


Ask the community...
I want to emphasize something that hasn't been mentioned enough in this thread - the importance of getting the EXACT assessment dates for each tax year from the IRS. Many people assume the CSED is calculated from when they filed their return or when the IRS sent notices, but it's actually calculated from the assessment date, which can be different. Your aunt should request Account Transcripts for each tax year (2017, 2018, 2019) directly from the IRS. These will show the precise assessment dates and any tolling events that have already occurred. You can get these online at irs.gov, by calling the IRS, or by mailing Form 4506-T. Given the complexity of her situation with multiple properties and an ex-husband involved, there's a real possibility that some years have different CSEDs due to amended returns, audit adjustments, or other factors. I've seen cases where people thought they had 2-3 years left to wait, only to discover that one tax year was actually expiring much sooner or had already been extended. Another critical point: if your aunt passes away before the CSED expires, the tax debt becomes a claim against her estate. At her age, this is unfortunately something to consider in the planning process. The liens would attach to her assets and could force the sale of her home to satisfy the debt. Before committing to any strategy, I'd really recommend she get those transcripts and have a qualified tax professional review them. The peace of mind from knowing exactly where she stands timeline-wise is worth the effort.
This is such an important point about getting the actual assessment dates! I made this exact mistake when I first started researching my own tax lien situation. I was calculating everything from when I received the first notice, but it turns out the assessment date was actually several months earlier, which shortened my timeline significantly. The point about estate implications is sobering but necessary to consider. At her age, having a clear understanding of how this debt would affect her heirs is crucial for proper estate planning. It might actually make a settlement or Currently Not Collectible status even more attractive if it provides certainty for her beneficiaries. One question about the Account Transcripts - when you request them, do they show tolling events clearly, or do you need to know what to look for? I'm worried about missing something important when reviewing them, especially given how complex the rules around statute extensions seem to be.
The advice about getting Account Transcripts is absolutely critical, and I want to build on that with some practical guidance. When you receive the transcripts, look for specific transaction codes that indicate tolling events: - TC 520/521: Bankruptcy filing (extends CSED) - TC 560: Offer in Compromise submission (suspends CSED) - TC 971 with Action Code 063: Collection Due Process hearing request (extends CSED) - TC 922: Installment agreement that waives statute (extends CSED) The transcripts don't always make tolling events obvious to non-professionals, so having someone experienced review them is crucial. I've seen cases where people missed a 2-day bankruptcy filing from years ago that added 2+ years to their collection period. Given your aunt's age and the stress this is causing her, I'd seriously consider the Currently Not Collectible route that others have mentioned. The emotional and health costs of living with this uncertainty for 6+ more years at her age may outweigh the financial benefits of waiting it out. CNC status would give her immediate relief from collection activities while still allowing the natural expiration of the liens. Also, since she's still on mortgages for multiple properties, the IRS has significant leverage. They could potentially force sales or demand payments from any refinancing proceeds. Getting proactive control of the situation through CNC status or a settlement might be preferable to hoping nothing triggers more aggressive collection action during the waiting period. The key is making an informed decision based on her actual timeline and circumstances rather than assumptions.
This breakdown of the transaction codes is incredibly helpful! I had no idea there were specific codes to look for on the transcripts that would reveal tolling events. The example about someone missing a 2-day bankruptcy filing that added 2+ years is exactly the kind of hidden detail that could completely derail the "wait it out" strategy. Your point about the IRS having significant leverage due to the multiple property mortgages really hits home. I hadn't fully considered that they could intercept refinancing proceeds or force property sales during the waiting period. Given that real estate values have increased significantly since 2017-2019, there's probably substantial equity in those properties that the IRS would be very interested in accessing. The more I read through all these responses, the more I'm convinced that my aunt needs to get those Account Transcripts immediately and have a professional review them before making any decisions. The Currently Not Collectible status is starting to sound like it might be the best path forward for her peace of mind and health, especially at her age. Sometimes the certainty of resolving a problem is worth more than the potential savings of gambling on a complex timeline with so many variables that could go wrong.
