< Back to IRS

Drew Hathaway

Can I Deduct Reverse Mortgage Interest Paid After Inheriting a Home?

I inherited my uncle's house about 3 years ago, but it had a reverse mortgage on it. To keep the property, I had to pay off the reverse mortgage loan completely, which I did. The following tax season, I received a 1098 form showing approximately $135K in interest paid. The form had my uncle's Social Security number and the loan information on it. I'm now being audited by the IRS regarding this 1098. I've already submitted all the documentation I have: my uncle's will, the original HUD reverse mortgage agreement, the HUD payoff statement, copy of the bank draft I used for payment, the 1098 form, and confirmation from HUD that the loan was fully paid. My tax preparer included the entire interest amount as a deduction on my return. They told me that since I paid off the loan in full, I could deduct all the interest. But now the IRS is saying I can only deduct $13.5K and that I owe around $32K in back taxes, penalties, and interest. As someone who inherited the property, I thought I was eligible to claim the full interest deduction, even though the 1098 came with the original borrower's information. Do I need to hire a tax attorney at this point? What options do I have to fight this?

Laila Prince

•

This is actually a complex situation with reverse mortgages and inheritance. When you inherit a property with a reverse mortgage, you're essentially stepping into a unique tax situation. The IRS is applying the mortgage interest deduction limits here. For tax years after 2017, you can generally only deduct interest on up to $750,000 of qualified residence debt. However, the bigger issue is that to claim mortgage interest, you typically need to be legally obligated on the loan. Since the reverse mortgage was in your uncle's name and not yours, the IRS position is that you weren't legally obligated to pay that debt - you chose to pay it to keep the property rather than letting it go to foreclosure. From their perspective, you were essentially paying someone else's debt, which is why they're limiting your deduction. You might have an argument that by accepting the inheritance and paying off the loan, you "stepped into the shoes" of the deceased, but this is a technical tax law area.

0 coins

Drew Hathaway

•

Thank you for explaining that. But if I wasn't legally obligated to pay the debt, why would HUD issue me a 1098 form for the interest at all? Doesn't receiving that form mean I'm entitled to some deduction? And since I had to pay off the reverse mortgage to keep the home, doesn't that create some kind of obligation?

0 coins

Laila Prince

•

The 1098 was likely issued because a significant amount of interest was paid, and the lender is required to report that payment. However, receiving a 1098 doesn't automatically entitle you to a deduction - eligibility for the deduction depends on your relationship to the debt. In your case, you weren't personally liable for the reverse mortgage - it was secured by the property itself. When you inherited the property, you had a choice: pay off the reverse mortgage or let the property go to foreclosure. You chose to pay it off, but that was to acquire clear title to the property, not because you were legally obligated to the debt itself. This distinction is why the IRS is limiting your deduction.

0 coins

Isabel Vega

•

I had a similar situation with my mom's reverse mortgage. After going in circles with the IRS, I finally used taxr.ai to analyze all my documents. It's specifically designed for complex tax situations like this where the IRS and taxpayers disagree about deduction amounts. I uploaded the 1098, the inheritance documents, and the HUD payoff statement to https://taxr.ai and it found several precedent cases where heirs were able to deduct a portion of the interest based on specific IRS code provisions I hadn't known about. The analysis helped me understand exactly what part of the interest was legally deductible and what wasn't. The tool also helped me draft a response to the IRS with the right technical language and citations. Saved me from having to pay a tax attorney thousands just to tell me the same thing.

0 coins

How exactly does this work? I'm dealing with a similar issue but with student loan interest that was paid by my parents after they cosigned. Does it just look at your documents and tell you if you have a case?

0 coins

Marilyn Dixon

•

I'm skeptical about these online services. Did they just tell you what you wanted to hear, or did they actually help you reduce what you owed to the IRS? Because getting the right answer and getting an answer the IRS accepts are two different things...

0 coins

Isabel Vega

•

The tool analyzes your tax documents, identifies applicable tax rules, and shows you relevant precedents. It's AI-powered but designed specifically for tax documents, so it understands forms like 1098s and inheritance situations. For cosigned loans, it would help clarify who can claim the interest deduction based on who's legally obligated to pay. It doesn't just tell you if you have a case - it shows you the specific rules that apply to your situation with citations. No, they didn't just tell me what I wanted to hear. In fact, they confirmed I couldn't deduct the full amount, but showed me I could claim more than what the IRS initially allowed based on specific provisions for inherited properties. I ended up reducing my tax bill by about 40% from what the IRS initially claimed, which was still a compromise but much better than paying the full amount.

0 coins

Marilyn Dixon

•

I was definitely skeptical about AI tax tools, but I decided to try taxr.ai for my own inherited property situation. I uploaded my documents including the 1098 and property transfer paperwork, and it actually provided really specific guidance. The analysis showed that while I couldn't deduct the full interest amount as my accountant had claimed, I was entitled to deduct the portion that represented interest accrued after I took legal ownership. The tool cited specific tax court cases involving inherited properties with existing mortgages. What impressed me was that it didn't just give a yes/no answer - it explained the legal reasoning and even helped me understand how to document my position properly. I'm still working through my audit, but having clear documentation of the legal basis for my partial deduction has made a huge difference in my communications with the IRS.

