How to handle repayment of overpaid wages in different tax years?
So I'm in a frustrating situation with my employer and need some tax advice. Back in 2023, my company accidentally overpaid me for several pay periods. When we discovered the issue, I agreed to repay the amount through installment payments throughout 2024. The payroll manager specifically told me "don't worry, as you repay the wages, we'll reduce your taxable income accordingly." Well, guess what? That didn't happen! I just got my final payment confirmation and realized they've done absolutely nothing to adjust my taxable wages. Since the overpayment was in 2023 and the repayments were in 2024, I'm now told it's completely on me to figure out the tax implications. I checked Publication 525 which seems to address this situation, but if I'm reading it correctly, I can't take a deduction because my repayment amount is under $3,000 (it's about $2,400 total). Is this actually right? Am I seriously going to be taxed on money I had to give back with no way to recover those taxes? This seems incredibly unfair - paying taxes on income I ultimately didn't get to keep. Any help would be greatly appreciated because my HR department has been utterly useless.
33 comments


Zara Shah
You've correctly identified the issue - this falls under what's called "claim of right" doctrine in tax law. Unfortunately, the tax code does create a threshold for how these repayments are handled. For repayments under $3,000, they're treated as miscellaneous itemized deductions, which were suspended under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act through 2025. This means you can't currently deduct these repayments if they're under that $3,000 threshold. For repayments over $3,000, you could use either a deduction or a tax credit calculation method (whichever benefits you more). Your employer should have handled this differently. Ideally, if you repay wages in the same year you received them, the employer simply reduces your W-2 wages. When repayment happens in a different year, they should issue a corrected W-2 for the year of overpayment or provide documentation of the repayment.
0 coins
Luca Bianchi
•Wait, so does this mean the IRS will effectively tax someone twice if they have to repay wages under $3k? Once when receiving the incorrect pay and again by not allowing any deduction when they repay it? How is this possibly fair?
0 coins
Zara Shah
•Yes, unfortunately that's exactly what it means for repayments under $3,000 that cross tax years. It's one of those quirks in the tax code that creates an unfair situation. Before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, you could potentially deduct these amounts as miscellaneous itemized deductions (subject to the 2% AGI floor), but even that limited relief was suspended through 2025.
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
This actually happened to me last year with an overpayment situation! I went absolutely crazy trying to figure it out until I found a service called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that helped me understand my options. They analyzed my paystubs and repayment documentation and explained exactly what I could and couldn't claim. The problem is definitely that $3,000 threshold in Pub 525, but they showed me how to properly document everything and maximize what I could claim. They even helped me draft a letter to my HR department that got them to provide proper documentation of the repayment that I could use with my tax filing.
0 coins
Nia Harris
•Does this taxr.ai thing just give advice or do they actually help you file? I'm in almost the exact same situation but my overpayment was about $3,200 so I think I might qualify for the deduction.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
•I'm skeptical about these online services... how much does it cost? And are they actually tax professionals or just some algorithm?
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
•They don't file your taxes for you - they analyze your tax documents and payroll records to help identify the correct way to handle specific situations like this. They give you detailed guidance you can use with whatever tax filing method you normally use. Their service uses both AI to analyze the documents and tax professionals who review the results. The nice thing was they spotted that my employer had actually miscalculated the overpayment amount, which I wouldn't have caught on my own.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
I have to admit I was wrong about taxr.ai! After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it with my own situation (similar wage repayment issue but with a former employer). I uploaded my documents and within hours got a detailed analysis showing exactly how to report everything. They found that my situation qualified for a different treatment because part of my repayment was actually for business expenses that were reimbursed incorrectly. This changed how I could report it on my taxes! Saved me from making a costly mistake and potentially getting flagged for an audit. Really glad I gave it a shot instead of just trying to figure it out on my own.
0 coins
Aisha Ali
If you need to contact the IRS to get clarity on this, I HIGHLY recommend using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I spent literally 3 weeks trying to reach someone at the IRS about a similar wage repayment issue, constantly getting disconnected or waiting for hours. I was about to give up when a coworker told me about this service. They got me a callback from the IRS in less than 24 hours! You can actually see how it works in their demo video here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I finally spoke with confirmed the $3,000 threshold issue but also told me about documentation I could request from my employer that would help prove my case if I got audited. Worth every penny for the time saved and getting an actual resolution.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•How does this actually work? I don't understand how a third party service could get the IRS to call you when nobody can get through on their own.
