IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar K-1 situation and wanted to add one more consideration that might be relevant for some folks here. If your partnership is involved in oil, gas, or other natural resource activities, some of those box 13, code W expenses might actually be depletion-related costs that could be handled differently. I learned this the hard way when I assumed all my box 13 expenses were the same suspended miscellaneous deductions. Also, for anyone tracking these expenses for future deductibility after 2025 - make sure you're also keeping records of any AMT adjustments related to these items. Some partnership expenses that aren't deductible for regular tax purposes might still affect your alternative minimum tax calculations, and you'll want that documentation if the rules change again. One last tip: if you're working with a tax professional, bring them the entire K-1 instructions booklet that came with your K-1, not just the form itself. Those instructions often contain partnership-specific explanations for the various codes that can be really helpful in determining the exact nature of your box 13 items.

0 coins

This is such valuable additional context! The point about natural resource partnerships is especially important - I hadn't considered that some box 13, code W expenses might have different treatment depending on the underlying business activity. Your mention of AMT implications is also spot-on. Even though individual AMT has much less impact post-TCJA due to the higher exemption amounts, it's still worth tracking these items since partnership investments can generate various preference items that might push you into AMT territory. The tip about bringing the full K-1 instructions booklet to your tax preparer is gold. I made the mistake of just handing over the K-1 form itself last year, and we missed some nuances that were clearly explained in the partnership-specific instructions that came with it. For anyone else reading this thread - it's also worth noting that if you have multiple partnership interests, each partnership might classify similar expenses with different box 13 codes depending on their specific activities and how their accountants interpret the reporting requirements. So don't assume all your "management fees" will be treated identically across different K-1s.

0 coins

This has been such an educational thread! As someone who's been wrestling with these same box 13, code W expenses from my real estate partnership K-1, I wanted to share what I learned from my state tax research. For those asking about state deductibility - it's really worth checking your specific state's conformity rules. I'm in Illinois, and while IL generally conforms to federal tax changes, they specifically chose NOT to suspend miscellaneous itemized deductions for state purposes. So I was able to deduct my $6,200 in management fees on my IL-1040, saving me about $310 in state taxes. The key is understanding that each state made its own decision about whether to conform to the TCJA changes. States like California, New York, Pennsylvania, and Illinois maintained these deductions, while others followed the federal suspension. Don't assume either way - check your state's specific rules or consult their tax website. Also, for those tracking these expenses for future years - I created a simple spreadsheet with columns for the tax year, partnership name, amount, and notes about the specific nature of the expenses. When 2026 rolls around and these become federally deductible again, you'll have a clean record of everything you've accumulated over the years. One more thing - if you're in a state that still allows these deductions, make sure you're actually itemizing on your state return. Some states require you to itemize state even if you take the standard deduction federally, which could make these partnership expenses valuable even if your other itemized deductions aren't high enough to beat the federal standard deduction.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful information about state-specific rules! I'm just getting started with understanding K-1s (this is my first year with partnership investments), and I had no idea that states could choose whether or not to follow federal tax law changes like this. Your point about needing to itemize on the state return even when taking the federal standard deduction is something I never would have thought of. I'm in Texas so we don't have state income tax, but this is great to know for future reference if I ever move. The spreadsheet idea is brilliant - I'm definitely going to set that up now rather than trying to reconstruct everything in a few years when the rules change back. Do you happen to track anything else in your spreadsheet beyond what you mentioned, like which specific box 13 codes the expenses came from or whether they might qualify for NIIT offset? Thanks for sharing your research process - as a newcomer to all this, it's really helpful to see how more experienced investors approach tracking these complex tax items!

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

Nobody has mentioned Credit Karma Tax (now called Cash App Taxes) which is completely free for federal AND state! I switched from TurboTax 3 years ago and have saved hundreds. It handles W-2s and basic 1099 income no problem. The IRS direct file is only available in 12 states right now for the 2025 filing season as part of their pilot program. Unless you're in Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, or Wyoming, you can't use it yet.

0 coins

I tried Cash App Taxes last year and it messed up my state return so badly I had to file an amendment. Their interface is pretty but their tax logic had some serious flaws. I'd be careful with them especially if you have anything remotely complicated.

