
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
Been waiting on my Oregon state refund and starting to get anxious. E-filed two weeks ago, got accepted right away but still nothing in my account. Anyone from Oregon know the typical timeline? Federal already hit my account last week.
I'm a full-time graduate student with full funding from my research advisor. For the past few years, my 1098-T forms have been straightforward (Box 1 roughly equaled Box 5, and Box 6 was always 0). This year, though nothing has changed with my funding situation, I'm seeing an additional $13,500 added to BOTH Box 5 and Box 6. This is causing me to suddenly owe a significant amount in taxes that I wasn't expecting. My university provided this explanation: "In most cases, Box 6 adjustments are the consequence of departments or the Financial Aid Office changing the source of aid from one internal account to another. When departments make this change, it creates a deficit from a prior year (Box 6) and this amount is then included in Box 5 along with the current year's aid." I don't understand how this makes sense. It seems like I'm being double-taxed just because my university moved money between internal accounts. There's a possibility my advisor changed my funding source within the past year or so, but the actual amount of funding stayed exactly the same. I have appointments scheduled with both my advisor and someone from university finance on Monday, but I'm completely stressed about this unexpected tax bill. Has anyone dealt with this 1098-T Box 6 situation before? Any insights would be incredibly helpful!
Question for those who've dealt with this before - does the 1098-T Box 6 issue affect how you should input this in TurboTax? I'm trying to file and it keeps asking me to enter Box 5 and Box 6 separately but doesn't seem to be calculating it correctly.
I had the same issue with TurboTax! What worked for me was entering the full amounts in both Box 5 and Box 6 as requested, but then going to the "Other Income" section and making a negative adjustment labeled as "1098-T Box 6 adjustment for internal fund transfer" to offset the double counting. This way the correct net amount gets reported. If you use another tax software, the process might be different, but the principle is the same - you need to make a manual adjustment somewhere to ensure you're only taxed on the net scholarship amount.
I'm dealing with this exact same situation right now! My 1098-T suddenly has $8,200 in Box 6 this year when it's always been zero before, and my university gave me almost the identical explanation about "internal account changes." Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful - I had no idea that I should be calculating the net amount (Box 5 minus Box 6) rather than treating them as separate income items. I was panicking thinking I owed taxes on an extra $8,200 that I never actually received. I'm definitely going to follow the advice about getting written documentation from my university confirming this was just an internal transfer. Has anyone had success getting this documentation from specific departments, or is it better to go straight to the bursar's office? My advisor mentioned they might have changed my funding classification last semester, which would explain the timing. Also, for those who used TurboTax - did you run into any issues during e-filing with the manual adjustment, or did it go through smoothly?
I turned 62 earlier this year and filed for my Social Security benefits about 5 months ago. My financial situation includes income from various stock dividends I've been collecting over the years. I'm also planning to start selling some of these stocks and taking capital gains. What I'm really confused about is whether these dividends and/or capital gains are considered "income" that would reduce my SSA payments. I keep hearing about that rule where for every $2 you earn over a certain threshold, you lose $1 of your Social Security payment. Does anyone know if investment income like dividends and capital gains count toward that earnings limit? I don't want to accidentally reduce my benefits by making the wrong financial moves. Thanks in advance for any clarity on this!
This is such helpful information for anyone navigating early Social Security benefits! I'm 64 and went through this same confusion last year. One thing I'd add is to keep really good records of all your income sources. When I had my annual review with SSA, they wanted documentation showing the difference between my earned income (from a small consulting gig) versus my unearned income (dividends, capital gains, etc.). Also, if you're planning to do any freelance or consulting work, make sure you understand the self-employment rules. Even small amounts of self-employment income count toward that earnings limit, and you might owe self-employment taxes on top of regular income taxes. @1acc35497938 For your specific situation with stock dividends and capital gains - you're in the clear! Those won't affect your SSA payments at all. Just watch out if you decide to do any paid work or consulting on the side.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm 63 and in a similar situation with dividend income and was worried I'd have to sell fewer stocks to avoid reducing my benefits. It's such a relief to know that investment income doesn't count toward the earnings limit. One thing I want to emphasize for anyone reading this - make sure you understand your full retirement age (FRA). For most of us born in the late 1950s and early 1960s, it's somewhere between 66 and 67. The earnings limits and penalties only apply BEFORE you reach your FRA. Once you hit that magic birthday, you can earn unlimited amounts without any reduction to your Social Security benefits. I'd also recommend checking your Social Security statement annually at ssa.gov to make sure they're calculating your benefits correctly and have accurate records of your earnings history. Catching errors early can save a lot of headaches later. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - it's made this whole process much less stressful!
