IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Zainab Khalil

•

Don't forget that tithes and offerings aren't the only church-related expenses that can be deductible! If you drive as a volunteer (like delivering meals for church outreach or driving for youth events), you can deduct mileage at the charitable rate (14 cents per mile I think). Also, if you buy supplies for church activities and aren't reimbursed, those count too.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

Is that charitable mileage deduction separate from the standard deduction? Or would I still need to be itemizing to claim it?

0 coins

You would still need to be itemizing to claim charitable mileage deductions. All charitable deductions, including mileage for volunteer work, are part of your itemized deductions on Schedule A. So if your total itemized deductions (charitable donations, mileage, mortgage interest, property taxes, etc.) don't exceed the standard deduction, you wouldn't benefit from claiming the mileage. Just to clarify - the charitable mileage rate for 2024 is actually 14 cents per mile, so you had that right! Make sure to keep a log of your volunteer driving with dates, destinations, and mileage for proper documentation.

0 coins

As someone who's been navigating church donations and taxes for years, I'd recommend keeping detailed records throughout the year rather than scrambling at tax time. I use a simple spreadsheet to track all my church giving - date, amount, and method of payment. For your $1300 in donations, make sure you have proper documentation. For any single donation of $250 or more, you'll need a written acknowledgment from the church (not just a bank record). The acknowledgment should state the amount, date, and confirm whether you received any goods or services in return. Also consider the "bunching" strategy others mentioned - if you're close to the itemization threshold, you might donate two years' worth in one year to exceed the standard deduction, then take the standard deduction the following year. This way you get tax benefits every other year instead of never. Given that you're already at $1300 with more of the year left, you might be closer to this strategy working than you think!

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm just starting to think seriously about tracking my giving for tax purposes. Quick question about the $250 rule - if I give $50 every week through the church's online system, do I need written acknowledgment for each $50 donation, or can the church provide one annual statement that covers all my giving for the year? Also, when you mention "bunching," how do you decide which year to bunch the donations in - is there a strategy for timing it right?

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

•

Great questions! For the $250 rule, since each individual donation is $50 (under $250), you don't need written acknowledgment for each one - your bank records or online donation confirmations are sufficient. However, getting an annual statement from the church is still smart for organization and shows the total clearly. For bunching strategy timing, I typically look at my projected income for the current vs. next year. If I expect lower income next year (lower tax bracket), I'd bunch donations in the current year to maximize the deduction value. Also consider other itemizable expenses - if you're planning a major home purchase with mortgage interest, or expecting high medical expenses, that might be the year to bunch your charitable giving too since you'll likely be itemizing anyway. The key is running the numbers both ways before December to see which approach saves more in taxes over the two-year period!

0 coins

As someone who just went through this exact situation with my elderly mother, I wanted to share what we learned after consulting with both a tax attorney and estate planning attorney. The key distinction everyone's mentioned about bank vs. brokerage accounts is absolutely correct, but there's another important consideration: the IRS has specific safe harbor provisions for joint accounts when they're established primarily for convenience and the original owner retains practical control. For bank accounts, if your father continues to be the primary user and you're only added for emergency access/convenience, the IRS is less likely to view this as a completed gift. However, you'd want to document this intent clearly - perhaps through a letter stating the purpose is convenience and emergency access only. For the brokerage account with $290k, I'd strongly echo the TOD recommendation others have made. We ended up doing this for my mom's investment accounts because it eliminated all the gift tax complications while still achieving our goals. One practical tip: before making any changes, consider having your dad speak with his financial advisor about setting up a limited power of attorney for the brokerage account specifically for management purposes. Many brokerages offer this option, and it gives you the ability to help manage investments without triggering any ownership transfer. The amounts you're dealing with ($468k total) definitely warrant professional consultation. The peace of mind alone is worth the cost when you're potentially looking at gift tax filings and all the downstream complications others have mentioned.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful guidance! The safe harbor provision for convenience accounts is something I hadn't heard about before. Do you happen to know if there are specific requirements for documenting the intent? Like, does it need to be notarized or just a simple letter explaining the purpose? Also, the limited power of attorney option for the brokerage account sounds perfect - it would give me the management access my dad wants me to have without any of the ownership complications. I'll definitely ask his broker about this option. You're absolutely right about the professional consultation being worth it with these amounts. After reading everyone's responses here, I'm realizing there are way more considerations than I initially thought - gift tax, estate planning, Medicaid, step-up basis, and now safe harbor provisions. Better to spend a few hundred on proper advice than potentially mess up a $468k situation! Thank you for sharing your real-world experience with your mother's situation. It's really reassuring to hear from someone who's actually navigated this successfully.