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
•This sounds like complete BS. The IRS doesn't prioritize calls from some random company. You probably just got lucky with timing or something.
0 coins
Aisha Ali
•It's not about priority - they use an automated system that continuously redials and navigates the IRS phone tree until it secures a spot in the callback queue. Then they transfer that callback to you when the IRS is ready to speak to someone. They don't actually talk to the IRS at all - they just handle the painful waiting and menu navigation part. Once you're connected, it's a direct conversation between you and the IRS agent, exactly like if you had called yourself (except without the hours of waiting and frustration).
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
Ok I need to publicly admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After dismissing it as BS, I was still desperate to talk to someone at the IRS about my wage repayment issue, so I tried it anyway. The service actually worked exactly as advertised. I got a call from an IRS representative the next morning! The agent I spoke with explained that while I couldn't deduct my repayment (also under $3k), I should keep documentation from my employer confirming the repayment amount and date for my records. The agent also suggested I talk to my employer about issuing a corrected W-2 for the original tax year. The call saved me from making mistakes on my return AND gave me leverage to go back to my HR department with specific requests. Never been so happy to be wrong about something!
0 coins
StarSurfer
Another option worth exploring is asking your employer to adjust your W-2 for the year the wages were originally paid. While they're not required to do this for different-year repayments, some employers will issue a corrected W-2 as a courtesy, especially if you explain the tax implications. I successfully got my company to do this by escalating to the head of payroll and referencing Revenue Ruling 79-311, which covers this specific situation. It took several conversations and a very polite but persistent approach.
0 coins
Sean O'Brien
•Has anyone actually successfully done this? My HR manager is insisting they can't adjust a prior year W-2 for repayments made in a different year, but I don't know if that's just them not wanting to deal with it.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•Yes, I successfully got this done, but it definitely depends on your company's payroll department and their willingness to help. Technically they're correct that they aren't required to adjust the prior year W-2 for repayments made in a different year. The approach that worked for me was explaining the tax impact (essentially being double-taxed) and appealing to their sense of fairness. I also mentioned that while not required, IRS guidance allows them to make this adjustment. Having the specific reference (Revenue Ruling 79-311) helped show I'd done my homework.
0 coins
Carmen Reyes
Has anyone tried claiming this on their state taxes? I know the federal deduction for amounts under $3k isn't available right now, but some states haven't adopted all the TCJA provisions and might still allow miscellaneous itemized deductions.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•Good point! I live in California and was able to deduct my wage repayment on my state return even though I couldn't on my federal. California didn't conform to all the TCJA changes. Saved me about $200 in state taxes at least.
0 coins
Logan Chiang
This is such a frustrating situation that unfortunately highlights a real gap in tax fairness. I went through something similar a few years ago and learned that the timing of when you discover and repay overpaid wages can make a huge difference in your tax outcomes. One thing I'd suggest is documenting everything meticulously - dates of original payments, dates of repayments, and any communications with your employer about the overpayment. Even though you can't deduct the repayment under $3k federally right now, you want to be prepared if the miscellaneous itemized deduction suspension gets lifted after 2025. Also, don't give up on getting your employer to issue corrected documentation. While they may not adjust the prior year W-2, they should at least provide you with a clear statement showing the repayment amounts and dates. This becomes crucial if you ever get audited and need to explain the situation to the IRS. The whole situation really shows how the tax code can create unfair outcomes for regular taxpayers dealing with employer payroll mistakes. You're essentially being penalized for your employer's error, which seems completely backwards from a fairness perspective.
