


Ask the community...
Former tax preparer here - a tip most people don't know: if you filed through ANY paid tax preparation service (H&R Block, Jackson Hewitt, local CPA, etc.), they are required by law to keep copies of your returns for at least 3 years. Call the office where you filed, and they can print you a complete copy, usually for a small fee (typically $25-50). This is often faster than going through the IRS, especially during busy periods. Just bring ID when you pick it up since it's sensitive information.
I appreciate the tip! Unfortunately I used TurboTax and did it myself online, but I'm still trying to figure out their system to download old returns. Their website navigation is not very intuitive. Do you know if online services like TurboTax have the same 3-year retention policy?
Online services like TurboTax typically store your returns for even longer than 3 years - many keep them for 7+ years. The challenge is usually navigating their interface to find them. For TurboTax specifically, after logging in, click on your name in the top right corner, then "Tax Returns & Documents." From that screen, you should see all your past returns with a "Download/Print PDF" option. If you're still having trouble, their customer support can guide you through it - they're pretty responsive if you use their chat feature.
If you're really in a pinch, call the Spanish university's international student office directly. I had a similar issue with a UK university, and when I explained the situation, they were willing to accept alternative documentation (my W-2 forms combined with the transcript). Sometimes they just need to verify your income/employment and can be flexible about the exact format. Worth a try before you go through all the hassle with the IRS!
Looking at the facts you've shared, the roof coating seems to qualify as a qualified improvement property (QIP). If that's the case, it would be eligible for bonus depreciation. For 2025, that would be 80% bonus depreciation, with the remaining 20% depreciated over 15 years. Might be worth looking into this angle.
Wait, I thought QIP only applies to interior improvements of nonresidential property? This is a residential rental building with exterior work.
You're absolutely right - I missed that this was a residential rental property. QIP only applies to interior improvements of nonresidential real property, so it wouldn't apply here. This would just be a standard capital improvement depreciated over 27.5 years as residential rental property. If you can establish the coating itself as a separate building component with a determinable useful life (based on manufacturer specs), you might be able to use a shorter recovery period. But it wouldn't qualify for QIP treatment.
Has anybody used the routine maintenance safe harbor for something like this? It states that if you expect to perform the activity more than once during the property's ADS class life, you can expense it. If this coating needs to be reapplied every 10-15 years, and the ADS class life for residential rental is 40 years, seems like it could qualify?
Interesting point, but I don't think it applies here. Routine maintenance is about keeping the property in efficient operating condition, not extending its useful life. Since OP specifically stated this coating extends the life of the roof, it's a betterment, not routine maintenance.
Don't overlook checking if your original tax return was actually correct. I thought I owed $12k in back taxes until I had a tax professional review my return. Turns out I had missed several deductions as a self-employed person. Filed an amended return and my liability dropped to around $7,500. Worth spending a few hundred bucks on a CPA review if you did your taxes yourself originally. Even if you used software, it's only as good as the info you put in.
What kind of deductions did you miss? I'm self-employed too and worried I might be overpaying.
The biggest ones I missed were home office deductions (I was afraid of an audit so I skipped it entirely), health insurance premiums (which are deductible for self-employed people), and retirement plan contributions. I also hadn't properly calculated my business mileage. The CPA also helped me properly categorize some expenses I had lumped together as "miscellaneous" which gave me more legitimate deductions. Even things like a portion of cell phone bills and internet costs can be deductible if you use them for business.
Has anyone considered bankruptcy as an option for tax debt? I've heard that older tax debts can sometimes be discharged.
Yes, but there are very specific rules. Tax debts can potentially be discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy if they meet ALL these conditions: - The taxes are income taxes (not payroll or fraud penalties) - The debt is at least 3 years old (from the due date) - You filed your tax return at least 2 years before filing bankruptcy - The IRS assessed the tax at least 240 days before filing bankruptcy - You didn't commit fraud or willful evasion For 2022 taxes, you wouldn't meet the 3-year rule yet, so bankruptcy wouldn't help with this specific debt until at least 2026. Also, bankruptcy has serious long-term consequences for your credit and financial future.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet - make sure you keep documentation about your mom living there all these years. The IRS might question why you're selling a property that wasn't your primary residence but also wasn't a rental property. Utility bills in her name, mail addressed to her at that address, her driver's license showing that address, etc. would all help establish that she was the actual resident even though you were the owner. You should definitely keep these records with your tax documents.
Would this documentation help reduce any tax liability though? Or is it just to explain the unusual situation if questioned?
It's primarily to explain the unusual situation if questioned during an audit. The documentation itself won't reduce your tax liability, as the property will still be treated as a non-primary residence for capital gains purposes. However, having this documentation ready could prevent potential complications if the IRS questions why you owned a property that wasn't your primary residence but also wasn't generating rental income. Without proper explanation, they might incorrectly assume it was an unreported rental property, which could trigger a more extensive audit.
Don't forget to check if your state has any different rules about this kind of property sale! Federal is one thing but some states have their own wrinkles. In NY where I am, there were additional forms needed for non-primary residence sales that my accountant almost missed.
Good point! In California we have totally different rules for property tax reassessments when property transfers between family members. The fed and state systems barely talk to each other.
Carmella Fromis
I've been doing AP for 15+ years and can tell you from experience - sending 1099s to corporations is just asking for trouble. Here's why: 1. Corps will call you asking why you sent it and you'll waste time explaining 2. Your 1099 totals won't match what the IRS expects to see for non-corp entities 3. It makes your company look unprofessional/inexperienced 4. You're creating MORE audit risk, not less Your tax director might be thinking "better safe than sorry" but this approach actually creates more problems. Print out the instructions for Form 1099-NEC which clearly state the exemption for corporations and highlight it for them. Sometimes seeing the official IRS instructions is the only thing that convinces the "higher ups.
0 coins
Lucas Schmidt
ā¢Thanks for the detailed explanation! Do you recommend any specific language to use when pushing back on this with the tax director? And also - is there any downside to the corporation if they receive an unnecessary 1099? Like, will they get flagged for an audit or anything?
0 coins
Carmella Fromis
ā¢I would approach it from an efficiency and accuracy standpoint: "I've researched the IRS requirements for 1099-NEC filing and found that issuing these forms to corporations is specifically exempted in the instructions. I'm concerned this approach might raise red flags with the IRS since our reporting will be inconsistent with their expectations, and it's creating significant additional work that isn't required by law. I've prepared a summary of the official guidelines if you'd like to review them." Regarding downsides for corporations receiving unnecessary 1099s - while it won't automatically trigger an audit, it can create reconciliation headaches for them. Their tax department will need to make sure the reported income matches their own records, and they might need to explain the discrepancy to their own accountants or auditors. In some cases, systems that automatically process 1099 data might misclassify the income. It mainly creates administrative hassle and confusion rather than legal problems.
0 coins
Theodore Nelson
Has anyone used the IRS's TIN matching system to verify vendor information? I heard it can help confirm whether a vendor is a corporation or not, but I'm not sure how to access it or if it's worth the effort.
0 coins
AaliyahAli
ā¢Yes, the IRS has the Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) Matching Program, but it's only available if you're required to file certain information returns like 1099s. You need to register for the IRS e-services and apply specifically for TIN Matching access. It doesn't directly tell you if a company is incorporated, but it does verify that the name and TIN combination is valid. The better approach is to have all vendors complete a W-9 form which requires them to indicate their entity type. That's your documentation showing why you did or didn't issue a 1099. If a vendor indicates they're a corporation on the W-9, you generally don't need to issue a 1099-NEC (with those few exceptions others mentioned).
0 coins