IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Something nobody's mentioned yet - the IRS audit rate has been dropping for years because of budget cuts. They're mostly focused on high-income earners ($500k+) and blatant red flags now. My accountant told me they're primarily using automated matching systems rather than human auditors for most income levels now. So if your W2s and 1099s match what you report, and your deductions aren't wildly out of line with your profession, you're probably not on their radar.

0 coins

Adriana Cohn

•

This matches what my CPA told me too. She said most "audits" for regular people are just automated letters asking you to verify specific items, not the full-blown audits we fear with agents combing through every receipt. Unless you're super wealthy or doing something obviously suspicious, it's usually just computer verification.

0 coins

Jay Lincoln

•

As someone who's been self-employed for 8 years and has never been audited despite claiming substantial business deductions, I can confirm that the under 1% rate is accurate for your income range. The key thing to understand is that the IRS uses algorithms to identify returns with unusual patterns relative to your industry and income level. Your $85k freelance design income with typical business deductions (home office, equipment, software) is completely normal and unlikely to trigger scrutiny. I've learned that audit anxiety often causes people to under-claim legitimate deductions, which actually costs more money than the minimal audit risk. Document everything properly (I use a simple spreadsheet and photo receipts), keep business and personal expenses separate, and claim what you're entitled to. Your friend's audit was likely triggered by something specific in her return - maybe the home office deduction was calculated incorrectly or she couldn't substantiate it with proper documentation. The IRS doesn't audit people for taking standard business deductions that are reasonable for their profession and income level.

0 coins

2 Did your settlement include any punitive damages? That part is definitely taxable! My cousin didn't realize this and ended up with a huge tax bill the following year.

0 coins

19 This is super important! I work at an accounting firm and see this mistake constantly. Personal injury settlements are only tax-free for compensatory damages (medical bills, pain/suffering, etc). Punitive damages are 100% taxable, and sometimes they're not clearly separated in settlement paperwork.

0 coins

Just went through this myself last year after a car accident settlement. The good news is that most of your settlement should indeed be tax-free! The key thing to look for is how your settlement agreement breaks down the payments. In my case, the settlement document clearly stated amounts for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and property damage - all of which were non-taxable. However, there was a small portion listed as "lost income compensation" that I did have to pay taxes on. One thing that caught me off guard was that my lawyer's fees were deducted from the gross settlement amount, but the IRS still considers the full gross amount as the settlement for tax purposes. So make sure you're looking at the right numbers when determining what's taxable vs non-taxable. Also, definitely get a 1099-MISC if your settlement is over $600 - even though most of it won't be taxable, you'll still need it for your records. My advice is to consult with a tax professional just to be 100% sure, especially since you're dealing with a significant amount of money. Better safe than sorry!

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with a twist - we lived in our house for 2 years, then moved out and rented it for 1.5 years, then moved BACK in for another year before converting it to a rental again for the past 2 years. From what I'm reading here, it sounds like only that first rental period (the 1.5 years before we moved back) would count as "non-qualified use" since it happened before our final period of primary residence use. The recent 2-year rental period after we moved out for good wouldn't count against the exemption. Does that sound right? This Publication 523 stuff is so confusing with all the back-and-forth living situations. I'm wondering if I should try one of those services mentioned here to get a proper analysis before I make any assumptions about my tax liability.

0 coins

Mason Davis

•

You've got it exactly right! Your understanding of the non-qualified use rules is spot on. Since you moved back into the property and used it as your primary residence after that first rental period, only that initial 1.5-year rental period would count as non-qualified use. The final 2-year rental period after you moved out for good gets the exemption under the "after last use as primary residence" rule. So you'd potentially have to pay capital gains on about 30% of your profit (1.5 years out of 5 total years), but the remaining 70% should qualify for the Section 121 exclusion assuming you meet the other requirements. Just make sure you have good documentation of when you lived there versus rented it out - lease agreements, utility bills, voter registration changes, etc. Given the complexity of your situation with multiple moves, getting a professional analysis like some others mentioned here might be worth it to make sure you're calculating everything correctly, especially if there's a substantial gain involved.

0 coins

I'm a tax professional and want to clarify something important that's been mentioned but might get lost in all the discussion - you absolutely need to keep detailed records of your occupancy periods and rental periods. The IRS can and will ask for proof if they audit this exemption. Beyond just utility bills and lease agreements, consider keeping: property tax records showing homestead exemptions during primary residence periods, insurance changes from homeowner's to landlord policies, any correspondence with property management companies, bank statements showing rental income deposits, and maintenance records that distinguish between personal use improvements versus rental property expenses. Also, while everyone's focused on the non-qualified use rules (which are correctly explained here), don't forget about mixed-use periods. If you ever lived in part of the property while renting out another part (like a basement apartment), those calculations get even more complex and you'll want professional help. The Publication 523 confusion is real - I deal with CPAs who misunderstand these rules regularly. When in doubt, get a professional opinion before you file, especially if your gain is substantial. An audit on a six-figure gain exclusion is not something you want to wing.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful advice, especially about the documentation requirements! I've been so focused on understanding the rules that I hadn't really thought about what proof the IRS would want if they questioned my exemption claim. Quick question - for the homestead exemption records, would county assessor records showing when I filed for and removed homestead status be sufficient? I'm pretty sure I have those somewhere, and I remember having to re-file when we moved back into the property after that first rental period. Also, you mentioned mixed-use situations - thankfully mine is straightforward (whole house primary residence vs. whole house rental), but I can see how that would add another layer of complexity. Thanks for the professional perspective on this!