0 coins
Paolo Longo
•Logan, you're absolutely right about the unfairness of this situation. It really does feel like being penalized for someone else's mistake. I appreciate your point about documenting everything - I've been keeping records but hadn't thought about the potential for the miscellaneous deduction suspension to be lifted after 2025. That's actually a good reason to stay organized even if there's no immediate benefit. The audit protection angle is something I hadn't considered either. If the IRS ever questions why I received wages that don't match what I actually kept, having that employer documentation could save a lot of headaches. Thanks for the practical advice - it helps to know others have navigated this successfully even if the system isn't fair.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation right now! My employer overpaid me about $1,800 in 2023, and I've been making repayments throughout 2024. Reading through this thread has been incredibly helpful - especially learning about the $3,000 threshold and how the TCJA suspended those miscellaneous deductions. What's really frustrating is that my payroll department initially told me the same thing yours did - that they'd adjust my taxable wages as I repaid. When I followed up after seeing no adjustments, they basically shrugged and said "that's a tax issue, not a payroll issue." The lack of accountability from employers when their mistakes create tax complications for employees is maddening. I'm definitely going to try the approach others mentioned about requesting proper documentation and asking about a corrected W-2. Even if they won't issue one, having that paper trail seems crucial. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - it's reassuring to know this isn't just happening to me and that there are at least some potential remedies to explore.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Mansour
•Omar, I feel your frustration completely! The "that's a tax issue, not a payroll issue" response is so typical and unhelpful. What's particularly annoying is that payroll departments often don't realize (or care) that their mistakes can cost employees hundreds of dollars in taxes with no recourse. I'd definitely push back on that response if you can. While they're technically correct that the tax implications aren't their direct responsibility, the overpayment absolutely was their mistake, and they should be willing to help mitigate the consequences. Even if they won't issue a corrected W-2, getting them to provide detailed documentation of the repayment schedule and amounts could be valuable. One thing that might help when talking to them is framing it as a documentation request rather than asking them to fix the tax issue. Something like "I need written confirmation of the overpayment amount and repayment schedule for my tax records" sounds more reasonable to HR than "fix this tax problem you created." Good luck!
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
This is exactly the kind of situation that makes me frustrated with our tax system - you're essentially being double-taxed because of your employer's mistake and the arbitrary $3,000 threshold. I've been following similar cases and it really does seem unfair that taxpayers bear the burden when employers mess up payroll across tax years. One thing I'd add to the great advice already given: consider filing a complaint with your state's Department of Labor or equivalent agency about your employer's handling of this situation. While they told you they'd adjust your taxable income as you repaid and then failed to do so, that could potentially be considered misleading information that caused you financial harm. Also, when you're documenting everything as others have suggested, make sure to include any written or email communications where your employer promised to handle the tax adjustments. Even if it doesn't help with the immediate tax issue, having that record could be useful if you decide to escalate the matter or if your state has any consumer protection remedies for employer payroll errors. The whole situation highlights why Congress really needs to revisit that $3,000 threshold - it's way too low given inflation and leaves too many people in exactly your position with no relief.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•Natasha raises an excellent point about the Department of Labor complaint option that I hadn't considered. If your employer explicitly promised to adjust your taxable wages during repayment and then failed to follow through, that could definitely constitute misleading information that caused financial harm. I'd also suggest checking if your state has any wage and hour laws that address employer errors and their remediation. Some states have specific provisions requiring employers to take reasonable steps to minimize the tax impact of their payroll mistakes on employees. It varies widely by state, but it's worth researching. The documentation angle is so crucial here - not just for tax purposes, but potentially for any labor complaint. If you have emails or written communications where they promised to handle the tax adjustments, that creates a clear record of their commitment and subsequent failure to follow through. Even verbal promises might be worth documenting with follow-up emails like "Just to confirm our conversation where you said..." You're absolutely right about that $3,000 threshold being too low. It probably made sense decades ago, but with wage levels today, $2,400 in overpaid wages isn't exactly a small amount for most working people to lose to double taxation.
0 coins
Millie Long
I'm really sorry you're dealing with this frustrating situation. Unfortunately, what you've discovered is correct - the tax code creates this unfair "double taxation" scenario for wage repayments under $3,000 that cross tax years. Here's what I'd recommend as your next steps: 1. **Document everything meticulously** - Keep records of all original overpayments, repayment dates/amounts, and any communications with your employer about promised tax adjustments. 2. **Request written documentation from your employer** - Even if they won't issue a corrected W-2, get them to provide a formal statement detailing the overpayment amount, repayment schedule, and confirmation that you've fully repaid the wages. Frame this as a documentation request rather than asking them to fix the tax issue. 3. **Don't give up on the corrected W-2 completely** - While not required, some employers will issue one as a courtesy. Reference Revenue Ruling 79-311 and escalate to someone higher in payroll/HR if needed. 4. **Check your state taxes** - Some states didn't conform to all TCJA provisions and may still allow miscellaneous itemized deductions for wage repayments. 5. **Keep records for the future** - The miscellaneous itemized deduction suspension expires after 2025, so your documentation could become valuable then. The situation absolutely stinks and highlights a real gap in tax fairness, but these steps might help minimize the impact and protect you if questions arise later.
