Auditing primary residence for tax purposes - how much risk with partial year move?
We own a house in one area and rent in another city. We're really close to having spent the majority of our days this year at our owned home (which would be better tax-wise since there are no city taxes there). We'd need to make some sacrifices to hit the exact number of days needed, but I'm wondering what the likelihood of being audited is if we're short by around 10 days? My driver's license and voter registration are already at the owned home address. All my important mail goes there too. If we do get audited, what kind of records will the IRS check to determine our primary residence? I've been keeping a calendar and have toll records as backup. What penalties would we be looking at if they found issues? Also, for days when we were on vacation, should we count those as days at our owned home or at the rental place we left from? Thanks for any help you can give. Just for context, our rental place has city taxes that we've been paying for several years (it's been our primary residence until this year), while our owned home is in an area with no city taxes.
26 comments


Mateo Gonzalez
This is definitely something you want to be careful about since you're dealing with a potential change in primary residence that has tax implications. The IRS doesn't have a specific day count requirement for primary residence determination, but many states and localities do - typically the 183-day rule (more than half the year). For audit risk, having documentation is your best defense. If you're off by ~10 days, that's potentially significant when you're right on the border. The IRS or local tax authorities might look at: utility bills showing usage patterns, employment records, bank statements showing local transactions, medical appointments, and even cell phone records showing your location over time. Your calendar and toll records are excellent starts, but more documentation is better. For vacation days, they generally count toward your primary residence at the time - so if you left from your rental, those days would typically count toward your rental location's total. Penalties vary widely depending on the jurisdiction, but you could face back taxes plus interest and penalties if they determine you incorrectly claimed residency.
0 coins
Nia Harris
•Thank you for the detailed response. Would it be smarter for us to just bite the bullet and make the extra trips needed to ensure we hit the proper day count for our owned home, rather than taking the risk? I'm worried about creating a pattern that looks like we're specifically trying to avoid city taxes. Also, do you know if working remotely from either location matters? Like if I'm physically at our owned home but working for a company based in the city where we rent, does that strengthen or weaken our primary residence claim?
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
•Yes, making those extra trips to ensure you clearly meet the day count would be the safer approach. Auditors look for patterns, and being right on the borderline may raise questions. It's always better to have a clear case rather than one that could go either way. Working remotely actually strengthens your primary residence claim for wherever you're physically located while working. What matters is your physical presence, not where your employer is based. Keep logs of your work-from-home days including location, and save any correspondence that mentions your work location. This documentation can be valuable if questions arise.
0 coins
Aisha Ali
After going through a somewhat similar situation, I found https://taxr.ai incredibly helpful for organizing my primary residence documentation. My situation was I owned homes in both Florida and New York, and needed to prove Florida was my primary residence to avoid NY state taxes. The tool helped me compile and analyze all my documentation - from cell phone location data to credit card transactions and even utility usage patterns. You upload your documents and it helps identify where the gaps are in your proof of residence timeline. It was actually eye-opening to see how much digital evidence of my whereabouts existed that I hadn't even thought about. What worked best for me was that it analyzed my flight records and showed exactly how many days I spent in each location. Since you mentioned you're only about 10 days short, this kind of detailed analysis might help you figure out if there are days you actually were at your owned home that you haven't accounted for.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•This sounds interesting, but how exactly does it work with the documentation? I've got a similar situation with properties in Washington and Oregon, and I'm worried about proving my primary residence. Does it just tell you what documents you need or does it actually do some kind of analysis?
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
•I'm skeptical about this. Sounds like you're just paying for something that tells you to keep track of your location. Couldn't you just use a spreadsheet and Google Timeline for free? Why would anyone need a special service for this?