0 coins

Based on my experience working with elderly clients in similar situations, I want to emphasize a few critical points that could save you significant headaches down the road. First, regarding the IRS position on JWROS accounts - the distinction between bank and brokerage accounts is real, but it's not as black and white as it might seem. The IRS looks at several factors including who contributed the funds, who has practical control, and the intent behind adding the joint owner. For your dad's $178k savings account, if you're added purely for convenience and he retains practical control (all deposits, withdrawals, and management decisions go through him), you may be able to avoid gift tax implications entirely. However, this needs to be properly documented and consistently maintained. The $290k brokerage account is trickier because investment accounts inherently involve more active management decisions, and the IRS tends to view joint ownership of securities as more substantive than bank account access. Here's what I'd strongly recommend: Before making ANY account changes, sit down with your dad and clearly define what you both want to accomplish. If it's just emergency access and eventual inheritance, TOD designations are almost certainly your best bet. If he genuinely wants you involved in day-to-day financial management, then you'll need to weigh the gift tax implications against the benefits. Also, don't forget about your state's laws - some states have different rules about joint accounts and gift taxes that could affect your situation. Given the total amounts involved, professional guidance isn't just recommended, it's essential. The cost of proper planning is minimal compared to the potential tax consequences of getting this wrong.

0 coins

Serene Snow

•

This is exactly the kind of thorough analysis I was hoping to find! Your point about properly documenting intent for the savings account is particularly valuable - I hadn't realized how important it would be to maintain consistent practices showing my dad retains control. The distinction you make about brokerage accounts involving more active management decisions really clarifies why the IRS treats them differently. It makes sense that joint ownership of securities would be viewed as more substantive than just having access to a checking account. Your recommendation to clearly define our goals before making any changes is spot on. After reading all these responses, I think our primary goals are really about emergency access and avoiding probate complications, not active day-to-day management. That definitely points toward TOD designations being the better approach for our situation. I'm also glad you mentioned state law differences - that's another layer I hadn't considered. Between federal gift tax rules, state variations, and all the estate planning implications, it's clear we need professional guidance to navigate this properly. Thank you for emphasizing the importance of getting this right the first time. With $468k at stake, the cost of proper planning is definitely a worthwhile investment compared to potential mistakes.

0 coins

I've been using a virtual mailbox for my tax filings for the past 6 years while living and working abroad, and I can confirm it's completely legal and widely accepted by the IRS. Your situation is actually very common among expats and digital nomads. The key things to remember: 1. **It's just a mailing address** - The IRS cares about where you earn income and your tax compliance, not whether your mailing address is a traditional residence or a mail forwarding service. 2. **Use the exact format provided** - Include any PMB, Suite, or Unit designations exactly as your mail service specifies to ensure proper routing. 3. **Choose a reliable service** - Look for established providers that are CMRA (Commercial Mail Receiving Agency) registered. This ensures they follow proper mail handling protocols. 4. **Be consistent** - Use this address across all tax forms, banking, and official correspondence to establish it as your legitimate US address. 5. **Document your actual presence** - Keep detailed records of time spent in each location for state tax purposes. This matters more than your mailing address type. I've never had any issues during correspondence with the IRS, and I've received all important notices without problems. The IRS processes thousands of returns with virtual addresses annually - it's become standard practice in our increasingly mobile economy. Just ensure your mail service is reliable so you don't miss any important correspondence, and you'll be fine.

0 coins

This is incredibly comprehensive - thank you for sharing 6 years of experience! Your point about CMRA registration is something I need to research more when selecting a provider. I'm just getting started with this setup and it's reassuring to hear from someone who's been doing it successfully for so long without any IRS issues. Quick question about the documentation aspect - when you mention keeping detailed records of time spent in each location, do you have any recommendations for the best way to track this? I'm thinking about using a travel app or spreadsheet, but I'm curious what method has worked best for you over the years. Also, have you ever needed to provide this documentation to tax authorities, or is it more for your own peace of mind and preparation? The consistency point across all official correspondence is really important - I hadn't fully considered how using different addresses for different purposes might create confusion or red flags. Thanks for the practical guidance!

