


Ask the community...
Hi Jackie! I'm new to this community but wanted to share my recent experience since I'm also in the gig economy (I do food delivery and some freelance graphic design work). I just had "Enclosed" show up on my transcript about 3 weeks ago and was equally worried, especially since I really needed my refund for some medical bills. It turned out the IRS sent me a CP12 notice - they had made a small adjustment to my refund because I had accidentally double-counted some business expenses on Schedule C. The letter arrived exactly 9 days after I first saw "Enclosed" on my transcript. Even though they adjusted my refund down by about $180, they still processed it and I received the payment about 10 days after getting the notice. Since you mentioned being careful with your mileage and expense tracking (which is great after your 2021 audit experience!), you're probably well-prepared for whatever they're asking about. The fact that you're organized with your records should make responding to any requests much easier. My suggestion: definitely check your mail every single day for the next week or so, and when you get the notice, don't panic - read it carefully to understand exactly what they need. Most of these situations resolve pretty quickly when you have good documentation like it sounds like you do. Hang in there!
Thanks for sharing your experience with the CP12 notice, Andre! I'm also new to this community and really appreciate hearing from fellow gig workers. Your situation gives me some reassurance - it sounds like even when they do make adjustments, they still process the refund relatively quickly. I'm curious, when you responded to the double-counted expenses issue, did you have to send any additional documentation or was it just a matter of accepting their adjustment? I do some freelance work too and I'm always paranoid about making mistakes on Schedule C since the rules can be confusing. Also, did you end up changing how you track expenses after that experience to avoid similar issues in the future?
Hi Jackie! I'm new to this community but wanted to share my experience since I'm also a gig worker (I do UberEats and some TaskRabbit work). I had the exact same "Enclosed" notation appear on my transcript about 6 weeks ago and was really stressed about it since I needed my refund to catch up on some bills. It turned out the IRS sent me a letter (took about 8 days to arrive) asking me to verify some of my business mileage deductions. Since you mentioned you're careful about tracking your mileage and expenses - which is smart given your 2021 audit experience - you're probably in a much better position than I was. I had to scramble to gather my mileage logs and gas receipts, but once I sent them the requested documentation, my refund was processed within about 3 weeks. The "Enclosed" notation basically just means they're mailing you something that requires your attention, but it doesn't mean your refund is denied or anything like that. Given that you're organized with your record-keeping, I'd say don't panic too much. Just keep checking your mailbox daily and respond quickly to whatever they send you. As fellow gig workers, we tend to get a bit more scrutiny on our returns, but it usually works out fine when we have our documentation ready. Hope you get your refund soon!
I wanted to share some additional perspective as someone who dealt with a similar medical expense situation. Beyond the excellent advice already given here, I'd recommend documenting any temporary housing or alternative living arrangements you might need during remediation - these costs can also qualify as medical expenses when they're necessary for treatment. Also, if you haven't already, consider getting a second opinion on the remediation scope and cost. Some companies will try to upsell unnecessary work when they know it's for health reasons. Get multiple detailed quotes and make sure each one specifically addresses the medical issues your doctors identified. One more thing - if your children are seeing specialists (pulmonologist, allergist, etc.), ask them about any specific post-remediation testing or monitoring they'd recommend. Having a clear medical follow-up plan shows the IRS that this isn't just a home improvement but an ongoing medical treatment plan. Your documentation sounds incredibly strong with four doctors confirming medical necessity. That level of professional consensus really demonstrates this is urgent medical care, not elective home improvement. Stay strong - you're doing everything right to help your kids and protect your family financially.
This is such valuable additional advice! I hadn't even thought about the temporary housing aspect - that could really add up if we need to stay somewhere else during the remediation process. It makes total sense that those costs would also be medically necessary if we literally can't live in the house while the work is being done. The point about getting multiple quotes is really important too. We've gotten quotes ranging from $13,500 to $26,000, which is a huge spread. I want to make sure we're not paying for unnecessary work while still addressing all the health concerns our doctors identified. Having a post-remediation medical monitoring plan is brilliant - it creates that ongoing treatment documentation you mentioned. I'll definitely ask our pediatric pulmonologist about follow-up testing protocols and what kind of timeline they'd expect to see improvement in the kids' conditions. Thank you for thinking through all these details. It's overwhelming trying to navigate both the medical and financial aspects of this situation, so having experienced perspectives like yours helps tremendously. Every bit of advice helps us build a stronger case while making sure we're doing right by our children's health.
