IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Form 2441 Child Care Credit Discrepancy - Why Different Tax Software Shows Different Amounts

Hey folks, I'm in the final stretch of completing my 2024 taxes and I've hit a strange issue. I always use multiple tax software programs to double-check my returns (paranoid, I know), but I've found a weird discrepancy in my federal returns. After digging through everything, I narrowed it down to Form 2441 (Child and Dependent Care Expenses). Two of my software programs match each other, but the third one is giving me a different result. Here's my situation: I have twins who started daycare around October 2024. Our total daycare expenses for the year came to $6,718. The first two programs correctly show this amount on Form 2441 Part 1 Line 1 Column (e). My husband has a dependent care FSA through work with a remaining balance of $483 as of December 31, 2024. The issue seems to be in Part 2 Line 2 Column (d). The first two programs split the daycare expenses between my twins as: Child 1 = $3,359 and Child 2 = $3,359 - $483 = $2,876. As a result, the first two programs show my Line 11 (Credit for child and dependent care expenses) as $1,247, while the third program shows $1,345. The difference is $98, which exactly matches the total federal return difference between the programs. I'm pretty sure the third program isn't properly subtracting my husband's dependent care FSA from the daycare charges. Am I right in thinking the first two programs are correct here? Any tax pros who can help clarify how Form 2441 should properly handle this situation? Thanks in advance! - Jamie

Emma Morales

•

This is exactly why I always recommend doing a manual check of Form 2441 when you have FSA involved! The math is pretty straightforward once you understand the logic - your total qualifying expenses of $6,718 minus the $483 FSA should give you $6,235 in eligible expenses for the credit calculation. The third software program giving you the higher credit is definitely wrong. You can't claim the full $6,718 in expenses when $483 was already paid with pre-tax dollars through your husband's FSA. That would be double-dipping on tax benefits, which the IRS specifically prohibits. I'd go with the calculation from your first two programs showing the $1,247 credit. Better to be conservative and correct than to claim too much and potentially face questions later. The $98 difference might seem small, but accuracy is key when it comes to tax filings!

0 coins

This is really helpful! I'm new to dealing with FSAs and childcare credits, so I appreciate the clear breakdown. Just to make sure I understand - if I had $5,000 in my FSA but only used $4,000 of it during the year, would I still need to subtract the full $5,000 from my eligible expenses, or just the $4,000 I actually used? I'm trying to plan ahead for next year's taxes.

0 coins

Great question! You would only subtract the amount you actually used from your FSA, not the full amount available. So in your example, you'd subtract the $4,000 you used, not the full $5,000 contribution. The IRS only requires you to reduce your eligible expenses by the FSA funds that were actually spent on qualifying childcare expenses during the tax year. Any unused FSA balance doesn't affect your Form 2441 calculation - though keep in mind most FSAs have "use it or lose it" rules, so you'll want to plan your spending accordingly!

0 coins

I've been through this exact same headache! As a tax preparer, I see this FSA/Form 2441 confusion ALL the time. Your first two programs are absolutely correct - the third one is making a costly mistake by not properly accounting for the FSA reduction. Here's what's happening: When you use pre-tax FSA dollars for childcare, those expenses can't also be used for the Child and Dependent Care Credit. It's one of the most common "double benefit" traps the IRS watches for. Your qualifying expenses should indeed be $6,235 ($6,718 - $483), not the full $6,718. The $98 difference might seem small, but trust me - the IRS computer systems are very good at catching these discrepancies during processing. I've had clients get notices months later when their software calculated this incorrectly. Stick with the $1,247 credit from your first two programs and you'll be in good shape. Pro tip: Always double-check that your FSA amount appears correctly in Part III of Form 2441 before filing. That's usually where these calculation errors originate!

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

This is such valuable advice from a professional perspective! I'm definitely going with the $1,247 credit calculation. You mentioned that IRS computer systems are good at catching these discrepancies - does that mean they automatically flag returns where the FSA reduction wasn't applied correctly? I'm wondering if using the wrong software calculation could trigger an audit or just a simple correction notice. Also, when you say to check Part III of Form 2441, what specifically should I be looking for to verify the FSA amount is entered correctly? I want to make sure I catch this type of error in future years before I file.

0 coins

Just went through this exact situation last year! Your 18-year-old definitely qualifies as a dependent since they're still in high school. The key things are: they lived with you more than half the year (check!), you provide more than half their support (sounds like it), and they're under 19 OR a full-time student under 24. High school senior absolutely counts as a student. You're totally fine to claim all 4 kids!

0 coins

This is super helpful, thank you! So relieved to hear from someone who actually went through this. Did you run into any issues when you filed or did everything go smoothly?

0 coins

Everything went super smooth! No issues at all with the IRS. Just make sure you have documentation that they lived with you (school records work great) and that you provided their support. The IRS systems are pretty good at recognizing legitimate dependent claims for students.

