


Ask the community...
I'm dealing with almost the exact same timeline as you! Filed 1/28, accepted 1/30, and got hit with that same 570 code. The waiting game is absolutely brutal, especially when you're checking your transcript multiple times a day hoping for any movement. From what I've gathered reading through everyone's experiences here, it sounds like the key is figuring out whether you actually need identity verification or if you're just stuck in the general review queue. Since you mentioned talking to 3 different reps with 3 different stories, that unfortunately seems par for the course with the IRS phone support. One thing that's helped me stay (somewhat) sane is setting a specific day each week to check my transcript instead of daily - the constant checking was driving me crazy and nothing ever changes that quickly anyway. Have you checked your IRS online account to see if there are any action items or notifications there? Sometimes that shows identity verification requests before the letters arrive. Really hoping both of us see some movement soon - this waiting is exhausting!
I totally feel you on the daily transcript checking obsession! I've been doing the same thing and it's like watching paint dry. Your suggestion about checking weekly instead of daily is actually brilliant - I think I need to try that for my own sanity. I haven't thought to check my IRS online account for notifications beyond just the transcript, so thanks for that tip! I'll definitely log in and see if there's anything there that might give me a clearer picture of what's happening. It's oddly comforting to know someone else is going through the exact same timeline and frustration. The uncertainty is definitely the worst part - not knowing if you need to take action or just wait it out. Fingers crossed we both see some positive movement soon! This whole process really makes you appreciate how complex the IRS system is behind the scenes.
I'm going through something very similar and your rollercoaster analogy is spot on! Filed 1/24, accepted 1/27, and got the 570 code with a 3/3 date. It's been almost two weeks of checking my transcript obsessively. From what I've learned lurking in these forums and talking to a few people who've been through this, the 570 code is basically the IRS saying "hold up, we need to take a closer look." The frustrating part is that "random review" can mean so many different things - income verification, education credit review, or even just their system flagging something that looks unusual. One thing that's helped me is understanding that if you truly needed identity verification, you'd typically get a specific letter (the 5071C that others mentioned) and there would be clear instructions. Since you haven't gotten that yet, you're probably just in the waiting game like the rest of us. I know it's easier said than done, but try not to drive yourself crazy with the daily checking. I've started limiting myself to checking twice a week max. The processing times have been brutal this year - I've seen people wait 6-10 weeks for resolution on these random reviews. Hang in there!
I used TaxBandit for my 941s last year and had a weird issue where they kept sending me emails saying my filing was rejected, but then other emails saying it was accepted. Their customer service took 3 days to respond when I asked about it. Turns out everything was fine but their notification system glitched.
I've been using TaxBandit for my 941 filings for about 8 months now and can confirm it's legitimate - no hidden fees or catches. The $5 is really all you pay per filing. What sold me was their customer support. When I had questions about how to handle my health insurance premiums and whether they counted as taxable wages, their chat support walked me through it. They also have a really helpful knowledge base with examples. One tip: before you switch from your accountant, maybe try TaxBandit for one quarter while still having your accountant do it too. Compare the results to make sure you're comfortable with the process. That's what I did and it gave me confidence that I was doing everything correctly. The interface is intuitive enough that even someone without accounting experience can handle it, especially for single-employee businesses like yours where the forms are straightforward.
That's a really smart approach - doing a parallel filing to compare results! I'm definitely going to try that strategy. Quick question though - when you did the comparison, were there any differences between what TaxBandit calculated versus your accountant? I'm curious if there are any subtle differences in how they handle certain deductions or calculations that I should watch out for.
When I did my parallel filing comparison, the results were identical down to the penny. Both TaxBandit and my accountant came up with the exact same tax liability amounts and wage breakdowns. The only minor difference I noticed was in how they presented certain information - my accountant included some additional explanatory notes on a separate sheet, while TaxBandit just had the core form data. But all the actual numbers that mattered to the IRS were perfectly aligned. Since you're a single-employee business, the calculations are pretty straightforward, so there's less room for variation compared to more complex payroll situations. Just make sure you're entering the same gross wage amounts and withholding data into both systems for an accurate comparison.
I handled a Code N 1099-R last year and it's important to know that while the recharacterization itself isn't taxable, you still need to be careful about contribution limits and deadlines!
Could you explain more about the contribution limits issue? If I do a recharacterization does that somehow count twice against my contribution limits? Getting anxious about this now...
