


Ask the community...
Anyone actually know when this limitation expires? I thought it was set to end after 2025 but heard rumors Congress might extend it. Has anyone seen anything definitive about the future of Form 461?
The excess business loss limitation was originally created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to be temporary through 2025. But you're right to be concerned - Congress extended it before (during COVID) and could definitely do so again given budget concerns. I haven't seen any official proposals to extend it beyond 2025 yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if it happens.
The timing aspect that Brianna mentioned is really crucial and often overlooked. I've found that bunching expenses into non-loss years while accelerating income into loss years can significantly help manage the Form 461 limitation. One specific strategy that worked for me: if you're expecting a profitable year next year, consider deferring some December equipment purchases or repairs to January. Conversely, if you have any outstanding receivables or can accelerate some 2025 income into 2024 (when you're already hitting the loss limitation), that can help balance things out. Also worth noting - the limitation applies at the taxpayer level, not per business. So if you have multiple businesses, profitable ones can offset losses from others before you hit the threshold. This is where proper business structure planning really matters. The key is looking at this as a multi-year tax planning opportunity rather than just dealing with the current year limitation. It's frustrating, but with proper planning, you can minimize the cash flow impact of having deductions pushed to future years.
This is really helpful advice about the timing strategies! I'm dealing with my first year hitting the Form 461 limitation and hadn't thought about the multi-year planning approach. Quick question - when you mention accelerating 2025 income into 2024, are there any specific methods that work well for service-based businesses? I'm worried about creating cash flow issues by pushing too much income into an already difficult year, even though I understand the tax benefit.
Are you sure you calculated your excess SS tax correctly? The limit is only on the amount of wages subject to SS tax, not the actual tax amount itself. For 2024, the wage base limit was $168,600. If your combined wages from both jobs exceeded that amount, then you would be entitled to a refund of the excess SS tax. But if your total wages were under that limit, you wouldn't be entitled to any excess SS tax refund.
Actually, this is incorrect. Even if total wages are below the limit, having multiple employers can still result in excess Social Security tax withholding. Each employer is required to withhold Social Security tax on wages up to the wage base limit ($168,600 for 2024), without considering what other employers might have withheld. So if OP had two jobs that each withheld at the full 6.2% rate without knowing about each other, the total withheld could exceed the maximum required payment.
I went through this exact same situation two years ago with multiple employers. The IRS verification process for excess Social Security tax claims is pretty standard - they just want to make sure the math checks out. Your calculation looks spot on. The key thing to remember is that each employer withholds Social Security tax independently without knowing what other employers have withheld from you during the year. So even though your total wages might be well below the $168,600 limit, you can still end up with excess withholding. When you respond to their letter, make sure to include: 1. Copies of both W-2s (not originals) 2. A simple calculation showing the excess like you did here 3. Your SSN written on every page 4. A copy of their letter Send it certified mail so you have proof of delivery. In my experience, once they see the W-2s, they process the refund pretty quickly. This is definitely not audit territory - just routine verification. Don't stress about it!
Just keep in mind that reverse exchanges are way more expensive - we paid almost $12K in additional fees for ours. Make sure the tax savings actually outweigh the costs!
That seems crazy high for fees! Was that just for the QI and EAT setup or did that include other closing costs too? The quote I got was around $6K for the reverse exchange services.
That included everything - the QI fees, legal documentation, EAT setup, title insurance for both properties, and additional closing costs. The base fee for the QI and EAT was about $7K, then the rest was for the additional complexity in closing costs. Our situation was more complex than most though since we were exchanging across state lines and one property was in an LLC. If your situation is straightforward, your $6K quote sounds reasonable. Just make sure to get everything in writing and check for any potential additional fees that might come up.
