


Ask the community...
Another thing that helps your CPA: if you use your home for teaching, measure the exact square footage of your teaching area vs. total home square footage. My accountant loves that I calculate this percentage ahead of time for home office deduction. Also keep utility bills organized if you claim a portion of those!
Thank you for mentioning this! I do teach some students from my home studio. Is it only the specific room I teach in that counts, or can I include waiting areas where parents sit during lessons too?
You can include any space that's used exclusively for your business. So if you have a dedicated teaching room plus a waiting area that's only used for your students/parents, both areas count. However, if the waiting area is also your living room that you use personally, then you can only count the dedicated teaching space. The key is "exclusive use" - the IRS is pretty strict about this. Take clear measurements and photos of the space for your records too. Your CPA will appreciate having exact numbers rather than rough estimates.
Does anyone use a specific system for tracking cash payments from students? I teach piano and about half my students pay cash, which makes keeping track of income a bit messy.
To answer the original question about why Direct File isn't available in all states - it's largely political. I worked in tax policy for years, and the major tax prep companies lobby HARD against free filing programs. States have to specifically opt in to the program, and the tax software industry puts pressure on state legislators to avoid joining. Virginia specifically has some tax processing systems that would need updating to be compatible with Direct File's current format. Plus, several legislators there have received campaign contributions from the tax prep industry (you can look this up in public records).
That's really disappointing to hear but makes a lot of sense. Do you know if there's anything Virginia residents can do to push for inclusion in the program? Should we be contacting state representatives or something?
Yes, contacting your state representatives is definitely the most effective approach. Let them know you want Virginia to join the IRS Direct File program for the next tax season. Specific requests like this can gain traction, especially if many constituents express interest. Additionally, you can submit feedback directly to the IRS about your interest in having the program expanded to Virginia. While the IRS doesn't make the final decision on state participation, documented public interest helps build the case for expansion.
Quick question - does anyone know if any of the free filing options through IRS partners allow you to do both federal AND state filing for free? I'm also in Virginia and trying to avoid paying anything if possible. My situation is pretty simple - just a W-2 and some student loan interest.
I used FreeTaxUSA last year and the federal was completely free, but they charged about $15 for state filing. Still way cheaper than TurboTax or H&R Block though! I think some of the other IRS Free File partners might offer free state filing if your income is under a certain amount (maybe $73k?).
Another option worth considering is looking into whether you might qualify as an independent student. You mentioned being engaged - if you get married before filing your FAFSA, you automatically qualify as independent and won't need parent information at all. Other qualifications for independent status: - Being 24 or older - Having children you support - Being a veteran - Being in graduate school - Being an orphan/ward of the court/in foster care after age 13 - Being legally emancipated - Being homeless or at risk of homelessness
Thanks for this info! My fiancΓ©e and I weren't planning to get married until after graduation, but maybe we should reconsider the timeline if it would help with financial aid. Would getting married now affect her financial aid situation too? She's currently classified as a dependent student on her parents' taxes.
Getting married would make both of you independent students for FAFSA purposes, regardless of whether your parents still claim either of you as dependents on their taxes (those are separate systems). This could be beneficial for both of you if your incomes are lower than your parents', as financial aid would be calculated based only on your finances, not your parents'. However, it could potentially reduce aid if one of you has significant income or assets that would now be counted toward both of your FAFSAs. Marriage also makes you eligible to file taxes jointly, which could have its own implications.
Have you considered community college? I was in a similar bind with FAFSA issues and started at community college where tuition was low enough that I could pay out of pocket while working part-time. Most community colleges have transfer agreements with state universities, so after two years, I transferred to finish my bachelor's degree. By then I was 22, closer to being considered independent for FAFSA purposes.
You need to check your custody agreement/court order first! In my case, even though my kid lived with my ex more than half the time, our divorce decree specifically stated who gets to claim our child each year (we alternate). The IRS actually follows these court orders when there's a dispute. If your temporary orders don't specify who claims the child, then yes, the residency test would probably give Jess the first right to claim Emma. BUT if you have it written into your court order that you get to claim your daughter, that would override the residency test. Also, something to consider - if Jess has zero income, she wouldn't get much benefit from claiming Emma anyway. Most child tax credits require you to have earned income to fully benefit. Your child support isn't considered income for her - it's tax-neutral.