0 coins

I had a nightmare trying to reach someone at the IRS about a similar inheritance tax issue. After 12+ calls and hours on hold, I found this service called Claimyr that got me through to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes. You just enter your phone number at https://claimyr.com and they navigate the IRS phone system for you, then call you when they've got an agent on the line. They also have a demo video of how it works: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c Since your case is pretty complex and involves a significant amount of money, talking directly with an IRS representative might help clarify what documentation they need and whether there's a specific form or process for your situation. The agent I spoke with actually explained that in inheritance cases, there's sometimes additional paperwork they need that isn't initially requested in the audit letter.

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

How does this actually work? Do they have some special connection to the IRS? Seems suspicious that they can get through when normal people can't.

0 coins

This sounds like a scam. Why would I give my phone number to some random service? And if they did somehow get the IRS on the line, wouldn't the IRS just put me on hold again when they transfer me? Not buying it.

0 coins

There's no special connection to the IRS - they use technology to navigate the phone tree and stay on hold for you. Think of it like having someone else wait in line while you do other things. You give them your phone number so they can call you back when they reach an IRS agent. They connect the call directly with the agent already on the line - there's no transfer that puts you back on hold. You just answer your phone and start talking to the IRS agent immediately.

0 coins

Ok, I owe everyone an apology. After posting that skeptical comment, I decided to try Claimyr anyway because I was desperate to resolve my own tax issue. I've been trying to reach the IRS for WEEKS about an incorrect 1099-R distribution that triggered an audit. I was absolutely shocked when my phone rang about 15 minutes after using the service, and there was an actual IRS representative on the line! No waiting, no automated system - just a real person ready to help. I explained my situation, and the agent was able to put notes in my file about the documentation I was sending. The agent also explained that for inheritance cases like the original poster's, there's a specific procedure for handling reverse mortgage interest deductions that doesn't appear in the standard audit letters. Having that conversation probably saved me thousands in incorrect tax assessments. I still can't believe how easy it was after weeks of frustration.

0 coins

Payton Black

•

You should definitely consult with a tax attorney at this point. The amount at stake ($32K) justifies the expense. Most tax attorneys will do an initial consultation for free or a small fee. The key issue here is whether you, as the heir, stepped into the shoes of the original borrower for tax purposes when you paid off the reverse mortgage. There are specific IRS rules about acquisition indebtedness versus home equity indebtedness that affect how much interest you can deduct. Also, the timing matters - when exactly did you inherit the property versus when you paid off the loan? Did you use the home as your primary residence after inheriting it? These factors all affect your deduction eligibility.

0 coins

Drew Hathaway

•

I inherited the home officially about 2 months before paying off the reverse mortgage. It took that long to process everything through probate. And yes, I moved in immediately after inheriting it and have been using it as my primary residence since then. Does that strengthen my case?

0 coins

Payton Black

•

That definitely strengthens your case! The fact that you established it as your primary residence before paying off the loan is significant. This means you might qualify for treating the debt as "acquisition indebtedness" rather than simply paying off someone else's debt. When you inherit a property and make it your primary residence, then pay off existing debt secured by that property, there's a strong argument that you've acquired both the asset and the associated debt. The key is documenting the timeline precisely for the IRS - when probate completed, when you established residency, and when you paid the loan.

0 coins

Harold Oh

•

Has anyone considered that this might actually be treated as part of the property's basis adjustment? When you inherit property, you generally get a stepped-up basis to fair market value at date of death. But inheriting property with a reverse mortgage is complicated. You might want to argue that part of what you paid was actually acquiring the property (increasing your basis) rather than deductible interest. This might not save you on current taxes but could reduce capital gains if you ever sell.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

That's actually really smart. Treating part of the payment as basis adjustment makes sense conceptually - you're paying to acquire full ownership, not just paying interest. Would need a tax pro to figure out how to document that though.

0 coins

I went through something very similar when I inherited my grandmother's home with a HECM reverse mortgage. The IRS initially disallowed most of my interest deduction, but I was able to get it partially resolved. The key issue is that with reverse mortgages, the "interest" on your 1098 includes both actual interest charges AND the mortgage insurance premiums that accumulated over the life of the loan. The IRS will generally allow you to deduct the actual interest portion that accrued after you became the legal owner, but not the accumulated MIP or interest that built up before inheritance. You'll need to request a detailed payoff statement from the servicer that breaks down exactly what portion was principal, accrued interest, and MIP. In my case, about 60% of what showed on the 1098 was actually deductible once we separated out the components properly. Also, since you established it as your primary residence before paying off the loan, you have a much stronger argument for the acquisition indeductedness treatment that others mentioned. Document everything - when probate closed, when you moved in, utility transfers, voter registration changes, etc. This timeline is crucial for your case. The $32K they're claiming seems excessive unless there are penalties involved. You might want to request penalty abatement if your tax preparer gave you reasonable advice about the deduction.

0 coins

Malik Jackson

•

This is incredibly helpful! I never realized that the 1098 might include both interest and MIP - that could explain why the numbers seemed so high. The servicer just sent me a basic payoff statement, but I'll definitely request the detailed breakdown you mentioned. Your point about documenting the timeline is spot on. I have most of that documentation already since I had to change everything over after moving in. The utility transfers and voter registration changes should be easy to pull together. Do you remember roughly how long it took to resolve your case once you provided the detailed breakdown? And did you end up needing an attorney, or were you able to work directly with the IRS examiner? Also, you're right about the penalties - that $32K does include substantial penalty and interest charges on top of the additional tax. I hadn't thought about requesting penalty abatement based on reasonable reliance on professional advice. That alone could save me thousands.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today