I'm really sorry you and your children are going through this difficult situation. As a parent myself, I can't imagine how stressful it must be to see your kids suffering while facing such a massive expense. Based on everything shared in this thread, it sounds like you have an exceptionally strong case for the medical deduction. The fact that you have four different doctors documenting the medical necessity is really powerful - that level of professional consensus clearly establishes this as urgent medical treatment rather than home improvement. I wanted to add one more consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet: if either of your children ends up needing to be hospitalized due to their conditions worsening from continued mold exposure, those costs would far exceed your remediation expenses. From a medical necessity standpoint, this remediation is actually preventive care that could avoid much more serious (and expensive) medical interventions down the line. Also, make sure to document any missed work or school days due to your children's symptoms. While you can't deduct lost wages, this information helps paint a complete picture of how severely the mold is impacting your family's daily life and your children's wellbeing. Your kids' health has to come first, and with your level of documentation, you should feel confident that you can properly claim this deduction. The IRS recognizes that some medical expenses are urgent regardless of cost, and your situation clearly fits that criteria. Wishing your family a quick recovery once you can get this remediation completed.
For someone in your situation with $475K from a business sale, I'd strongly recommend "The Tax and Legal Playbook" by Mark Kohler. He's both a CPA and attorney, so he covers both the tax optimization and asset protection angles really well. The book specifically addresses how to structure things after a liquidity event like yours. Another excellent resource is "Loopholes of Real Estate" by Garrett Sutton - even if you're not planning to invest in real estate, it explains how different entity structures work for asset protection in ways that apply to any type of wealth. One thing I learned the hard way: don't rush into setting up complex structures just because you can. Start with understanding what you're actually trying to protect against and what your ongoing tax situation will look like. Sometimes a simple LLC is perfect, other times you might need a more sophisticated setup with trusts or multiple entities. Also, make sure whatever accountant you work with has experience with business sales and the resulting tax implications. The person who did your personal returns might not be the best fit for post-sale planning.
This is exactly the kind of practical advice I was hoping for! I hadn't considered that my regular accountant might not be the best fit for this level of planning. The Kohler book sounds perfect since it addresses both the tax and legal sides - that's exactly what I'm trying to wrap my head around. Quick question: when you mention not rushing into complex structures, how do you know when you actually need something more sophisticated than a basic LLC? Is it based on the amount of assets, the type of risks you're facing, or something else? I'm definitely guilty of getting excited about all the possibilities without really thinking through what problems I'm actually trying to solve. Thanks for the reality check!
Great question! The complexity you need really depends on three main factors: 1) Your risk exposure (are you in a lawsuit-prone profession or industry?), 2) The types of assets you have (real estate, securities, business interests each have different considerations), and 3) Your state's laws (some states like Nevada and Delaware offer better asset protection than others). For someone with $475K mostly in cash/securities, a single-member LLC might be perfect if you're just looking for basic liability protection and some tax flexibility. But if you're planning to buy rental properties, start another business, or you're in a high-risk profession, you might need multiple LLCs or even domestic asset protection trusts. The Kohler book actually has a great flowchart that helps you assess your specific situation. I'd start there before meeting with professionals - it'll help you ask the right questions and avoid getting sold structures you don't actually need. And you're absolutely right to think through the problems first! I see too many people set up elaborate structures and then realize they're paying thousands in annual maintenance fees for protection they didn't really need.
