IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Your 82% on the first practice test is actually really encouraging! I just passed the Intuit Academy Tax Level 1 certification last month and started with very similar scores. What I found most helpful was treating each practice test as a diagnostic tool rather than just a score to beat. After each test, I'd spend time categorizing my wrong answers into themes - like "missed filing status rules" or "confused dependency qualifications" - which helped me see patterns I wouldn't have noticed otherwise. The real exam definitely emphasizes scenario-based questions where you need to apply multiple concepts together. For example, you might get a question about a divorced parent claiming a child as a dependent, which requires you to understand both dependency rules AND filing status implications simultaneously. One specific tip that made a huge difference: practice explaining tax concepts out loud as if you're teaching someone else. I found that when I could clearly articulate WHY a particular rule applies in a given situation, I was much better prepared for those complex application questions on the actual exam. Keep working through all the practice tests - you're building a solid foundation, and consistent scores in the mid-80s should definitely give you confidence to schedule the real exam. The format is very similar, just with more nuanced scenarios that test your understanding rather than just recall.

0 coins

This approach of treating practice tests as diagnostic tools is brilliant! I'm just beginning my preparation for the Intuit Academy Tax Level 1 certification and your method of categorizing wrong answers into themes sounds like it would be much more effective than just reviewing individual questions. Your example about the divorced parent scenario really illustrates how the exam tests interconnected concepts rather than isolated rules. I can see how that would require a deeper understanding than just knowing the dependency rules or filing status rules separately. The tip about explaining concepts out loud as if teaching someone else is something I definitely want to try. It makes sense that if you can clearly articulate the reasoning behind a rule, you'd be better prepared for those application-heavy questions everyone keeps mentioning. Thanks for sharing such practical advice! It's really reassuring to hear that starting around 82% can lead to success with the right preparation strategy. Your emphasis on understanding the "why" behind rules rather than just memorizing them aligns with what several others have mentioned in this thread.

0 coins

Just wanted to add my perspective as someone who recently completed the Intuit Academy Tax Level 1 certification! An 82% on your first practice test is actually quite solid - I started around 79% and was feeling pretty discouraged initially. What really helped me bridge the gap between practice tests and the actual exam was focusing on the interconnected nature of tax concepts. The real exam doesn't just test whether you know individual rules - it tests whether you can apply multiple rules together in complex scenarios. For example, you might encounter a question about a college student who works part-time, lives with their parents part of the year, and provides some of their own support. This requires understanding dependency tests, filing requirements, education credits, AND earned income rules all at once. I found that creating "decision trees" for complex topics like filing status and dependency determinations was incredibly helpful. Instead of memorizing isolated facts, I mapped out the logical flow of questions you need to ask to reach the right conclusion. Also, don't underestimate the importance of timing practice. The actual exam has that 90-minute limit, and you need to be comfortable making decisions without second-guessing yourself too much. Practice tests under timed conditions really helped me build that confidence. Keep at it - you're definitely on the right track with your methodical approach to working through all the practice tests!

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

Has anyone here used TurboTax for this kind of situation? I also get a car allowance from my employer AND use my car for my side business. Wondering if TurboTax handles this well or if I need to pay for a CPA this year.

0 coins

I tried doing this in turbotax last year and it was a nightmare. It doesnt have a clear way to handle the situation where you get a w2 stipend AND claim business use. I ended up having to manually override some calculations and im not sure if i did it right. This year im using a cpa because vehicle deductions are audit triggers.

0 coins

I went through this exact situation last year with my consulting business and W2 job that provided a vehicle allowance. The key thing to understand is that you absolutely CAN claim depreciation on the business portion of your vehicle even while receiving a W2 stipend - they're completely separate tax situations. Here's what worked for me: I calculated my total business mileage (excluding the W2 job miles since that's covered by the stipend) and divided by total miles driven to get my business use percentage. For a $45k truck, if you use it 60% for your own business, you can depreciate 60% of the cost. Keep detailed mileage logs with dates, destinations, and business purposes. I use a simple spreadsheet that tracks: date, starting odometer, ending odometer, destination, and whether it's personal, W2 job, or my business. This documentation is crucial if you're ever audited. One more tip - consider whether your truck qualifies as a heavy vehicle (over 6,000 lbs GVWR) because you might be able to take a larger Section 179 deduction in the first year instead of spreading depreciation over several years. Just make sure your business use percentage stays above 50% to qualify.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

This is really helpful! I'm new to this whole vehicle depreciation thing and was getting confused by all the different rules. Just to clarify - when you say "excluding the W2 job miles" from your business calculation, does that mean those miles don't count toward your total annual mileage either? Or do they still count in the denominator when calculating the business use percentage? I want to make sure I'm tracking this correctly from the start.

