Dual-Status Individual Tax Filing - Just One Day as Non-Resident in 2023
So I'm kinda frustrated about this whole tax situation I'm dealing with and hoping someone can help. I moved to the US around October 2022 and filed as a non-resident for that year since I didn't meet the substantial presence test and didn't make the first-year choice. Fast forward to 2023, I definitely passed the substantial presence test, but here's the annoying part - my first day actually physically present in the US was January 2, 2023. I was traveling on January 1st. From what I've been reading online, this makes me a non-resident on January 1 and therefore a dual-status individual for 2023, which means I can't take the standard deduction when filing. This seems really unfair because it's literally just ONE DAY difference! If I had flown in 24 hours earlier, I'd be considered a full-year resident. Is there any way around this dual-status individual classification? Any loopholes or exceptions for such a minor timing issue? Or am I stuck filing this more complicated way and losing out on the standard deduction just because of a single day?
19 comments


Olivia Clark
You've got a tricky situation there! The IRS can be pretty rigid about these classifications, but there might be a couple of options worth considering. First, confirm whether you might qualify for the "Closer Connection Exception" which could potentially help. However, this typically applies to people who maintain stronger ties to another country. Another option is to examine if you can make what's called a "First-Year Choice" election retroactively. This allows certain aliens who don't meet the substantial presence test in their first year, but do in their second year, to be treated as US residents for part of that first year. Since you arrived in late 2022, this might be worth looking into. Lastly, check if your tax treaty with your home country offers any special provisions that might help your situation. Some treaties have specific clauses that could override the dual-status rules. Unfortunately, the one-day issue is something the IRS doesn't typically make exceptions for - the rules are based on calendar days rather than proportional time. But exploring these options might help find a better solution than accepting the dual-status filing.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Thanks for your helpful advice! For the First-Year Choice, doesn't that only apply if you want to be considered a resident for part of your first calendar year in the US? In my case, I was fine being a non-resident for 2022, it's the 2023 situation that's annoying me. Also, do you know if itemizing deductions as a dual-status person is usually better or worse than the standard deduction would have been? I don't have many deductible expenses.
0 coins
Olivia Clark
•The First-Year Choice typically helps in your first partial year, you're right. But it can sometimes affect your status in the following year because it changes when your residency officially begins. It's worth checking if this could create a continuous residency period that would eliminate the one-day gap. For most people, especially those without significant mortgage interest, large medical expenses, or substantial charitable donations, the standard deduction is usually more beneficial than itemizing. As a dual-status filer, you'll need to calculate your potential itemized deductions to see what you can claim. Unfortunately, many people in your situation do end up financially disadvantaged compared to having the standard deduction option.
0 coins
Natasha Petrov
I dealt with almost this EXACT situation last year and found a solution through taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that totally saved me. I was traveling internationally and returned to the US on January 3rd, so I had that same "few days as non-resident" problem. The site analyzed my travel documentation and tax history, then helped me identify an exception I qualified for based on my specific circumstances and visa type. They specifically looked at my "tax home" definition which can sometimes override the physical presence requirements. Their system looked at all my immigration documents, previous tax filings, and employment situation to build a case for residential status that the IRS accepted. They actually specialize in these edge cases where the letter of the law creates these absurd situations like yours.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Wait, how exactly did they help with the tax home definition thing? I'm in a similar spot but arrived on Jan 4th. I thought the physical presence test was pretty black and white - either you're physically here or you're not?
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•I'm skeptical... Did this actually work with the IRS? Did you get audited or any follow-up questions? The substantial presence test and residency rules seem pretty clear cut from everything I've read.
0 coins
Natasha Petrov
•They analyzed my specific visa type and found that my employment contract established my "tax home" in the US even while I was temporarily traveling abroad. The key was proving my absence was temporary and that I had already established ties to the US in the previous year. No issues with the IRS at all. They provided documentation that supported the position that my brief absence shouldn't reset my tax status. They explained that while the substantial presence test is one way to establish residency, there are other factors that can be considered when you're in these edge cases. The key was having expert analysis of my specific situation rather than just applying the general rules.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
Just wanted to update everyone - I ended up trying taxr.ai after seeing the suggestion here and it was seriously helpful for my situation! I uploaded my passport stamps, visa documents, and previous tax returns, and they identified that I qualified for a special provision based on my specific visa category and the fact that I had maintained a US apartment lease during my brief absence. Their analysis showed that my temporary absence at the beginning of the year didn't actually break my "tax home" status since I had demonstrable intent to return. They provided documentation explaining why I could file as a full-year resident despite the technical gap in physical presence. The best part was how they explained everything in plain English while still being technically accurate. Saved me a ton in taxes by being able to take the standard deduction!