0 coins
Jacob Smithson
•Millie's advice is really comprehensive and practical. I'd add one more thing to consider - if you do end up filing a Department of Labor complaint as Natasha suggested, having that formal documentation from your employer (per Millie's point #2) becomes even more important. It establishes a clear timeline and acknowledgment of their error. Also, regarding the state tax angle - it's worth checking even if your state generally conforms to federal tax law. Some states have their own provisions for wage repayments or allow deductions that the federal government doesn't. A quick call to your state's tax department or checking with a local tax preparer familiar with your state's rules could potentially save you some money. The whole situation really does highlight how employer payroll mistakes can have lasting financial consequences for employees, especially when they cross tax years. Hopefully some of these strategies will help you recover at least part of what you're losing to this unfair double taxation.
0 coins
Maxwell St. Laurent
This situation is unfortunately all too common and really exposes a fundamental unfairness in how the tax code handles employer payroll errors. As others have mentioned, you're caught in the "claim of right" doctrine trap where the timing of discovery and repayment creates a double taxation scenario for amounts under $3,000. I'd strongly recommend taking a multi-pronged approach here: **Immediate actions:** - Document every communication where your employer promised to adjust taxable wages during repayment - Request a formal letter from HR/payroll acknowledging the overpayment amount, repayment schedule, and dates - Push for a corrected W-2 by escalating beyond your immediate HR contact - sometimes higher-level executives are more willing to authorize this as a customer service gesture **Longer-term considerations:** - File your taxes correctly for now (unfortunately paying tax on the full amount), but keep meticulous records - Consider whether your state tax laws might provide relief that federal law doesn't - Document everything for potential future benefit when the miscellaneous itemized deduction suspension expires after 2025 **Potential escalation:** - If your employer explicitly promised tax adjustments and failed to deliver, consider filing a complaint with your state's labor department for misleading information that caused financial harm The $3,000 threshold really needs to be updated for inflation - $2,400 is a significant amount for most working people to lose to double taxation due to an employer's mistake. Your frustration is completely justified, and I hope some of these approaches help you recover at least part of what you're losing to this unfair situation.
0 coins
Micah Trail
•Maxwell's breakdown is really thorough and captures all the key strategies mentioned throughout this thread. What strikes me most about this whole discussion is how it reveals a systemic problem - when employers make payroll mistakes that cross tax years, it's always the employee who bears the financial burden. The fact that multiple people in this thread are dealing with nearly identical situations shows this isn't just an isolated issue. It's particularly frustrating that employers can promise one thing ("we'll adjust your taxable income") and then simply walk away when it becomes inconvenient, leaving employees to navigate complex tax implications on their own. I think the escalation approach Maxwell mentions is really important here. Too often employees just accept these situations because challenging an employer feels risky, but when they've made explicit promises about handling the tax implications and then renege, that crosses a line into potential bad faith. The documentation strategy everyone's emphasizing can't be overstated - even if it doesn't help immediately, having a clear paper trail protects you if questions arise during an audit or if tax laws change in the future. Plus, it establishes accountability that might be useful in any labor complaint or if you need to escalate within your company. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and solutions. This thread should be required reading for anyone dealing with cross-year wage repayments!
0 coins
Mateo Silva
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my employer overpaid me about $2,100 in 2023, and I've been repaying it throughout 2024. Like everyone else here, I was told initially that they'd adjust my taxable wages during repayment, but that never happened. What's been most valuable from reading all these responses is realizing this isn't just my problem - it's a systemic issue with how the tax code handles employer errors across tax years. The $3,000 threshold really does seem arbitrary and unfair when you consider that $2,000+ is still a significant amount for most people to effectively lose to double taxation. I'm definitely going to try several of the strategies mentioned here: requesting formal documentation from my employer, pushing harder for a corrected W-2 by escalating beyond my immediate HR contact, and checking if my state tax laws provide any relief that federal law doesn't. The point about documenting everything for when the miscellaneous itemized deduction suspension expires after 2025 is also really smart - even if there's no immediate benefit, it could pay off later. One thing I'll add is that this experience has made me much more aware of checking my paystubs carefully going forward. If I catch an overpayment in the same tax year, it sounds like the resolution would be much simpler. Prevention is definitely better than trying to fix this mess after the fact! Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and solutions - you've turned a really frustrating situation into at least having a clear action plan.
