IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

4 Hey, just wanted to share what I did in a similar situation. My husband and I got married mid-2023, and I was working while he was in med school. I actually filled out my W4 as "Married filing jointly" but then used the "Multiple Jobs Worksheet" that comes with the W4 form to calculate additional withholding. It worked perfectly - we ended up with a small refund instead of owing. The key is that Step 2 of the form lets you account for situations where one spouse works or when both work but earn different amounts.

0 coins

11 Did you have to do the worksheet thing every time you got paid? Or is it just once when you fill out the W4?

0 coins

4 You only need to do the worksheet once when you initially fill out the W4. The calculations help you determine an extra amount to have withheld from each paycheck, which you'll put on line 4(c) of the form. Your employer then automatically withholds that additional amount along with your regular withholding from each paycheck. When your situation changes (like when your wife starts working in April), you'll want to complete a new W4 with new calculations. But day-to-day or paycheck-to-paycheck, there's nothing additional you need to do once the form is submitted to your employer.

0 coins

19 Is anyone else annoyed that the W4 became so complicated after they redesigned it? I miss the old simple withholding allowances. Now I feel like I need an accounting degree just to fill out a basic form...

0 coins

13 For real! I've been doing my taxes for 20 years and the new W4 confused the heck out of me the first time I saw it. What happened to just putting "0" or "1" for allowances? That was way more straightforward.

0 coins

Luca Ricci

•

I work at a tax prep office and see this EXACT issue with Webull forms all the time. It's a known glitch in their reporting system. Here's what we do: 1. Make Box 5 match Box 1a exactly 2. Document the original values somewhere in your records 3. File normally The discrepancy is due to how Webull handles fractional shares and dividend rounding. Since Section 199A dividends (Box 5) are supposed to be a subset of ordinary dividends (Box 1a), the numbers get slightly misaligned in their system. This is so common with Webull that we have a standard procedure for it. I've never seen a client get any follow-up questions from the IRS about this minor adjustment.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

Thanks so much for this info! It's reassuring to hear this is a known issue. For the sake of my own records, should I keep a copy of the original 1099-DIV along with a note about the adjustment I made? Just trying to be thorough in case questions ever come up.

0 coins

Luca Ricci

•

Yes, definitely keep a copy of your original 1099-DIV form. I always recommend that clients maintain a simple document noting any adjustments they made when filing, along with the reason for the change. Just a basic note like "Adjusted Webull 1099-DIV Box 5 from $X.XX to match Box 1a amount of $X.XX due to reporting inconsistency" is sufficient. This creates a clean audit trail if you ever need to explain the adjustment. Though as I mentioned, these tiny discrepancies are so common with certain brokers that they rarely raise any questions. The IRS systems understand that small rounding differences occur, especially with fractional share investments.

0 coins

I discovered that you can actually override TurboTax's error check for this! When you get the error message, look for a small "continue anyway" or "override" option (it's easy to miss). I've been doing this for the past two years with my Webull forms since they always have this issue. For what it's worth, I've never had any problems filing this way - no audit, no questions, nothing. It's such a small amount that the IRS systems probably don't even flag it. Their automated systems are looking for much bigger discrepancies than a few pennies.

0 coins

I tried looking for an override button but couldn't find it in the newest version of TurboTax. Did they remove this option for 2025 filing season? Where exactly should I be looking?

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

Remember that if this is a Final K-1, you need to check if the distribution exceeds your client's basis in the partnership interest. If it does, the excess is generally treated as capital gain. Section 731(a) covers this. The tricky part with partnership-to-partnership distributions is applying the tiered partnership rules correctly. Make sure you're accounting for any Section 751 "hot assets" in the distributing partnership as well.

0 coins

Fidel Carson

•

Thanks for bringing up Section 731(a)! The distribution amount is actually less than their basis, so I think we're ok there. But can you explain more about these "hot assets" you mentioned? I'm not familiar with Section 751 in this context.

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

Section 751 "hot assets" refer to unrealized receivables and substantially appreciated inventory. When a partnership distributes cash or property, you need to determine if any portion is attributable to these hot assets. The significance is that distributions attributable to hot assets are treated as ordinary income rather than capital gain, even if the distribution exceeds basis. This prevents converting what would be ordinary income into capital gain. In a partnership-to-partnership scenario, this analysis needs to be done at both partnership levels, which gets complex quickly.

0 coins

Has anyone mentioned carried interest yet? If this partnership investment involves any carried interest arrangements, that adds another layer to track correctly. The tax treatment can vary significantly.

0 coins

Carried interest typically applies to investment fund managers, not regular partnerships investing in other partnerships. Unless OP's client is a fund manager receiving carried interest as compensation, it's probably not relevant here.

0 coins

Im in a similar situation but my numbers are different - my line 15 is -2,453 and line 16 is 3,102. I put the -2,453 on line 3 of the worksheet but then tax software is giving me an error saying I cant have a negative number there?? So confused.

0 coins

What tax software are you using? Some programs have quirks when handling negative values. I had the same issue with TurboTax last year but it turned out to be a display issue not a calculation error.

0 coins

Joy Olmedo

•

Just a heads up - make sure you're using the correct worksheet version for your tax year. The Qualified Dividends and Capital Gain Tax Worksheet gets updated, and using last year's version could lead to errors. I learned this the hard way when I was using old instructions I printed out last year. Also double-check that you correctly calculated lines 15 and 16 on Schedule D in the first place. Line 15 should be your net long-term capital gain or loss, and line 16 is typically your net short-term and long-term combined. If those aren't calculated right, it cascades through the rest of your forms.

0 coins

Just want to add something important about Section 174 that confused us - you need to be careful about the "first-year convention" when doing your calculations. The tax regs actually have you amortize only HALF of the first-year amount. So for that $125k engineer salary, you'd actually deduct $12.5k in year 1, then $25k in years 2-5, and the final $12.5k in year 6. Spreads it over 6 tax years technically. Our accountant missed this at first and we had to adjust our quarterly estimates. Make sure whoever does your taxes understands this nuance!

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

Is this first-year convention the same for all amortizable expenses or just for Section 174 specifically? I've never heard of this before and we've been doing R&D work for years.

0 coins

This applies specifically to Section 174 expenses under the current rules. It's similar to the half-year convention used for depreciation of certain assets, but in this case it's specifically part of the Section 174 amortization requirements. It's spelled out in the regulations, but many tax preparers missed this detail when the law changed because they weren't used to dealing with Section 174 amortization before (when most R&D could be expensed immediately). That's why so many businesses had to make corrections to their estimates or returns.

0 coins

Does anyone know if there's still a chance Congress might reverse the Section 174 amortization requirement? Our company's cash flow is getting killed by this change since we're heavily R&D focused but still pre-revenue. Being able to deduct only 1/5 of our actual expenses each year is brutal for our tax situation.

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

There's been talk about it for 2 years now, but nothing concrete has happened. Several bills have been introduced that would restore immediate expensing for domestic R&D, but they haven't moved forward. I wouldn't count on a change anytime soon, unfortunately.

0 coins

Prev1...38793880388138823883...5643Next