Great discussion here! I'm actually in the middle of a reverse 1031 exchange right now and wanted to share a few additional tips that have helped me: 1. Start your property search for the replacement property early and get pre-approved financing lined up. The 180-day clock starts ticking the moment you close on the replacement property, so you want to be ready to move quickly on selling your relinquished property. 2. Consider hiring a real estate agent who has experience with 1031 exchanges. They understand the timeline pressures and can help price your original property aggressively to ensure it sells within the exchange period. 3. Have your tax documents and property records organized before you start. The QI will need detailed information about your original property's basis, improvements, and depreciation history. The reverse exchange process definitely requires more coordination than a standard exchange, but it's been worth it for us to secure the replacement property we really wanted. Just make sure you have a good team - QI, real estate agent, accountant, and lender who all understand the process and timelines involved.
I had the exact same issue last year! The problem is that when you and your spouse both work, each payroll system calculates withholding as if that's the only income in your household. So you're effectively getting double the standard deduction in your withholding calculations. Quick fix: take your combined annual income, find what tax bracket portions of it fall into, then calculate how much EXTRA tax you should be paying on that combined income vs what's being withheld. Divide by number of paychecks left in the year and put that amount in line 4(c) of your W-4s. For example, if together you're $10k into the 22% bracket but being withheld at 12% for that portion, you'd need about $1,000 more withholding for the year, or about $40 per biweekly paycheck each if you split it.
I tried doing this calculation myself last year and still messed it up somehow. Is there a calculator you used? The IRS one kept giving me errors.
I actually created a simple spreadsheet that does this calculation. The key thing to remember is that each job's withholding system assumes you get the full standard deduction ($25,900 for married filing jointly in 2022). So when both spouses work, you're effectively getting that deduction twice in your withholding calculations, even though you only get it once when filing. The IRS calculator is definitely the official way to go, but if it's giving you errors, try clearing your browser cache or using a different browser. Sometimes it has technical issues. Alternatively, many major tax software providers like TurboTax and H&R Block have free withholding calculators on their websites that are often more user-friendly than the IRS version.
Don't feel bad, this happened to tons of people! The W-4 changes plus adjustments to withholding tables have messed up a lot of people's withholding. My husband and I owed $3k this year despite having "0" allowances for years with no problems. One thing no one's mentioned - check if your health insurance premiums or retirement contributions changed significantly. Those are pre-tax deductions that affect your withholding calculations. In our case, we switched to a cheaper health plan, which meant more taxable income but the withholding didn't adjust properly to account for it.
That's a good point about the health insurance! We did switch to a high-deductible plan this year to save on premiums. I didn't realize that could affect withholding calculations. So we had more taxable income but the withholding didn't keep up?
Exactly! When you switch to a high-deductible health plan, your monthly premiums go down, which means less money is being deducted pre-tax from your paycheck. This increases your taxable income, but your W-4 withholding settings stayed the same, so not enough additional tax was being withheld to cover that higher taxable amount. It's one of those sneaky things that can throw off your withholding without you realizing it. The same thing happens if you reduce your 401k contributions, pay off student loans (losing the interest deduction), or even if your employer stops providing certain benefits that were previously reducing your taxable income. When you update your W-4s, make sure to account for these kinds of changes in your overall tax picture, not just the income amounts.
Angel Campbell
6 Has anyone successfully filed an ERTC claim using the regular mail? Or is e-filing the only realistic option with this tight deadline? My tax software doesn't support the amended returns needed for ERTC and I'm freaking out a bit.
0 coins
Angel Campbell
β’14 Paper filing is technically allowed but I wouldn't risk it with the deadline so close. The IRS considers the postmark date as the filing date, but there have been massive delays with paper processing. I'd recommend using a specialized service or finding someone with the right software to e-file.
0 coins
Nia Johnson
This deadline change is absolutely brutal for small firms like ours. I've been in practice for 15 years and I've never seen the IRS make such a dramatic deadline shift with so little notice. What's really frustrating is that many of my clients who legitimately qualify for ERTC are now going to miss out entirely because they don't have their documentation ready. The irony is that the IRS created this mess by not processing claims efficiently in the first place, and now they're punishing everyone - legitimate claimants included - to solve their fraud problem. I'm wondering if any professional organizations like AICPA are pushing back on this or if we're all just supposed to accept that tax season now starts in January. Has anyone heard of any advocacy efforts to at least get a brief extension for claims already in preparation?
0 coins