@d1ebf4b48088 Great questions! For inherited stocks, you're correct - capital gains from selling them would still be considered unearned income and won't count toward the SSA earnings limit. The good news with inherited assets is that you typically get a "stepped-up basis," meaning the cost basis is adjusted to the fair market value at the time of inheritance, which can reduce your capital gains tax liability. Regarding RMDs, those are also considered unearned income for Social Security purposes, so they won't reduce your benefits either. However, they will count toward your total income for determining whether your Social Security benefits are taxable (the 50%/85% thresholds others mentioned earlier). Since you're planning ahead, you might want to consider doing some strategic Roth conversions in the years before RMDs kick in, especially if you're in a lower tax bracket now. This can help reduce the size of future RMDs and potentially keep you in a lower tax bracket when combined with your Social Security benefits. The SSA website has a good section on what counts as "wages" versus other income - definitely worth bookmarking for future reference!
@d1ebf4b48088 Great questions! For inherited stocks, you're correct - capital gains from selling inherited assets are still considered unearned income and won't count toward the SSA earnings limit. The only thing to keep in mind is that inherited assets get a "stepped-up basis," meaning your cost basis is the value of the stocks when your grandmother passed away, not what she originally paid for them. This can actually reduce your taxable capital gains significantly. Regarding RMDs, those are also considered unearned income and won't affect your Social Security benefits under the earnings test. However, RMDs will count toward your total income for determining whether your Social Security benefits themselves become taxable (that separate calculation we discussed earlier in this thread). Since you're planning ahead, you might want to consider doing some strategic Roth conversions in the years before RMDs kick in, especially if you're in a lower tax bracket now. This can help reduce future RMD amounts and potentially keep more of your Social Security benefits from being taxed later.
Title: Do I owe state income taxes if I live in a Zero-Income tax state but work in a state with income tax? 1 I'm trying to figure out my tax situation for 2025 and I'm getting confused about state income taxes. I live in one state but commute to work in another, and our tax situations are different. Some examples of what I'm talking about: - Living in Nevada but working in California - Living in Texas but working in Oklahoma - Living in New Hampshire but working in Vermont - Living in Tennessee but working in Virginia - Living in Washington but working in Idaho My specific situation is that I live in Washington (no state income tax) but I recently took a job across the border in Oregon (which does have state income tax). I've been commuting daily for about 3 months now. Do I need to pay Oregon state income taxes even though I'm not a resident? Or does my Washington residency protect me from paying Oregon state income taxes? Is this different depending on which states are involved? I'd love to hear from other people in similar situations and how they handle their taxes!
22 One important thing nobody has mentioned: some states have reciprocity agreements! For example, if you live in Virginia but work in DC, you don't have to file a DC tax return due to their reciprocity agreement. Same with some other state pairs like: - NJ and PA - MD and DC - VA and DC Always check if your states have such an agreement before assuming you need to file a non-resident return!
5 Do you know if Texas and Oklahoma have any kind of reciprocity agreement? I'm about to start a job across the border but staying in TX.
22 Texas and Oklahoma do not have a reciprocity agreement. You'll need to file an Oklahoma non-resident tax return (Form 511NR) for the income you earn there. However, since Texas doesn't have income tax, you won't have to worry about filing anything in Texas or dealing with tax credits between states. Make sure your employer is withholding Oklahoma state taxes from your paycheck! Some employers aren't familiar with cross-border situations and might miss this, which could leave you with a surprise tax bill when you file.