0 coins

Based on your situation (W-2 plus under $3,000 in side gig income), I'd definitely recommend FreeTaxUSA over filing directly through IRS.gov. The IRS website doesn't actually have comprehensive tax prep software - they mainly offer Free File Fillable Forms which are basically digital versions of paper forms without much guidance. FreeTaxUSA will walk you through everything step-by-step and handle your side gig income properly with Schedule C forms. Federal filing is completely free and it's much more user-friendly than trying to navigate tax forms on your own. Plus, you'll avoid the constant upselling that made you want to ditch TurboTax in the first place. The new IRS Direct File program everyone's talking about is still very limited - only available in 12 pilot states and doesn't handle all tax situations yet. For your second year filing with a straightforward but not completely simple situation, FreeTaxUSA hits that sweet spot of being comprehensive without being overwhelming.

0 coins

Nia Wilson

•

This is really helpful, thanks! I'm definitely leaning towards FreeTaxUSA now after reading everyone's experiences. Quick question - when you mention Schedule C forms for the side gig income, does FreeTaxUSA automatically know to use those or do I need to specifically tell it that I have self-employment income? I made the money doing freelance graphic design work if that matters. Also, do you know if there's a deadline to switch from one service to another, or can I start with FreeTaxUSA even though I used TurboTax last year?

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

Whoever designed these tax programs is evil genius level. They detect you made a retirement contribution, force Form 8880 into your return knowing most people won't qualify for the credit, then charge you for the "premium" form. Absolute scam but totally legal.

0 coins

They're not forcing anything. Form 8880 is legitimately required if you made retirement contributions, regardless of whether you end up qualifying for the credit or not. The IRS requires you to fill out the form to verify if you qualify.

0 coins

Actually, Miguel is incorrect about Form 8880 being required for all retirement contributions. You only need to file Form 8880 if you're actually claiming the Saver's Credit. If your income is above the eligibility thresholds, you don't need this form at all. The real issue is that tax software companies use this as a revenue opportunity. They detect retirement contributions and automatically assume you might qualify for the credit, then charge you for the "premium" version to include the form. But if you know you don't qualify based on your income, you can often work around this by being more specific about how you enter your retirement information. For 2024 taxes, the income limits are $36,500 for single filers and $73,000 for married filing jointly. If you're above these amounts, you can safely skip Form 8880 entirely. The key is finding tax software that doesn't automatically force it or knowing how to navigate around the upsell tactics.

0 coins

This is exactly the clarification I needed! I've been so confused about whether I actually need Form 8880 or if the software is just trying to upsell me. My income is definitely above $36,500 so it sounds like I can skip this form entirely. Do you know if there's a way to tell TurboTax or H&R Block that I don't want to claim the Saver's Credit so they stop forcing the form? Or should I just switch to one of the free alternatives people mentioned?

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

As a newcomer to this community, I wanted to share my perspective on your Apple Watch deduction question since I'm currently navigating a very similar situation as a freelance business consultant. Your 80% business use calculation sounds very reasonable for a real estate agent! I'm calculating mine at around 75% for client communications, project management, and time tracking across different clients. What I've learned from all these incredibly helpful responses is that the key is demonstrating legitimate business purpose with reasonable documentation. Based on everyone's experiences shared here, it looks like you'll want to: - Keep your purchase receipt and note the business purpose - Document your specific work use cases (which you've already identified perfectly) - Consider tracking usage for 2-3 weeks to establish your 80% pattern - Take screenshots of your business apps and notification settings Since your $429 watch is under the $2,500 threshold, you should benefit from the de minimis safe harbor rule and be able to deduct about $343 (80% of the cost) immediately rather than depreciating it. The "Business" focus mode idea that several members mentioned is brilliant - it would create natural documentation showing work vs personal use patterns. Your use cases of client emails, showing notifications, mileage tracking, and property notes are textbook examples of legitimate business necessity. This community has been incredibly helpful for understanding these practical tax situations! Thanks to everyone who's shared their real-world experiences - it makes navigating business deductions so much less intimidating for newcomers like us.

0 coins

Harold Oh

•

Welcome to the community, Rajan! As another newcomer here, I'm so impressed by how thoroughly you've synthesized all the great advice from this thread. Your 75% business use calculation as a consultant sounds very reasonable and aligns well with what others have shared. I just joined this community myself and have been amazed by how generous everyone is with sharing their real-world experiences. The practical steps you've outlined - keeping receipts, documenting use cases, tracking for a few weeks, taking screenshots - creates such a clear roadmap for approaching this deduction properly. The de minimis safe harbor rule has been such an eye-opener for me through reading this discussion. Being able to deduct the full business portion immediately rather than dealing with depreciation makes the whole process much more straightforward than I initially expected. Your point about the "Business" focus mode creating natural documentation is spot on - it's such a clever way to use the device's built-in features to help establish that business vs personal use separation automatically. As someone who was initially intimidated by business deductions, this thread has been incredibly valuable for building confidence that the process is manageable when you have legitimate business use and keep reasonable records. Thanks for contributing to such a helpful discussion!

