


Ask the community...
One thing nobody has mentioned yet - if you have ANY other Traditional IRA assets with pre-tax money in them (like from old 401k rollovers), the conversion option gets more complicated because of the pro-rata rule. The IRS won't let you just convert the non-deductible portion - you have to convert proportionally across all your Traditional IRA assets. Recharacterization avoids this issue completely since it's like the Traditional contribution never happened. So if you have other Traditional IRA assets, definitely go the recharacterization route while you still can!
Oh that's really good to know! I actually do have an old 401k that I rolled into a Traditional IRA last year. So if I did conversion instead of recharacterization, I'd have to convert some of that old 401k money too and pay taxes on it?
Yes, that's exactly the issue. With the pro-rata rule, you can't cherry-pick which dollars to convert. If you have $9,500 in non-deductible contributions and, say, $40,000 in pre-tax money from your old 401k rollover (all in Traditional IRAs), then any conversion would be proportionally taxable. If you converted $9,500, about 19% would be considered non-taxable (your non-deductible portion) and 81% would be taxable. The IRS looks at all your Traditional IRAs as one big bucket for this calculation. Recharacterization bypasses this completely since it's treated as if you never contributed to the Traditional IRA in the first place.
Anybody have experience with Fidelity handling these recharacterizations? Their website is confusing me. Do I need to call or can I do it online?
I did a recharacterization with Fidelity last year. Had to call - couldn't find any way to do it online. The phone rep was actually really helpful and processed it while I was on the call. Had to confirm I understood the tax implications but it was pretty straightforward once I got through to someone.
22 One thing nobody mentioned yet - if you owe less than $100,000, you can actually pay by credit card. There's a processing fee (around 2% I think), but if you have a good rewards card or a 0% intro APR offer, it might be worth considering instead of the IRS installment plan. Just make sure you can pay it off before any promotional rate expires!
19 Isn't the processing fee higher than the IRS interest rate though? I thought IRS interest was like 8% annually which would be less than 2% for a couple months of payments?
22 The math really depends on your specific situation. The processing fee is a one-time 2% charge, while IRS interest compounds daily at their current rate. If you can pay off the credit card quickly (especially with a 0% intro APR), the one-time fee might be cheaper than ongoing IRS interest plus the installment plan setup fee. Plus, if you earn rewards on that spending, it can offset some of the processing fee.
4 Don't forget about state taxes! The IRS payment deadline applies to federal taxes, but your state might have different rules and deadlines for payment. Make sure you check your state's tax website too.
Something nobody's mentioned yet - make sure you're calculating the $83,500 limit correctly. It includes: - Your pre-tax/Roth 401k contributions (max $23,000 or $30,500 if over 50) - Employer match and any profit sharing - After-tax contributions But if you're self-employed with a Solo 401k or have a SEP IRA, the calculations can be different. Also, the limit is per-employer, so if you changed jobs mid-year, you might actually be ok.
Wait the $83,500 limit is per employer?? I thought it was a total annual limit across all accounts? Does that mean if I contribute to a 401k at two different employers in the same year I could potentially contribute up to $167,000 total??
Yes, the $83,500 annual addition limit (for 2024) is technically per-employer. So if you work for two completely unrelated employers who each have their own 401(k) plan, you could potentially contribute up to the limit in each plan. However, your personal elective deferral limit ($23,000 for 2024, or $30,500 if you're over 50) is a combined limit across all employer plans. So while you can't defer more than $23,000 total between both employers' plans, you could still potentially reach the annual addition limit at each employer through employer contributions and after-tax contributions.
The 1099-R with Code G is only showing your mega backdoor Roth conversion amount, not your total contributions. The Code P you're referring to would only appear if Vanguard had identified and distributed excess deferrals back to you. Check your W-2 Box 12 codes D, AA, and BB to see your actual pre-tax and Roth 401k contributions. Then get your total employer contributions from your year-end statement. Add those three together and if they're over $83,500, THEN you have an excess contribution.