0 coins
Aisha Ali
•It works by analyzing the documentation you upload - receipts, utility bills, bank statements, etc. The system extracts date and location data from these documents and creates a comprehensive timeline. For your Washington/Oregon situation, it would categorize each day based on your evidence and show you exactly where your proof is strong or weak. Unlike just using a spreadsheet, it actually detects patterns and inconsistencies across multiple document types that might be hard to spot manually. For example, it might notice you have a grocery store receipt in Oregon on a day you thought you were in Washington. I initially tried the spreadsheet approach but missed several days where my documentation contradicted my memory.
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
I need to follow up about my skeptical comment on the taxr.ai service. I decided to try it after continuing to stress about my own multi-state situation between California and Nevada. I was honestly shocked at how helpful it was! The system found several weeks of days I hadn't properly accounted for by analyzing my Amazon deliveries, cell phone bills, and even my Ring doorbell activity logs. Turns out I had actually spent 22 more days in Nevada than I had recorded manually, which pushed me safely over the 183-day threshold. The document analysis saved me thousands in potential California state income taxes by strengthening my Nevada residency claim. Plus it organized everything in a way that would be easy to present if I ever get audited. Definitely worth it for peace of mind alone.
0 coins
StarSurfer
If you're worried about being audited over primary residence, I struggled with this exact issue between NYC and my upstate home. After months of trying to get straight answers from the IRS and NY state tax office with no luck, I used https://claimyr.com to get through to an actual IRS agent. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The service got me past the endless hold times (took about 25 mins instead of the 3+ hours I spent before getting disconnected). The IRS agent I spoke with gave me specific guidance on what documentation would be considered definitive for my situation. She told me that cell phone location data, credit card statements, and work attendance records were actually more valuable than my self-kept calendar. Most importantly, I learned that inconsistent patterns (going back and forth a lot) trigger more scrutiny than just being slightly under the day count. They look at the overall pattern of your life to determine your "tax home.
0 coins
Carmen Reyes
•Wait, how does this actually work? Do they just call the IRS for you? I'm confused about how a third party service can get you through to the IRS faster than calling directly.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•This sounds like complete BS. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS. If this worked, everyone would use it and then the system would be just as backed up as before. Pretty sure they're just taking your money and then you still wait the same amount of time.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•They use an automated system that continually redials and navigates the IRS phone tree until it gets through to a representative. When a live person answers, you get a call connecting you directly to that agent. It's not skipping the line - you're still in the same queue as everyone else, but their system handles the frustrating part of constant redialing and waiting on hold. It works because most people give up after being on hold for an hour or getting disconnected, then try again later, creating even more congestion. The service just has more persistence than a human typically would. I was skeptical too until I actually got through and spoke with an agent who gave me information I had been trying to get for weeks.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
I have to publicly eat my words about the Claimyr service I called BS on. After continuing to fail getting through to the IRS about my residency situation between Illinois and Indiana, I reluctantly tried it last week. It actually worked exactly as described. Their system called me back in about 35 minutes and connected me with an IRS agent who was extremely helpful. I explained my situation with maintaining homes in both states, and she walked me through exactly what documentation would protect me in case of an audit. The agent confirmed that for vacation days, they should be attributed to wherever your established home base was at that time, not necessarily where you physically departed from. She also emphasized keeping all travel receipts and explained that digital evidence (like ATM withdrawals and electronic toll records) carries significant weight during residency audits. Saved me so much stress!
0 coins
Zoe Christodoulou
I went through a residency audit in New York when I moved to Florida but kept a vacation home in NY. My audit experience might help you. The tax authorities looked at: 1) My cell phone records - they requested 12 months of detailed call logs showing tower locations 2) Credit card statements showing where purchases were made 3) Utility bills from both properties showing usage patterns 4) Flight records and toll receipts 5) Work location documentation 6) Doctors appointments and other recurring local activities The biggest surprise was how detailed they got with cell tower data - they literally mapped out my movements! For the vacation question, they counted days where I was physically present in each location. Days spent traveling elsewhere counted toward my "home base" at that time. My advice: be conservative and make those extra trips to clearly establish your owned home as primary residence. The paperwork headache of an audit isn't worth saving a few days of travel.