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

I've been in a similar situation for about 7 years now, working remotely while maintaining US domicile but living internationally. Using a virtual mailbox address on your 1040 is absolutely fine - I've done it every year without any issues. A few things I'd add to the excellent advice already shared: **For your specific situation:** Since you're maintaining domicile in your home state, the virtual mailbox actually works perfectly because it gives you a consistent address in that same state. This helps with the continuity of your domicile claim. **Practical tip:** When setting up your virtual mailbox, ask specifically about their IRS correspondence handling procedures. Some services have special protocols for tax-related mail that ensure faster processing and notification. **State tax consideration:** Since you mentioned spending enough time in your home state to meet domicile requirements, make sure you're tracking those days carefully. The virtual mailbox address will support your state tax position, but the actual time spent physically present is what really matters for domicile determination. **Banking/Credit:** I've never had issues with financial institutions accepting my virtual mailbox address, but I always mention upfront that it's a mail forwarding service if asked directly. Most institutions are familiar with these arrangements now. The semi-nomadic lifestyle is becoming increasingly common, and the tax system has adapted well to handle virtual addresses. You're definitely not breaking any rules by using this setup.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of experienced perspective I was hoping to find! Seven years of successfully using this setup is really reassuring. Your point about asking the virtual mailbox service about their IRS correspondence handling procedures is brilliant - I hadn't thought to ask about that specifically, but it makes total sense that some services might have specialized processes for tax-related mail. The banking insight is also helpful. I've been wondering whether to proactively mention that it's a mail forwarding service or just provide the address as-is. It sounds like being upfront about it when asked directly is the way to go, especially since these arrangements are becoming more common. Your advice about tracking days spent in my home state is spot on. I've been somewhat casual about this documentation, but reading all these responses is making me realize I need to be much more systematic. The virtual mailbox supporting my domicile claim while I track actual physical presence makes a lot of sense - it's like having the administrative anchor while maintaining the legal requirements through actual time spent there. Thanks for sharing such detailed insights from your long experience with this setup!

0 coins

Great to hear you got it sorted out! Just wanted to add one more tip for future reference - keep all your Robinhood statements and 1099-B forms saved digitally or printed out for at least 3 years after filing. The IRS can ask for supporting documentation during that time period, and having everything organized makes it much easier if they ever have questions. Also, since this was your first year with stock transactions, you might want to consider keeping a simple spreadsheet next year to track your trades throughout the year. It makes tax time much less stressful when you don't have to rely entirely on what the brokerage reports. Sometimes there are small discrepancies or missing information that's easier to catch when you have your own records. Good luck with the rest of your filing!

0 coins

Zoe Wang

•

This is really solid advice, especially about keeping your own records! I learned this the hard way when my broker had a small error in my cost basis reporting and I had no way to verify it. Having your own spreadsheet also helps you spot potential wash sales before they happen, which can save you from accidentally triggering them if you're actively trading. One thing I'd add - if you use Robinhood's desktop version or export features, you can usually download your transaction history as a CSV file which makes creating that tracking spreadsheet much easier than entering everything manually.

0 coins

As someone who just went through this exact same situation last year, I can totally relate to the confusion! The good news is that you're overthinking the Form 8453 requirement. For standard stock transactions like what you're describing with Robinhood, you won't need to worry about Form 8453 at all. FreeTaxUSA (and most modern tax software) handles everything electronically now. When you enter your 1099-B information, the software automatically generates Schedule D and Form 8949, and transmits everything directly to the IRS. The Form 8453 is only needed in very specific situations where you have supporting documents that can't be e-filed, which doesn't apply to typical stock sales. Just make sure you're entering all the information from your Robinhood 1099-B exactly as it appears - purchase dates, sale dates, proceeds, and cost basis for each transaction. Even if some transactions show that the cost basis wasn't reported to the IRS (you'll see checkboxes for this), you still don't need Form 8453. The software will handle the proper coding automatically. You're doing great by being careful about this! It shows you're taking it seriously, which is exactly the right approach for your first time filing independently.

0 coins

I think there's some misunderstanding about how the offset system works: • The debt WILL appear in the Treasury Offset Program database • You SHOULD receive a notice from the creditor agency (state unemployment) • The offset WILL appear on your tax transcript, but possibly not until after processing • The BFS (not IRS) handles the actual offset process • You CAN call TOP directly at 1-800-304-3107 to verify debts • You MAY have appeal rights depending on the debt type I appreciate all the insights shared here. This helped me understand the process much better!

0 coins

Based on my experience dealing with this exact situation last year, I can confirm that unemployment overpayments will typically show up in the Treasury Offset Program before they take your refund, but the timing and visibility can be inconsistent. Here's what actually happened in my case: 1. I received a generic overpayment letter from my state unemployment office in October 2. In December, I checked the TOP database by calling 1-800-304-3107 and confirmed my debt was listed 3. When I filed my taxes in February, there was no indication on my initial transcript 4. My refund was processed but reduced by the overpayment amount 5. Code 898 appeared on my transcript about 10 days AFTER the offset occurred The key lesson: don't rely solely on your tax transcript for advance warning. If you suspect you might have an unemployment overpayment, proactively call the TOP line or contact your state unemployment office directly. The "60-90 day advance notice" rule exists on paper, but in practice, many people (myself included) don't receive adequate warning. I'd recommend checking both your state unemployment portal and calling TOP directly if you're concerned. Better to know now than be surprised when your refund is smaller than expected!

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

This is really helpful, thank you for sharing your actual timeline! It's frustrating that the system seems so inconsistent. I'm in a similar situation right now - got a vague letter about potential overpayment but nothing specific about offsets. Your advice about calling TOP directly is gold - I had no idea that was even an option. Did you end up having to pay anything beyond what they took from your refund, or did the offset cover the full amount?

0 coins

Prev1...769770771772773...5643Next