Hey just wanted to add - I was in a somewhat similar situation with the First Time Homebuyer Credit a few years back. The one thing I learned is that you should stop making those $500 payments ASAP if you have documentation proving your closing date was in 2009. The reason is that continuing to pay acknowledges the debt. Talk to a tax pro, but in my case, I was able to get the IRS to recognize that I had incorrectly categorized my purchase date and should have received the non-repayable credit. I didn't get back what I'd already paid, but I was relieved of future payment obligations. Make sure you keep ALL your closing documents safe - you'll need them if the IRS questions why you stopped making payments.
Did you have to file any special forms when you got them to stop requiring repayment? I'm worried if I just stop paying the $500 installments it'll trigger some kind of automatic collection process. Did they give you any pushback or was it fairly straightforward once you showed them the correct closing date?
I had to file a Form 843 (Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement) along with a detailed letter explaining the situation. I attached copies of my closing documents clearly showing the 2009 date, plus copies of my original tax returns where I made the mistake. The IRS did initially send some automated notices when I stopped making the payments. That's why it's important to be proactive rather than just stopping. They eventually processed my claim and sent a letter confirming I was no longer responsible for the remaining payments. It took about 5 months total from submission to resolution.
Just a quick tax tip that might help others - the First Time Homebuyer Credit had different versions depending on when you purchased: - April 9, 2008 - Dec 31, 2008: $7,500 credit that must be repaid over 15 years - Jan 1, 2009 - Nov 6, 2009: $8,000 credit with NO repayment required - Nov 7, 2009 - April 30, 2010: $8,000 credit for first-time buyers OR $6,500 for long-time residents So the OP definitely got caught in an unfortunate timing situation by accidentally claiming the 2008 credit when their purchase was actually in 2009. Just 3 days difference between a loan and a true credit!
That's why I always tell people to triple-check dates on major tax credits! The government loves to create these weird cutoff periods that can cost you thousands. I had a client who missed the solar tax credit by ONE DAY because of installation timing. Brutal.
Malik Johnson
Something nobody's mentioned yet - gas stations are regulated differently than most businesses. In many states, there are specific laws about how gas prices are displayed and advertised. Some states actually require gas stations to show the lowest price (cash price) on their big signs. Also, gas stations often pay higher processing fees than other retailers because of the high dollar amounts and fraud potential. The card networks classify them as "high-risk merchants" which means higher rates.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
ā¢Do you know if there's any regulation about how much extra they can charge for credit? My local station is charging almost a dollar more per gallon for credit vs cash which seems WAY more than the actual processing fee would be.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
ā¢The regulations vary by state, but generally there's no strict limit on the price difference. However, in most states, they do need to clearly post both prices. Some states like California have regulations requiring that credit card surcharges can't exceed the actual cost to the merchant, but enforcement is spotty. The large difference you're seeing (nearly a dollar) is definitely more than just covering the processing fee. It's likely they're using the cash discount to encourage a payment method that has other benefits for them - faster settlement, no chargebacks, and possibly some unreported cash transactions. It's a way to improve their overall margins in a business with typically very thin profit margins.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
Former gas station manager here. The credit/cash price difference isn't just about processing fees and tax deductions. There's more to it. 1) Cash payments are immediate. Credit card payments can take 2-3 days to process, which affects cash flow. 2) Cash transactions have no risk of chargebacks, which are a huge headache. 3) Cash transactions are faster at the pump, meaning more customers served. 4) Credit card companies charge higher rates for premium cards (those 2% cashback cards cost merchants more). Yes, the processing fees are tax deductible, but like someone else said, that only saves us about 21% of the actual fee. We're still paying the other 79%.
0 coins
Freya Larsen
ā¢Is it true that gas stations make almost no money on the actual gas and make all their profit on the convenience store stuff? I've heard that's why they try so hard to get people inside the store.
0 coins