IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Fidel Carson

•

I've been through this exact scenario with multiple PE investments over the past few years, and I can share what's worked for me. The annualized income installment method on Schedule AI is definitely your best bet, but there are a few key strategies that can help maximize your chances of penalty relief. First, for the timing issue - while partnerships technically "earn" income throughout their tax year, the IRS has been increasingly reasonable about K-1 situations where the actual amounts are genuinely unknowable until you receive the forms. I've successfully allocated December year-end partnership income to Q1 when I could document that valuations and audits prevented earlier disclosure. Second, consider the "cascading" approach on Schedule AI - start by calculating what your penalty would be if you allocated all K-1 income to Q4, then recalculate allocating it to Q1 based on when you actually received the information. The IRS allows you to use whichever method results in the lowest penalty. Third, proactively file Form 843 with your return including a detailed timeline of when you contacted partnerships requesting estimates and their responses (or lack thereof). I've found that showing you made good faith efforts to obtain information during the year significantly strengthens your reasonable cause argument. The system definitely feels stacked against individual investors dealing with PE K-1s, but with proper documentation and use of the annualized method, you can usually get most or all penalties abated. The key is being thorough with your paperwork and consistent in your approach across all partnerships.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful advice, especially the "cascading" approach you mentioned! I hadn't thought about calculating the penalty both ways and using whichever method results in lower penalties. Quick question about the Form 843 documentation - when you say you included a timeline of contacting partnerships for estimates, did you literally reach out to each partnership during the year asking for projections? I'm wondering if I should start doing this proactively for next year, even though I suspect most won't provide anything useful. It sounds like having that paper trail of "I tried but they couldn't/wouldn't help" is really valuable for the reasonable cause argument. Also, have you ever had the IRS push back on allocating December year-end partnership income to Q1, or have they generally been accepting of that approach when you have proper documentation?

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Yes, I do proactively reach out to my partnerships, usually in September and December, asking for year-end estimates or projections. You're absolutely right that most won't provide anything concrete - I'd say maybe 1 out of 5 actually gives useful numbers. But the key is documenting these attempts. I keep emails showing I requested estimates and their responses (usually something like "we can't provide reliable estimates until our audit is complete" or "valuations are still in process"). Even non-responses are valuable - I follow up after a week or two and note when partnerships don't reply to estimate requests. Regarding IRS pushback on Q1 allocation for December year-end partnerships, I've never had them challenge it when I have proper documentation showing the income amount was genuinely unknowable in Q4. The IRS seems to distinguish between partnerships that could reasonably provide estimates (like operating businesses) versus PE funds dealing with complex valuations. One tip: when reaching out to partnerships, specifically ask about their timeline for providing estimates and when they expect to have final numbers. Include this in your documentation. It helps show that the delay wasn't due to your lack of planning but rather the nature of these investments. This approach has worked well for me across multiple years and various fund types.

0 coins

Cedric Chung

•

I've been dealing with K-1 penalty issues for years with my PE investments, and one thing that's helped me is understanding the difference between "actual knowledge" versus "constructive knowledge" of income for Schedule AI purposes. The IRS generally recognizes that with private equity, you don't have actual knowledge of your income until you receive the K-1, even if the partnership's tax year ended earlier. This is different from, say, rental income where you know month by month what you're earning. A few practical tips from my experience: 1) Keep a log throughout the year of any attempts to get information from your partnerships - even informal conversations at annual meetings where you ask about expected distributions. 2) When filing Schedule AI, include a brief statement with each partnership explaining why the income amount was unknowable until you received the K-1 (e.g., "Income dependent on year-end valuations completed in Q1"). 3) Consider the "prior year safe harbor" calculation first - sometimes it's better to just pay 110% of last year's tax (if your AGI was over $150K) and avoid the whole penalty calculation altogether. The annualized income method definitely works, but it requires careful documentation. The IRS has been reasonable in my experience when you can show you made good faith efforts to comply but were genuinely limited by information availability.

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

This distinction between "actual knowledge" and "constructive knowledge" is really important - thank you for explaining that! I'm dealing with my first year of PE K-1s and had no idea this was even a consideration for Schedule AI. Your point about keeping a log throughout the year is smart. I wish I had started doing that this year, but I'll definitely implement it going forward. For this year's filing, I'm wondering if I can still document my situation effectively even though I didn't proactively reach out to the partnerships. I literally had no idea these distributions were coming until the K-1s showed up in March. The prior year safe harbor would have been great, but unfortunately my income jumped so dramatically this year that 110% of last year's tax doesn't even come close to covering what I owe. Looks like Schedule AI is my best option at this point. One question about your statement approach - do you include these explanations directly on Schedule AI, or do you attach them as a separate document with your return?

