


Ask the community...
Great question! I was in a similar situation last year and learned that PayPal survey payments can be tricky to navigate. Since you mentioned making around $800, you're likely below the $600 threshold for receiving a 1099-K from PayPal in 2024, but that doesn't mean the income isn't taxable. The IRS considers survey rewards as taxable income regardless of whether you receive tax forms. Since you're doing this casually rather than as a structured business, you'd typically report it as "other income" on Schedule 1 of your tax return rather than self-employment income on Schedule C. This saves you from paying the additional 15.3% self-employment tax. Make sure to keep records of your survey payments - screenshots of PayPal transactions or emails from survey companies work well. Even though $800 might seem small, it's always better to report it correctly than risk issues later. The IRS has been paying more attention to digital payment platforms lately, so proper documentation is key.
Thanks for the clear breakdown! Quick follow-up question - when you say "screenshots of PayPal transactions," do you mean I need to screenshot every individual survey payment, or is downloading the annual PayPal statement sufficient? I've been doing surveys on and off for about 6 months now and there are probably 20-30 small payments scattered throughout. Want to make sure I'm documenting this properly without going overboard.
The annual PayPal statement should be perfectly sufficient! No need to screenshot every individual transaction - that would be overkill. The annual statement will show all your transactions with dates, amounts, and sender information, which is exactly what you'd need if the IRS ever had questions. I'd recommend downloading your annual statement and then creating a simple spreadsheet that summarizes just your survey income. List the survey company names, total amounts received from each, and maybe note which months you were most active. This gives you a clean summary while the detailed PayPal statement serves as your backup documentation. For 20-30 small payments, this approach will save you tons of time compared to individual screenshots and still gives you solid documentation. The key is showing you made a good faith effort to track and report the income accurately.
One thing to keep in mind is that the $600 threshold for 1099-K forms changed recently. For 2024, PayPal and other payment processors are required to issue 1099-K forms if you receive $600 or more in payments for goods and services (this was lowered from the previous $20,000 threshold). Since you mentioned making around $800 from surveys, there's a good chance you'll receive a 1099-K from PayPal for 2024. However, as others have mentioned, receiving this form doesn't change your tax obligations - you still need to report the income even if you don't get the form. The key distinction is whether your survey activities constitute a business or hobby. If you're just doing surveys occasionally in your spare time without any business-like approach, you can report it as "other income" on Schedule 1. But if you're doing it regularly with the intent to make profit, the IRS might consider it self-employment income requiring Schedule C and self-employment taxes. Keep good records either way - a simple spreadsheet tracking survey payments with dates and amounts will serve you well come tax time.
Anybody know if this question on the 1040 about digital assets is new? I swear I don't remember seeing this on my tax forms before last year. Is the IRS just trying to crack down on crypto now?
It's been around for a few years but they keep changing the wording. It used to be called "virtual currency" instead of "digital assets" and was on Schedule 1. Now they've moved it to the main 1040 form and broadened the language to include more types of digital assets, not just cryptocurrency. Definitely part of the IRS trying to increase compliance with crypto reporting.
I had the exact same confusion with my Robinhood crypto trades! After going through this myself, I can confirm that yes, you absolutely need to answer "Yes" to that digital asset question. The IRS doesn't care which platform you used - crypto is crypto. One tip that really helped me: make sure you download your full transaction history from Robinhood, not just rely on the 1099-B. I found some small transactions that weren't clearly reflected on the form but still needed to be reported. Also, if you did any transfers between different cryptocurrencies (like Bitcoin to Ethereum), those count as taxable events too, even if you didn't convert back to cash. The "basis not reported to IRS" thing is annoying but manageable if you keep good records. I just went through my transaction history month by month and matched up my purchases with sales. Takes some time but beats getting a letter from the IRS later!
This is really helpful advice! I'm new to crypto taxes and didn't realize that crypto-to-crypto trades were taxable events. So if I swapped some Ethereum for Bitcoin on Robinhood, that's something I need to report even though I never got actual cash? That seems like it could create a lot of paperwork for people who do frequent trades between different coins. Also, when you say "download your full transaction history," where exactly do I find that in Robinhood? I can see my 1099-B but want to make sure I'm not missing anything like you mentioned.
Has anyone here actually done what the OP is asking about? I'm in almost the identical situation (retired from state job, now working part-time with 401k access). My HR department at the new job got confused when I told them about my 457b contributions earlier this year. They kept saying I was over the limit already, but I showed them the IRS guidelines about separate limits.
I did exactly this last year. Contributed the max to my 457b, then took a private sector job and contributed to their 401k. Payroll was confused at first, but I printed out IRS Publication 575 which specifically addresses this situation. Once they reviewed it with their benefits team, they processed my contributions without issue. Just be prepared with the documentation.
I'm in a similar situation but with a twist - I'm 58 and considering whether to use the special 3-year catchup provision for my 457b or wait until I'm eligible for the regular age 50+ catchup. My state plan allows the special catchup starting 3 years before normal retirement age (which is 60 for me). One thing I learned from my benefits coordinator is that you can't use both the special 3-year catchup AND the age 50+ catchup in the same year - you have to choose whichever gives you the higher contribution limit. In most cases, the special 3-year catchup allows much higher contributions because it lets you make up for years when you didn't max out your contributions. For anyone considering this, make sure you understand your plan's normal retirement age definition. Some state plans define it differently than others, which affects when you become eligible for the special catchup provision.