No, recharacterizations don't count twice against your contribution limits! The key thing to understand is that a recharacterization is treated as if you made the contribution to the correct account type from the beginning. So if you contributed $6,000 to a Traditional IRA and then recharacterized it to a Roth IRA, it's as if you originally contributed $6,000 directly to the Roth - you're still only using $6,000 of your annual contribution limit, not $12,000. The deadline concern is more about timing - you have until the tax filing deadline (including extensions) to complete a recharacterization for the previous tax year. But since @Tyler already completed his recharacterization and received the 1099-R, he's all set on that front. The contribution limits you need to watch are the standard annual limits ($6,000 or $7,000 if 50+) and income limits for Roth contributions, but the recharacterization itself doesn't create any additional limit issues.
Just want to add a quick note about timing for anyone else who might be in a similar situation. The fact that you received your 1099-R already is actually great timing - some brokerages are notoriously slow getting these forms out, and you definitely want to have it in hand before your tax appointment. One thing that might give you extra peace of mind: you can always ask your tax preparer to show you exactly where the 1099-R information appears on your return and how it's being treated. A good tax pro should be able to walk you through the forms and show you that while the transaction is reported, it's not adding to your taxable income. This way you can see for yourself that it's not affecting your refund. Don't stress too much about this - Code N recharacterizations are pretty routine for tax preparers, especially during tax season. Your situation is more common than you might think!
This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in a very similar situation - just received my 1099-R with Code N for a recharacterization I did last year. I was panicking thinking I'd somehow screwed up my taxes, but reading through this whole thread has been incredibly reassuring. It's good to know that asking the tax preparer to walk through exactly where it shows up on the return is a reasonable request. I tend to just nod along when they're explaining things, but for something this important I definitely want to see it for myself. Thanks for mentioning that Code N recharacterizations are routine - that makes me feel so much better about my upcoming appointment!
I filed 3/25 and my transcript updated this morning with a DDD of 4/8, so that'll be 14 days total. I claimed EIC too, so I was surprised it moved so quickly. I think they're catching up on the backlog from earlier in the season.
That's actually impressive for an EIC return this late in the season. They must be processing faster now that the early rush is over.
Filed 3/29 here and still showing "received" on WMR. Reading through everyone's experiences, it sounds like there's really no rhyme or reason to the timing this year! Some getting it in 8 days, others taking the full 21. I have a pretty straightforward return - just W-2 and standard deduction, no kids or credits - so hopefully I'll be on the faster side. Thanks for sharing your timelines everyone, it helps to know I'm not the only one obsessively checking every morning!
Amelia Cartwright
Has anyone had success with reasonable cause abatement specifically for medical issues? I'm curious how detailed the medical documentation needs to be. Do they want actual medical records or just a doctor's letter?
0 coins
Chris King
β’I got penalties abated due to a medical issue last year. I included a letter from my doctor stating the dates I was incapacitated and how it affected my ability to handle financial matters. I didn't have to provide actual medical records - the doctor's letter on official letterhead was sufficient. The key was showing the timeline - that the medical issue directly overlapped with the tax deadline and explaining why it prevented me from filing on time. Make sure your documentation clearly connects those dots.
0 coins
Amelia Cartwright
β’Thank you so much! That's exactly what I needed to know. I was worried they'd need my actual medical records which would be a privacy concern for me. I'll reach out to my doctor for a letter that outlines the timeline and how it impacted my ability to handle my taxes.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
Based on my experience helping clients with penalty abatements, your strategy of trying first-time abatement first is solid. You can absolutely submit a second Form 843 for reasonable cause if the FTA is denied - there's no restriction on multiple attempts using different abatement theories. One thing to consider: since you have both a potential FTA qualification AND a strong reasonable cause argument (medical situation), you might want to mention both briefly on your initial Form 843. In section 4, you could state something like "Requesting first-time penalty abatement as I have no penalties in the prior three years. Additionally, I experienced a serious knee injury requiring surgery that significantly limited my mobility during the filing period." This way, if the IRS agent reviewing your case sees any issue with your FTA eligibility, they can immediately consider your reasonable cause without requiring a second submission. The medical documentation you mentioned would only be needed if they specifically request it or if you end up filing a dedicated reasonable cause request later. The only real downside to your sequential approach is time - but given that you have a legitimate reasonable cause backup, there's no harm in trying the simpler FTA route first.
0 coins