Help with Schedule K-1, 1099-B and Section 1256 Gains for commodity futures - double taxation?
I'm stuck in a Section 1256 nightmare and could use some advice. I've done extensive research including poring over Schedule K instructions (probably missing something obvious) and even visited a tax pro who seemed completely lost on this issue. Here's my situation: Year 1 - I bought shares in a publicly traded limited partnership (USO) that deals with commodity futures through my Fidelity account. Year 2 - USO sent me a Schedule K-1 for Year 1 showing my unrealized gains, which I reported using the 60-40 split tax treatment since commodity futures fall under Section 1256 Contracts and are marked-to-market. Year 2 - I sold my USO position. After year-end, I received another Schedule K-1, which I handled like before. However, Fidelity also included the sale on my 1099-B, using my original cost basis and categorizing it with my regular long-term security transactions - NOT in any Section 1256 category. I called Fidelity thinking they made a mistake and should have listed it under Section 1256, but they insisted they have to report the sale with a 1099-B just like any other ETF. My questions: 1. Is Fidelity wrong? Should they correct my 1099 to show the security under a Section 1256 classification? 2. Do I need to adjust the 1099-B gain using Form 8949? 3. Am I mistaken in thinking I shouldn't be taxed TWICE - once under Sec 1256 rates AND again under normal capital gains rates? Any help would be greatly appreciated as I'm completely confused at this point.
20 comments


Lilah Brooks
This is actually a common issue with publicly traded partnerships (PTPs) that deal with futures contracts. Let me clarify what's happening: When you own USO, you're not directly owning Section 1256 contracts - you own partnership interests in an entity that trades those contracts. The partnership (USO) is the one directly holding the Section 1256 contracts. The Schedule K-1 reports your share of the partnership's trading activities, including the Section 1256 gains that get the 60/40 treatment. This is correct and reflects your portion of what happens INSIDE the partnership. The 1099-B from Fidelity is reporting the sale of your partnership interest itself, which is a separate transaction from the partnership's internal trading activities. The partnership interest is treated as a capital asset, not as a Section 1256 contract. So Fidelity is correct in their reporting. You're not being double-taxed because you're dealing with two different assets: 1) your share of the partnership's Section 1256 transactions (via K-1) and 2) the partnership interest itself (via 1099-B). You should report both transactions, but you may need to adjust your basis on the 1099-B sale using Form 8949 to account for previously taxed income reported on your K-1s.
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
•Thanks for the explanation, but I'm still confused about the basis adjustment. Since I already paid tax on the gains reported on the K-1 using the 60/40 treatment, wouldn't I be paying tax on those same gains again when I report the 1099-B sale if I don't adjust something? Also, what specific code would I use on Form 8949 for this kind of adjustment? I've been looking at the codes and I'm not sure which one applies to this situation.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
•You're absolutely right to be concerned about double taxation. You need to adjust your basis in the partnership interest to account for previously taxed income. This is done using code "B" on Form 8949 for "Basis adjustment from partnership interest." The basis in your partnership interest increases by income you've recognized and decreases by losses and distributions. So all those K-1 amounts you've already paid tax on (including the Section 1256 gains) should have increased your basis in the partnership units. When you sell the units, you use this adjusted basis - not the original purchase price that Fidelity reports on the 1099-B. You'll report the sale on Form 8949 with the proceeds as reported on the 1099-B, but you'll enter your adjusted basis (original cost plus income reported on K-1s minus distributions), and use code "B" to explain the adjustment.
0 coins
Jackson Carter
After dealing with a similar commodity futures partnership nightmare last year, I finally found an amazing solution through taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai). I was also getting conflicting info about Schedule K-1s, Section 1256 gains, and broker statements. The taxr.ai system analyzed my Schedule K-1 and 1099-B forms, spotted the exact issue you're describing, and explained exactly how to handle the basis adjustments. They clarified that I needed to track my "outside basis" in the partnership separate from what's reported on my 1099. Their system flagged the potential double taxation issue before I even asked about it and provided step-by-step instructions specifically for USO and similar partnerships. It saved me hours of research and probably thousands in potential tax overpayment.
