


Ask the community...
Have you looked into whether your employer offers a Section 125 Cafeteria Plan? Some employers allow domestic partners to be covered pre-tax through these plans, which could eliminate the imputed income issue. My company started offering this last year and it saved me from the exact problem you're describing.
I haven't heard about this option. I'll definitely ask HR about it tomorrow. Do you know if there are specific requirements for a domestic partner to qualify under a Section 125 plan? Or does it vary by employer?
It does vary by employer, but generally they require proof of financial interdependence like joint bank accounts, shared lease/mortgage, or being named as beneficiaries on insurance policies. Some employers also require an affidavit that you've been in a committed relationship for a certain period (often 6-12 months). The key thing is that Section 125 plans allow employers more flexibility in defining eligible participants than standard health plans. Not all employers offer this option though, as it requires specific plan administration. Definitely worth asking about!
lol just get married already, problem solved š¤·āāļø srsly tho why deal with all this tax headache for "personal reasons" when marriage would instantly fix it and probably save you thousands?
That's a pretty insensitive comment. There are many valid reasons people choose not to get married that have nothing to do with their commitment level. Financial considerations are just one factor in that decision.
Just adding some clarity on this whole W-2 vs 1040 thing: - W-2: This is given to you by your employer showing your annual income and tax withholdings. Your employer also sends a copy to the IRS. - 1040: This is your actual tax return that you need to submit (either yourself or through a preparer). The information from your W-2 goes onto your 1040. You definitely need to make sure your 1040 was filed, either electronically or by mailing the paper form. If your tax preparer gave you a paper copy but didn't confirm he e-filed it, you need to ask him directly or check with the IRS.
THANK YOU ALL for explaining this! I feel so dumb now lol. I guess I need to call my tax guy again to see if he actually submitted the 1040 for me or if I need to do it myself. Makes so much more sense now that the W-2 is just info FROM my employer and the 1040 is what actually gets sent TO the government. Definitely gonna be more careful next year and maybe try one of these tools you guys mentioned instead of using my uncle's church friend...
Don't feel dumb at all! Tax forms are confusing and nobody teaches us this stuff. When you talk to your tax preparer, specifically ask if he e-filed your 1040 and ask for confirmation of the submission. Most tax software or professionals can provide an acknowledgment when the IRS accepts your return. If you can't reach him, calling the IRS directly is your best bet to see if a return has been filed under your Social Security number for this tax year.
This happened to me last year...my "tax guy" gave me copies of everything but never actually filed! I only found out when I didn't get my refund and the IRS had no record of my return. Now I always use tax software that gives me a confirmation when the IRS accepts my return.
Remember that refund size isn't everything! You need to look at your total tax LIABILITY not just the refund amount. If you were withholding differently, the refund numbers would change even if your actual tax obligation stayed the same. Compare line 24 (total tax) from your 1040 across the different scenarios. That's the true measure of which filing status is better. Also check if you're losing any deductions when filing separately. Some tax benefits are only available to joint filers, like student loan interest deductions, some education credits, and child/dependent care credits.
We looked at the total tax liability too, and it's still higher when filing jointly. I think the issue is that combining our incomes is pushing us into higher phase-out ranges for the child tax credit. What deductions specifically should I be looking for that we might lose by filing separately?
You're right that the phase-outs for child tax credit could be causing this if your combined income is pushing you into that range. For deductions you might lose when filing separately, check specifically: 1) Student loan interest deduction is completely unavailable when filing separately. 2) Child and Dependent Care Credit is generally not available when filing separately (with some exceptions). 3) Earned Income Credit cannot be claimed when filing separately. 4) Education credits like the American Opportunity Credit and Lifetime Learning Credit are not available when filing separately. 5) The income threshold for IRA contribution deductions is much lower for separate filers. Double check if any of these apply to your situation as they might offset what you're seeing with the child tax credit phase-out.
Did you use the same tax software to calculate all three scenarios? Different software can give different results. I'd run all three options (you claiming kids, spouse claiming kids, filing jointly) through the same program to make sure you're getting consistent calculations. Also, check if you qualify for Head of Household status when filing separately - that could make a big difference but you have to meet specific requirements.
