatically flags these transactions when they receive the 1099-B from your broker (Morgan Stanley). The CP2000 notice is correct in principle, but you should verify that the cost basis for your original CERN shares is accurately reflected. If the cost basis is missing or incorrect, you'll be taxed on the full value rather than just the gains. You should check your Morgan Stanley statements to confirm your original purchase price for the CERN shares, then compare that with what's reported on the CP2000. You may need to file a response with corrected information if your cost basis wasn't properly reported.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
•Thanks for the explanation. That seems weird though - I didn't choose to sell anything, ORCL just acquired the company. So even though it was completely out of my control, I still have to pay taxes on it? My cost basis was definitely reported correctly from what I can tell. Follow up question: does this mean I now have a new cost basis for my ORCL shares equal to whatever they were valued at during the acquisition?
0 coins
Zara Malik
•Yes, unfortunately the IRS doesn't distinguish between voluntary and involuntary sales in most cases. When the acquisition happened, it legally counted as a sale of your CERN shares at that acquisition price, even though you had no choice in the matter. This is standard practice for taxable stock acquisitions. Yes, your new cost basis for the ORCL shares is indeed the value of those shares on the date of the acquisition. This is important to track because when you eventually sell these ORCL shares, you'll only pay tax on any gains beyond this new acquisition-date basis. Make sure to keep documentation of this transaction for your future tax filings.
0 coins
Luca Greco
I went through something very similar with a merger between tech companies last year. After weeks of stressing and trying to make sense of everything, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which was incredibly helpful for dealing with my CP2000 notice. I uploaded my Morgan Stanley statements and the CP2000 notice, and their system analyzed everything to determine if I had grounds to dispute the notice. Turns out I did have a partial case - some of my shares had the wrong cost basis. The tool helped me draft a response with the correct calculations and explained exactly what documentation I needed to attach. What was really helpful was that it explained the tax implications in plain English and showed me what parts of the CP2000 were correct vs. what parts I could legitimately dispute. Saved me a ton of stress and probably some money too!
0 coins
Nia Thompson
•How long did it take to get an answer from the tool? I got a similar notice but for a different acquisition situation and I'm on a tight timeline to respond.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
•Is it really worth using a service for this? Couldn't you just call the IRS directly? I'm always skeptical about these tax services that pop up online.
0 coins
Luca Greco
•The analysis was completed within a couple hours of uploading my documents. They have some automated processing that happens quickly, and then you get a more detailed report shortly after. Definitely fast enough to meet IRS response deadlines which are usually 30 days. I tried calling the IRS directly first and spent literally 3+ hours on hold before giving up. The automated system they have is also really confusing. With taxr.ai, I didn't have to explain my situation to different IRS reps or worry about getting inconsistent answers. Instead, I got clear documentation I could use for my response.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
Just wanted to update - I ended up using taxr.ai after seeing the recommendation here and wow, it actually worked! I was in the same situation with a company acquisition (different companies but same concept). My CP2000 was claiming I owed almost $4,300 in taxes on the stock conversion. The tool helped me identify that while the acquisition was indeed taxable, the IRS had missed my cost basis completely on several lots of shares. I submitted the response they helped me draft along with my proof of purchase history, and just got a revised notice reducing what I owe to only $870! The step-by-step guidance made a huge difference since I would have had no idea how to properly dispute this otherwise. Definitely recommend if anyone else gets hit with these acquisition-related notices.
0 coins
Aisha Hussain
If you're having trouble getting through to the IRS to discuss your CP2000 notice, you might want to try Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I was in a similar situation with a stock acquisition tax issue and needed to talk to a real person at the IRS, but kept hitting the "call volume too high" message. I was super frustrated until I found their service through a YouTube video (https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c). They basically hold your place in the IRS phone queue and call you when an agent is about to pick up. Saved me from having to redial the IRS dozens of times or sit on hold for hours. When I finally got through to an IRS representative, they confirmed that stock acquisitions are indeed taxable events, but they helped me understand exactly what documentation I needed to provide to ensure my cost basis was correctly calculated.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
•Wait, how does this actually work? Do they have some special access to the IRS phone systems or something?
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
•This sounds sketchy as hell. You're telling me some random service can somehow magically get through the IRS phone system when millions of Americans can't? And I'm supposed to trust them with my personal info? Yeah right.
0 coins
Aisha Hussain
•They don't have special access - they use automated systems to continually dial and navigate the IRS phone tree until they get through. When a representative is about to answer, they connect you. It's basically doing what you'd be doing manually, but their system handles the frustrating part. I was skeptical too at first. But they don't actually need any sensitive personal information to do this - they're just getting you past the hold queue. You handle the actual conversation with the IRS agent directly. I was desperate after trying to get through for three days straight with no luck, and this literally saved me hours of frustration.
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting that skeptical comment, I was still desperate to talk to someone at the IRS about my CP2000 notice for a different stock conversion situation, so I reluctantly gave it a try. I still can't believe it actually worked. After trying to call the IRS directly for two weeks with no success, Claimyr got me through to an agent in about 35 minutes. I didn't have to sit by my phone either - they texted me when they were getting close and then called when an agent was about to pick up. The IRS agent was able to pull up my CP2000 notice and confirmed I could submit documentation showing my correct cost basis for the shares. She even gave me a direct fax number (yes, apparently fax is still a thing) to send my supporting documents and told me what to write on the cover sheet to make sure it got to the right department. This would have been impossible to figure out without actually speaking to someone.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
Just to add a bit more technical detail to this discussion - when ORCL acquired CERN, if it was a taxable acquisition (which it sounds like it was), you'll need to report it on Schedule D and Form 8949 with code M. The important thing is to track your "realized gain" which is the difference between your original purchase price of the CERN shares and their value at the time of conversion to ORCL. Your Morgan Stanley statements should have all this information, including the date of acquisition and conversion values. Also, check if there was any cash in lieu of fractional shares - that's also taxable and sometimes reported separately.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
•Thanks for mentioning the code M thing - I had no idea about that. Is that something I need to include in my response to the CP2000, or is that only relevant for filing my tax return?
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•For responding to the CP2000 notice, you don't necessarily need to reference code M specifically, but it's helpful to understand that's how it should have been reported. What's most important for your CP2000 response is to clearly show your original cost basis for the CERN shares and the conversion value. If you're disputing the amount on the CP2000, you'll want to complete the response form they provided, attach your supporting documentation from Morgan Stanley showing your purchase history and the conversion details, and provide a clear explanation of why you believe the notice amount is incorrect. If you're not disputing the amount and just paying it, you can simply follow the payment instructions.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
One thing nobody has mentioned yet - check if the ORCL/CERN acquisition could potentially qualify as a tax-free reorganization under section 368 of the tax code. While most acquisitions are taxable events, some qualify for tax-deferred treatment. Not sure about ORCL/CERN specifically, but the acquiring company usually sends documentation stating whether it's taxable or tax-free. Might be worth checking your emails or Morgan Stanley account for any acquisition-related documents.
0 coins
Carmen Ruiz
•This is really good advice. I went through a similar situation with Adobe acquiring another company and initially got a CP2000. After digging through all the paperwork, I found documentation that it qualified as a tax-free reorganization. Saved me thousands in unexpected taxes!
0 coins