IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Malia Ponder

•

I'm going through this exact same situation right now! Just got my 846 code yesterday for an amended return I e-filed through TurboTax back in January (had to correct some missing 1099-MISC income from freelance work). The uncertainty about whether it'll be direct deposit or paper check is absolutely driving me crazy! After reading through everyone's experiences here, it's both reassuring and frustrating to see how completely unpredictable the IRS is with amended refunds. It really does seem like there's no consistent logic - people with nearly identical situations are getting totally different delivery methods, which makes it impossible to know what to expect. I'm going to follow the advice I keep seeing about monitoring my bank account for about a week after the 846 date, then switching focus to watching for mail if nothing shows up electronically. Already set up those mobile banking alerts so I can stop obsessively checking every hour and try to preserve my sanity! It's oddly comforting to know so many of us are in this same nerve-wracking waiting period together. At least having that 846 code means we're all finally in the home stretch - whether it's a pleasant direct deposit surprise in the next few days or a paper check in a couple weeks, we know our refunds are approved and definitely coming. This whole amended return process has been way more stressful than I ever expected when I first realized I needed to file one!

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

I'm in literally the exact same boat as everyone here! Just got my 846 code this morning for an amended return I e-filed through FreeTaxUSA back in February (correcting some missing HSA contribution deductions). The stress of not knowing if it's direct deposit or paper check is unreal - I've already checked my bank account like 15 times today! What's really frustrating after reading all these experiences is how there's absolutely no way to predict what the IRS will do. It's like they just randomly decide for each person regardless of filing method or circumstances. I'm trying to keep my expectations low and assume paper check, but secretly hoping for that direct deposit miracle! I'm definitely going with the week-long bank monitoring strategy before switching to mail watching mode. Already got those mobile alerts set up so I can stop compulsively refreshing my account every 30 minutes. It's actually really helpful to see so many people going through this same anxiety-inducing wait - at least we're all suffering together! The 846 code gives me hope that we're finally at the finish line though, however the money ends up getting to us.

0 coins

I'm dealing with this exact same situation! Just got my 846 code this morning for an amended return I e-filed through TaxSlayer back in January (had to correct some missing retirement distribution information from a corrected 1099-R). The uncertainty about whether it's coming as direct deposit or paper check is absolutely nerve-wracking! After reading through all these experiences, it's clear the IRS is completely inconsistent with amended refunds - it really does seem like they just flip a coin for each case regardless of how you filed or which software you used. I'm trying to manage my expectations and assume it'll be a paper check since that seems more common, but I can't help holding onto a little hope for direct deposit since I e-filed. I'm definitely going to follow the advice about monitoring my bank account for about a week after the 846 date before switching to mailbox surveillance mode. Already set up those mobile banking alerts so I can stop obsessively checking every hour! It's honestly really comforting to see so many people going through this same stressful waiting period - at least we all have our 846 codes now so we know we're finally in the home stretch, however the money ends up getting to us!

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

Has anyone used H&R Block for inheritance taxes? Their website says they handle it but I'm not sure if the regular preparers know about this stuff or if you need to specifically ask for someone who specializes in estates.

0 coins

I used them last year for my mom's estate and it was a complete disaster. The regular preparer had NO IDEA how to handle the inherited IRA distributions and I ended up having to go to a CPA to fix everything. Cost me way more in the end.

0 coins

I'm really sorry for your loss. Going through this while grieving is incredibly difficult. Given the complexity you're describing - multiple accounts, six-figure inheritance, and especially that overseas account - I'd strongly recommend getting a tax professional. The foreign account alone could trigger FBAR reporting requirements if it exceeds $10,000, and the penalties for missing those deadlines are severe. Inherited retirement accounts also have specific rules that changed under the SECURE Act, and the distribution requirements vary depending on your relationship to your dad and the type of account. A good CPA or EA will help you navigate the step-up in basis for non-retirement investments, ensure proper foreign account reporting, and potentially save you money through strategies you wouldn't know about. The peace of mind alone is worth the cost when you're dealing with this much complexity. Look for someone who specifically has experience with inheritance and foreign account reporting - not all tax pros are equally versed in these areas.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

Quick tip if you're preparing Form 8594: the IRS mentions in Publication 535 that you should use the "residual method" for allocating purchase price. This means you assign values to tangible assets first (based on fair market value), then whatever's left goes to intangibles and goodwill. Has anyone used TurboTax Business for filing this form? Wondering if it walks you through this process well or if I should use a different software...