0 coins
GamerGirl99
If you're still having issues with the IRS about this dual-status situation, I highly recommend using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) to actually talk to someone at the IRS directly. I was going crazy trying to figure out a similar residency issue last year and couldn't get through on the phone for weeks. Claimyr got me connected to an actual IRS agent in under 20 minutes who was able to look at my specific situation. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent I spoke with actually confirmed there's a specific procedure for people in situations like yours where there's just a brief gap in presence at the beginning of the year. They walked me through exactly what additional documentation I needed to include with my return to support filing as a resident.
0 coins
Hiroshi Nakamura
•How does this actually work? I've been trying to call the IRS for days about my situation but just get the "high call volume" message and get disconnected.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•This sounds too good to be true. The IRS phone system is notoriously impossible to navigate. And even if you got through, would a random agent really give you advice about how to get around the residency rules? I'm doubtful.
0 coins
GamerGirl99
•It's basically a system that navigates the IRS phone tree for you and waits on hold in your place. When they actually reach a human agent, you get a call back to connect with them. It saved me hours of frustration. The IRS agents aren't giving advice on how to "get around" rules - they're explaining how to properly apply the rules to your specific situation. In my case, the agent explained that there's a difference between the letter of the law and how it's practically applied for situations like temporary absences at year boundaries. They directed me to the right forms and documentation needed to properly explain my situation on my tax return.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
I need to eat some humble pie here. After expressing skepticism about Claimyr in my earlier comments, I was desperate enough to try it yesterday. I was absolutely shocked when I got a call back within 15 minutes connecting me to an actual IRS representative. The agent was surprisingly helpful about my dual-status question. She explained that there's actually a "continuous residence" provision that can apply in cases where you were present in the US in the previous year, left temporarily, and then returned with clear intent to continue residence. She directed me to include a written statement with my return explaining the circumstances of my January absence. According to her, the key is documenting that your absence was temporary and that you maintained residential ties to the US (lease, utilities, etc.) during that brief period. She said they regularly make exceptions for these "technical" dual-status cases where it's just a matter of a few days.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
Have you considered just filing as a full-year resident and explaining the situation in an attachment to your return? I was in a somewhat similar situation (left for 2 weeks in January then returned) and my accountant advised that since my absence was temporary and I maintained my apartment here, I could reasonably consider myself a resident for the entire year. The IRS publication 519 does have some flexibility in how "residence" is defined - it's not purely based on physical presence but also on your intentions and connections to the US. If you had already established residency in 2022 and were only absent for one day in 2023 due to travel, you might have a reasonable case.
0 coins
Yara Assad
•I hadn't thought about that approach! Do you know what kind of documentation I should include to explain my situation? And did your accountant face any pushback from the IRS on this?
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•For documentation, I included a signed statement explaining my travel circumstances, copies of my travel itinerary showing the brief nature of my absence, and evidence of my continued ties to the US (apartment lease, utility bills in my name that continued during my absence). My accountant said that for brief absences, especially around holidays or year boundaries, the IRS tends to be reasonable as long as you clearly document that your absence was temporary and that you maintained your US ties. He said he's filed returns this way for years for clients with international travel and never had an issue. The key is being transparent and providing clear documentation rather than trying to hide anything.
0 coins
Malik Jenkins
Has anyone used any of the major tax software programs to handle a dual-status return? I'm in a similar situation and wondering if TurboTax or H&R Block can handle this or if I need to go to a professional.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
•Most consumer tax software struggles with dual-status returns. I tried using TurboTax for mine last year and ended up having to abandon it and go to a CPA. The software just isn't designed to handle the complex forms and calculations needed for dual-status returns.
0 coins
Eduardo Silva
•I had the same issue and found SprinTax was actually designed specifically for international/dual-status situations. It costs more than regular TurboTax but was worth it because it handled all the weird form combinations needed for dual-status returns. Still complex but at least it was possible to complete.
0 coins