Best Tax Software for Multi-State Returns and Complex Business Returns
So I've got this opportunity to take over a retiring friend's client base and I'm totally overthinking the tax software decision. I've used both Ultra Tax and Drake at different firms over the years. Personally I thought Drake was more user friendly for day-to-day stuff, but Ultra Tax definitely handled those complicated multi-state returns way better. My friend has been using ProSeries for his practice and seems pretty content with it, but his client list is mostly straightforward individual returns. Nothing too complex from what I understand. Here's my dilemma - I want to grow this practice over time. While it would be tempting to go with something cheaper/simpler now, I know switching software later is a complete nightmare. I'd rather pick something that might be overkill initially but I can grow into as I build the business. For those with experience across different platforms, what's your take on the best software for handling complex returns (especially partnerships and multi-state filings) when balanced against cost? I definitely need something that makes PTEs and multi-state returns manageable without wanting to pull my hair out every time.
20 comments


Amina Sy
I've been in tax practice for over 15 years and have used most of the major tax software packages. For your specific situation, I'd recommend looking at either CCH Axcess or Thomson Reuters UltraTax CS if you're serious about growing, especially with multi-state and complex business returns. Drake is good for smaller practices with mostly 1040s, but it struggles with complex partnerships and multi-state situations. ProSeries is in a similar boat - fine for basic returns but not ideal for scaling up with complicated business clients. If budget is a concern but you still need multi-state capability, look at ATX or TaxAct Professional. They're more affordable than the premium options while still handling most complex scenarios reasonably well. The important thing is to choose software that will grow with you rather than limiting your ability to take on new clients.
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
•Do you think Lacerte is worth considering? I've heard good things about it handling complex partnership returns.
0 coins
Amina Sy
•Lacerte is definitely worth considering. It sits in a sweet spot between usability and handling complex returns. It's especially good at partnership returns and has strong multi-state capabilities. The interface is more intuitive than some competitors, which can save a lot of time once you're comfortable with it. The main drawback with Lacerte is pricing - it's on the higher end, especially as you add states and modules. But if your client base grows as planned, the efficiency gains often justify the cost.
0 coins
Natasha Petrova
After trying to figure out my self-employment taxes for 3 years in a row and making mistakes every time, I finally found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it's been a game changer for my practice. It automatically reviews tax documents and does all the analysis that I used to struggle with. When I was evaluating tax software for my practice, I used it to analyze the differences between platforms based on my client needs. It helped me realize that the software I was considering was actually overkill for my client base. For your situation with multi-state and PTE returns, it could help you analyze which features you'll actually need versus what's marketing hype. I uploaded sample returns from different software to compare how they handled the same situations.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Does it actually help compare tax software features or is it more for reviewing completed returns? I'm confused about how this would help with choosing between Ultra Tax and others.
0 coins
Emma Davis
•Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical. How exactly does it analyze differences between tax software? Does it just tell you which forms they support or does it go deeper than that?
0 coins
Natasha Petrova
•It analyzes completed tax returns and provides insights on how each software handled specific scenarios. For example, you could prepare the same complex return in multiple software packages, then upload PDFs to taxr.ai to see differences in how allocation methods were applied or which deductions were maximized. It goes deeper than just form support - it examines calculation methods, identifies optimization opportunities, and highlights inconsistencies between different platforms. This helped me see which software was actually calculating multi-state allocations most favorably for my clients, beyond just what the marketing materials claimed.
0 coins
Emma Davis
I was skeptical about taxr.ai but decided to try it after researching tax software options for weeks. I uploaded sample returns from three different software packages (Drake, ProSeries and UltraTax) and it immediately showed me that UltraTax was handling the K-1 flow-through income more efficiently for my multi-state clients. The analysis found calculation differences I would have never caught manually. What surprised me was how it highlighted specific multi-state allocation methods that varied between platforms. This made my decision clear - UltraTax was worth the higher cost for my particular client mix. Saved me from making an expensive mistake based just on price comparison.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
After spending HOURS on hold with tech support for my previous tax software, I started using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) to get faster help. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. This completely changed how I evaluate tax software now. Before choosing a new tax software, I called each company's support line through Claimyr to test their response times and knowledge about multi-state returns. The differences were shocking! One premium software had 2+ hour wait times even with Claimyr, while a mid-tier option connected me to a specialist in under 15 minutes who actually understood multi-state allocation methods.