This is really helpful information about the special 3-year catchup provision! I had no idea you couldn't combine it with the regular age 50+ catchup. That's an important distinction that could save people from making contribution errors. Quick question - when you say "make up for years when you didn't max out your contributions," does that mean if I contributed $15,000 one year when the limit was $20,000, I could potentially contribute an extra $5,000 during my special catchup years? Or is there a specific formula the plan uses to calculate your unused contribution amounts? Also, do you know if this special catchup provision applies to all governmental 457b plans, or are there some that don't offer it? I want to make sure I'm not assuming something that might not apply to everyone's situation.
Quick question - I'm using TurboTax and wondering if it can handle Form 3115 for missed depreciation? Their support wasn't clear about it.
I tried doing this with TurboTax last year and it was a nightmare. They technically support Form 3115 but not for this specific use case. I ended up switching to H&R Block's premium version which handled it much better. FreeTaxUSA might support it too but I haven't personally tried it for Form 3115.
I'd recommend using a professional for Form 3115, especially your first time. It's one of the more complex IRS forms with a lot of different sections and schedules. Getting it wrong can create bigger problems than just missing the depreciation in the first place. Even as a tax professional, I reference the Form 3115 instructions every time I complete one.
I went through this exact same situation with three rental properties I bought between 2020-2022. The stress was overwhelming until I realized how straightforward the fix actually is with Form 3115. A few practical tips that helped me: 1. Calculate your basis correctly - for residential rentals, you can only depreciate the building, not the land. Your purchase contract or property tax assessment should show the land vs building allocation. 2. Remember that depreciation starts when the property is "placed in service" for rental use, not necessarily when you bought it. If you spent time renovating before it was rentable, that affects your start date. 3. The Section 481(a) adjustment on Form 3115 will be substantial (mine was over $35k total), but don't worry - this is exactly what the form is designed for. The IRS expects large catch-up amounts. 4. File Form 3115 with your current year return, not as an amendment to prior years. This is key - it saves you from the hassle and potential issues of multiple amended returns. One last thing - make sure you continue depreciating correctly going forward! The mistake is fixable, but you don't want to repeat it. Good luck!
This is incredibly helpful, especially the point about land vs building allocation! I never even thought about that distinction. Do you happen to know what percentage is typically allocated to land vs building for residential properties? I'm looking at my closing documents now and I don't see a clear breakdown. Would the county assessor's office have this information, or is there a standard method to determine it? Also, regarding the "placed in service" date - I did do some minor repairs and cleaning on both properties before renting them out (maybe 2-3 weeks after closing). Should I use the repair completion date or the date I first listed them for rent as the placed in service date?
Lucas Adams
One thing I'm not seeing mentioned is the timing. Getting married in December 2025 vs January 2026 makes a HUGE difference for taxes. The IRS considers you married for the ENTIRE tax year even if you get married on December 31st. So if they just got married, they'll be "married filing jointly" for the entire 2025 tax year when they file in 2026.
0 coins
Harper Hill
ā¢This is actually a really good point. I've seen people strategically time their weddings for tax purposes. Had friends who moved their wedding from January to December specifically for this reason.
0 coins
Lucas Adams
ā¢Exactly! It's one of those weird tax rules that can work in your favor if you know about it. The reverse is true too - if you get divorced on December 31st, you're considered unmarried for the whole year. The tax code has some strange timing quirks that can make a big difference.
0 coins
Chloe Davis
As a tax professional, I want to address a few key points here. First, the $10k difference you calculated seems unusually high for those income levels - typically the marriage bonus for a $145k/$32k couple would be in the $3-5k range as others have mentioned. You might want to double-check those TurboTax calculations. That said, your friend will likely see some legitimate tax benefits. With such disparate incomes, married filing jointly usually results in savings because the higher earner's income gets "averaged" with the lower earner's income, potentially moving more income into lower tax brackets. However, I echo what others have said - marriage is a huge legal and financial commitment that goes far beyond taxes. It affects debt liability, property rights, inheritance, healthcare decisions, and more. If they were already planning to marry eventually, then this might have just accelerated their timeline. But if taxes were the primary driver, that's concerning. My advice: sit down with your friend, acknowledge that you may have been overzealous about the tax benefits, and suggest they speak with a tax professional to get accurate numbers. Most importantly, be supportive of their marriage regardless of how it started - they're the ones who ultimately made the decision.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
ā¢Thank you for the professional perspective! This really helps put things in context. I'm definitely going to have that honest conversation with my friend and suggest they get a proper tax professional consultation to verify the actual numbers. Do you think it would be worth having them run the calculations through one of those services mentioned earlier (like taxr.ai) to get a clearer picture, or would you recommend going straight to a CPA? I'm trying to figure out the best way to help them get accurate information without spending a fortune on professional fees, especially since they just had wedding expenses. Also, I'm curious - in your experience, do you see couples who got married primarily for tax reasons? How do those situations typically work out long-term?
0 coins