0 coins

Consider looking into Captive Insurance Companies (CICs) if you own a business or have significant business income. Under Section 831(b), you can elect to have your captive taxed only on investment income, not insurance premiums, for captives with less than $2.3M in annual premiums. This allows you to deduct legitimate business insurance premiums paid to your own captive, while the captive accumulates wealth in a tax-advantaged structure. Another often-overlooked strategy is investing in Qualified Opportunity Zone funds, which allow you to defer capital gains taxes by investing those gains into designated economically distressed communities. You get a 10% step-up in basis after 5 years, 15% after 7 years, and if held for 10+ years, any appreciation in the QOZ investment itself is tax-free. For immediate tax relief, look into Cost Segregation studies if you own any commercial real estate or rental properties. This allows you to accelerate depreciation on certain components of buildings (like flooring, lighting, landscaping) from 27.5-39 years down to 5-15 years, creating significant upfront deductions. Finally, consider establishing a Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT) if you have highly appreciated assets. You get an immediate charitable deduction, avoid capital gains tax on the sale of the appreciated assets within the trust, and can receive income payments for life while ultimately benefiting charity.

0 coins

Aria Park

•

This is incredibly comprehensive - thank you! The Captive Insurance Company strategy is completely new to me. Is there a minimum business income threshold where CICs start to make sense, or specific types of businesses where they work best? I'm curious about the operational complexity too - do you essentially have to run a legitimate insurance operation, or can it be more passive? The Opportunity Zone concept sounds interesting but I'm wondering about liquidity concerns with the 10-year hold requirement. Have you seen good quality investment opportunities in these zones, or are most of them pretty speculative real estate plays? Also, regarding Cost Segregation studies - roughly what's the minimum property value where the study costs justify the tax benefits? I have one rental property worth about $300k but wasn't sure if it would be worth the expense of hiring specialists for the analysis.

0 coins

Aisha Patel

•

Great questions! For CICs, you typically need at least $500k-1M in annual business income to justify the setup and ongoing compliance costs. They work best for businesses with genuine insurable risks - professional services, manufacturing, real estate operations, etc. You do need to run it as a legitimate insurance company with proper reserves, claims handling, and risk distribution, though many use third-party managers to handle operations. For Opportunity Zones, you're right about liquidity concerns - it's definitely a long-term play. The quality varies widely. I've seen some solid multifamily housing developments and mixed-use projects in gentrifying areas, but also plenty of sketchy ground-up construction deals. The key is finding established sponsors with track records in the specific markets. Don't chase the tax benefits if the underlying investment doesn't make sense. On Cost Segregation, $300k is borderline but potentially worthwhile depending on the property type and your tax situation. Residential rental studies typically cost $3k-8k, so if you can accelerate $50k+ in depreciation from 27.5 years to 5-15 years, the first-year tax savings often justify the cost. Get quotes from a few firms - some will do a preliminary analysis to estimate benefits before you commit. All these strategies require good professional guidance. The tax code complexity means small mistakes can be expensive.

0 coins

One strategy that hasn't been mentioned yet is establishing a Solo 401(k) with a profit-sharing component if you have any 1099 income. Even small amounts of consulting or freelance work can open up significant additional retirement contribution space beyond your regular employer 401(k). Also consider tax-efficient withdrawal strategies from existing accounts. At your income level, you might benefit from Roth conversions during lower-income years (if you plan any sabbaticals, career transitions, or early retirement). Converting traditional IRA funds to Roth during a year when your income dips can be incredibly valuable long-term. Don't overlook state tax planning either - depending on where you live, strategies like establishing residency in a no-tax state before retirement or timing certain income recognition around state tax rules can save substantial amounts. Finally, if you're charitably inclined, consider a Donor Advised Fund (DAF). You can make a large contribution in a high-income year to get the deduction, then distribute the funds to charities over multiple years. It's more flexible than direct charitable giving and can help with the "bunching" strategy others mentioned. The key is working with a fee-only financial advisor who specializes in tax planning, not just someone who does basic tax prep. The strategies get much more sophisticated at your income level.

