


Ask the community...
Code 846 is definitely a positive sign! It means the IRS has processed your return and officially issued your refund. The date shown (02-01-2025) is typically when the funds are released to your bank. Most people see their deposit within 1-3 business days of that date, though it can vary by bank. Since you mentioned you have Chase, they're usually pretty reliable with timing - often posting on the same day or next business day after the 846 date. Just keep in mind weekends and holidays might affect the exact timing, but you should definitely see that money very soon! The 846 code is basically the IRS saying "we've sent it" so you're in the final stretch. š¤
Hey Ravi! Code 846 is definitely the light at the end of the tunnel - it means your refund has been officially processed and sent to your bank. With Chase, you're looking at pretty reliable timing. They usually post refunds either on the 846 date itself or the next business day. Since your 846 shows 02-01-2025, I'd expect to see that $6,397 hit your account either Saturday 2/1 or Monday 2/3 (depending on how Chase handles weekend processing). The fact that you're seeing 846 means you've cleared all the IRS hurdles - no more waiting for processing or reviews. Just the final bank transfer step left! Keep checking your account over the weekend. š
I'm currently at day 38 since filing my amended return and still waiting for any notice. Reading through everyone's experiences here is both reassuring and nerve-wracking - it seems like 30-50 days is pretty typical, but the uncertainty is killing me! I've been checking my mailbox obsessively and even signed up for USPS Informed Delivery, though I see some folks mentioned notices don't always show up there. Has anyone had success checking their IRS transcript online to see if there are any codes indicating a review has started? I'm wondering if that might give me a heads up before the physical notice arrives. Also, for those who eventually got through to the IRS by phone - did you call right at 7 AM when they open, or is there a better time to avoid the longest wait times?
I'm in a similar boat - day 42 here and still anxiously checking the mail! From what I've gathered reading everyone's experiences, it sounds like you're still well within the normal range. I actually did check my transcript online last week and found a code 570 (account freeze) which at least confirmed something was happening behind the scenes, even though no physical notice had arrived yet. As for calling times, I've had the best luck calling right at 7 AM sharp - I set three alarms and hit redial the moment they open. The wait times are still brutal, but definitely shorter than calling later in the day. Hang in there - it sounds like most people are getting their notices between weeks 5-7!
I'm at day 41 since filing my amended return and still no notice here either! This thread has been incredibly helpful - it's reassuring to know I'm not alone in this waiting game. Based on everyone's experiences, it seems like 30-50 days is the current norm, which means I should hopefully see something soon. I've been religiously checking my online transcript every few days and finally saw a transaction code 971 show up last week, which I believe indicates they've sent a notice. Now I'm just waiting for it to actually arrive in my mailbox. For what it's worth, I called the amended return hotline at 866-464-2050 (thanks @Hazel Garcia for that tip!) and while I still waited 2.5 hours, I did get through and the agent confirmed my return was received and is in the review queue. They couldn't give me an exact timeline but said notices are currently taking 6-8 weeks to be mailed out. Hang in there everyone - sounds like we're all in the same boat!
Thank you so much for sharing that amended return hotline number and your experience with it! I've been calling the general IRS line and getting nowhere fast - literally spending entire afternoons on hold just to get disconnected. It's really encouraging to hear that the 866-464-2050 number actually connects you to agents who can provide specific information about amended returns. I'm definitely going to try that number tomorrow morning. The 6-8 week timeline the agent gave you actually aligns pretty well with what most people are reporting here, so that gives me some peace of mind. I'm at day 36 myself, so hopefully I'll see something in the next couple of weeks. Thanks again for taking the time to call and share what you learned - this kind of real-world intel is so much more valuable than the generic timelines on the IRS website!
Just curious - did your payment method specify whose SSN the payment was for? When my husband and I pay, we make sure to include a note on electronic payments that specifies "1040 payment for [primary SSN]." Might help others avoid this situation in the future.
This is really good advice. I always make sure to include the primary SSN in the memo/notes field for any tax payments for exactly this reason. It doesn't guarantee the IRS will process it correctly, but it helps if you need to dispute anything later. Also worth noting - for couples that file jointly but have separate bank accounts, whoever makes the payment should be super clear about whose SSN should get "credit" for the payment.
I went through this exact same nightmare last year! The frustrating thing is that when you file jointly, the IRS systems should automatically know to apply payments to the primary taxpayer's SSN, but their payment processing system doesn't always communicate properly with their return processing system. One thing that really helped me was getting a transcript of my account activity from the IRS website (you can get it instantly online if you have an account). This shows exactly when and how your payment was applied, and you can use it as evidence when you talk to an agent. It's under "Get Transcript" and you want the "Account Transcript" for the tax year in question. Also, when you do get through to someone, ask them to put notes in your file about the payment misapplication. That way if you have to call back, the next agent can see what's happening without you having to re-explain everything from scratch. The IRS agents can see payments across different SSNs in their system, so they should be able to fix this pretty quickly once you get the right person on the phone. Don't give up - this is definitely fixable, just requires persistence with their terrible phone system!
