


Ask the community...
I missed reporting a 1099-B last year and the IRS actually adjusted my refund automatically. They sent me a notice saying they had information that didn't match my return, showed the calculation, and reduced my refund by the appropriate amount. No penalties since the difference was under $1000. I didn't even have to file an amended return! Might not be the same for everyone but thought I'd share my experience.
Was that for a large amount? I've heard they only do automatic adjustments if the tax difference is significant. Also, how long did it take them to process your refund after they made the adjustment?
It was for about $150 in additional tax. They processed my refund with the adjustment about 4 weeks after I filed, which was only about a week later than my previous year's refund had taken. The notice came at the same time as my refund deposit, explaining the difference between what I requested and what they sent. It was surprisingly straightforward. I've heard they're more likely to do this simple adjustment process for straightforward income items like 1099s rather than more complex issues.
I'm dealing with something similar but mine's a bit more complicated - I forgot to include a 1099-R from an old 401k rollover that had taxes withheld. The additional tax owed is only about $45, but I'm worried because it involves retirement account reporting. Based on what everyone's saying here, it sounds like waiting for the original refund to process first is the safer bet for small amounts. My concern is whether retirement account discrepancies get flagged differently than regular dividend income. Does anyone know if 1099-R matching happens on the same timeline as other 1099 forms? Also really appreciate the practical advice from the tax preparer - knowing that the matching typically doesn't happen until late summer gives me some peace of mind about the timing.
From what I understand, 1099-R forms are actually processed through the same document matching system as other 1099 forms, so the timeline should be similar. However, retirement account discrepancies might get a bit more scrutiny since they involve withholding and potential penalties. For your situation with the 401k rollover, the IRS will see both the distribution and the taxes that were withheld. If you properly reported the rollover but just missed including the form, the main issue would be the missing withholding credit rather than unreported income. This could actually work in your favor since you might be entitled to a larger refund once corrected. I'd still recommend the same approach - wait for your original refund, then file the amendment. The $45 difference is small enough that penalties would be minimal even if they catch it first. Just make sure when you amend that you're properly claiming credit for the taxes that were withheld from the distribution.
As someone who works for a nonprofit, I'll add that many donation centers for clothes and household items will give you a receipt if you ask for one. They typically don't assign values (that's your responsibility), but having that receipt proves you made the donation. For the foreign donations, unfortunately those likely won't qualify unless they went through a US-recognized charity.
Thanks for the advice! I'll definitely get receipts from now on when I donate locally. I'm learning a lot about how this all works. For this year, I'll probably just claim the local donations where I can find the receipts and skip the international stuff. Next time I want to help people abroad, I'll try to find a proper US charity that works in that region.
Just to add a practical tip for future donations - many people don't realize that for non-cash donations, you need to use "fair market value" rather than what you originally paid. So those clothes worth $375 should be valued at what they'd sell for at a thrift store or consignment shop, not their original retail price. For your current situation, since the cash went directly to individuals and the international donations weren't through qualified US organizations, unfortunately neither would qualify for deductions. But don't let that discourage you from helping people in need! Just structure future donations through recognized charities if you want the tax benefit. One more thing - if you do decide to itemize this year for other reasons, make sure your total itemized deductions exceed the standard deduction ($13,850 for single filers in 2023) or you won't get any tax benefit anyway.
One thing to consider - even if the W2 is only for $79.75, the IRS might send you a CP2000 notice eventually if you don't amend. They match all W2s with tax returns and flag discrepancies. It's automated so even small amounts get caught. I learned this the hard way a few years ago with a tiny 1099. The notice included interest charges too. Better to just fix it now!
Thanks for mentioning this! This is exactly what I was worried about. Do you remember approximately how long it took before you got the notice from the IRS? And was the process of dealing with it really complicated?
I got the CP2000 notice about 8 months after filing my return. The process wasn't super complicated, but it was definitely more annoying than if I had just amended right away. The notice listed the discrepancy and calculated what I owed including interest. I had to either agree and pay, or explain why I disagreed. Since they were right, I just paid it. The whole thing probably took an hour of my time to deal with, plus I paid more because of the interest charges. If I had amended early on, it would have been simpler and cheaper.
In my experience, the IRS computer system will eventually catch this discrepancy and send you a notice. It might take 6-12 months, but it's pretty much guaranteed since employers send W2s directly to the IRS. With such a small amount, you'll probably owe less than $15 in additional tax, but they might add interest and a small penalty by the time they get around to notifying you.
Would the IRS really add penalties for such a tiny amount? Seems excessive.
Have you checked your tax transcript directly from the IRS? As of April 7th, 2024, many refunds that were filed in early March are showing code 846 (refund issued) but the funds are still being held by processors like SBTPG for 1-3 business days. What date did you file your return, and have you been able to access your transcript to see if there's a refund issued code yet?
I've seen this exact issue multiple times in my experience helping taxpayers. The key thing to understand is that SBTPG operates differently than most online account systems - they don't typically create individual consumer accounts that you can log into like a bank. Instead, they use a verification system tied to your specific tax return details. First, make sure you're using the correct portal (taxpayer.sbtpg.com as mentioned earlier), not their professional portal. You'll need your exact refund amount, SSN, and filing status to verify. If that still doesn't work, it's highly likely that either: 1) your preparer used a different processor entirely, 2) your refund has already been processed and sent to your bank, or 3) there was an issue with your return that prevented it from reaching SBTPG. I'd recommend calling your tax preparer first - they can check their system immediately and tell you exactly which processor was used and the current status.
Olivia Martinez
17 Just wanted to add that I've been through this exact situation. Since you receive a K1, you should check if your partnership agreement allows for "unreimbursed partnership expenses" (UPE). If it does, you might be able to deduct some expenses on Schedule E rather than as home office deductions. The rules changed after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and many partners miss this. Talk to the partnership's accountant specifically about how construction costs should be handled, because your situation is more complex than a typical home office scenario.
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
ā¢4 Can you explain more about these unreimbursed partnership expenses? My CPA hasn't mentioned this as an option for my home office expenses. How would it be better than the regular home office deduction?
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
ā¢17 Unreimbursed partnership expenses (UPEs) are business expenses you pay personally that benefit the partnership, but aren't reimbursed. Before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, these were deductible on Schedule E as "not subject to the 2% floor" for miscellaneous itemized deductions. The benefit compared to regular home office deductions is that UPEs aren't subject to the exclusive use test and don't require depreciation over 39 years. However, your partnership agreement must explicitly state that partners are required to pay these expenses without reimbursement. Many CPAs miss this because the rules changed in 2018. Definitely worth discussing with your partnership's tax advisor as it could significantly impact how you handle the construction costs.
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
11 I just went through this with my tax advisor. Some of the construction costs might qualify for bonus depreciation or Section 179 expensing rather than 39-year depreciation. For example, if you install specialized electrical work for computers, dedicated HVAC for the office space, or built-in storage systems.
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
ā¢2 Really? I thought Section 179 couldn't be used for structural components of a building. How exactly would you separate those systems from the overall construction costs?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Farsi
ā¢You're right to question that - structural components like walls, floors, and roofing generally can't use Section 179. However, certain equipment and fixtures can be separated out if they're not integral to the building structure. For example, standalone HVAC units, electrical panels specifically for office equipment, and removable built-in furniture might qualify. The key is having your contractor itemize these separately on invoices and being able to demonstrate they could be removed without damaging the building's structure. It requires careful documentation and may not apply to a large portion of your $42,000, but every bit helps when you're looking at 39-year depreciation otherwise.
0 coins