Our temporary orders don't actually specify who can claim Emma for taxes. The final custody agreement is still being worked out. That's really helpful info about the benefits Jess would get - or not get - with zero income. I hadn't thought about that angle. Would the grandparents benefit more from claiming Emma than either of us since they actually have income?
Yes, with zero earned income, Jess wouldn't benefit much from many of the tax credits related to having a dependent child. Some credits like the Child Tax Credit are partially refundable, but without income, she wouldn't get the full benefit. The grandparents would likely benefit more than Jess would since they presumably have income. They could potentially claim dependency exemptions and other benefits. However, that doesn't mean they have the legal right to claim Emma - they would only have that right if neither parent claims her. Since you're actively involved and supporting Emma, you should definitely try to address this in your final custody agreement. Many agreements include specific language about alternating years for tax purposes, regardless of where the child primarily lives.
Make sure you document EVERYTHING. I went through this with my ex's parents trying to claim my kid. Keep receipts for all child support payments, extra expenses, gifts, etc. Also document all visits, calls, and other involvement. If someone incorrectly claims your child and you believe you have the right to claim them, you can still file your return claiming the child (you'll have to paper file if someone else already claimed them electronically). The IRS will then send notices to both parties and investigate. They may ask for proof like: - School/medical records showing the child's address - Court custody agreements - Documentation of financial support - Documentation of your relationship/involvement with the child Sometimes just letting the grandparents know you're going to claim your child and have documentation can prevent the issue entirely!
Ravi Choudhury
To add to the distinction between CPAs and tax lawyers - it's also about when you bring them in. CPAs are great for ongoing tax compliance and planning BEFORE you file. Tax lawyers are often brought in AFTER there's a problem or for complex planning. My family learned this the hard way when my father tried to handle a complex real estate exchange himself with just TurboTax. Ended up with an audit and potential penalties. The tax attorney saved us thousands by properly structuring an argument based on tax case law that a CPA wouldn't have been familiar with. For your inheritance situation, a CPA is probably sufficient unless there are legal disputes about the inheritance or particularly complex assets involved.
0 coins
CosmosCaptain
β’What about for tax planning for the future? I've got a small business that's starting to do well, and I'm wondering if I should be talking to someone about the best way to structure things for tax purposes before it gets bigger.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
β’For forward-looking tax planning with a growing business, I'd actually recommend starting with a CPA who specializes in small businesses. They can help with immediate tax optimization strategies and basic business structure advice. As your business grows more complex or if you're considering significant changes like bringing on investors or expanding internationally, that's when adding a tax attorney to your advisory team makes sense. The attorney can help with more sophisticated legal structures and contracts that have tax implications while ensuring you're protected legally in other ways too.
0 coins
Freya Johansen
One thing nobody has mentioned is that many professionals are BOTH CPAs and tax attorneys. My tax guy has both credentials and it's super helpful because he can handle everything from preparing my returns to helping with tax court issues when my ex-wife messed up our joint return from years ago. Cost-wise, CPAs are generally cheaper (like $150-300/hr in my area) while tax attorneys can run $350-600/hr depending on their experience and location. But sometimes paying for the attorney saves money in the long run if you have serious tax issues.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
β’That's really good to know! I hadn't considered someone might have both credentials. Do you find that having someone with both qualifications costs more than just a regular CPA for standard tax prep?
0 coins
Freya Johansen
β’For standard tax prep, professionals with both credentials do tend to charge more than a typical CPA - I pay about 25% more than friends who use regular CPAs. However, I don't think it's necessary to pay that premium for straightforward tax preparation. Where I've found the dual credential valuable is for ongoing tax planning throughout the year. My situation includes a small business, rental properties, and some international income, so having someone who understands both the accounting and legal implications has helped me make better strategic decisions and avoid costly mistakes. For simpler situations, a good CPA alone is probably sufficient.
0 coins