0 coins
Kolton Murphy
•How exactly does the basis adjustment work with taxr.ai? Does it integrate with tax software or is it just giving you information that you have to manually enter somewhere else? I've got a similar situation with a different futures partnership.
0 coins
Evelyn Rivera
•I'm always skeptical of tax services that claim to handle complex situations like Section 1256 contracts and partnership basis adjustments. Did you actually verify their recommendations were correct? Did your tax advisor agree with what they suggested?
0 coins
Jackson Carter
•The basis adjustment calculation is actually done within the system - you upload your documents and it tracks your basis adjustments across tax years. It shows all the income components from the K-1 that increase your basis and all distributions that decrease it. Then it provides exact figures for Form 8949. Regarding verification, I was skeptical too, which is why I actually had my CPA review their recommendations. He was impressed and said they handled the Section 1256 issue correctly - specifically the interaction between the K-1 reporting and the sale reported on the 1099-B. He said most tax software doesn't handle these specialized partnership situations well.
0 coins
Kolton Murphy
Just wanted to follow up after trying taxr.ai like you suggested. Wow! I uploaded my partnership K-1s and 1099-B, and it immediately identified the exact issue with my commodity futures partnership. The system calculated my adjusted basis, accounting for the Section 1256 gains I'd already reported in previous years. It showed exactly where the potential double taxation would occur and created a completed Form 8949 with the proper basis adjustments and code B for my tax return. What really helped was their specific explanation about how publicly traded partnerships like USO that deal with Section 1256 contracts create this unusual tax situation. Their documentation explained why both Fidelity's 1099-B reporting AND the K-1 Section 1256 treatment were correct, but needed to be reconciled. My tax bill ended up being about $2,300 lower than what it would have been if I'd just blindly followed the 1099-B without adjustments!
0 coins
Julia Hall
If you're still struggling with getting help from the IRS on this Section 1256/K-1 issue, I strongly recommend checking out Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I was in the same boat - stuck between conflicting info from my broker and the partnership, and couldn't get anyone at the IRS on the phone for weeks. I was skeptical, but Claimyr got me connected to an actual IRS agent in less than 20 minutes who was knowledgeable about partnership basis issues and Section 1256 contracts. You can see how it works in their demo: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent confirmed exactly what to do with Form 8949 and the basis adjustments, and even explained how to document everything properly in case of an audit. No more guessing about whether I was handling this correctly!
0 coins
Arjun Patel
•How does Claimyr actually work? I've been on hold with the IRS forever trying to get clarification on this exact issue. Does it just keep calling for you or something? Seems too good to be true.
0 coins
Jade Lopez
•Yeah right. There's no way this service actually gets you through to the IRS faster than just waiting on hold yourself. I've dealt with Section 1256 issues before and ended up just figuring it out myself because the IRS phone system is completely useless. Sounds like a scam.
0 coins
Julia Hall
•It uses a combination of automated dialing technology and timing algorithms to navigate the IRS phone system efficiently. It basically keeps trying optimal times and pathways until it gets through, then calls you once an agent is on the line. The skepticism is totally fair - I felt the same way! The big difference is that instead of YOU sitting on hold for hours, their system does the waiting. When they get an actual human IRS agent on the line, you get a call connecting you directly to that person. I was connected in about 18 minutes when I had been trying for days on my own.
0 coins
Jade Lopez
I need to follow up about Claimyr after my skeptical comment. I decided to try it as a last resort for my Section 1256 partnership mess, and I'm honestly shocked it worked. After failing to reach anyone at the IRS for two weeks, Claimyr got me connected to an IRS tax law specialist in about 25 minutes. The agent walked me through exactly how to handle the Schedule K-1 Section 1256 gains versus the 1099-B reporting of the partnership sale. She confirmed I needed to use Form 8949 with adjustment code B to increase my basis by the amount of partnership income I'd already been taxed on through the K-1s. She also explained that the broker is correct in how they reported the sale - it's not their job to track my basis adjustments from partnership activities. Can't believe I wasted so many hours on hold before finding this. If you're stuck on complex partnership tax issues like Section 1256 treatments, actually speaking to a knowledgeable IRS agent makes all the difference.