0 coins
Jamal Thompson
•Did they actually request your cell phone records directly from your carrier or did they just ask you to provide them? I'm in a similar situation between Colorado and Arizona and now I'm freaking out a bit about how invasive this process can get.
0 coins
Zoe Christodoulou
•They asked me to provide the records, they didn't go to the carrier directly. I had to request detailed logs from my carrier (Verizon), which wasn't difficult but took some time. The records showed which cell towers my phone connected to throughout each day. They were most interested in patterns - not just where I slept at night but where I consistently spent my time during work hours and weekends. My audit was with New York State though, not the IRS, so federal procedures might differ. The level of detail surprised me too, but having all my records organized actually made the process go smoothly. They concluded my Florida residence was legitimate after reviewing everything.
0 coins
Mei Chen
Quick tip that helped me in a similar situation: if you're using Google Maps on your phone, check out your Timeline feature. It keeps a scary-accurate record of everywhere you've been that can be super helpful for proving residence days. Google Timeline helped me win a residency dispute with California when I moved to Nevada but still worked occasionally in CA. I was able to export data showing exactly which days I was where. Combine that with credit card statements and you've got pretty solid documentation.
0 coins
CosmicCadet
•Thats a great tip! Also check your amazon purchase history and delivery addresses. I used those records to help prove my residence changed from nyc to connecticut and they accepted it during an audit. also toll records esp if you use ezpass or something similar.
0 coins
Nia Harris
•Thank you for this suggestion! I just checked my Google Timeline and it does indeed show my location history pretty accurately. This will be really helpful for filling in some of the gaps in my records. I guess the privacy concerns with location tracking can sometimes have an upside! I think based on all the advice here, we're going to make those extra trips to ensure we clearly hit the day count for our owned home residence. Better to be safe than deal with an audit. Thanks again everyone for all your insights!
0 coins
Giovanni Marino
Just wanted to add another perspective as someone who works in tax preparation - the 10-day shortage you mentioned could be more significant than it seems. Tax authorities often use a "facts and circumstances" test for primary residence, and being right on the borderline invites scrutiny. Beyond the documentation everyone's mentioned, consider these often-overlooked factors: where you're registered to vote, your driver's license address, where your children attend school (if applicable), your primary bank branch, and even your gym membership. These all paint a picture of your "center of vital interests." One thing I tell clients is to document not just where you sleep, but where you live your life. If you're spending most weekends at your owned home, having regular appointments there (doctor, dentist, hair salon), and shopping locally, that strengthens your case even if you're a few days short on the strict count. The penalties for getting this wrong can be substantial - back taxes, interest, and penalties that can add up to thousands. Making those extra trips to clearly establish residency is almost always worth it compared to the potential cost and stress of an audit.
0 coins
Landon Flounder
•This is really helpful advice about the "facts and circumstances" test - I hadn't thought about some of those other factors like gym membership and regular appointments. It makes sense that they'd look at the bigger picture of where you actually live your life, not just where you sleep. Your point about the potential costs really drives it home. Even if the chance of an audit is relatively low, the financial consequences of getting it wrong seem to far outweigh the inconvenience of making a few extra trips to establish clear residency. Plus, having all those lifestyle connections at our owned home would probably make the residency claim much stronger overall. Thanks for the professional perspective - it's reassuring to hear from someone who deals with these situations regularly!
0 coins
Lara Woods
As someone who went through a similar dual-residence situation, I'd strongly recommend erring on the side of caution and making those extra trips to clearly establish your owned home as your primary residence. The stress and potential financial consequences of an audit aren't worth cutting it close by 10 days. One thing that really helped me was creating a "residency portfolio" beyond just counting days. I made sure my voter registration, driver's license, primary care doctor, dentist, and even my preferred grocery store were all at my tax-advantaged location. This created a clear pattern of where my life was centered, which is what auditors really look for. Also, start documenting everything now - not just where you sleep, but where you conduct your daily life. Receipt timestamps from local businesses, gym check-ins, library visits, even prescription pickups can all support your residency claim. The more evidence you have showing your owned home is where you actually live (not just stay), the stronger your position will be. The 10-day shortage might seem minor, but it puts you in that gray area where auditors have discretion. Making those sacrifices to hit the day count removes that uncertainty entirely.