As someone who just went through this exact situation last year, I can definitely confirm what everyone else has said - you absolutely qualify as a full-time student for tax purposes! Your spring semester from January to May already meets the 5-month requirement, and the fact that your school maintained your full-time enrollment status during the internship semester (hence the full tuition) just solidifies your case. I was in a similar boat with a co-op program where I alternated between classroom semesters and work terms. The IRS really does go by your school's official classification, not whether you were physically sitting in lectures. Since your internship was school-registered and you were classified as a full-time student, you're completely in the clear. Don't let TurboTax's sometimes confusing prompts make you second-guess yourself - the software isn't always great at handling non-traditional academic programs. Trust the guidance from this thread and your school's classification. You've got this!
Thank you so much for sharing your co-op experience! It's incredibly helpful to hear from someone who literally just went through this situation. I was definitely getting confused by TurboTax's prompts and starting to doubt myself, but this whole thread has been so reassuring. Your point about the IRS going by the school's official classification rather than physical classroom attendance really clarifies things for me. I think I was overthinking the "student" definition when the rules are actually much more accommodating than I realized. Having my spring semester already cover the 5-month requirement plus the school-registered internship with full-time status makes this feel like a pretty clear-cut case. I really appreciate everyone taking the time to share their experiences and expertise here - it's made what felt like a complicated tax question much more straightforward!
Just wanted to add my perspective as someone who works in university financial aid - we see these questions constantly during tax season! Your situation is actually very common with internship programs, and you're definitely overthinking it. The IRS full-time student test is pretty generous: you just need to be enrolled for what your school considers full-time for any part of 5 calendar months during the year. Your spring semester (January-May) already covers this completely, so even if there was any question about your fall internship status (which there isn't), you'd still qualify. The fact that you were charged full tuition during your internship semester is the clearest indicator that your school classified you as a full-time student throughout the year. Universities don't charge full-time tuition rates unless you're officially enrolled full-time in their system. For future reference, if you ever need documentation of your enrollment status, you can request an official enrollment verification letter from your registrar. This will clearly state your full-time/part-time status for any semester, which is exactly what the IRS would want to see if they ever had questions. But honestly, your situation is so straightforward that I wouldn't worry about it!
Has anyone successfully claimed both the lifetime learning credit AND used 529 funds in the same year? My wife is in grad school and we're trying to figure out the most tax-efficient way to pay for it since the AOTC isn't available for graduate education.
Yes, but remember you need to have enough qualified expenses to "allocate" between them. Example: $15k in grad school tuition - use $13k from 529 and pay $2k out of pocket, then claim the lifetime learning credit on that $2k. You just can't claim the credit on the same dollars that came from the 529.
This is exactly the situation I was in last year! The key thing to remember is that you can't use the same dollar for multiple tax benefits, but you CAN strategically allocate your expenses. Since your 529 covered $7,800 in tuition, you can't claim the tuition deduction (Form 8917) on that amount. However, if you had ANY other qualified education expenses that you paid out-of-pocket - like required textbooks, lab fees, course materials, or even additional tuition beyond what the 529 covered - you can absolutely use those for the American Opportunity Tax Credit. The AOTC is usually much more valuable than the tuition deduction anyway (up to $2,500 credit vs. up to $4,000 deduction), so focus on maximizing that if you have any out-of-pocket expenses. Even if you only spent $500 on books, that could still get you a $500 credit through the AOTC. Make sure to keep all your receipts and document which expenses were paid by which source. The IRS is pretty clear about this in Publication 970 - you just need to show that you're not "double-dipping" on the same expenses.
This is super helpful! I'm in a similar boat as the original poster - 22 and using 529 funds for the first time. Quick question though: do required course materials have to be purchased directly from the school to qualify for AOTC, or can I buy textbooks from Amazon or other retailers and still claim them? I saved like $300 buying used books online instead of from the campus bookstore.
