


Ask the community...
The consensus from what I've seen across multiple tax forums is that 570 without 971 is usually good news. It typically means they're reviewing something internally that doesn't require your input. Most people report these resolving within 2-8 weeks with no action needed. If you had a 971, that's when you should expect a letter requesting information or explaining an adjustment.
I'm in a similar situation right now - TC 570 appeared on my transcript 3 weeks ago with no TC 971 code. Reading through everyone's experiences here is both reassuring and nerve-wracking! It sounds like there's a decent chance it will resolve on its own, but the uncertainty is really stressful when you're counting on that refund. Has anyone found any patterns in terms of what day of the week or time of month these 570 codes typically get resolved? I've been checking my transcript every morning but wondering if there are certain days when the IRS batch-processes these reviews.
Just a warning - if customs holds your package and you don't pay the fees within 10 days (at least with bpost), they might send it back to the seller! This happened to me with an order from Japan because I was on vacation when they sent the notification. Check your email regularly and maybe download the app for whatever delivery service is bringing your package.
Adding to this - sometimes the notifications go to spam too! Always worth checking your spam folder if you're expecting an international package. I almost missed a DHL customs payment email that way.
Had a very similar experience with an order from Zalando that I thought was shipping from their European warehouse but ended up coming from their Hong Kong fulfillment center. Ended up paying about ā¬45 in total fees on a ā¬170 order (VAT + duties + DHL handling fee). One thing I'd recommend - if you have the tracking number, you can sometimes see which courier service will be delivering it. Different companies have different handling fees, so at least you'll know what to expect. DHL tends to be the most expensive for handling fees but they're usually pretty quick with the customs clearance process. Also, don't panic if the tracking shows "held by customs" for a few days - that's totally normal. They're just processing the paperwork and calculating the fees. You should get contacted within 2-3 business days with payment instructions.
Has anyone considered that the OP might be able to use the home office deduction? If you have a legitimate home office for your podcast business (editing, admin work, etc.), then drives from your home office to other business locations aren't considered commuting - they're business travel. Might be a workaround worth exploring.
This is actually a really smart approach. I do photography and my tax guy helped me set this up. Because my home office is my "principal place of business," my drives to photoshoots are considered business travel, not commuting. OP would need to have a dedicated space used regularly and exclusively for the podcast business though.
I've been dealing with similar mixed-use vehicle situations for my freelance consulting work. One thing that helped me was keeping a detailed log that separates my different uses of the car. For your situation, I'd suggest tracking three categories: 1) Regular W2 commute (not deductible), 2) Podcast-related equipment transport or meetings (potentially deductible), and 3) Any additional trips solely for podcast business (definitely deductible). The key is proving that specific trips or portions of your vehicle use are exclusively for the podcast business, not just multitasking during your regular commute. If you ever drive somewhere specifically to record an episode, meet with sponsors, or pick up podcast equipment, those miles would be legitimate business expenses. The IRS really focuses on the primary purpose of each trip, so documentation is crucial. Also consider that as your podcast grows, you might start doing more podcast-specific travel (conferences, interviews, equipment purchases) which would clearly be deductible business use.
What about work-life balance differences between the two? I'm currently in law school and considering tax law, but hearing horror stories about attorney hours has me second-guessing.
I've been a tax attorney for 7 years after switching from general practice. The work-life balance actually isn't as bad as other legal specialties. Tax attorneys typically work 50-60 hour weeks, with some seasonality but nothing like the 80+ hours you might see in corporate or litigation. The CPA side does have more extreme seasonality though. My CPA friends work insane hours January-April (70+ hour weeks), but then have much more reasonable schedules the rest of the year. Some even take extended time off in summer.
This is such a helpful thread! I'm in a similar position - been doing tax prep for 3 years and trying to decide my next move. One thing I'm curious about that hasn't been mentioned much is the income progression differences. From what I've researched, tax attorneys seem to have higher starting salaries but CPAs might have more predictable income growth over time. Has anyone here made the switch from one to the other, or can you speak to how the compensation tracks differently over a 10-15 year career span? Also, I'm wondering about the continuing education requirements - are they significantly different between the two paths? I know both require ongoing learning, but I'm curious if one is more intensive than the other in terms of staying current. Thanks for all the real-world insights everyone has shared so far - this is exactly the kind of practical information that's hard to find elsewhere!
Great questions! I'm actually pretty new to this community but have been researching both paths myself. From what I've gathered talking to professionals in both fields, the income trajectory does seem to differ quite a bit. Tax attorneys typically start higher (maybe $80-120k depending on firm size/location) but their growth can be more variable - it really depends on whether they make partner, build a strong client base, or specialize in high-demand areas. CPAs might start lower ($55-75k) but seem to have more predictable income growth, especially if they build their own practice or move into industry roles. On continuing education, both require ongoing learning but the focus is different. CPAs need 40 hours annually in most states, with specific requirements for ethics and technical updates. Tax attorneys have similar hour requirements but through their bar associations, plus they need to stay current on case law and legal precedents, not just tax code changes. I'm still weighing both options myself, but the seasonal vs. project-based work styles seem like the biggest differentiator to me. Really appreciate everyone sharing their real experiences here!
Christopher Morgan
Has anyone looked into using a cash value life insurance policy instead of doing Roth conversions? My financial advisor says its a better option for accessing retirement funds early without tax penalties.
0 coins
Aurora St.Pierre
ā¢Be careful with cash value life insurance. While it can offer some tax advantages, the fees are typically much higher than standard investment accounts. I'd compare the total costs over time before making that decision. Most fee-only financial planners advise against it unless you've maxed out all other tax-advantaged options first.
0 coins
Christopher Morgan
ā¢Thanks for the insight! I hadn't thought about the fee structure. My advisor was really pushing it hard, which should have been a red flag. I'll look more carefully at the numbers and probably stick with the Roth conversion strategy for now.
0 coins
Anastasia Romanov
Great question about Roth conversion strategy! Given your situation with $185k in traditional 401k and $52k in traditional IRA, I'd recommend a gradual approach rather than converting everything at once. Since you're already maxing out your 401k contributions, you're likely in a higher tax bracket. Converting the entire $52k IRA in one year could push you into an even higher bracket, significantly increasing your tax bill. Consider doing partial conversions over 3-4 years - maybe $13-15k annually. This keeps you in your current tax bracket while steadily building your Roth balance. You can always accelerate conversions in years when your income is lower. For your 401k, if your plan offers a Roth 401k option, consider splitting future contributions 50/50 between traditional and Roth. This creates tax diversification without a big conversion tax hit. Also, since you mentioned early retirement, make sure you have a bridge strategy for accessing funds before 59½. You might want to keep some traditional money available for SEPP distributions if needed. The key is running the numbers for your specific tax situation - consider using tax software or consulting with a fee-only financial planner to model different scenarios.
0 coins