IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Jade Lopez

•

Based on my experience dealing with similar partnership refinancing issues, I'd strongly echo the advice about maintaining detailed documentation and being very careful about timing. One additional consideration that hasn't been fully addressed is the impact of your state's tax laws - some states have different rules for partnership interest deductions that could affect your strategy. We went through a refinance situation similar to yours about 18 months ago. What saved us during our review was creating a formal "loan proceeds tracking policy" that we documented in our partnership meeting minutes. This policy specified exactly how refinanced funds would be segregated, what types of expenses they could cover, and included specific prohibitions against using them for distributions or partner advances. I'd also recommend getting clarity on your partnership's "substantial economic effect" requirements under your operating agreement. The IRS looks at whether your partnership allocations have real economic consequences, and how you handle the refinanced funds can impact this analysis. One practical tip: consider opening the refinanced funds account at a completely different bank from your regular operating accounts. This creates an even clearer separation and makes the paper trail easier to follow if you're ever audited. The additional account fees are minimal compared to the potential tax consequences of getting this wrong. Your accountant's mention of debt-financed distributions and interest tracing rules suggests they understand the complexity here - definitely follow up with them for written guidance specific to your situation before proceeding.

0 coins

Nia Williams

•

This is excellent advice about state tax considerations - something I completely overlooked! The point about different banks for the refinanced funds account is particularly smart. Even if it's not legally required, that extra layer of separation would make any audit much cleaner to navigate. Your mention of "substantial economic effect" requirements is really important too. I'm realizing there are multiple layers of compliance here beyond just the federal interest tracing rules. The formal loan proceeds tracking policy documented in partnership minutes sounds like a best practice that creates a clear framework for everyone to follow. I'm curious about the state tax angle you mentioned - are there specific states that have particularly strict rules about partnership interest deductions, or is it more about ensuring consistency between state and federal treatment? Our partnership operates in California, so I should probably research whether there are any state-specific requirements we need to consider alongside the federal rules. Thanks for the practical guidance about working with our accountant for written guidance. Given all the complexity discussed in this thread, it's clear this isn't something to handle with general advice - we definitely need specific written recommendations for our situation before moving forward with the refinance.

0 coins

California actually has some specific considerations for partnership taxation that could impact your refinancing strategy. The state generally follows federal partnership tax rules, but there are some nuances around interest deductions and partnership distributions that you'll want to verify. California requires partnerships to file Form 565, and they're particularly strict about substance-over-form issues. The Franchise Tax Board has been known to challenge partnership interest deductions during audits if they suspect debt-financed distributions, even when the federal position is defensible. One California-specific issue to watch is how the state treats guaranteed payments versus distributions - this can affect how they view refinanced funds used for partner compensation. The state also has its own version of the economic substance doctrine that could apply to your refinancing transaction. I'd definitely recommend having your accountant research California's conformity to federal Reg. 1.163-8T and whether the state has issued any specific guidance on partnership refinancing transactions. The California tax court has ruled on several partnership cases in recent years that might provide insight into how they'd view your proposed structure. Given California's aggressive audit practices for partnerships, the extra documentation and separate banking approach becomes even more critical. You definitely don't want to give them any reason to question the business purpose of your refinance or challenge your interest deductions.

0 coins

Melody Miles

•

I've been through a similar refinancing situation with my LLC partnership, and I want to emphasize how critical the documentation piece really is. Beyond just keeping receipts, we created a detailed "refinance proceeds ledger" that tracked every single dollar from the refinanced funds to specific business expenses, with dates, check numbers, and business justifications. One thing that really helped us was working with our bank to set up automatic transfers from our refinanced funds account to our operating account only when we had specific invoices to pay. This created an even cleaner paper trail showing that we weren't just moving money around freely. Also, don't underestimate the importance of your partnership agreement language. We had to amend ours to explicitly state that refinanced loan proceeds could never be used for partner distributions or advances, and that any violation would result in the violating partner being responsible for any resulting tax penalties. The timing issue others mentioned is huge too. We actually suspended all partner distributions for 4 months after our refinance, even though it was financially inconvenient, just to make it crystal clear that the refinance wasn't connected to our distribution strategy. It was worth the temporary cash flow hit to avoid potential IRS complications down the road. One final tip: consider having a tax attorney review your entire structure before you execute the refinance. The upfront cost is nothing compared to the potential penalties if the IRS reclassifies your interest deductions later.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

As someone who's dealt with this frustration for years, I've found that switching to a tax prep service that can work with preliminary data has been a lifesaver. The delays are real and unfortunately unavoidable due to all the regulatory requirements and data dependencies others have mentioned. One thing I learned is that you can often get a pretty good estimate by downloading your year-end portfolio statements and transaction history from your brokerage portal - even before the official tax forms arrive. Most brokerages have these available by early January. It won't be perfect, but it's usually close enough to help you plan ahead and avoid that last-minute scramble. Also, if you're consistently frustrated by late February/March delivery dates, consider simplifying your investment holdings. Sticking to basic index funds and avoiding REITs, MLPs, and foreign securities can often get you into the earlier January 31st deadline bucket instead of the March extensions.