0 coins

Cynthia Love

•

As a newcomer to this community, I wanted to share my experience since I just went through this exact process with my Apple Watch deduction as a freelance property manager. Your situation sounds very similar to mine! I use my Apple Watch Series 9 constantly for tenant communications, maintenance scheduling, emergency notifications, and tracking time between different properties. After documenting my usage for about a month, I calculated roughly 83% business use. The documentation was much simpler than I expected. I kept my receipt, wrote a brief memo explaining my business use cases, and took screenshots of my key work apps (calendar, messaging, timer functions). My tax preparer confirmed this was more than sufficient. Since your $429 watch is under the $2,500 threshold, you can use the de minimis safe harbor rule and deduct about $343 (80% of cost) immediately instead of depreciating it. Your use case as a real estate agent is perfect - client communications, showing alerts, mileage tracking, and property notes are all clearly legitimate business functions. One tip that worked great for me: I set up a "Real Estate" focus mode that only shows work-related apps and notifications during business hours. This created automatic documentation of business vs personal use that could be helpful if questioned. The key insight I learned is that the IRS focuses on genuine business purpose and reasonable records rather than perfect documentation. Since you're already thinking about this properly, you're in great shape! This community has been incredibly helpful for navigating these practical tax questions.

0 coins

Olivia Garcia

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I was actually in a similar situation a few months ago and wanted to share what I learned from the process. One thing that really helped me was setting up a separate savings account specifically for HSA contributions before making them. I'd transfer the after-tax money there first, then move it to the HSA when I was ready. This made it much easier to track exactly how much I contributed with after-tax dollars when it came time to fill out Form 8889. Also, don't forget about the timing - you can make HSA contributions for the previous tax year up until the tax filing deadline (usually April 15th). So if you're close to the contribution limit for this year but want to get invested sooner, you might consider making part of your contribution count toward next year's limit instead. The investment option has been totally worth it for me. Even with some market volatility, the long-term growth potential of HSA funds is amazing since you never pay taxes on qualified withdrawals. Just make sure you're comfortable with the investment options your provider offers before you commit!

0 coins

This is such a smart approach with the separate savings account! I never thought about creating that paper trail beforehand. I'm definitely going to set something like this up before I make my contribution. The timing point you mentioned is really interesting too. So if I'm already close to this year's contribution limit but want to get invested sooner rather than later, I could make the contribution now but designate it for next tax year? Does that mean I'd claim the deduction on next year's tax return instead of this year's?

0 coins

CyberSiren

•

@Evelyn Martinez Exactly right! If you designate the contribution for the following tax year, you would claim the deduction on next year s'tax return instead of this year s.'Most HSA providers will ask you to specify which tax year the contribution is for when you make it, especially if you re'contributing between January 1st and the tax filing deadline. This can be a great strategy if you re'already maxed out for the current year but want to get your money invested sooner. Just make sure to keep clear records of which contributions go toward which tax year - it can get confusing come tax time if you re'not organized about it. The separate savings account approach that Olivia mentioned really helps with this kind of tracking!

0 coins

Juan Moreno

•

I just want to echo what several others have mentioned about keeping detailed records - this saved me from a major headache! When I made my after-tax HSA contribution last year, I created a simple spreadsheet tracking the date, amount, and source of each contribution (payroll vs. personal). One additional tip: if you use a credit card or bank transfer for your after-tax contribution, make sure the transaction description clearly identifies it as an HSA contribution. Some banks use generic descriptions like "TRANSFER TO EXTERNAL ACCOUNT" which doesn't help much when you're trying to reconstruct your tax situation months later. Also, regarding the investment threshold strategy - I did exactly what you're planning and it worked great! Just remember that once you start investing, you'll want to review your investment options periodically. Many HSA providers have limited fund choices with higher expense ratios compared to regular brokerages, so factor that into your long-term planning. The tax advantages still make it worthwhile, but it's good to be aware of the total cost of ownership for your HSA investments.

0 coins

This spreadsheet tracking idea is brilliant! I'm definitely implementing this system before I make my contribution. Your point about transaction descriptions is spot on - I've had issues with vague bank descriptions before when trying to categorize expenses for other tax purposes. Quick question about the investment options you mentioned - did you find that the limited fund choices significantly impacted your returns, or were the tax advantages substantial enough to offset any higher expense ratios? I'm trying to weigh whether hitting that investment threshold quickly is worth it if the fund options aren't great, or if I should just be patient and build up the balance more slowly with better investment options elsewhere.

0 coins

Prev1...725726727728729...5645Next