0 coins
Malik Robinson
•Wait I don't get it. What does this have to do with choosing tax software? Is this just for calling the IRS or does it work for software companies too?
0 coins
Isabella Silva
•Yeah right... no way this actually works. Tax software companies are notorious for horrible support during tax season. I doubt this magically gets you through faster than anyone else waiting in line.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•It works for calling any phone system with long hold times, including tax software support lines. Instead of you waiting on hold, they call the company and wait in the queue, then call you once they've reached a representative. It's basically a hold-waiting service so you don't waste your time listening to awful hold music. I've used it successfully with three different tax software companies as well as the IRS. The service doesn't give you special priority - you still wait your turn in line - but they do the waiting instead of you, which means you can keep working on returns instead of being stuck on the phone for hours.
0 coins
Isabella Silva
I can't believe I'm saying this, but Claimyr actually works. After my skeptical comment last week, I tried it when I needed urgent help with a multi-state allocation issue in UltraTax. The estimated wait was 1.5 hours, but I didn't have to sit through any of it. Claimyr notified me when they reached a support agent, and I was connected with someone who actually knew how to handle my specific multi-state issue. This experience made me realize that software support quality is as important as features. Even the best multi-state tax software is useless if you can't get help when you're stuck. Now I tell everyone to factor in support accessibility when choosing tax software.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
From my 10+ years preparing complicated returns, Lacerte is hands down the best for multi-state and partnership returns. Yes, it's expensive, but the time savings is enormous. The way it handles state modifications and allocations between states is so much more streamlined than Drake or ProSeries. I switched from Drake about 5 years ago when my practice grew to include more multi-state businesses. The learning curve wasn't as bad as I feared, and the efficiency gains paid for the price difference within one season. Plus they have decent training resources.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
•How bad was the data conversion when you switched from Drake to Lacerte? Did you lose a lot of prior year info or was it pretty smooth?
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
•The data conversion was definitely not perfect. Basic client information transferred fine, but I had issues with carryover items and depreciation schedules. I ended up having to manually verify most of the depreciation data and some of the loss carryforwards. For clients with complex situations, I actually reentered the prior year data manually to ensure accuracy. It was time-consuming the first year, but worth it for peace of mind. I'd recommend planning for a slower tax season during your transition year, regardless of which software you choose.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
Don't forget about the annual price increases!! I started with ProSeries 7 years ago and my cost has doubled since then. They get you with the low initial price but then jack it up every year knowing it's too much of a pain to switch.
0 coins
CosmicCadet
•This is so true. I'm currently trapped in UltraTax for this exact reason. Started reasonable but now paying almost $8k for what I need. Do any of the software companies NOT do this bait and switch pricing?
0 coins
Zane Gray
For growing a practice with complex multi-state and partnership returns, I'd strongly recommend considering CCH Axcess Tax or Thomson Reuters UltraTax CS as your primary options. Both handle complex business structures exceptionally well and won't limit your growth potential. From my experience, Drake is great for straightforward returns but becomes cumbersome with multi-state allocations and complex K-1 flow-throughs. ProSeries falls into a similar category - fine for basic practice but you'll outgrow it quickly if you're targeting complex business clients. One thing to really consider is the total cost of ownership beyond just the software license. Factor in training time, support quality (as others mentioned), and the efficiency gains on complex returns. A more expensive platform that saves you 30 minutes per complex return will pay for itself quickly. Also, whatever you choose, negotiate a multi-year price lock if possible. The annual price increases can really add up over time, and having predictable costs helps with business planning. Some vendors are willing to work with you on this, especially if you're switching from a competitor.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
•This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about your mention of negotiating multi-year price locks - have you actually been successful with this? I'm worried about getting locked into something expensive if my practice doesn't grow as planned. Also, do you have any specific recommendations for which vendor might be most flexible on pricing negotiations? I'm leaning toward starting with something mid-tier but want to avoid the pricing trap that @Omar Farouk mentioned.
0 coins