0 coins

This is really helpful perspective on the strategic timing aspects! I hadn't thought about using Roth conversions as a timing strategy during lower income years. That could be huge if I ever take a sabbatical or career break. The Donor Advised Fund suggestion is particularly interesting - I do give to charity but haven't been strategic about the timing for tax purposes. Quick question: is there a minimum amount that makes sense for setting up a DAF, or can you start with smaller contributions and build it up over time? Also, are there any fees or administrative costs I should factor in when comparing it to direct charitable giving? The state tax planning point is something I definitely need to research more. I'm in California now so the state tax burden is pretty significant. Have you seen people successfully establish residency in states like Texas or Florida while still working remotely for California-based companies? I imagine there are some complex rules around that.

0 coins

Ryan Andre

•

As a newcomer to both this community and tax-loss harvesting, this entire thread has been incredibly educational! I've been hesitant to try these strategies due to wash sale concerns, but the unanimous consensus here from tax professionals and experienced practitioners is really reassuring. What finally made it click for me is understanding that this isn't about correlation at all - it's about actual ownership. When you buy VTI, you literally own thousands of mid and small-cap stocks that don't exist in VOO whatsoever. That's not a subtle difference - it's owning a fundamentally different slice of the market (500 large-cap stocks vs 3,500+ total market stocks). The documentation strategies shared here are fantastic. I love the idea of creating a transaction log with dates, funds involved, key differences, and most importantly, investment rationale beyond tax benefits. It shows the IRS that you're making genuine economic decisions, not just paper shuffling for tax purposes. From what I've gathered, the key factors that make this strategy so defensible are: (1) different underlying indices (S&P 500 vs CRSP Total Market), (2) massively different compositions (500 vs 3,500+ holdings), and (3) legitimate investment reasoning (large-cap focus vs total market exposure). Your swap clearly hits all three criteria. Your 6-7 week holding period seems extremely conservative given the substantial compositional differences, but it provides extra peace of mind. Based on all the professional expertise and real-world success stories shared here, you should feel very confident proceeding with your strategy!

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

This has been such an incredible thread to follow as someone brand new to tax-loss harvesting! I really appreciate how welcoming this community is to newcomers and how willing everyone is to share their detailed expertise and real-world experiences. Your point about ownership versus correlation really sealed it for me too. When you frame it as "Do I own the same companies?" rather than "Do these funds perform similarly?", the answer becomes crystal clear. VOO owns 500 large-cap companies, VTI owns those same 500 PLUS about 3,000 additional mid and small-cap companies. That's not correlation - that's fundamentally different market exposure. The three-factor test you outlined is perfect for evaluating these strategies: different indices, different compositions, and legitimate investment rationale. It's such a clear framework for thinking about wash sale risk that I'm definitely going to use it when evaluating other potential swaps in the future. What gives me the most confidence is seeing the consistency across all the professional opinions shared here - tax preparers, experienced harvesters, even someone who got direct IRS guidance all reached the same conclusion. For someone just starting out, that kind of unanimous expert consensus is incredibly valuable. Thanks to everyone who contributed to making this such an educational discussion! I'm excited to start implementing some of these strategies myself with the solid foundation of knowledge this thread has provided.

0 coins

StarGazer101

•

As someone who's been doing tax-loss harvesting for about 3 years now, I can confirm that your VOO to VTI swap is one of the most defensible strategies you can use. The compositional differences are so substantial that it's hard to imagine how anyone could argue these are "substantially identical" securities. What really drives this home is that VTI contains approximately 7x more securities than VOO (3,500+ vs 500). You're not just swapping similar funds - you're moving from large-cap only exposure to total market exposure that includes thousands of mid and small-cap companies that VOO doesn't hold at all. I've done this exact swap multiple times in both directions and have never had any issues. The key documentation I maintain includes: fund fact sheets showing different indices tracked, screenshots of holdings comparisons, and a simple spreadsheet noting my investment rationale (wanting broader market exposure vs focused large-cap exposure). One thing I'd add to all the great advice here - consider setting up alerts to remind yourself when your 30-day wash sale window expires if you want to be extra conservative. Though based on the substantial differences between these funds, most tax professionals would argue the wash sale rule doesn't even apply since they track fundamentally different market segments. Your 6-7 week timeline gives you plenty of cushion, and the professional consensus in this thread is remarkably consistent. You should feel confident proceeding with your strategy and claiming the tax loss.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

•

This has been such a comprehensive and educational discussion! As someone completely new to tax-loss harvesting, I'm amazed at the depth of knowledge and real-world experience shared in this thread. Your point about VTI containing 7x more securities than VOO (3,500+ vs 500) really puts the difference in perspective. It's not just about correlation - we're talking about fundamentally different universes of holdings. The fact that you've successfully executed this exact strategy multiple times over 3 years gives me tremendous confidence. I really appreciate your practical tip about setting up alerts for the 30-day window - that's the kind of operational detail that's so helpful for someone just starting out. Though as you noted, the compositional differences here are so substantial that the wash sale rule probably doesn't even apply. What strikes me most about this entire discussion is how unanimous the expert consensus has been. From tax professionals to multi-year practitioners like yourself to direct IRS feedback - everyone seems to agree that different indices with substantially different compositions create sufficient distinction for tax purposes. I'm definitely implementing the documentation strategies discussed here (fund fact sheets, comparison screenshots, transaction logs with investment rationale) and feel confident moving forward with similar strategies myself. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise - this community is incredibly welcoming and educational for newcomers!

