


Ask the community...
If you compare this to other tax situations, HOH with both EITC and CTC is definitely in the "slower processing" category. I've prepared returns for clients in similar situations, and I'm seeing about 30-45 days for processing compared to 14-21 days for simpler returns. This is actually faster than during the COVID years when these same returns were taking 60+ days. The best approach is to create an account on IRS.gov and check your transcript - it will show movement long before TurboTax updates their status.
It's like TurboTax and the IRS are two different planets with occasional radio contact. Your return could be happily processing in IRS land while TurboTax is still showing it as pending in TurboTax world. I was shocked when I learned how disconnected these systems actually are - it's like sending a letter and assuming it's lost because the post office doesn't text you updates. Always check directly with the IRS through their Where's My Refund tool or by getting your transcript. The tax credits you mentioned basically put your return in the "extra scrutiny" pile, which is like getting in the slow lane at airport security.
I processed a return on February 8th with only the $500 ODC (no EITC or ACTC) for a client. The 846 Refund Issued code appeared on their transcript exactly 16 days later, and the deposit hit their account on February 27th. The PATH Act verification period had zero impact on their processing time. The IRS's Modernized e-File (MeF) system handles ODC-only returns through the standard workflow.
According to Internal Revenue Code Β§6402(m) and the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015, the mandatory holding period applies specifically to returns claiming EITC under Β§32 or ACTC under Β§24(d). The Other Dependent Credit falls under Β§24(h)(4) and is not subject to these heightened verification procedures. Your return should follow standard processing guidelines as outlined in IRM 21.4.1.3 (Processing Time Frames).
This is a common issue with the W-4 redesign that occurred a few years ago. The form no longer uses allowances, which has created withholding discrepancies for many taxpayers, especially those with straightforward tax situations like your daughter's. The Marginal Propensity to Withhold (not an official term, but appropriate) is now calculated differently, and many employers' payroll systems haven't fully optimized for these changes. For 2024, she should consider filing a new W-4 with her employer and either specify an additional amount to withhold on Line 4(c) or check the box in Step 2(c) if she has multiple jobs.
This happened to my daughter too! She made $34,000 last year and owed $380 despite having what seemed like appropriate withholding. I'm concerned that this is becoming a pattern where younger workers are being caught off guard by these tax bills. When I helped her fill out a new W-4 for 2024, we added an extra $40 per month in withholding on line 4(c) to prevent this from happening again.
I solved this exact problem for my daughter last year. Would you believe her income was almost identical - $32,900? The issue is the withholding calculations. Have you checked if she's claiming herself as a dependent on her own return? Or could you possibly be claiming her on yours? Because that would create exactly this situation. I had my daughter adjust her W-4 to withhold an additional $30 per paycheck (assuming biweekly pay), and this year she got a $212 refund instead of owing. The withholding system isn't perfect, is it? But with a small adjustment, you can fix it for next year.
I'm in a similar situation - just started my first full-time job on January 15th, 2024, making about $34,000. Based on your experience, should I submit a new W-4 now? I'm worried about owing next year and want to avoid that if possible.
This is exactly what happened to me! The dependent thing is what got me. I was claiming myself as independent on my W-4 but my parents were still claiming me on their taxes (which was correct since they provided over half my support). The IRS doesn't care about the contradiction until tax time, and then you're stuck with the bill. So frustrating that they don't make this clearer to young workers!
Tax pro here. There's def confusion in this thread. The IRS doesn't offer EITC advances directly. What you've likely applied for is an RAL (Refund Anticipation Loan) through your prep software. These aren't IRS products but 3rd-party loans based on your expected refund. The approval process is handled by the lender, not the IRS. Check your filing confirmation emails for info about the loan provider and contact them directly. They'll have a separate approval process that has nothing to do with your transcript codes.
This whole EITC advance situation is a mess every year! π I've gone through this rodeo before and learned it's all about who you filed with, not the IRS. H&R Block, TurboTax, etc. all have different "advance" programs with different lenders and timelines. The IRS transcript won't show anything about these because they're private loans. Best community wisdom: check who the actual lender is (usually buried in the fine print of what you signed) and contact them directly. Your tax preparer is just the middleman and often knows nothing about the loan status.
Ethan Clark
Think of a government shutdown like a snowstorm hitting government services - some roads stay open (essential services) while others close temporarily. Compared to the 2019 shutdown, SNAP benefits now have better contingency plans. Back then, many recipients got February benefits in January with no clear guidance. For taxes, it's similar to how banks operate during holidays - certain automated processes continue while customer service is limited. If you're expecting a refund, electronic filing and direct deposit is like taking the express lane during a traffic jam - still your best option even during a shutdown.
0 coins
AstroAce
β’Did you experience any issues with amended returns during previous shutdowns? I filed an amendment last month and I'm wondering if those get completely stopped or just delayed.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
β’Thank you for this explanation! Per USDA Regulation 7 CFR 273.10, SNAP benefits must continue during shutdowns, though delivery methods may be modified. This information is extremely helpful for those of us trying to plan ahead before the funding deadline hits next week!
0 coins
Carmen Vega
Can someone clarify something about SNAP during shutdowns? If benefits get issued early like last time, do we still get the next month's benefits on schedule or is there a gap? And doesn't the IRS technically operate on user fees rather than appropriated funds anyway? Why would they even shut down?
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
β’I've been looking at the USDA.gov and benefits.gov websites, and I'm surprised how complicated this is! Apparently, the IRS is partially funded by user fees but still needs Congressional appropriations for most operations. For SNAP, each shutdown has different contingency plans - sometimes they issue benefits early, sometimes they have enough reserve funding for a month or two. It depends on how long the shutdown lasts and what emergency measures they implement.
0 coins