IRS

Pay nothing until a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

$0 upfront. We only hold your card.
No live agent, no charge.

$9.99 is charged only once a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Arjun Patel

โ€ข

This is why I only buy properties with cash now. Dealing with the mortgage interest vs principal stuff was giving me a headache come tax time. Plus when you own outright, your cash flow is way better and the tax situation is simpler.

0 coins

Jade Lopez

โ€ข

Must be nice to have enough cash to buy properties outright! For us regular folks, mortgages are the only way to get into real estate investing. Even with the principal payment issue, I still think leveraging with mortgages gives better overall returns on your initial investment.

0 coins

Evelyn Martinez

โ€ข

The key thing to remember is that you're not actually "losing" that principal payment - you're converting it into equity. I went through the same confusion when I started with rental properties. What helped me understand it better was thinking about the complete financial picture: Yes, your cash flow is reduced by the full mortgage payment, but your net worth is only reduced by the interest portion. The principal portion just moves from your cash account to your property equity. Also consider that depreciation often more than makes up for this. I typically show a paper loss on my tax return even though I have positive cash flow, thanks to the depreciation deduction. This "phantom loss" actually reduces my overall tax burden on other income. The real benefit becomes clear over time - your tenant is essentially paying down your mortgage for you while you get tax benefits and (hopefully) appreciation. It's a long-term wealth building strategy, not just a cash flow play.

0 coins

Freya Larsen

โ€ข

Has anyone actually had the IRS reject or delay a future return because of name inconsistencies? I've had my name spelled 3 different ways on tax forms over the years (Maria, Marie, Marria) and never had any issues with processing or refunds.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

โ€ข

My cousin works for the IRS and says they mostly care about SSN matching. Names are secondary identifiers. But consistent mismatches over multiple years CAN trigger a review flag, especially with the new anti-fraud systems they're using.

0 coins

Ella Russell

โ€ข

I had almost the exact same thing happen to me two years ago - my first name was spelled "Micheal" instead of "Michael" on my return. I was panicking about depositing the check, but it turned out to be no big deal at all. I took it to my bank and explained the situation to the teller. She just had me show my ID, confirmed my SSN matched what was on file, and deposited it without any issues. The key is that all your other identifying information (SSN, last name, address) is correct - that's what really matters to both the bank and the IRS. Don't stress about calling the IRS right now. Just have your accountant fix it on next year's return and you'll be all set. The one-letter typo won't cause any long-term problems as long as it gets corrected going forward. Your SSN is your primary identifier with the IRS anyway, not your name spelling.

0 coins

Tax implications of keeping Section 179 equipment when closing a sole proprietorship business

I've been talking to my CPA about this situation, but want to make sure I'm getting the right advice. Important enough that I might actually pay for a second opinion, but figured I'd check here first. I run a sole proprietorship excavation business - everything's just in my name, no separate entity. Over the years, I've purchased various equipment - backhoes, bulldozers, dump trucks, trailers, etc. I've taken the Section 179 deduction on all of them when purchased, bringing the cost basis to zero. The business has been profitable enough that I've always been able to take the full deduction. Looking at retiring in about 4-5 years, but here's the thing - I want to keep a lot of this equipment for my personal use. I'm planning to buy some acreage and will need the equipment for maintaining the property. I understand that if I sell equipment after taking a 179 deduction, I'd pay ordinary income tax on the sale (like if I bought something for $150k, took the 179, then sold it years later for $85k, I'd pay tax on that $85k). But what happens if I simply close my business and keep using the equipment personally? My accountant says since everything's already in my name (no separate business entity), there's no "sale" taking place, so no taxable event. For titled vehicles, they're already in my name anyway. This seems too good to be true - can I really just keep all this equipment without any tax implications? Surely the IRS has thought of this...

Amara Nwosu

โ€ข

I closed my landscaping business last year and kept about $80k worth of equipment that I had taken Section 179 on. My accountant had me document the fair market value of each piece when I closed, and I did pay tax on that value (painful but legal). What I wish I'd known beforehand was that if you plan ahead, you could potentially avoid some of this tax hit by stopping the Section 179 deductions a few years before closing. If you use regular depreciation instead on equipment you know you'll keep, your basis won't be zero when you convert it. Too late for equipment you've already 179'd, but if you're buying new stuff in these last few years before retirement, consider whether maximum upfront deduction makes sense if you'll keep the equipment.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

โ€ข

Did you just write a check to the IRS for the FMV at closing? Or was there some kind of form you had to file? I'm going through this exact situation and my accountant seems uncertain about the process.

0 coins

ThunderBolt7

โ€ข

This is a really complex area where the technical rules and practical enforcement can be quite different. From what I've seen in my own tax preparation practice, the IRS position is clear: converting Section 179 equipment from business to personal use is technically a taxable event at fair market value, even for sole proprietorships. However, the practical reality is that many sole proprietors do exactly what your accountant suggests - they simply stop using the equipment for business without formally "converting" it, and this rarely gets scrutinized unless there's an audit for other reasons. If you want to be completely above board, you should: 1. Document fair market value of each piece of equipment when you close the business 2. Report the conversion as income on your final tax return 3. Establish clear documentation showing when business use ended The middle ground approach many take is to document the FMV but not proactively report it unless asked. Not tax advice, but that's the reality of how this often plays out. Given the amounts involved with heavy equipment, I'd lean toward being conservative and reporting it properly. Your second CPA opinion is definitely worth getting - this is exactly the kind of situation where different practitioners might give you different advice based on their risk tolerance.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

โ€ข

The thing about these letters is you gotta be patient. They're understaffed and backed up. Best thing to do is just wait it out unless they specifically ask for more info from you. Keep checking your transcript for updates tho!