0 coins

That's really helpful advice about simplifying holdings! I never realized that certain investment types were what was pushing my forms into the March deadline. I have a few REITs that I bought thinking they were good for diversification, but honestly the tax headache might not be worth it. Do you happen to know if there's an easy way to identify which specific holdings in your portfolio are likely to cause delays? I'd love to review my investments and maybe swap out the problematic ones for similar but simpler alternatives before next tax season.

0 coins

The complexity really comes down to the interconnected nature of the investment world. When you own shares of a mutual fund or ETF, that fund might hold hundreds or thousands of underlying securities. Each of those underlying companies has to finalize their own tax reporting first before the fund can determine what portion of your distributions were ordinary dividends vs. qualified dividends vs. return of capital. Then you layer on top of that things like foreign tax credits (if the fund holds international stocks), corporate actions like spin-offs or mergers that happened during the year, and various adjustments that companies make to their initial reporting. It creates a domino effect where everyone is waiting for someone else upstream to finalize their numbers. The brokerages are basically at the end of this chain, so they can't move any faster than the slowest link. It's frustrating as an individual investor, but when you think about the scale - Fidelity and Schwab each manage trillions of dollars across millions of accounts with incredibly complex holdings - it's actually pretty impressive they get everything sorted by March at the latest.

0 coins

This is such a great explanation of the whole chain reaction! I never really thought about how my simple index fund purchase connects to potentially thousands of individual companies that all need to get their act together first. It makes me wonder though - are there any investment types that are particularly "clean" from a tax timing perspective? Like, if someone wanted to build a portfolio that consistently gets tax docs by the January 31st deadline, what would be the safest bets? I'm thinking basic S&P 500 index funds probably fall into this category, but I'm curious about others.

0 coins

Oil & Gas K1 with IDC deductions - Schedule SE calculation issue for working interest partnership

So I've got this somewhat complicated situation with my Oil & Gas investment that I need help with from anyone who really understands these things. I'm a partial owner in a general partnership with working interest in several O&G properties. On my K1, there's a note at the bottom that specifically states "QUALIFIED BUSINESS INCOME HAS NOT BEEN REDUCED BY INTANGIBLE DRILLING COSTS AND OIL AND GAS DEPLETION." Here's where things get confusing. My new CPA (switched this year) is subtracting the IDC and Depletion amounts from box 14a to calculate my net self-employment earnings for Schedule SE. This was apparently at the instruction of the partnership's 1065/K1 preparer. But when I went back and looked at my 2020 and 2021 returns, my former CPA used the full box 14a amount on Schedule SE without any reductions - even though those K1s had the exact same notation about QBI not being reduced. The IDC and Depletion amounts on those years were substantial - we're talking about differences of $46K and $85K in net SE income. When I approached my former CPA about possibly amending those returns, she flat-out refused to even look into it, insisting everything was done correctly. Meanwhile, my current CPA isn't being responsive about this issue either. So my questions are: - Which method is correct for Schedule SE - using the full box 14a amount or reducing it by IDC and Depletion? - Can/should I amend my 2020-2021 returns if the former approach was wrong? - How do I get my former CPA to at least review this issue considering I fired her last year for late filing and other mistakes?

Rachel Clark

•

This entire thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who's been struggling with similar K1 issues from a working interest partnership, I can't thank everyone enough for sharing their expertise and experiences. What really stands out to me is how this situation perfectly illustrates the importance of getting the right professional help. The fact that two different CPAs can handle the exact same K1 information so differently is honestly shocking - and expensive for taxpayers who get the wrong treatment. For the original poster, I'd definitely echo the advice about finding a CPA who specializes in energy taxation. The general consensus here seems clear that your new CPA is handling this correctly by subtracting IDC and depletion from Box 14a for Schedule SE purposes. One additional resource I'd suggest is reaching out to the partnership itself. Many oil & gas partnerships have relationships with tax professionals who understand their specific structures and can provide guidance or even referrals to qualified CPAs in your area. They deal with these K1 questions all the time and usually want their partners to handle things correctly. The potential savings you're looking at ($7K-$13K) definitely justify the time and effort to get this sorted out properly. Don't let your former CPA's unwillingness to address this stop you from pursuing what sounds like legitimate refunds. With all the resources and expert opinions shared in this thread, you've got solid ground to stand on when filing those amendments.