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

I used TaxAct last year for my business sale and it was pretty decent with Form 8594. It had a specific section for business sales that walked through each asset class and helped allocate everything. Can't speak to TurboTax specifically but the business versions of most tax software handle this form adequately.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

Just went through this exact same situation when I sold my coffee shop last year! The Form 8594 confusion is real. Here's what I learned that might help: For your first question about valuing intangibles you never recorded - don't stress about not having them on your books. The IRS expects you to make reasonable estimates. For your bakery, think about what a buyer would pay for: your recipes (maybe compare to cookbook values or licensing fees), your prime location lease (difference between market rent and what you pay), customer base (annual revenue per customer), and your brand/reviews (advertising cost to rebuild that reputation). For your second question - you MUST allocate based on your actual $25k sale price, not what you think it's worth. I made this mistake initially and my accountant corrected me. The total across all Form 8594 classes has to equal exactly what you received. Here's my suggested approach: List your equipment, inventory, and other tangible assets at fair market value first. Then allocate the remaining amount to Class VI intangibles and Class VII goodwill. Keep simple documentation of how you estimated each value - even rough calculations help if you're ever questioned. The buyer has to file matching numbers, so you can't inflate the total. Focus on reasonable allocations within your actual sale price rather than trying to capture the "true" value of what you built over 15 years.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding the complexities of educational reimbursement timing! As someone just starting to navigate my company's tuition assistance program, I'm realizing there are so many nuances I hadn't considered. The distinction between when benefits are "earned" versus "received" seems to be the crux of most timing issues. After reading through all these experiences, it's clear that being proactive is essential - waiting until you're already in the problematic situation limits your options significantly. I'm particularly intrigued by the success stories where people were able to work with their benefits administrators to adjust payment timing or reclassify reimbursements. It sounds like many companies have more flexibility than they initially advertise, but you need to know the right questions to ask and frame it properly as a tax compliance issue. For anyone facing similar situations, it seems like the key steps are: 1) Get your exact policy language and processing timeline in writing, 2) Calculate the specific tax impact in dollar terms, 3) Contact benefits administrators directly (not just HR), and 4) Document everything thoroughly. One question I haven't seen addressed - for those who successfully got payments reclassified as working condition fringe benefits, did this affect how the benefit appeared on your W-2? I'm wondering if there are any reporting differences employees should be aware of when pursuing this option. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical guidance that's hard to find elsewhere!

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Great question about W-2 reporting for working condition fringe benefits! When educational assistance gets reclassified from Section 127 to working condition fringe benefits, it typically doesn't appear as taxable income on your W-2 at all - that's the main advantage of this classification. Under Section 127, amounts up to $5,250 are excluded from income, but anything over that limit shows up as taxable wages. With working condition fringe benefits (IRC Section 132), the entire amount is excluded as long as it meets the job-related education requirements, so there's no dollar limit and nothing appears on your W-2. Your summary of key steps is spot-on. I'd add one more thing based on what I've seen work: when contacting benefits administrators, it helps to reference specific IRS regulations (like Treasury Reg. 1.162-5 for working condition benefits) rather than just describing the problem generally. It shows you've done your homework and makes it easier for them to verify the legitimacy of your request. The proactive approach really can't be overstated. Once you're already in January of the following year, your options become much more limited. Planning ahead during course enrollment and reimbursement submission gives you the most flexibility to avoid these timing traps.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

This is such a comprehensive discussion! As someone who's been through employer tuition reimbursement programs, I can relate to how frustrating these timing issues can be. The tax code really doesn't account well for the reality of how academic calendars and corporate payment schedules interact. I want to emphasize something that several people touched on but bears repeating - the importance of understanding your company's exact policy language around when benefits are "earned" versus "disbursed." In my experience, many employees (and even some HR representatives) don't fully understand this distinction, but it can be crucial for constructive receipt arguments. One additional tip I haven't seen mentioned: if you're planning to take courses across multiple years, consider having a conversation with your benefits team about their payment processing calendar early in the year. Some companies will work with you to batch smaller reimbursements or adjust timing if you explain the Section 127 implications upfront, but they're much less likely to accommodate changes once payments are already in their system. The success stories about reclassification to working condition fringe benefits are encouraging, but I'd caution that this really does require a clear connection between your coursework and current job duties. The IRS scrutinizes these classifications, so make sure you can document how the education maintains or improves skills you actually use in your present role, not just general career development. For your immediate situation with the $2,625 excess - even if you can't avoid the tax consequences, you're still getting substantial value from the program overall. The additional tax burden is frustrating but manageable compared to paying full tuition out of pocket.