0 coins

Mei Wong

โ€ข

facts! checking transcripts is key. just dont check every day like i did lmaooo

0 coins

Charlee Coleman

โ€ข

I received a 3176C letter about 6 months ago and it was nerve-wracking at first! Like others mentioned, it's just the IRS letting you know they need extra time to review something on your return. Mine was related to the Earned Income Tax Credit verification. The whole process took about 3 months total, but I did get my full refund eventually. My advice is to make sure you have all your documentation ready just in case they ask for it later, and try not to stress too much - it's more common than you'd think!

0 coins

MidnightRider

โ€ข

This has been such an incredibly helpful thread! As someone who's been lurking in tax forums for years, I rarely see such comprehensive, real-world advice all in one place. I'm actually facing a potential move from Michigan to Florida next year for a job opportunity, and reading through everyone's experiences has given me so much insight into what I need to plan for. The tip about timing the move strategically (early in the year to a no-tax state) is something I hadn't considered but makes total sense. A couple of questions for the group: 1. For those who used tax professionals during multi-state moves, how did you find ones who were knowledgeable about both states' rules? I'm worried about ending up with someone who's only familiar with one jurisdiction. 2. Has anyone dealt with employer stock options or RSUs during a multi-state move? I'm wondering if there are special considerations for how those get allocated between states. The tools mentioned here (taxr.ai, Claimyr) sound like they could be game-changers for complex situations like these. Definitely going to check them out as I start planning for this potential move. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed, practical advice!

0 coins

Ella Cofer

โ€ข

Great questions! For finding tax professionals experienced with multi-state issues, I'd recommend looking for CPAs who specifically advertise multi-state tax expertise or are part of larger firms with offices in both states. The AICPA website has a "Find a CPA" tool where you can filter by specializations. I also found success by asking for referrals in local Facebook groups or LinkedIn networks - people who've gone through similar moves are often happy to share their CPA recommendations. Regarding stock options and RSUs, that's definitely a complex area during multi-state moves. Generally, the income is sourced based on where you performed the services that earned the equity compensation, but it can get tricky with vesting schedules that span your move. Michigan and Florida have different approaches to this, so you'll want professional guidance. Some companies' HR departments are surprisingly helpful with this too - they often have resources or can connect you with specialists who understand the tax implications of equity comp across state lines. One thing I wish I'd done when planning my move was to run scenarios with different timing options. Moving early in the year to Florida (no state tax) versus late in the year can make a significant difference in your overall tax burden for that year. Worth modeling out both scenarios before you commit to a specific timeline!

0 coins

Jasmine Hancock

โ€ข

This thread has been absolutely fantastic! I'm a tax preparer and have seen so many clients struggle with multi-state moves and estimated payments. The advice here is spot-on, especially about finding the specific line numbers on tax forms and calculating safe harbor amounts separately for each jurisdiction. One thing I'd add that I don't think has been mentioned: if you're moving mid-year, pay close attention to any state tax credits you might lose or gain. For example, some states have credits for taxes paid to other states, but the timing of your move can affect your eligibility. Also, if you had significant itemized deductions in your prior year (especially state and local taxes), moving to a no-tax or low-tax state could actually increase your federal tax liability due to losing those deductions under the SALT cap. I've been recommending that clients in complex multi-state situations keep a "move binder" with all their documentation - lease agreements, utility transfers, employment records, bank account changes, voter registration, etc. It's saved several of my clients from costly residency audits. The tools mentioned here like taxr.ai sound really interesting from a professional standpoint. Always looking for ways to help clients navigate these complex situations more efficiently!

0 coins

Great question! From my professional experience, the most common mistake I see is people trying to apply federal safe harbor rules to state taxes without checking each state's specific requirements. For example, assuming the 110% rule applies everywhere when some states use 100% or have completely different thresholds. The second biggest mistake is improper income allocation between states - especially for people with self-employment income or bonuses that span the move date. I've seen clients allocate everything based on their physical location on the payment date, when it should often be based on when the income was earned or services performed. Regarding tools like taxr.ai, anything that can automatically extract the correct line numbers from tax returns and highlight state-specific differences would be incredibly valuable. Most of my clients come in with a shoebox of documents having no idea which numbers are actually relevant for their calculations. A tool that could quickly identify their prior year total tax liability for each jurisdiction would save hours of explanation and reduce calculation errors. The other thing these tools could help with is the "what-if" scenarios for timing moves strategically. Being able to model different move dates and see the tax impact could help people make more informed decisions about when to relocate.

0 coins

Connor O'Neill

โ€ข

From my experience as a tax preparer, the most common mistake I see is people not understanding that the 110% safe harbor rule only applies to federal taxes and that each state has its own rules. I've had clients assume all jurisdictions follow the same 110% threshold, which can lead to underpayment penalties at the state level. Another frequent error is improper income allocation between states. People often think they can just divide their annual income by 12 and multiply by the months in each state, but that's not always correct - especially for things like bonuses, commissions, or investment income that might have specific sourcing rules. Regarding tools like taxr.ai, I think they could definitely help reduce errors by automatically identifying the correct line items from prior year returns and highlighting state-specific requirements. From what I've heard about it, having that kind of automated document analysis could prevent a lot of the manual calculation errors I see. The key is making sure people understand that while tools can help with the number-crunching, they still need to be aware of the unique rules in each state they're dealing with. I always tell clients that multi-state moves are one area where spending money on professional guidance upfront almost always saves money (and stress) in the long run!

0 coins

Prev1...5354555657...5645Next