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Just wanted to add - don't forget about state taxes too! In Pennsylvania (where you mentioned you live), you'll need to file a PA Schedule C with your state return as well. Pennsylvania doesn't recognize LLCs as separate from their owners for tax purposes, similar to federal treatment for single-member LLCs. Also, depending on your local municipality, you might need to file a local business tax return or get a business privilege license. Some PA cities and townships have these requirements even for small side businesses. Might be worth checking with your local government office.

0 coins

This is important! I'm in PA too and was surprised when I got a letter from my township about needing a business privilege license for my side gig. The fee wasn't much ($50) but they can charge penalties if you operate without one.

0 coins

Great question! I went through this exact same situation when I started my consulting LLC alongside my teaching job. A few additional points that might help: Since you're already employed as a high school counselor with taxes withheld, you might want to consider increasing your withholding at your main job rather than making quarterly payments. You can adjust your W-4 to have extra tax withheld to cover the tax liability from your LLC income - this is often easier than remembering to make quarterly payments. Also, don't underestimate your deductible expenses! Beyond the obvious ones like mileage and startup costs, consider things like: - Professional liability insurance (if you get it for your coaching) - Continuing education related to your coaching specialty - Office supplies (even if it's just notebooks and pens for client sessions) - Professional memberships or certifications - Business meals with potential clients (50% deductible) One more tip: Keep detailed records of your time and activities. Since coaching can sometimes blur the line between business and personal development, having clear documentation of your business activities will be helpful if you're ever audited. The Schedule C filing is straightforward, especially with TurboTax, but don't hesitate to consult a tax professional if your income grows significantly or your situation becomes more complex.

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

•

This is incredibly helpful advice! I'm actually in a very similar situation - just started an LLC for my freelance writing business while keeping my full-time job. The tip about adjusting W-4 withholding instead of quarterly payments is brilliant - I hadn't thought of that approach but it makes so much more sense than trying to calculate and remember quarterly deadlines. I'm definitely going to look into professional liability insurance now that you mention it. Do you have any recommendations for where to get coverage for coaching/consulting businesses? Also, I'm curious about the business meals deduction - does that apply even for initial consultation meetings where you're not yet working with the client? Thanks for mentioning the documentation aspect too. I've been pretty casual about record-keeping but realize I need to get more systematic about tracking everything business-related.

0 coins

Jean Claude

•

Before you proceed with the withdrawal, I'd strongly recommend getting a professional tax consultation to review your specific situation. The 5-year rule for conversions can be tricky, and there might be some nuances in your particular case that could affect the penalty calculation. One thing to consider is the timing of your withdrawals. If you're going to take money out anyway, you might want to wait until January 2028 when your 2023 conversion will have satisfied its 5-year requirement. That could save you 10% on $6,000 ($600 in penalties). Also, make sure you understand exactly how much of your account balance represents conversions versus any potential earnings. Your brokerage should be able to provide detailed statements showing the breakdown, which will be crucial for accurate tax reporting on Form 8606. The penalty math is straightforward but painful - 10% on any conversion amounts withdrawn before their respective 5-year periods expire. Given that you're looking at potentially $1,450 in penalties on the full $14,500, exploring other financing options (personal loan, credit line, etc.) might be worth comparing against the total cost of early withdrawal.

0 coins

Lauren Wood

•

This is excellent advice about timing the withdrawal strategically. Waiting until January 2028 to avoid the penalty on that $6,000 from 2023 could make a huge difference if you can manage it financially. I'm also curious - when you mention getting detailed statements from the brokerage showing the breakdown, do most major brokerages automatically track this conversion vs earnings information? Or is this something you typically need to request specifically? I want to make sure I have all the documentation I'd need before making any moves. The comparison to other financing options is really eye-opening too. Even a higher-interest personal loan might be cheaper than losing that retirement contribution space forever, especially when you factor in decades of missed tax-free growth.