0 coins
Tony Brooks
One thing nobody's mentioned yet that's really important: You also need to consider if you received any cash distributions from USO during the time you held it. Those distributions would have reduced your basis in the partnership interest. The full calculation for your adjusted basis would be: Original purchase price + Income reported on K-1s (including Section 1256 gains) - Losses reported on K-1s - Distributions received If distributions exceeded your basis at any point, you would have had to recognize gain in that year. This gets complicated fast with publicly traded partnerships like USO.
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
•I did receive quarterly distributions! I didn't realize those affected my basis calculation. Do I need to go back and look at all the distribution statements to figure this out? And do the distributions get reported separately anywhere or are they already factored into the K-1?
0 coins
Tony Brooks
•The distributions should be reported on Line 19A of your Schedule K-1. You definitely need to include these in your basis calculations. The distributions reduce your basis in the partnership. The distributions themselves aren't separately taxable when you receive them (unlike dividends) - they're essentially treated as a return of capital. But they do reduce your basis, which means when you sell, you'll have a larger gain (or smaller loss) because of the reduced basis. This is how partnerships avoid double taxation of distributed income.
0 coins
Ella rollingthunder87
I got audited last year on this exact issue with a different commodity futures partnership! My advice: keep EXTREMELY detailed records of your basis adjustments. The IRS computer system often flags returns where the basis reported on Form 8949 differs significantly from what's on the 1099-B, even when you use the adjustment codes correctly. The auditor initially thought I was trying to avoid taxes until I showed my spreadsheet tracking each year's: - K-1 income by category (especially Section 1256 gains) - Distributions received - Basis adjustments calculated - Supporting documentation After reviewing everything, the auditor agreed my calculations were correct. But save yourself the headache and document EVERYTHING about your basis calculations!
0 coins
Yara Campbell
•Did the IRS give you any specific form or format they want to see for tracking partnership basis? I've heard some people attach a statement to their return explaining the basis adjustment, but I'm not sure if that's required or helpful.
0 coins
Aria Washington
Based on everyone's helpful responses, I want to add one more critical point that saved me significant time and potential errors: always request the "Partnership Basis Schedule" or "Outside Basis Statement" from the partnership if they provide one. Some partnerships like USO will provide a detailed basis tracking statement upon request that shows your cumulative basis adjustments from year to year. This can be incredibly helpful for complex situations involving multiple years of Section 1256 gains and distributions. If your partnership doesn't provide this, I highly recommend creating your own tracking spreadsheet starting from day one. Include columns for: - Beginning basis each year - K-1 income items (by line) - K-1 loss items (by line) - Distributions received - Ending basis This becomes invaluable when you sell, especially for partnerships with complex activities like commodity futures. It also provides clear documentation if you ever face an audit on the basis adjustments you report on Form 8949. The key is being proactive about tracking rather than trying to reconstruct everything when you sell years later!
0 coins
Darcy Moore
•This is excellent advice about requesting the Partnership Basis Schedule! I wish I had known about this when I first started dealing with USO. I've been manually tracking everything in Excel, but having an official statement from the partnership would have saved me so much time and given me more confidence in my calculations. For anyone else reading this thread - do partnerships typically charge a fee for these basis statements? And should I request this annually or just when I'm planning to sell? I'm wondering if it's worth getting one each year to verify my own tracking is correct, especially given how complex the Section 1256 treatment makes everything. Also, does anyone know if other commodity futures partnerships besides USO provide these statements? I'm looking at potentially investing in some other futures-based partnerships but want to make sure I can get proper documentation before I get into another basis tracking nightmare!
0 coins