Coming from a similar situation (sold my tech consulting business last year), I can't recommend "The Entrepreneur's Guide to Business Law" by Bagley and Dauchy highly enough. It's more comprehensive than most single-topic books and covers everything from entity selection to exit strategies. For the asset protection side specifically, "Asset Protection for Everyone" by Robert Mintz is written in plain English and doesn't assume you have a law degree. He explains when simple structures work versus when you need more sophisticated planning. One practical tip: before diving deep into books, spend a weekend mapping out your current financial situation, future income expectations, and what specific risks you're trying to protect against. This will help you focus on the most relevant sections of whatever books you choose. Also, since you mentioned feeling lost with your accountant - consider interviewing 2-3 different CPAs who specialize in business owners and wealth management. The right professional relationship will be worth more than any book, and they can recommend additional reading tailored to your specific situation.
This is really solid advice! I especially like the idea of mapping out my situation before diving into the books - it would definitely help me focus on what's actually relevant rather than getting overwhelmed by all the different strategies out there. The point about interviewing multiple CPAs is something I hadn't really considered. I've just been working with the same guy who did my business taxes, but you're right that this is a completely different level of planning. Do you have any specific questions I should ask when interviewing potential CPAs to make sure they're experienced with post-sale planning? Also, how did you handle the timing of setting up your structures after your sale? I keep going back and forth on whether I should get everything in place quickly or take my time to really understand the options first.
Other countries like Estonia and Denmark have much simpler tax systems and they work fine. Some even pre-fill your tax forms with known information so you just need to verify it's correct. The complexity in the US system isn't a necessity - it's a choice we keep making.
But those are much smaller countries with different economies. Would that really scale to a country of 330+ million people with the world's largest economy?
The scale argument is interesting but I'm not sure it holds up. California alone has almost 40 million people and processes state taxes just fine. The complexity isn't really about population size - it's about policy choices. Countries like Germany (83 million people) and the UK (67 million) have much simpler tax systems than ours. Even if you scaled up Denmark's approach, the fundamental principle of pre-filled returns based on third-party reporting would work the same whether you have 6 million taxpayers or 160 million. The real barrier is that we've chosen to use our tax code as a delivery mechanism for social policy instead of keeping it focused on revenue collection. Every special interest group wants their preferred activity to get a tax break rather than direct government support, which creates this maze of credits and deductions. If we moved all that stuff out of the tax code and into direct spending programs, we could absolutely have return-free filing for the majority of Americans who just have W-2 income and basic investments.
This is such a great point about using the tax code for social policy delivery! I never thought about it that way before. It really does seem like we've created this Frankenstein system where the IRS has to be both a revenue collector AND a social program administrator. Your example about California is really compelling too. If they can handle 40 million people efficiently at the state level, there's no reason the federal government couldn't do the same with better systems. I'm curious though - do you think there would be political resistance to moving things like the EITC out of the tax code? It seems like politicians love being able to say they're giving people "tax relief" rather than "government benefits," even when it's essentially the same thing.
Giovanni Conti
Ugh, this is so frustrating! I'm in literally the exact same situation - offset line showing my 2022 debt that I already paid off months ago. Been losing sleep over this thinking they're gonna take my refund again. Reading everyone's responses here is making me feel way better though. Definitely gonna call that TOP number tomorrow and get this sorted out once and for all. Thanks everyone for the advice! π
0 coins
Freya Larsen
β’I totally get the anxiety around this! Just went through the same thing last month and it worked out fine. The key thing is having documentation that you already paid the 2022 offset - keep those records handy when you call TOP. Also, don't be surprised if the first rep you talk to isn't super helpful, sometimes you gotta ask to speak with someone else. But yeah, if it's already been paid they definitely can't take it twice! Hope you get it cleared up quickly π€
0 coins
Zara Khan
Just wanted to chime in as someone who went through this exact scenario! Had the same panic when I saw an old offset showing up on the automated line that I'd already resolved. Turns out it was just their system lagging behind - super common during filing season when everything gets backed up. The good news is if you've already paid your 2022 offset, you're protected from double collection. I'd still recommend calling that TOP number (800-304-3107) that others mentioned, but honestly don't lose sleep over it. Keep your payment records handy just in case, but you should be good to go! πͺ
0 coins