0 coins

This is such an eye-opening discussion! As someone completely new to partnership investments, I had no idea these kinds of technical issues existed with K1s and Schedule SE calculations. It's honestly a bit scary to think that something this significant - potentially thousands of dollars in overpaid taxes - can slip through the cracks so easily. What strikes me most is how the partnership itself includes that note about QBI not being reduced by IDC and depletion, but then it's left up to individual CPAs to know what that means for Schedule SE purposes. It seems like there should be clearer guidance or standardized instructions to prevent these kinds of errors. For someone just getting into oil & gas or real estate partnerships, what red flags should we watch for to make sure our CPA is handling these specialized situations correctly? Are there specific questions we should ask upfront, or particular certifications we should look for? Also, is this type of SE tax adjustment issue common with other types of partnerships, or is it mainly oil & gas and real estate? I'm trying to understand if this is something I need to be concerned about across all my investment activities or just certain sectors. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences - this thread is going to save a lot of people from making costly mistakes!

0 coins

This discussion has been incredibly valuable for understanding these complex partnership tax issues. As a tax professional who works with various partnership structures, I want to emphasize a few key points for anyone dealing with similar situations. First, the confusion around IDC and depletion adjustments for Schedule SE is unfortunately very common. The root issue is that Box 14a on the K1 shows net income that includes these items, but for self-employment tax purposes, IDC and percentage depletion are treated as capital expenditures rather than ordinary business expenses. This distinction is crucial but not obvious from the K1 itself. For those asking about finding qualified professionals, look for CPAs who specifically mention oil & gas or energy taxation on their websites or marketing materials. The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) also has specialized sections - you can search for members of the Oil, Gas & Other Natural Resources Committee. Additionally, many larger regional CPA firms have dedicated energy practice groups. Regarding documentation for amendments, you'll typically need to include a statement explaining the changes, copies of the relevant K1s, and calculations showing the corrected Schedule SE amounts. The IRS Form 1040-X instructions provide good guidance on what to include. One important note: if you're amending multiple years, consider whether you had other self-employment income that might have already pushed you over the Social Security wage base. This affects your potential savings calculation. The three-year statute of limitations mentioned earlier is correct, so don't delay if you believe you have legitimate adjustments to make. These amendments are routine for energy investments when handled properly.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

This exact same thing happened to me last year! I was panicking because I had always gotten refunds and suddenly owed $850. After digging through everything, I found out that my employer's payroll system had automatically updated to new IRS withholding tables in the middle of the year without telling anyone. Even though my W-4 settings stayed exactly the same, less tax was being taken out of each paycheck. The other big factor was losing those pandemic-related credits. I had gotten the Recovery Rebate Credit the year before, which was a huge boost to my refund that obviously wasn't there anymore. What really helped me was going through my paystubs month by month and comparing the federal tax withheld to the previous year. You can see exactly when the withholding amounts changed. Once I understood what happened, I adjusted my W-4 to have an extra $50 per paycheck withheld, and now I'm back to getting small refunds instead of owing. Don't panic - this is actually pretty common when tax laws or withholding tables change. Just make sure to adjust your withholding going forward so it doesn't happen again next year!

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

This is really helpful to know I'm not alone in this! The month-by-month paycheck comparison is a great idea - I never thought to look at it that way. I'm definitely going to go through my paystubs tonight and see exactly when the withholding changed. The extra $50 per paycheck sounds like a smart approach. I'd much rather have a small refund than go through this stress again next year. Did you just put that amount on line 4(c) of your W-4, or did you change other settings too? I want to make sure I adjust it correctly with HR. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's reassuring to know this is more common than I thought and that there's a straightforward way to fix it going forward!

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Yes, I just put the extra $50 on line 4(c) of the W-4 - that's the "Extra withholding" line. It's the simplest way to increase your withholding without messing with exemptions or other settings that might overcorrect things. When you fill out the new W-4 with HR, they'll start taking that extra amount out of each paycheck on top of your normal withholding. So if you normally have $200 withheld, it'll become $250. Just make sure to mention to HR that you're only changing the additional withholding amount - everything else stays the same. The month-by-month comparison really opened my eyes! I could see exactly in June when my withholding dropped by about $75 per paycheck, which added up to around $1,500 less over the year. Once you see the pattern, it all makes sense why you ended up owing instead of getting a refund.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm going through the exact same situation - always gotten refunds but suddenly owe $650 this year. Reading everyone's experiences makes me feel so much better that this isn't just me doing something wrong. I think the combination of factors everyone mentioned really explains what happened: the withholding table changes, losing those one-time pandemic credits, and probably some salary increases that pushed me into different withholding calculations. I'm definitely going to compare my W-2s from last year and this year to see the actual withholding differences, and then adjust my W-4 with the extra withholding amount on line 4(c) like several people suggested. Better to get a small refund next year than go through this stress again! Has anyone found a good rule of thumb for how much extra to withhold? I'm thinking maybe an extra $40-50 per paycheck to be safe, but don't want to overdo it and give the government an interest-free loan either.