This is super helpful advice! I didn't even know about the account transcript feature. Just logged into my IRS account and pulled the transcript - it clearly shows the payment applied to my wife's SSN on the correct date, but my account shows zero payments received. This is exactly the kind of documentation I need when I call them. The tip about asking them to put notes in the file is brilliant too. I've been worried about having to start from scratch if I get disconnected or need to call back. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's reassuring to know this really can be resolved!
OP, I think you need to check if your tax software correctly classified your Traditional IRA contribution as non-deductible. At your income level with a workplace plan, you're definitely above the deduction phaseout limits. What should happen is: 1. Your capital loss of $3k reduces your taxable income by $3k 2. Your Traditional IRA contribution should be classified as non-deductible 3. You should file Form 8606 to track your non-deductible contributions The $700 reduction in tax due is roughly consistent with just the $3k capital loss deduction at your tax bracket. You're probably not getting any deduction for the IRA contribution, which is correct based on your income.
Thanks for the detailed explanation! That makes sense now - I didn't realize the Traditional IRA deduction phases out at my income level since I have a workplace retirement plan. I checked and my tax software did correctly mark it as non-deductible, which explains why I only saw the benefit from the capital losses. Would you recommend I do a Backdoor Roth IRA instead for this year? I've heard about it but wasn't sure if it applied to my situation.
Yes, the Backdoor Roth IRA would be perfect for your situation. Since you can't deduct traditional IRA contributions anyway, you might as well get the tax-free growth benefit of a Roth. The process involves making a non-deductible traditional IRA contribution (which you've already done) and then converting it to a Roth IRA. If you don't have any other traditional IRA assets, this is very clean tax-wise. Just be sure to file Form 8606 properly to document the non-deductible contribution, and then report the conversion on next year's taxes. The conversion itself isn't taxable if you convert soon after contributing (before significant gains occur).
Has anyone used the "What-If" scenario feature in tax software to see how different retirement contributions affect your tax outcome? I always run these before finalizing my return.
That's good to know! I need to use those tools more effectively. I think a lot of people (including me) just assume traditional retirement contributions always lower current taxes, without realizing the phaseout limitations. Did you find the what-if calculators accurate compared to your actual filing results?
The what-if calculators in most tax software are pretty accurate for basic scenarios, but they sometimes miss the nuanced stuff like IRA deduction phaseouts. I've found they're great for comparing traditional vs Roth contributions when you're clearly above or below income limits, but they can be misleading in those gray areas where phaseouts apply. For someone like the OP with high income and workplace retirement plans, I'd recommend running the scenarios but also double-checking the results against IRS Publication 590-A to make sure the software is applying the phaseout rules correctly. Sometimes the calculators assume full deductibility when you're actually in a phaseout range.
Josef Tearle
Has anyone dealt with PTPs in retirement accounts? I have some MLPs in my IRA and just got K-1s for them too. Do I need to report these since they're in a tax-advantaged account?
0 coins
Hailey O'Leary
ā¢This is actually a really important question! PTPs in retirement accounts can create unexpected issues. If the PTP generates Unrelated Business Taxable Income (UBTI) over $1,000, your IRA itself might have to file a tax return (Form 990-T) and pay taxes, even though it's normally tax-advantaged. Look at Box 20, Code V on your K-1s - this shows UBTI. Many investors don't realize this can create a tax liability even within an IRA. If the amount is small, you might not need to worry, but it's something to monitor.
0 coins
Omar Fawaz
ā¢@Hailey O'Leary is absolutely right about the UBTI issue. I learned this the hard way when my IRA had to file Form 990-T and pay taxes on $1,200 of UBTI from an MLP I held. Your IRA custodian should handle the filing and payment, but they'll charge you fees for it (mine charged $150 for the filing plus the actual tax owed). Some custodians will even automatically liquidate part of your IRA holdings to cover these costs. Check with your IRA provider about their policy on UBTI - some will send you a bill, others will just deduct it from your account. Either way, it's an unpleasant surprise if you're not expecting it. Many people end up moving their PTP/MLP investments to taxable accounts to avoid this issue entirely.
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
I went through this exact same confusion last year with my PTP holdings! The key thing to remember is that the K-1 is the authoritative document - it shows your actual taxable income from the partnership. When you enter your brokerage 1099, look for a section that lets you exclude or adjust certain items. Most tax software will have options like "income reported elsewhere" or "excludable amounts" where you can back out the PTP distributions that appear on your 1099-DIV or 1099-B. The distributions on your 1099 are just cash flows - they're not necessarily taxable income. Your actual taxable income is what's calculated and reported on the K-1 based on the partnership's operations. Sometimes you'll get more in distributions than taxable income, sometimes less (the "phantom income" issue others mentioned). Make sure to keep good records of both forms though. Even though you're not double-counting them for tax purposes, having both helps you reconcile everything and can be helpful if you ever get questioned about the reporting.
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
ā¢This is really helpful! I'm dealing with my first PTP this year and was completely lost. One quick follow-up question - when you say "back out" the PTP distributions from the 1099, do you literally enter a negative number somewhere, or is there usually a checkbox or something? I'm using TaxAct and want to make sure I do this right. Also, should I be worried if my K-1 taxable income is way different from what I actually received in cash? My distributions were about $800 but the K-1 shows like $1,200 in taxable income.
0 coins