0 coins

This entire thread has been incredibly enlightening! As someone who's just starting to navigate employer educational benefits, I had no idea how complex the timing issues could be. The distinction between Section 127 and working condition fringe benefits is something I never would have known to ask about. Your point about having early conversations with benefits teams about payment processing calendars is really smart strategic planning. It sounds like being proactive at the beginning of the academic year - rather than reactive when problems arise - gives you so many more options for avoiding these calendar year timing traps. I'm also struck by how many people have found success by going directly to benefits administrators rather than general HR. It makes sense that specialists would have more detailed knowledge about tax implications and available workarounds, but it's not intuitive that you need to bypass the usual HR channels. The documentation theme throughout this discussion really resonates too. Even when you can't change the outcome, having a clear paper trail showing course timelines, administrative delays, and good faith efforts to address timing issues seems valuable for potential future IRS interactions. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical, real-world guidance that helps newcomers avoid costly mistakes!

0 coins

Sean Flanagan

•

This has been such a valuable discussion! I'm in a similar situation - just got my PTIN and starting my own practice but the EFIN wait time is daunting. Reading through everyone's experiences, it's clear that the batch services are a legitimate interim solution. I appreciate how @Keisha Brown explained the technical side of how these services work within IRS guidelines - that really helped me understand the relationship between preparers and EROs. I'm particularly interested in the comparison between Drake Tax and TaxSlayer Pro that several people mentioned. The extra cost for Drake seems worth it based on the feedback about customer support and professional documentation. As someone just starting out, having reliable support and credible-looking confirmations for clients feels essential. One thing I'm curious about - for those using batch services, how do you handle the timing with clients? Do you set different expectations for refund processing times, or is the 24-48 hour delay usually not noticeable to them in the overall processing timeline? Also taking the advice about applying for EFIN immediately! Going to get that process started this week while I research the best batch service option. Thanks everyone for sharing your real experiences - this kind of practical guidance is exactly what I needed to feel confident about making the transition.

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

Welcome to the tax prep world! From my experience last season, the 24-48 hour delay with batch services is usually not something clients notice much. Most people expect their refunds to take at least a week or two anyway, so an extra day or two in the submission process doesn't really impact their expectations. What I found helpful was being proactive about communication - I'd let clients know their return was "submitted for processing" once I sent it to the batch service, then follow up with "accepted by IRS" once I got the confirmation. This kept them informed without having to explain the technical details of the batch process. The key is having that tracking system @Javier Torres mentioned so you can give clients accurate updates if they ask. Most are just happy to know their return is moving through the system properly. Drake Tax really is worth the extra cost for the peace of mind, especially in your first year when everything feels overwhelming. Their support team actually understands the batch service process and can help troubleshoot issues quickly. Good luck with your EFIN application - the sooner you get that started, the sooner you ll'have full control over your filing process!

0 coins

Thais Soares

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful for someone in my exact situation! I'm also transitioning from employee to running my own tax practice and was feeling overwhelmed by the EFIN timeline. Based on all the experiences shared here, I'm convinced that using a batch service temporarily while waiting for my EFIN is the right approach. The explanation of how these services work as Electronic Return Originators really cleared up my concerns about legitimacy - I was worried about accidentally violating IRS regulations. I'm going to follow the advice and apply for my EFIN immediately while setting up with Drake Tax for their batch service. The consensus seems to be that their customer support and professional documentation are worth the extra cost, especially when you're just starting out and need that credibility with clients. One practical question I have - for those who used batch services, did you find it helpful to mention this arrangement in your engagement letters with clients, or did you handle it more as an operational detail that didn't need specific disclosure? I want to be transparent but also don't want to overcomplicate things or make clients worry about the process. Really appreciate everyone sharing their real-world experiences here. It's exactly the kind of practical guidance you need when making this transition but can't find in the official IRS publications!

0 coins

Welcome to the tax prep community! You're asking all the right questions. Regarding engagement letters, I'd recommend keeping it simple - you can mention something like "returns will be electronically filed through an authorized IRS e-file provider" without getting into the technical details of batch processing. This is accurate and transparent without making clients worry about the mechanics. Most clients just want to know their returns will be filed properly and securely. The batch service arrangement is really more of an operational detail on your end. What matters to them is that you have the proper credentials (your PTIN) and that their returns are being handled by IRS-authorized systems. Drake Tax's documentation actually makes this easy since their confirmations look very professional and official - clients get the same level of confidence they'd have with direct e-filing. The key is having that tracking system ready so you can provide updates promptly if anyone asks about status. You're smart to get the EFIN application started right away. Even with the batch service working well, having your own EFIN gives you much more control and flexibility as your practice grows. Good luck with your new venture - sounds like you're setting yourself up for success!

0 coins

Prev1...770771772773774...5643Next