0 coins

For the extra withholding amount, I'd suggest calculating it based on what you actually owed this year. If you owed $650, then having an extra $25-30 per paycheck withheld (assuming you're paid biweekly, that's about $650-780 per year) should put you back in refund territory. You could also use the IRS withholding calculator on their website - it takes into account your specific situation and tells you exactly what to put on your W-4. I found it pretty accurate when I used it last year. The $40-50 range you mentioned sounds reasonable too, especially if you want a buffer in case your income goes up again or other factors change. Just remember you can always adjust it again if you find you're getting too big of a refund. It's much easier to reduce withholding mid-year than to deal with owing money at tax time!

0 coins

Received Form 1099-R with Distribution Code R for IRA Conversion - Do I Need to Amend My 2022 Return?

So I've got a bit of a tax situation here. Back in 2022, I contributed to both a Traditional and Roth IRA. Then in 2023, I decided to simplify things by consolidating everything into a single Roth IRA. After this whole process, I received 3 different 1099-R forms related to this conversion/rollover/recharacterization thing. Now I'm confused because when I'm doing my taxes with FreeTaxUSA, I got this screen saying a 1099-R with Distribution Code R is "uncommon" and that I need to amend my 2022 tax return because part of what I recharacterized to Roth in 2023 was from traditional contributions made in 2022. The help screen on FreeTaxUSA literally says "if you have a 2023 Form 1099-R with distribution code R you would report it on your 2022 tax return." I already reported this form on my 2023 return (just filed yesterday) and FreeTaxUSA said "you can enter it, but it will not change your IRA deduction for the year." So I went back to my 2022 FreeTaxUSA account to try adding the 1099-R form and making the corresponding changes on the IRA recharacterization screen under 'Common Deductions and Credits.' But here's the weird thing - it doesn't change my taxes owed or refund amount at all! My federal tax summary stays exactly the same. My California state tax summary doesn't change either. I double-checked and the forms I entered do show up in the software. The 2023 1099-R with distribution code R shows $0.00 in line 2a (Taxable amount), which I'm taking to mean no taxes are due. So do I really need to go through the hassle of filing a 2022 amendment? I already reported this form on my 2023 return, so the IRS has all the same info. I'm concerned that filing the same form for two different tax years might create confusion, especially when filing an amendment that results in zero change to my tax liability. What should I do? Thanks in advance for any advice!

I'm curious if anyone knows... does FreeTaxUSA handle the recharacterization correctly for the 2023 return? I'm about to file both 2022 and 2023 returns and have a similar situation with Distribution Code R on my 1099-R.

0 coins

Carmen Ruiz

•

In my experience, FreeTaxUSA does handle it correctly for 2023, but doesn't make it obvious what you need to do about 2022. When you enter the 1099-R with Code R in your 2023 return, the software should correctly show it as a non-taxable event for 2023. But you still need to go back and amend 2022 to properly categorize which type of IRA your contribution went to. The software won't prompt you clearly enough about this dual-year impact. I had to call FreeTaxUSA support to confirm this was the right approach.

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation last year and understand your confusion completely! The key thing to remember is that a recharacterization with Distribution Code R is treated as if you originally made the contribution to the destination account type. Since your amendment shows zero change in tax liability, you likely either didn't claim a Traditional IRA deduction in 2022 (maybe due to income limits or already having a 401k), or the recharacterized amount was small enough not to impact your taxes. Technically, you should file the amendment to ensure your records match what the IRS has on file, even with zero tax impact. This prevents potential future matching issues when the IRS computers try to reconcile your forms. The good news is that since there's no tax change, it's considered a "compliance amendment" rather than an urgent correction. You have until April 15, 2026 to file the 2022 amendment, so no need to rush. I'd recommend doing it sooner rather than later though, just to have clean records. And yes, you can e-file the amendment through FreeTaxUSA which makes it much easier than the old paper process. The fact that you reported it on your 2023 return is correct for that tax year, but the IRS still wants the 2022 return to accurately reflect the final destination of your 2022 contributions.

0 coins

This is really helpful! I'm new to all this IRA stuff and was getting totally overwhelmed by the different forms and codes. Your explanation about it being a "compliance amendment" makes it feel way less scary. I think I was panicking because I thought I had messed something up badly, but it sounds like this is just a paperwork correction to keep everything clean with the IRS. The fact that I have until 2026 to file the amendment definitely takes the pressure off. One quick question - when you say "the IRS computers try to reconcile your forms," does that mean they automatically flag accounts where the forms don't match up? I'm wondering if not filing the amendment could trigger some kind of automated notice down the road.

0 coins

Prev1...537538539540541...5644Next