0 coins

I've been using Taxcaster for a few years now and I'd say it's decent for a rough estimate but definitely not perfect. The biggest issue I've found is that it doesn't handle more complex tax situations very well - like if you have multiple income sources, itemized deductions, or any unusual circumstances. That said, a $10.5k refund does sound like you're significantly overwithholding! Even if Taxcaster is off by 20-30%, you're still probably getting way more back than you should be. I'd recommend starting conservatively - maybe adjust your withholdings to reduce your expected refund by half rather than trying to zero it out completely. That way you still get some extra money in your paychecks but have a safety buffer. Also, definitely double-check your inputs in Taxcaster and consider running the numbers through the IRS Withholding Calculator as well. Having two different estimates can help you feel more confident about making changes.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar situation where I think I'm overwithholding but I've been too nervous to make changes. The idea of adjusting by half rather than trying to zero out the entire refund is smart - gives you that safety net while still getting some benefit. Quick question though - when you say Taxcaster doesn't handle complex situations well, what specific things should I watch out for? I have a pretty straightforward W-2 job but I do have some investment income from dividends and I'm wondering if that could throw off the estimate significantly.

0 coins

Investment income is definitely one of those things that can throw off Taxcaster's estimates! Dividends are subject to different tax rates depending on whether they're qualified or non-qualified, and Taxcaster sometimes oversimplifies this. It also doesn't always account properly for the timing of when you receive dividends throughout the year. Other things to watch out for include: side gig income (1099 work), rental property income, capital gains/losses from selling investments, tax-loss harvesting, and any major changes in your situation mid-year (like getting married, having a baby, or buying a house). For your dividend income, I'd recommend being extra conservative with your withholding adjustments. Maybe start by reducing your expected refund by just 25-30% instead of half, and see how that plays out. You can always adjust further next year once you see how accurate the estimates were.

0 coins

I've been using Taxcaster for about 3 years and my experience has been that it's usually within about $500-800 of my actual refund, which is pretty good for a free tool. However, $10.5k does seem quite high - that suggests you're definitely overwithholding by a significant amount. One thing I learned the hard way is to be really careful about entering your current withholdings correctly in Taxcaster. Make sure you're looking at your most recent paystub to get the exact federal tax withheld year-to-date, not just estimating. Also, if you've had any major life changes this year (marriage, divorce, new baby, buying a house), those can significantly impact your tax situation. My recommendation would be to run your numbers through both Taxcaster AND the official IRS Withholding Calculator, then split the difference between what they recommend. That way you're not putting all your eggs in one basket with a single estimate. I did this approach last year and ended up with a small refund of about $400 instead of the $3k I was getting before - much better for my monthly budget!

0 coins

Freya Larsen

•

This is exactly the kind of balanced approach I was looking for! Using both Taxcaster and the IRS Withholding Calculator to cross-check each other makes so much sense. I hadn't thought about splitting the difference between their recommendations - that's a really smart way to hedge against either tool being significantly off. Your point about entering current withholdings correctly is spot on too. I realized I was just guessing at my year-to-date withholding instead of actually looking at my paystub. No wonder my estimates might be unreliable! Going from a $3k refund to $400 while getting that extra money in your monthly budget sounds like the perfect outcome. That's definitely what I'm aiming for rather than trying to zero out my refund completely and risking owing money.

0 coins

Does anyone know if there's a time limit for claiming these energy credits? I installed a new HVAC system in 2021 but didn't know about these credits when I filed my taxes for that year. Is it too late to get the credit now?

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

You can amend your return from 2021 to claim the credit! The IRS generally allows you to amend returns within 3 years of the original filing date, so you're well within the timeframe. You'll need to file Form 1040-X (amended return) along with a completed Form 5695 for that tax year. Just make sure you use the 2021 version of Form 5695, as the credit amounts and requirements might be different from the current year.

0 coins

I just went through this exact process last month! One thing I'd add to the great advice already given - don't forget to check if your local utility company offered any rebates for your HVAC installation. Many utilities provide rebates for energy-efficient equipment, and you can claim both the federal tax credit AND the utility rebate. Also, if you're having trouble finding the manufacturer's certification statement online, try calling their customer service line with your model number. I couldn't find my heat pump's efficiency documentation on their website, but when I called, they emailed me an official certificate within 24 hours. One last tip: if you used a credit card for the purchase, that statement can serve as additional proof of purchase date if your invoice gets damaged or lost. The IRS accepts multiple forms of documentation, so having backup proof is always helpful!

0 coins

Prev1...26302631263226332634...5644Next