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
•Mateo, you're absolutely right about this being a systemic issue rather than isolated cases. What really bothers me is how employers seem to routinely make promises about handling the tax implications of their payroll mistakes, only to abandon employees when it becomes complicated. Your point about prevention is spot-on - carefully reviewing paystubs is definitely the best defense against these situations. But honestly, that puts the burden on employees to catch their employer's mistakes, which doesn't seem right either. I'd also suggest when you're requesting that formal documentation from your employer, specifically ask them to acknowledge in writing that they initially promised to adjust your taxable wages during repayment. Having that broken promise documented could be valuable if you decide to escalate the matter or file any kind of complaint. The state tax angle is definitely worth exploring - even if you only save $50-100 on state taxes, that's still something. And you're smart to think about the post-2025 potential benefits of keeping detailed records. This whole thread really shows how much the tax code needs reform around these cross-year employer error situations. No one should have to become a tax expert just because their employer messed up payroll!
0 coins
Ingrid Larsson
This is such a perfect example of how the tax code can create incredibly unfair situations for ordinary taxpayers. I'm a tax professional, and I see cases like yours more often than you'd think - it's unfortunately become quite common with the suspension of miscellaneous itemized deductions under the TCJA. A few additional points that might help: **Consider filing Form 8275 (Disclosure Statement)** with your tax return to document the unusual circumstances. While this won't change your tax liability, it creates a clear record for the IRS that you're aware of the situation and handling it correctly. This can provide some protection if your return gets flagged for review. **Look into your employee handbook or union contract** (if applicable) to see if there are any provisions about how payroll errors should be handled. Some organizations have policies requiring them to minimize tax impacts on employees when their mistakes create these situations. **Track your effective tax rate impact** - calculate exactly how much extra tax you're paying due to this double taxation. Having that specific dollar amount can be powerful when escalating with your employer or if you decide to pursue any kind of complaint. The reality is that while the law is clear about the $3,000 threshold, the equitable outcome would be for your employer to issue a corrected W-2 or find another way to make you whole. Don't let them dismiss this as "just a tax issue" - it's a financial consequence of their error that disproportionately harms you.
0 coins
Rajan Walker
•Ingrid, this is really valuable professional insight! The Form 8275 disclosure strategy is something I hadn't heard of before - that's a great way to get ahead of any potential audit issues by proactively documenting the unusual circumstances. Even if it doesn't reduce the tax burden, having that protection could save a lot of headaches later. Your point about checking employee handbooks and union contracts is brilliant too. I never thought to look there for payroll error policies, but you're right that some organizations might have specific procedures they're supposed to follow when their mistakes create tax consequences for employees. The idea of calculating the exact dollar impact of the double taxation is also really smart for escalation purposes. Being able to say "your payroll error is costing me $347 in additional taxes" is much more compelling than just explaining the general unfairness. It puts a concrete number on the harm caused by their mistake and follow-through failure. I really appreciate you sharing your professional perspective on this. It's reassuring to know that tax professionals recognize how unfair these situations are and that there are additional protective measures we can take beyond just accepting the double taxation. The Form 8275 approach especially seems like something everyone dealing with this issue should consider.
0 coins
Zoe Dimitriou
This thread has been incredibly eye-opening! I had no idea that wage repayment situations like this were so common or that the tax code created such unfair outcomes for amounts under $3,000. Reading through everyone's experiences really highlights how employers can essentially pass the financial burden of their mistakes onto employees with no accountability. What really stands out to me is how many people were given the same misleading assurance from their employers - "don't worry, we'll adjust your taxable income as you repay." It seems like HR departments either don't understand the tax implications of cross-year repayments or they're deliberately making promises they can't keep to avoid dealing with the immediate problem. The strategies everyone has shared are fantastic - particularly the Form 8275 disclosure approach that Ingrid mentioned and the emphasis on thorough documentation. I think the key takeaway is that even though the tax law creates an unfair situation, there are still ways to protect yourself and potentially recover some costs through state taxes, escalation with employers, or future changes to the miscellaneous deduction rules. This really should be required reading for anyone dealing with employer payroll errors. The fact that a $3,000 threshold from decades ago is still determining who gets relief while wages and living costs have increased dramatically just shows how out of touch some of these tax provisions have become. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - you've created an incredibly valuable resource for people facing this frustrating situation!
0 coins