0 coins

The timing strategy mentioned by Jean Claude is really smart, but I wanted to add that you should also check if your brokerage offers any short-term lending options against your IRA balance. Some major brokerages like Schwab, Fidelity, and Vanguard offer securities-based lending where you can borrow against your retirement account value without actually withdrawing the funds. This could potentially let you access the cash you need while avoiding the early withdrawal penalties entirely. The interest rates are usually much lower than personal loans (often 3-5% depending on the amount), and you keep your retirement funds invested and growing. Obviously you'd want to be careful about the risks of borrowing against investments, but for a temporary financial crunch, it might be a much better option than paying 10% penalties plus losing that contribution space forever. Worth calling your brokerage to see what lending options they have available.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

This is a fantastic suggestion about securities-based lending! I had no idea that was even an option with retirement accounts. The 3-5% interest rate sounds way more manageable than the 10% penalty plus losing all that future growth potential. Do you know if there are any restrictions on what you can use the borrowed funds for? And how does the approval process typically work - is it based on your credit score or primarily on the account value? I'm wondering if this could be a viable option for someone in a financial crunch who might not qualify for traditional personal loans. Also curious about the repayment terms - are these typically structured like a line of credit where you can pay it back over time, or do they expect faster repayment?

0 coins

Ava Williams

•

I've been in a similar situation with precious metals transactions. One thing to keep in mind is that even though you're creating your own documentation, you should try to be as detailed as possible for your own protection. Since you mentioned you didn't track individual transactions, I'd recommend trying to reconstruct what you can remember. Check your bank statements or credit card records for cash withdrawals around the times you went to estate sales - this can help you estimate dates and amounts spent. For the sales, try to remember which coin shop you used and approximately when you made each visit. Also, make sure you understand the difference between hobby income and business income for tax purposes. If you're doing this regularly with the intention of making profit, it's likely business income (Schedule C). If it was more casual/occasional, it might be capital gains. The treatment affects how you can deduct expenses. One more tip: start keeping detailed records going forward! A simple notebook or phone app where you log each purchase and sale will save you this headache next year.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I wish I had thought to check my bank statements - that's a great way to reconstruct the timeline. I mostly used cash from ATM withdrawals, so those dates should help me piece together when I was actively buying. You're absolutely right about keeping better records going forward. I learned my lesson the hard way this tax season. I'm definitely going to start a simple log on my phone for any future transactions. Quick question about the hobby vs business distinction - since I only made about $1,000 profit and it wasn't really a regular schedule (just whenever I found good estate sales), would that lean more toward hobby income? I wasn't treating it like a formal business at all.

0 coins

Oliver Weber

•

The hobby vs. business distinction depends on several factors, not just the amount you made. The IRS looks at things like: Do you operate in a businesslike manner? Do you spend considerable time on the activity? Do you depend on income from it? Do you have expertise in the area? Have you made profits in some years? In your case, since you were actively seeking out estate sales specifically looking for gold, and you had a system for selling to the coin dealer, it sounds more like a business activity even if informal. The profit amount doesn't really matter - people run small businesses that make under $1,000 all the time. If it's business income (Schedule C), you can deduct expenses like gas to drive to estate sales, but you'd also potentially owe self-employment tax if your net profit is over $400. If it's capital gains, you can't deduct those expenses, but you avoid self-employment tax. Given that you were doing this systematically rather than just occasionally selling personal items, I'd lean toward treating it as business income. But definitely consult the IRS factors or a tax professional to be sure!

0 coins

Arjun Kurti

•

I had a very similar situation last year with buying and flipping vintage items at estate sales. What really helped me was creating a simple Excel spreadsheet with columns for: Date (estimated), Item Description, Purchase Price, Sale Price, and Profit/Loss. Even though I didn't have perfect records, I was able to reconstruct most of it by going through my photos (I had pictures of items I bought), checking my bank account for ATM withdrawals around estate sale dates, and looking at my calendar to remember which weekends I went out hunting. For FreeTaxUSA, I saved this spreadsheet as a PDF and attached it when prompted. The software accepted it without any issues. Just make sure to title it something clear like "Summary Statement of Gold Sales - 2024" and include a note that amounts and dates are estimates based on available records. One thing I learned is to take photos of everything you buy going forward - not just for records, but it actually helps you remember the details later. Also, many estate sale companies post their sales on Facebook or EstateSales.net, so you might be able to look back at those listings to help reconstruct your timeline. Since your profit was under $1,000 and this sounds more occasional than systematic, you'll probably be fine reporting it as capital gains rather than business income. Just be honest about your estimates and keep whatever documentation you can create.