0 coins

Xan Dae

•

Don't panic! You absolutely can handle this on your own, especially for your first year. I was in the exact same situation when I started contracting - couldn't find an accountant anywhere and was totally overwhelmed. Here's what I wish someone had told me when I started: **Start simple:** You don't need to figure out S-corps or LLCs right away. Just focus on tracking your income and expenses properly this first year. You can always form an entity later once you understand your income patterns. **Essential first steps:** - Open a separate business checking account (makes everything cleaner) - Start tracking ALL business expenses immediately - home office, internet, phone, computer equipment, software subscriptions, etc. - Set aside 25-30% of every payment for taxes in a separate savings account - Make quarterly estimated tax payments (due dates are Jan 15, April 15, June 15, and Sept 15) **Marriage question:** Don't make major life decisions based on taxes alone! The marriage penalty/benefit depends on both your incomes, so run some scenarios with tax software first. For your first year, I'd recommend using TurboTax Self-Employed or FreeTaxUSA. They're designed for 1099 contractors and will walk you through everything. You can always upgrade to an accountant next year once you have a full year of data and know what questions to ask. You've got this! The first year feels overwhelming, but it gets much easier once you establish good systems.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of practical advice I needed to hear! I've been overthinking everything and making it way more complicated than it needs to be. The separate business checking account tip is brilliant - I hadn't even thought of that but it makes total sense for keeping everything organized. Quick follow-up question: when you say "set aside 25-30% of every payment" - is that enough to cover federal, state, AND self-employment taxes? I'm in California so I know state taxes here are pretty high. Want to make sure I'm not setting myself up for a nasty surprise come tax time!

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

For California, you'll definitely want to bump that up to 35-40%! California state tax can be brutal for contractors - it ranges from 1% to 13.3% depending on your income level, plus you've got the 15.3% self-employment tax and federal taxes on top of that. I learned this the hard way my first year - set aside 25% thinking I was being conservative, then got hit with a much bigger tax bill than expected. Now I automatically transfer 40% of every payment into a separate "tax savings" account. Better to have too much saved and get a refund than scramble to come up with extra money at tax time. Also, since you're in CA, make sure you're aware of the quarterly estimated tax payments for state taxes too - they're separate from federal. California uses Form 540ES for estimated payments.

0 coins

Melissa Lin

•

I completely understand the panic - I went through the exact same thing when I transitioned to 1099 work two years ago! The good news is that while an accountant is definitely helpful, it's not absolutely essential, especially for your first year. Here's my practical advice for getting started: **Immediate priorities:** - Open a separate business bank account ASAP (makes tracking so much cleaner) - Start tracking every business expense from day one - dedicated workspace, internet, phone, equipment, software, professional development - Set aside 35-40% of each payment for taxes (federal + state + self-employment tax) - Sign up for quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid penalties **The S-corp question:** Don't stress about this yet. Generally only worth considering once you're consistently making $80K+ annually. The administrative costs and complexity usually outweigh benefits below that threshold. **Marriage decision:** Never make major life decisions purely for tax reasons! Run some scenarios with tax software to see the actual impact, but remember the "marriage penalty" varies greatly based on both partners' incomes. For your first year, I'd recommend starting with TurboTax Self-Employed or FreeTaxUSA - they're designed specifically for contractors and will guide you through everything. You can always hire an accountant next year once you have a full year of data and better understand your specific situation. The first year feels overwhelming, but you absolutely can handle this! Focus on good record-keeping habits now, and everything else will fall into place.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

This is such helpful advice! I'm definitely feeling less panicked after reading everyone's responses. The 35-40% savings rate makes sense - I'd rather be safe than sorry when tax time comes around. One thing I'm still confused about though - when you mention tracking "dedicated workspace" expenses, how does the home office deduction actually work? I'll be working from my apartment but don't have a separate room that's only for work. Can I still claim anything, or do you need a completely separate office space to qualify for the deduction?

0 coins

Prev1...352353354355356...5643Next