Hey Gisselle! š I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation right now and totally feel your stress! Filed back in February, went through the whole verification nightmare, and just recently got those same 570/971 codes after my finally moved off that dreaded N/A status. From everything I've learned lurking in this community and talking to others going through this, the 570 code basically means they've put a temporary hold while doing additional review, and the 971 means you should be getting a in the mail soon explaining what's happening. The fact that your actually updated and is showing real codes now is honestly huge progress - it means you're officially back in their system! Since you already completed verification (which is honestly the hardest part), they're probably just doing their final checks on your return - could be income verification, reviewing credits, or just standard post-verification processing. From what I've seen, the timeline after these codes can be super variable - anywhere from 2-10 weeks unfortunately, but most people seem to see movement within 4-6 weeks. Keep checking your weekly for any new codes - you're looking for that beautiful 846 ( issued) to eventually show up! I know the waiting game is absolutely brutal when you've already jumped through all their hoops, but you've gotten through the worst part already. Hang in there - you're definitely moving in the right direction! š¤āØ
Hey Gisselle! š I totally understand how stressful those 570/971 codes can be after going through verification - the uncertainty is honestly the worst part! The good news is that your updating from N/A to showing actual codes means you're officially back in their system and making real progress. The 570 code indicates they have a temporary hold for additional review, and the 971 means you should receive a in the mail soon explaining what they're looking at. Since you've already completed verification (which is honestly the hardest hurdle), they're likely doing their final review process - could be income verification, checking you claimed, or just standard post-verification processing. From what I've seen in this community, the timeline after these codes appear can vary quite a bit - anywhere from 2-8 weeks typically. I know that's a frustrating range, but it really depends on what specific review they're conducting. Keep checking your weekly for any updates - you're looking for that magical 846 code ( issued) to eventually show up! The should give you more specific details about what they're reviewing and any timeline. I know the waiting game is brutal when you've already done everything they asked, but you've cleared the biggest obstacle with verification. You're definitely on the right track - hang in there! š¤šŖ
Drake
The 60-month calculation can be tricky, but it's worth getting right since it could save you hundreds or even thousands of dollars. You need to track your actual days of physical presence in the US, not just calendar time. Start with your initial entry date on F1 status and count forward 60 months (1,826 days), but subtract any days you were outside the US during that period. Those summer trips home definitely count against your presence, so if you were gone 3 weeks each year for 5 years, that's about 105 days total that would extend your exemption period. You can request your I-94 travel history from CBP's website (i94.cbp.dhs.gov) to get exact entry/exit dates if you don't have detailed records. This will give you the precise date when your FICA exemption ended. Given that your employer is just now discovering this issue, I'd be surprised if they did the calculation correctly the first time. Most HR departments just assume calendar years rather than doing the actual day-by-day count. Definitely worth double-checking their math!
0 coins
James Martinez
ā¢This is incredibly helpful! I had no idea about the CBP I-94 website - that's going to make tracking my exact travel dates so much easier. I've been trying to piece together my trips from old passport stamps and flight confirmations, but having the official entry/exit records will be much more accurate. You're absolutely right that most HR departments probably just use calendar years. I'm definitely going to do this calculation myself before meeting with them tomorrow. If my exemption period actually ended several months later than they calculated, that could make a huge difference in what I supposedly owe. Thanks for pointing me toward the official records - this gives me much more confidence going into that conversation with actual data to back up my position.
0 coins
Mae Bennett
This is such a common issue with F1 visa holders! I work in payroll for a university and we see this mistake happen frequently, especially with smaller employers who aren't familiar with the 5-year exemption rules. A few additional things to consider that haven't been mentioned yet: 1. If your employer is calculating interest or penalties on what you "owe" them, push back on this. The IRS penalties and interest are their responsibility since they made the withholding error, not yours. 2. Make sure they're using the correct wage base for FICA calculations. There's a Social Security wage base cap each year (it was $142,800 for 2021, $147,000 for 2022, etc.), but Medicare has no cap. If you earned above these amounts, the calculation gets more complex. 3. Your employer should also be correcting their quarterly 941 forms for each affected period. This isn't just about getting money from you - they have compliance obligations to the IRS that need to be addressed properly. 4. Consider asking for documentation showing exactly how they calculated your exemption end date and the amounts owed. Given the complexity around the 60-month physical presence test that others mentioned, there's a good chance their initial calculation is wrong. The good news is this is fixable, and you have more leverage than you might think since it was their mistake to begin with!
0 coins
Mason Lopez
ā¢This is exactly the kind of comprehensive advice I needed! I'm definitely going to ask for detailed documentation of their calculations before agreeing to anything. The point about the Social Security wage base cap is particularly important - I did earn over $142,800 in 2021, so that could significantly reduce what they think I owe for that year. I'm also glad you mentioned that any IRS penalties should be their responsibility. My employer initially made it sound like I'd be responsible for everything, including penalties, which seemed really unfair given that I had no way of knowing about this rule. Do you have any suggestions for how to approach this diplomatically with HR? I want to be cooperative but also make sure I'm not taken advantage of because of their mistake.
0 coins