0 coins

Jay Lincoln

•

That's a brilliant idea about checking EstateSales.net and Facebook for past listings! I never thought of that. Those sites usually keep archives of their sales with dates and addresses, which could really help piece together the timeline. The photo tip is gold (no pun intended) - I actually did take some pictures of pieces I thought were interesting, so I might be able to use those to help estimate values and dates. Your spreadsheet approach sounds much more organized than what I was trying to cobble together. One question - when you reported as capital gains, did you have to specify anywhere that these were collectibles subject to the 28% rate, or does the tax software handle that automatically once you describe them as gold items?

0 coins

Great question about the collectibles tax rate! In my experience with FreeTaxUSA, you typically need to specify this when entering the transaction details. When you're inputting your gold sales, there's usually a field or dropdown where you can select the type of asset - make sure to choose "collectibles" rather than just "capital asset" or "investment." The software should then automatically apply the correct tax treatment. For short-term gains (held less than a year), it gets taxed as ordinary income anyway, but for long-term gains, selecting "collectibles" ensures it gets the 28% maximum rate instead of the lower capital gains rates. If you're unsure, you can always look for a "collectibles" checkbox or mention in the description that these are "gold collectibles" to be safe. The key is being clear about what you're reporting so the software applies the right tax rules. Also, totally agree about those estate sale websites being goldmines for reconstructing timelines - I was able to piece together almost my entire buying history that way!

0 coins

Zara Perez

•

This thread has been incredibly enlightening! As someone who's been working remotely since 2019, I had no idea about all the compliance complexities that companies face when employees move states. I always assumed it was just a matter of updating your address in the system. I'm currently based in Ohio but have been considering a move to either Colorado or Arizona for lifestyle reasons. After reading through everyone's experiences, it sounds like I need to be much more strategic about approaching this conversation with my employer. The suggestion about getting specific requirements from the destination state's tax agency beforehand is brilliant. I'm going to research both Colorado and Arizona's employer registration requirements and present a clear compliance plan when I have that discussion with HR. It seems like showing you've done the homework and understand what's involved goes a long way toward getting approval. Has anyone here successfully negotiated remote work approval for a state their company hadn't previously operated in? I'm curious about what made the difference in getting that "yes" versus being told it's not feasible.

0 coins

Caleb Stark

•

I successfully got approval to work from Montana even though my company had never had employees there before! The key was definitely doing the homework upfront. I spent a weekend researching Montana's tax requirements, employment laws, and registration process, then put together a one-page summary showing exactly what my employer would need to do. What really sealed the deal was offering to handle the initial legwork myself - I volunteered to fill out the registration forms, research the quarterly filing requirements, and even offered to reimburse the $75 registration fee. My HR director later told me that my proactive approach made all the difference because it showed I understood this wasn't just "updating my address." The other thing that helped was timing - I brought this up during my annual review when we were already discussing my performance and future with the company. It felt like a natural extension of that conversation rather than a random request that might catch them off guard. Both Colorado and Arizona should be pretty manageable for most employers since they have straightforward tax structures. Good luck with your move planning!

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

This whole discussion has been a real eye-opener! I work for the IRS in business compliance, and while I can't give specific tax advice, I can confirm that the challenges everyone's describing are very real from our perspective too. We've definitely seen a massive increase in inquiries from employers trying to figure out their multi-state obligations since remote work exploded. The good news is that most states have pretty clear guidance on their websites about employer registration requirements - it's just that many companies don't know where to look or what questions to ask. One thing I'd add to the great advice already given: make sure your employer understands the difference between having nexus for income tax purposes versus just having payroll obligations. Having one remote employee in a state usually creates payroll tax obligations (withholding, unemployment insurance) but doesn't necessarily mean the company owes income tax in that state. However, this can vary significantly by state and business type. The proactive approach several people mentioned - researching requirements beforehand and presenting a clear plan - is definitely the way to go. It shows you understand this isn't just an HR inconvenience but a real compliance matter that needs to be handled properly.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

This is incredibly valuable insight from someone who sees this from the government side! I'm curious about something you mentioned - the distinction between payroll obligations and income tax nexus. As someone planning a move, should I be researching both aspects when I prepare my proposal to my employer? Also, when you say "most states have pretty clear guidance on their websites," are there specific sections or resources you'd recommend looking at? I want to make sure I'm finding the official requirements rather than potentially outdated or incorrect information from third-party sources. The nexus distinction seems particularly important to understand since it could affect how I frame the conversation with my company. If having one remote employee doesn't automatically create corporate income tax obligations, that might make the compliance burden seem more manageable to a hesitant employer.

0 coins

Prev1...669670671672673...5643Next