Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
ShadowHunter
This is such a fascinating topic! As someone who's always wondered about the tax implications of these viral giveaway videos, I really appreciate all the detailed explanations here. One thing I'm curious about - has anyone seen any official statements from MrBeast or his team about how they handle the tax reporting side of things? I imagine they must have a whole system in place given the volume of prizes they give out. It would be interesting to know if they automatically collect tax information from winners or if it's left up to the recipients to figure out on their own. Also, for the people mentioning the difficulty of reaching the IRS - I had no idea there were services to help with that! The phone system is absolutely brutal when you actually need to talk to someone. Good to know there are options besides spending entire days on hold.
Brady Clean
ā¢Great question about MrBeast's official process! I haven't seen any public statements from his team about their tax reporting procedures, but given the scale of his operations, they definitely must have something systematic in place. From what I understand about similar content creators and game shows, they typically work with tax professionals to handle the 1099 reporting requirements. They probably collect winner information (name, address, SSN) either during filming or shortly after to ensure proper reporting to the IRS. What's really interesting is that his company (MrBeast LLC) likely treats all these giveaways as legitimate business expenses for content creation, which actually makes the tax situation cleaner from an accounting perspective. The recipients get the income, the business gets the deduction, and everyone's obligations are clear. And yeah, the IRS phone situation is genuinely terrible! I've been there myself trying to get through about a simple question. It's wild that we need third-party services just to talk to our own tax agency, but here we are in 2025 I guess.
GalacticGuru
This whole thread has been super educational! I never realized how complex the tax situation gets with these big YouTube giveaways. One angle I haven't seen mentioned yet is what happens if you're a minor when you win one of these prizes. Like, MrBeast sometimes gives money to kids in his videos - do the parents have to report it on their tax return? And what about international winners? I've seen him give prizes to people in other countries in some of his videos. Also, reading about all the phone troubles with the IRS makes me wonder if there are other government agencies that are similarly hard to reach. Seems like a systemic problem that really needs fixing when taxpayers can't even get basic questions answered without using third-party services. The whole non-cash prize situation with houses and cars is honestly terrifying from a tax perspective. Imagine being handed keys to a dream house only to realize you now owe six figures in taxes you don't have! Really makes you think twice about entering those kinds of contests.
You've brought up some really interesting edge cases! For minors, the tax situation gets tricky - generally speaking, any income earned by a minor still needs to be reported, but it would typically go on the parents' tax return if the child doesn't file their own. The parents would be responsible for the tax liability, which could be a nasty surprise if they weren't expecting it. International winners face even more complexity since there are often tax treaties between countries that affect how prize winnings are taxed. Some countries might tax the winnings locally AND the US might require withholding, potentially creating double taxation issues. You're absolutely right about the systemic problem with government phone systems. It's not just the IRS - try calling Social Security, Medicare, or state unemployment offices and you'll face similar nightmares. It really highlights how much our government systems need modernization. The house/car prize situation is genuinely scary! I've heard of people who had to take out loans just to pay the taxes on prizes they won. Some game shows now actually offer "tax assistance" or smaller cash prizes specifically to help winners cover the tax burden, which shows how real this problem is.
Join the conversation
One thing I learned the hard way - be super careful about claiming too much of your house as rental property if you ever want to claim the capital gains exclusion when selling! If you claim 60% as rental, you might only be able to exclude 40% of your gains from capital gains taxes when you sell. Also, make sure you're tracking the dates that rooms are actually rented vs. vacant. If a room sits empty for a few months while you're looking for a tenant, the expenses during that time are still deductible as long as the room is being actively marketed for rent.
Wait, so does this mean I shouldn't be claiming as much rental use as possible? I thought the goal was to maximize deductions?
Sean O'Brien
Great question about the capital gains exclusion! You're right to think about maximizing deductions, but it's all about timing and your long-term plans. If you're planning to sell within a few years, you might want to be more conservative with your rental percentage claims. But if you're planning to keep the property long-term, maximizing current deductions usually makes more sense. The key is that you can qualify for the capital gains exclusion on your primary residence portion as long as you've lived in the home as your main residence for at least 2 of the last 5 years before selling. So if you're claiming 60% rental use, you'd potentially pay capital gains on 60% of your profit, but exclude up to $250k (or $500k if married) of gains on the 40% personal use portion. Run the numbers both ways - sometimes the annual tax savings from higher rental deductions outweigh the future capital gains hit, especially if you're in a high tax bracket now. A good tax professional can help you model different scenarios based on your specific situation and timeline.
This is exactly the kind of strategic thinking I wish I'd had when I first started renting out rooms! I jumped straight into maximizing deductions without considering the long-term implications. Now I'm realizing I might have painted myself into a corner for when I eventually want to sell. @Sean O'Brien - do you know if there's a way to adjust your rental percentage claims in future years if your situation changes? Like if I initially claimed 60% rental use but later decide I want to be more conservative, can I dial that back to maybe 40% in subsequent tax years? Or does the IRS expect consistency once you establish a pattern? I'm also curious about the 2-out-of-5-years rule - if I stop renting rooms entirely a year before selling, would that help me qualify for more of the capital gains exclusion on the whole property?
Join the conversation
Sean O'Brien
I had the same issue with MI last month! Turned out my return was still in "processing" status even though it had been weeks. The state website doesn't update until it's fully processed, unlike the federal system. You might want to try calling their automated line at 517-636-4486 - sometimes it gives you more info than the website does. Hang in there, it's frustrating but normal this year!