Head of Household isn't available if they're married unless they've been living apart for the last 6 months of the year. Married people generally have to choose between married filing jointly or married filing separately.
Make sure you're clear about the legal structure of your business (sole prop, LLC, S-Corp, etc) as that affects how you'll report this income. For example, if you're a sole proprietor, you'll report on Schedule C, but S-Corp would be different. With the commission structure + referral bonuses, you're looking at some complexity.
I'm currently operating as a sole proprietor, but considering forming an LLC soon as the business grows. Would that change how I need to document these transactions?
As a sole proprietor, you're currently reporting everything on Schedule C. If you form an LLC but remain a single-member LLC with no special tax election, you'll still file the same way (Schedule C with your personal return). If you elect S-Corp status for your LLC (which many small business owners do to potentially save on self-employment taxes), then you'll need to file Form 1120-S and issue yourself a W-2 as an employee. In that case, the record-keeping becomes more complex because you need to separate owner compensation from business profits. The 20% commission structure remains a business income/expense issue, but you'll need more formal accounting.
Just want to add that you should keep meticulous records of WHEN each transaction happens. I do something similar and got audited because my records didn't clearly show which tax year some transactions belonged to. The 80% you're giving back could span different tax years if collected in December but paid in January.
This is so important! I use Quickbooks and make sure to enter the actual transaction date rather than the date I'm entering it. Also, do you use cash basis or accrual accounting for this kind of business?
Mateo Hernandez
Something critical that hasn't been mentioned yet is the concept of "tax residency" vs just physical presence or visa status. The US-Canada tax treaty has specific provisions that might apply to your situation as a Canadian citizen. Even if you meet the substantial presence test, you might be able to claim closer connection to Canada under the treaty's "tie-breaker rules" if you maintain significant ties there. However, claiming treaty benefits requires filing Form 8833, which actually puts you on the IRS radar rather than hiding from it. And if you're trading US securities while physically present in the US, that income may still be considered US-sourced regardless of treaty provisions. The offshore entity adds another layer of complexity because of anti-avoidance rules like CFC (Controlled Foreign Corporation) regulations. If you control the entity, the IRS may look through it and tax you directly.
0 coins
Aisha Khan
ā¢Can you clarify how the tie-breaker rules work? I'm a Canadian citizen on TN status but have been in the US for 4 years. I was told I can't claim treaty benefits anymore because I'm clearly a US resident for tax purposes now.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
ā¢Tie-breaker rules look at factors like where you have a permanent home, center of vital interests (closer personal/economic ties), habitual abode, and nationality. After 4 years in the US on a TN, it's difficult (but not impossible) to claim closer connection to Canada. You would need to demonstrate stronger ties to Canada than the US - permanent home there, family, bank accounts, voting, etc. The longer you stay in the US, the harder this becomes. Most tax professionals advise that after 3-4 years, you're likely a US tax resident unless you've deliberately maintained stronger Canadian connections. Filing Form 8833 to claim treaty benefits doesn't guarantee approval - it just asserts your position.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
Everyone's missing a crucial point here. The INTENTION behind your structure matters legally. If the IRS determines the primary purpose of your offshore structure is tax avoidance rather than legitimate business purposes, you could face serious consequences beyond just taxes. I'm not an expert, but I've seen cases where people were hit with civil penalties and even criminal charges under various anti-money laundering and tax evasion statutes. The IRS and FinCEN don't look kindly on structures designed primarily to hide income. If you're trading US markets while physically present in the US, using an offshore entity primarily for tax benefits is exactly the kind of arrangement that gets flagged. The "economic substance doctrine" means the IRS can disregard arrangements that don't have legitimate business purpose beyond tax savings.
0 coins
Yuki Ito
ā¢This is a really important point. My friend went down this road with a Cayman Islands setup for his trading business. Ended up with a full IRS audit, massive penalties, and had to pay all back taxes plus interest. The IRS agent specifically cited the lack of economic substance to the arrangement as the primary issue. Not worth the risk.
0 coins