11 I've been living in Tennessee and working in Kentucky for 6 years now. Here's what I've learned: 1) You ALWAYS pay taxes where you earn the money, not where you live 2) Your employer should automatically withhold taxes for the state where you work 3) If you're in a no-income-tax state but work in a tax state, it's actually simpler because you only file one state return (as a non-resident) 4) If you work remotely some days, it gets complicated - you need to track days worked in each location The worst situation is living in a tax state and working in another tax state - then you have to file in both places and claim credits to avoid double taxation.
2 This was super helpful! One question - does this apply to self-employed people too? I live in Washington but have clients in Oregon and Idaho.
For self-employed people, it gets more complex because you're essentially running a business across state lines. Generally, you'll owe taxes to the state where you physically perform the work, but there are additional considerations like where your business is registered, where you have nexus, and what type of services you provide. For your Washington/Oregon/Idaho situation, if you're traveling to client sites in those states to perform work, you'd likely owe income taxes to those states as a non-resident. However, if you're working remotely from your Washington home office for out-of-state clients, that income would typically not be subject to other states' taxes. I'd strongly recommend consulting with a tax professional who specializes in multi-state business taxation, as the rules can vary significantly based on your specific business structure and the nature of your services. Self-employment taxes across state lines have a lot more nuances than regular W-2 employment situations.
So frustrated right now! I've been doing this thing where I prepare my taxes on two different platforms to double-check myself, but now I'm totally confused because they're giving me completely different results for my state taxes. On Taxslayer, it's showing that I owe around $650 in state taxes. But when I input everything into H&R Block, it says I'm getting back about $420 in a refund. That's over a $1000 difference between the two! I dug deeper and noticed something weird. In Taxslayer, it looks like they're using the same income amount ($78,250) for both my Federal and State returns. But in H&R Block, they're using $78,250 for Federal but then a higher number ($89,800) for my state return calculation. The higher number actually matches what's in boxes 3 & 5 on my W2 (Social Security and Medicare wages), but not what's in box 1 (Federal wages). Is it normal for Federal and State returns to use different income numbers? Should I just go with the one giving me a refund and hope the IRS sorts it out if there's a problem? I'm totally lost here! Thanks in advance to anyone who can help me figure this out!
Why are taxes so complicated?? It makes no sense that two supposedly professional tax software programs give totally different results. How is the average person supposed to know which one is right?? ๐ก Seriously considering just paying an accountant next year even though I've always done my own taxes. This is giving me a headache.
I switched to using an accountant three years ago and it was the best decision ever. Yes, it costs more than tax software, but my accountant has saved me way more than her fee each year by finding deductions and credits I didn't know about. Plus she handles any weird situations like this so I don't have to stress about it.
I feel your frustration! I had the exact same issue two years ago with FreeTaxUSA and TurboTax showing completely different state tax amounts. It's maddening when you're trying to do everything right and the "professional" software can't even agree. What helped me was actually printing out both state tax forms (not just looking at the summary screens) and going through them line by line. I found that one software was correctly handling my state's treatment of student loan interest deductions while the other wasn't. My state doesn't allow the same deduction that federal does. The tax preparer who commented above is absolutely right - don't just pick the better outcome. I learned that lesson the hard way when I got a notice from my state tax department the following year asking for additional documentation. If you do decide to go with an accountant next year, it's honestly worth it for the peace of mind. But for this year, definitely compare the actual forms line by line rather than just the final numbers. That's where you'll find exactly what's causing the difference.
Chris King
PSA: if you filed with TurboTax double check that your routing number is correct. They had a glitch this year that was causing issues with OR returns
0 coins
Charlotte White
Authoromg thanks for the heads up! gonna check rn
0 coins
Rachel Clark
anyone else notice oregon is way slower this year than last? 2023 i got mine in like 10 days
0 coins
Zachary Hughes
they probably understaffed like everyone else tbh
0 coins
Daryl Bright
Yeah definitely noticed the same thing. I think they mentioned budget cuts affecting their processing capacity. Plus with all the new tax law changes they're probably being extra careful with reviews.
0 coins