


Ask the community...
Have you considered a Donor Advised Fund? It allows you to bunch several years of charitable contributions into a single tax year to potentially get over the standard deduction threshold. You get the tax deduction upfront but can distribute the actual charitable gifts over many years. Also, if you own your home, a HELOC used for home improvements might provide some deductible interest. And don't forget about medical expense deductions if you can exceed the 7.5% of AGI threshold.
The Donor Advised Fund sounds interesting! If I bunch several years of donations together, would that help me stay under the IRMAA threshold for multiple years, or just give me one good year and then potentially push me over in subsequent years? Also, do you know if medical premiums count toward that 7.5% threshold? I have some pretty hefty supplemental insurance costs.
Bunching donations can give you one year with a lower MAGI, which helps with IRMAA for just that determining year. You're right that you'd need to plan for the subsequent years too - that's where QCDs become helpful since they can reduce your taxable income each year without needing to itemize. Yes, your premiums for Medicare Part B, Part D, Medicare Advantage, and supplemental policies all count toward the 7.5% medical expense threshold! Many retirees don't realize this. Track all your out-of-pocket medical costs including dental, vision, hearing aids, and long-term care insurance premiums too. With the higher healthcare costs in retirement, you might be surprised how often you can clear that 7.5% threshold.
As a retiree who just went through this last year, don't sleep on investing in a small business! My daughter started an Etsy shop and I invested as a silent partner. The business expenses during startup gave me some nice deductions through my Schedule K-1, and now I'm getting some income too. Just make sure it's a legitimate business with profit motive - the IRS gets suspicious of "hobby businesses" that only generate losses.
I asked my HR about this last yr and they said sometimes it looks like more taxes are taken because they also take the regular deductions from your bonus (health insurance, 401k, etc). So check ur bonus stub carefully to see what's actually being taken for taxes vs other stuff. Might explain why it feels like more than 22%!
Pro tip: if you want less tax withheld from your bonus, increase your 401k contribution just for that paycheck if your company allows it. I put 50% of my bonus straight into 401k last year and it lowered my taxable income. Double win!
Something nobody mentioned - if you get your bonus in a different calendar year, it can affect which tax year it counts for. My company pays year-end bonuses in January, so they count for the new tax year, not the year the bonus was earned for. Worth keeping in mind for planning purposes!
This is actually a really important point! My bonus pushed me into a higher tax bracket last year because it came in December. If it had come in January, my tax situation would have been completely different. Timing matters!
Something else to consider - do you have any 1099 income at all? Even a small amount would strengthen your position for putting the malpractice tail on Schedule C. Maybe a few medical consultations or chart reviews you could do? In my experience (tax preparer), the IRS is less likely to question the Schedule C treatment if you show at least some related income, even if it's minimal compared to the expense. Starting a legitimate business activity with even a small amount of income before filing would give you stronger footing.
Would moonlighting at an urgent care for even just a few shifts count for this? I'm in a similar situation (different professional liability insurance though) and wondering if even just a few thousand in 1099 income would help establish the business intent.
Yes, moonlighting at an urgent care as a 1099 contractor would absolutely help establish business intent. Even just a few shifts generating a couple thousand dollars would create a much stronger case that you were genuinely engaged in business activity related to the insurance expense. The key is making sure you're actually classified as an independent contractor (receiving a 1099) rather than a part-time employee (W-2). As long as you have some legitimate 1099 income from medical work, you'll be in a much better position to justify the large deduction on Schedule C.
Hey just a heads up - I'm an accountant and have worked with physicians in similar situations. Make sure you consider the impact on self-employment taxes too. If you report the tail on Schedule C with zero or minimal income, you'll show a loss that will offset ordinary income but won't create SE tax. However, if your husband has SE income from real estate, your tail expense can't offset his SE tax since it's not related to his business. Each Schedule C is treated separately. You might want to run the numbers both ways (Schedule C loss vs. possibly amortizing the tail over multiple years if you do any 1099 work in the future) to see what makes the most sense for your specific situation.
Thank you so much for this insight! I hadn't even considered the self-employment tax angle. The more I think about it, the more I'm leaning toward filing Schedule C with the full expense. I actually do have some very minimal income (around $3K) from chart reviews I did while transitioning between jobs. That should help establish business intent, right? I'm thinking I'll use some combination of the advice here - documenting everything thoroughly, including my correspondence with the locums company about credentialing, and making sure I'm prepared in case of an audit. The tax savings between Schedule C vs. effectively no deduction on Schedule A is just too significant to ignore.
The loophole I want eliminated is the carried interest loophole. It's insane that hedge fund managers get to classify their income as capital gains instead of ordinary income. They're just doing their jobs managing other people's money, but they pay way lower tax rates than regular working people.
What exactly is the carried interest loophole? I hear about it but don't really understand how it works or why it's such a big deal.
Carried interest is basically the share of profits that hedge fund and private equity managers get as compensation for managing investments. Instead of being taxed as ordinary income (which can be up to 37%), it's taxed at the capital gains rate (usually 20%). So imagine a fund manager who makes $10 million from managing other people's money. Instead of paying $3.7 million in taxes like other high-earning professionals would, they might only pay $2 million. That's a $1.7 million tax break just because of how their compensation is classified! Meanwhile teachers, doctors, and engineers all pay the higher ordinary income rates on their earnings.
The mortgage interest deduction needs major reform. It mostly benefits wealthy people with expensive homes. The deduction should be capped at houses worth $500k or less. Why should taxpayers subsidize mansions?
That would totally screw over people in high cost of living areas though. $500k won't even buy you a 1 bedroom condo in San Francisco or NYC. Not everyone with a mortgage over $500k is wealthy - many are middle class families in expensive metro areas.
Andre Dupont
One thing nobody's mentioned yet is the currency exchange risk. Your $130k USD salary in Montreal will be paid in Canadian dollars, so your actual take-home in USD terms will fluctuate with exchange rates. This doesn't directly affect your tax situation, but it does impact your real purchasing power if you have US debts or plan to move back eventually. Also, Quebec has higher sales tax (14.975% combined GST/QST) compared to Texas (6.25% state sales tax plus up to 2% local). This isn't income tax, but it affects your overall cost of living.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
•That's a really good point about currency risk that I hadn't considered! Do you know if there are any tax-efficient ways to manage currency conversion when sending money back to the US? I'll still have some student loans and a car payment in USD.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•There aren't specific tax advantages for currency conversion, but you might want to look into services like Wise (formerly TransferWise) or OFX for better exchange rates than banks offer. The conversions themselves aren't tax events unless you're actually trading currencies as investments. For your US debts, you might consider keeping a US bank account open and periodically transferring larger sums to minimize conversion fees, rather than monthly smaller transfers. Some expats also maintain US credit cards for US-based recurring payments while living abroad, which can simplify things.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
Don't overlook the totalization agreement between the US and Canada regarding social security! You'll be paying into the Canada/Quebec Pension Plan instead of US Social Security, but the agreement ensures these contributions count toward your eligibility for both systems. This becomes important if you don't spend your entire career in one country - you might be eligible for partial benefits from both systems depending on your total work history. The IRS Publication 519 has details on this, and it's definitely worth reading.
0 coins
ThunderBolt7
•This is so important and often overlooked! I worked in Canada for 7 years and then moved back to the US. When I applied for Social Security benefits, they initially calculated without my Canadian work history. I had to specifically request they consider the totalization agreement, which increased my monthly benefit by about $300!
0 coins