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

Just to add some clarity - the IRS tests for qualifying children are pretty straightforward: relationship (your child āœ“), age (under 19 OR under 24 if full-time student āœ“), residency (lived with you more than half the year āœ“), and support (you provide more than half āœ“). Your 18-year-old high school senior meets all these requirements easily. Don't stress about it - you can definitely claim all 4 kids on your return!

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

This thread has been incredibly valuable! I'm bookmarking it because I know so many people get blindsided by offsets without any warning. One thing I'd add from my experience - if you discover your offset is related to federal student loans, don't panic. The Department of Education has been pretty reasonable to work with lately, especially with the Fresh Start program that several people mentioned. I was able to get my loans out of default and they even stopped future offsets once I completed the rehabilitation process. The key is acting quickly once you know what you're dealing with. Also, for anyone reading this who thinks they might have old debts floating around - it's worth pulling a free credit report annually just to see what's out there before it surprises you at tax time. Thanks to everyone who shared their stories and practical advice!

0 coins

This whole thread is incredibly helpful! I just went through this exact situation a few months ago. My refund was short by almost $2,000 and I had no clue what happened. The 800-304-3107 Treasury Offset hotline saved my sanity - turns out it was an old medical debt that had been sent to the state for collection. One tip I haven't seen mentioned yet: if you're dealing with medical debt offsets, many hospitals and collection agencies have financial hardship programs that can significantly reduce what you owe. I was able to get my $1,800 debt reduced to $600 just by filling out some paperwork showing my income. Don't be afraid to negotiate! Also, keep calling back if you don't get helpful answers the first time. I talked to three different people before finding someone who could actually walk me through my options instead of just reading me policy. The whole process took about a month but I got most of my refund back and learned a lot about how to handle these situations in the future.

0 coins

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - market timing. If you think we're headed for a correction soon, selling some winners now might make sense regardless of the tax implications. I sold half my tech stock gains in early 2022 and was glad I did when everything crashed later that year.

0 coins

Jason Brewer

•

That's just dumb luck though. Nobody can time the market consistently. Better to make decisions based on your tax situation and long-term investment goals rather than trying to predict market movements.

0 coins

Taylor To

•

Just wanted to add another perspective on your situation. With $10k in realized losses and $40k in unrealized gains split between short-term and long-term, you have some good flexibility here. One strategy to consider is "laddering" your gain realization over multiple tax years if you don't need the cash immediately. Instead of realizing all $10k in gains this year to offset your losses, you could realize maybe $7k this year (prioritizing short-term gains as others mentioned) and carry forward the remaining $3k in losses to offset future gains or deduct against ordinary income next year. This approach can be particularly beneficial if you expect to be in a higher tax bracket next year or if you anticipate having more capital gains in the future. The $3k annual deduction against ordinary income can provide nice tax savings year after year if you don't have enough gains to offset it. Also worth noting - if you do decide to sell and immediately repurchase (which is fine for gains), just make sure you're not creating any unintended wash sale issues with related securities or funds that might track the same underlying assets.

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

This is really helpful advice about laddering gains across tax years! I hadn't considered the strategic advantage of carrying forward some losses rather than using them all up this year. Quick question though - when you mention "related securities or funds that might track the same underlying assets," can you give an example of what that might look like? I'm wondering if holding both an individual stock and an ETF that includes that same stock could create wash sale issues.

0 coins

Does anyone know if there's still a chance Congress might reverse the Section 174 amortization requirement? Our company's cash flow is getting killed by this change since we're heavily R&D focused but still pre-revenue. Being able to deduct only 1/5 of our actual expenses each year is brutal for our tax situation.

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

There's been talk about it for 2 years now, but nothing concrete has happened. Several bills have been introduced that would restore immediate expensing for domestic R&D, but they haven't moved forward. I wouldn't count on a change anytime soon, unfortunately.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

The amortization requirement is hitting our startup hard too. We've had to adjust our hiring plans because the cash flow impact is so significant - when you can only deduct 20% of your R&D labor costs in the first year, it creates a real burden for companies that are reinvesting everything into research and development. One thing that's helped us is getting very precise about what qualifies as R&D versus regular software development. We found that a lot of what we initially thought was "research" was actually implementation work that can still be expensed immediately. The four-part test for qualified research is pretty strict - it has to involve technological uncertainty, experimentation, technological in nature, and useful in developing a business component. We ended up redesigning our project tracking to clearly separate exploratory/experimental work from routine development. It's administrative overhead we didn't need before, but it's made a meaningful difference in how much we can deduct each year versus amortize. Has anyone found other strategies for managing the cash flow impact while we wait to see if Congress acts?

0 coins

Prev1...21542155215621572158...5644Next