0 coins
A Man D Mortal
•This is exactly the kind of comprehensive approach I wish I had known about when I was dealing with my own residency questions! The "residency portfolio" concept makes so much sense - it's not just about meeting a day count but demonstrating that your life is genuinely centered at your primary residence location. Your point about documenting daily life activities really resonates with me. I've been focused mainly on the big things like where I sleep and work, but hadn't thought about all those smaller interactions that actually show where you live your life. Things like pharmacy pickups and gym visits probably paint a much clearer picture than I realized. The advice about removing uncertainty by hitting the day count rather than risking the gray area is spot on. After reading all these responses, it's clear that being conservative now is much better than potentially dealing with audit stress and penalties later. Thanks for sharing your experience!
0 coins
Fernanda Marquez
Based on my experience helping clients with residency issues, I'd echo what others have said about being conservative with your day count. The IRS and state tax authorities have become increasingly sophisticated in their audit techniques, especially for residency cases that could result in significant tax savings. One additional consideration I haven't seen mentioned yet: keep detailed records of your work activities at each location. If you're working remotely from your owned home, save emails that reference your location, video call logs, and any work-related deliveries or appointments. This creates a paper trail showing your owned home as your active work location, which strengthens the "center of vital interests" argument. Also, be mindful of social media posts that could contradict your residency claim. I've seen cases where vacation photos or check-ins inadvertently undermined someone's documentation. Make sure your digital footprint aligns with your residency timeline. The penalties for incorrect residency claims can include not just back taxes and interest, but also potential fraud penalties if the authorities believe you deliberately misrepresented your situation. Given that you're dealing with city tax avoidance, they may be particularly thorough in their review. Making those extra trips to clearly establish residency is definitely the safer path.
0 coins
Zane Gray
•This is such valuable insight about the digital footprint aspect - I hadn't even thought about how social media posts could potentially contradict residency documentation! It's scary to think that a simple vacation check-in or photo could undermine months of careful record-keeping. The point about work-related documentation is also really helpful. Since I do work remotely from both locations, I should definitely start being more intentional about saving those work-related emails and delivery records that show my owned home as my primary work base. Your warning about fraud penalties really drives home why being conservative is the right approach here. The potential consequences go way beyond just paying back taxes - we're talking about penalties that could be much more serious if they think there was deliberate misrepresentation. After reading all these responses, I'm convinced that making those extra trips to clearly establish our owned home residency is absolutely the way to go. The peace of mind alone is worth the inconvenience, and it sounds like having clear, unambiguous documentation will make any potential future interactions with tax authorities much smoother. Thank you for the professional perspective!
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
Having dealt with a similar situation between Texas and California, I can't stress enough how important it is to establish clear, unambiguous residency rather than cutting it close. The 10-day shortage you mentioned puts you in exactly the kind of gray area that can trigger additional scrutiny. One thing I learned during my residency determination process is that consistency across all your records matters enormously. Beyond just counting days, make sure your voter registration, driver's license, bank statements, insurance policies, and even subscription services all point to your owned home as your primary address. Any inconsistencies can raise red flags. For your vacation day question - the general rule is that vacation days count toward your established "home base" at the time of travel. So if your primary residence was the rental when you took the vacation, those days would typically count toward the rental location, not the owned home. Given the potential city tax savings you're looking at, the financial stakes are probably high enough to justify making those extra trips to clearly hit the day count. The cost and stress of an audit, even if you ultimately prevail, usually far exceeds the inconvenience of a few additional trips. Better to have an iron-clad case than one that requires explaining or defending.
0 coins