That automated line tip is gold! Just tried it and actually got more info than the website. Still says processing but at least I know they have my return. Thanks for sharing that number!
Michigan resident here who went through this exact same thing last year! The "no match found" error is super common when their system is backlogged. I ended up waiting about 5-6 weeks before my return showed up in their lookup tool. One thing that helped me was keeping a screenshot of my submission confirmation from when I e-filed - that way you have proof you submitted it on time. Also, if you're really worried, you can request a payment trace after 6 weeks if your refund still hasn't shown up. Don't stress too much, MI is just notoriously slow compared to federal!
Sean Doyle
ā¢This is super helpful! I'm in the same boat and was starting to panic that something went wrong with my filing. Good to know that 5-6 weeks is normal for MI - I'm only at 3 weeks so I guess I need to be more patient. Definitely going to save that screenshot tip for next year. Thanks for the reassurance that this is just how MI works!
Join the conversation
I just wanted to add my voice to everyone saying check your IRS transcript first - it really is the fastest way to get answers! I went through this same situation about 6 months ago and was terrified I'd somehow messed up my taxes or that the IRS would demand the money back later. Turned out they had automatically applied the Recovery Rebate Credit that I was eligible for but hadn't claimed on my original return. The transcript showed exactly what happened with a clear code explanation. One thing I'll add that I haven't seen mentioned - if you do end up needing to call the IRS for any reason, try calling right when they open at 7 AM. I had much better luck getting through during the first hour they're open versus trying later in the day. But honestly, the transcript check will probably give you everything you need without having to call at all. Don't stress too much about it - these automatic adjustments happen all the time and are usually good news!
Mateo Silva
ā¢That's a great tip about calling right at 7 AM if you do need to reach them by phone! I never would have thought of that timing strategy. The Recovery Rebate Credit is another one of those credits that seems to get missed frequently during initial processing - it's reassuring to know the IRS systems catch these things automatically and send the additional refunds. Your experience really reinforces what everyone else has been saying about these adjustments being routine rather than something to panic about. It's amazing how many legitimate reasons there can be for unexpected refund checks - from calculation errors to missed credits to employer reporting corrections. Thanks for adding your perspective! The more examples people share, the more it helps others realize this isn't some rare or problematic situation. The transcript check really does seem to be the universal solution that works quickly for almost everyone.
Ana Rusula
This happened to me too! Got an unexpected $395 check about a month after my direct deposit refund came through. I was completely panicking thinking I'd made some huge mistake or that the IRS would come after me later demanding it back with penalties. After reading through all the great advice here, I checked my IRS account transcript online and found the answer immediately. Turns out they had made an automatic adjustment because my employer submitted a corrected W-2 that showed I had paid more state taxes than originally reported, which affected my state and local tax deduction on my federal return. The whole thing was resolved in literally 5 minutes of checking the transcript. I found a code 291 adjustment that explained exactly what happened. The IRS code lookup tool translated it into plain English so I could understand it without any confusion. I was so relieved to discover it was completely legitimate! I had worked myself up thinking this was going to be a massive headache, but it turned out to be a pleasant surprise. The IRS systems really do catch these things automatically and send corrections when they work in your favor. Definitely start with checking your transcript online - it's free, fast, and will give you peace of mind right away. Thanks to everyone in this thread for sharing their experiences and advice!
Luca Esposito
If your total itemized deductions are close to the standard deduction amount, sometimes it's not even worth the hassle of tracking all those charitable donations. For 2024 taxes, the standard deduction is $14,600 for singles and $29,200 for married filing jointly. Unless your total itemized deductions (including charitable donations, mortgage interest, state taxes, etc.) exceed those amounts, you're better off just taking the standard deduction. I used to meticulously track every $5 and $10 donation until I realized I wasn't even close to exceeding the standard deduction threshold.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
ā¢That's a really good point! I spent hours organizing donation receipts last year only to discover my total itemized deductions were about $2,000 below the standard deduction. Complete waste of time. Now I only bother tracking if I know I've made major donations or have other big deductions that might push me over the threshold.
0 coins
Malia Ponder
Great question! Beyond what others have mentioned about statistical flagging and documentation requirements, there are a few additional deterrents worth noting. The IRS has access to third-party data that many people don't realize. For example, if you claim large donations but your bank records (which they can access during an audit) don't show corresponding withdrawals or checks, that's a red flag. Credit card companies also report certain transaction data that can be cross-referenced. There's also the "lifestyle audit" aspect - if you're claiming $5,000 in charitable donations but your reported income and other financial behaviors suggest you're living paycheck to paycheck, that inconsistency might trigger scrutiny. The penalties for understating your tax liability can be steep too. If they determine you knowingly inflated deductions, you could face accuracy-related penalties of 20% of the underpayment, plus interest, and in severe cases even fraud penalties of 75%. For most people, the risk just isn't worth the relatively small tax savings from inflating donations. That said, don't let paranoia stop you from claiming legitimate donations! Just keep good records and be honest about amounts.
0 coins
Bethany Groves
ā¢This is really helpful context about the lifestyle audit aspect! I hadn't considered that the IRS might look at the bigger picture of your financial situation. It makes sense that claiming huge charitable donations while having minimal bank account activity would raise eyebrows. The point about third-party data access is eye-opening too. I always assumed they only looked at what you submitted, but if they can cross-reference with bank records and credit card data during an audit, that's a pretty comprehensive verification system. Do you know if there's a typical income-to-donation ratio that might trigger additional scrutiny? Like, would donating 10% of your income be considered normal while 25% might raise flags?
0 coins