IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Malik Thomas

•

Filed mine about the same time as you! The transcript route is definitely your best bet for getting the real status. WMR can be pretty vague with just "processing" but your transcript will show specific codes that tell you exactly where things stand. Usually takes 24-48 hours after filing to show up in the system. Don't stress too much - if you got a confirmation from your filing software, you're probably good to go!

0 coins

Yara Khoury

•

Thanks for the reassurance! Yeah I did get a confirmation email from TurboTax so hopefully that's a good sign. Going to check the transcript thing this weekend - fingers crossed it shows up by then šŸ¤ž

0 coins

Another option is calling the IRS automated line at 1-800-829-1040, but honestly the transcript method is way faster. Once you get your account set up, you can check anytime without waiting on hold. Just make sure you have your AGI from last year's return handy for the verification process - that trips up a lot of people!

0 coins

Good call on having the AGI ready! I made that mistake last year and got locked out for 24 hours šŸ¤¦ā€ā™€ļø The automated line is decent but you're right about transcripts being faster. Plus you get way more detail than just "we received it" or "it's processing

0 coins

Why does SBTPG release tax refunds at 2:30 PM Pacific Time instead of in the morning? I've been waiting 19 days already!

Just checked my refund processing info and it says the IRS releases funds starting at 2:30 PM Pacific time??? That's 5:30 pm where i live. Why wouldn't they just release the funds first thing in the morning? I've been waiting 19 days for my refund now and its getting frustrating. According to this Pay-by-Refund information I'm looking at: "Pay-by-Refund isn't a loan against the refund. The IRS or state tax agency needs to first release the funds to the bank before the taxpayer will receive their refund. The IRS issues most refunds within 21 days; however it's possible the tax return may require additional review and could take longer. When IRS or state tax funding has been received, SBTPG releases the funds starting at 2:30 PM Pacific time. It can take an additional 1-2 hours to process and for the disbursement records to reach your tax software." So basically the IRS needs to release the funds to the bank before I can get my refund, and it could take another 1-2 hours to process after that. And of course there's that disclaimer about "additional review" that might make it take longer than 21 days. Anyone else experience this weird 2:30 PM Pacific release time? I've been checking my account balance all day and now I have to wait until evening ugh. Also, what's SBTPG? I assume that's the bank that handles the refund processing? The document I'm looking at also has a "Back to Table of Contents" link and mentions something about "What does Pay-by-Refund cost?" but doesn't show the answer to that question. I'm just frustrated that they can't release these funds in the morning instead of making people wait until late afternoon/evening depending on your time zone.

This is so frustrating! I had the exact same experience with SBTPG last year. What made it worse is that I could see on the IRS "Where's My Refund" tool that my refund had already been sent out, but then I had to wait another full day for SBTPG to process it at their arbitrary 2:30 PM cutoff time. It's like they're holding your own money hostage! The worst part is realizing you're paying extra fees for this "convenience" when direct deposit would have been faster and free. I'm definitely paying my tax prep fees upfront next year and skipping all these third-party processors. The 1-2 hour processing delay they mention can easily turn into 24+ hours if the IRS sends your refund after their daily cutoff time. Hang in there - once SBTPG processes it, the money should hit your account pretty quickly after that!

0 coins

This is so helpful to read! I'm definitely in the same boat and kicking myself for not understanding what I was signing up for. It's crazy that they can just decide to hold onto your money until a specific time each day. I'm checking my account obsessively and it's driving me nuts knowing the IRS already sent it but now I have to wait for some bank's processing schedule. Lesson learned for next year - direct deposit all the way!

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

I feel your pain! This exact situation happened to me two years ago and I was so confused about why my refund was taking forever when the IRS website said it was already processed. Turns out I had unknowingly signed up for that refund transfer service through TurboTax just to avoid paying the preparation fees upfront. What's really annoying is that SBTPG's 2:30 PM Pacific cutoff means if the IRS sends your refund at 3:00 PM Pacific, you're waiting until the next business day for them to process it. So what should be a same-day transfer turns into an extra 24-hour delay. The silver lining is that once SBTPG does process your refund, it typically shows up in your bank account within a few hours. So if they process it at 2:30 PM Pacific today, you should see the money by tonight or early tomorrow morning depending on your bank. Next year I'm definitely doing what everyone else here suggested - paying the tax prep fees with a credit card and having the refund go directly to my bank account. No middleman, no arbitrary processing schedules, no extra fees. Live and learn!

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

Thanks for explaining this so clearly! I had no idea about the cutoff time thing - that makes the delay even more frustrating. It's like they're playing games with our money. I'm definitely going to remember this for next year and just pay the fees upfront. The "convenience" of having fees deducted from the refund is clearly not convenient at all when you factor in the extra delays and fees. Really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences here - at least now I know I'm not the only one dealing with this nonsense!

0 coins

LunarEclipse

•

I'm experiencing the exact same issue! My direct deposit is scheduled for 2/24 (same as yours) and Santa Barbara has been showing "account not found" for the past 4 days. I was getting really worried until I read these responses. I just checked the official IRS Where's My Refund tool and it shows my refund is still processing normally with the expected deposit date. Based on what others are saying here, it seems like Santa Barbara's system just has sync issues during peak season. I'm going to stop obsessively checking their site and trust the official IRS tools instead. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - it's really reassuring to know this is a common glitch and not an actual problem with our refunds!

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

Same boat here! I've been checking Santa Barbara obsessively for the past week with no luck - just that frustrating "account not found" message. My DD is also scheduled for 2/24. After reading everyone's experiences, I feel so much better knowing this is just their system being glitchy during tax season. I checked the official IRS site and everything looks good there too. It's crazy how much anxiety these third-party sites can cause when they're not synced properly! Definitely going to stick to the official IRS tools from now on.

0 coins

Amina Bah

•

I'm dealing with this same Santa Barbara "account not found" error and it's been driving me crazy! My refund is scheduled for 2/26 and I've been checking multiple times a day with no luck. Reading through all these responses is such a relief - it sounds like this is just a recurring system issue they have every tax season rather than an actual problem with our refunds. I just verified on the official IRS Where's My Refund tool and my refund shows as processing normally. It's frustrating that Santa Barbara can't keep their system in sync during the busiest time of year, but at least now I know to trust the official IRS sources instead of panicking over their glitchy website. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this community is so helpful for peace of mind during tax season!

0 coins

This thread has been so helpful! I'm a newcomer here and was really starting to panic about the same Santa Barbara issue. My DD is scheduled for 2/25 and I've been getting that "account not found" error for 3 days now. Reading everyone's experiences makes me feel so much better - it's clearly just their system having sync problems during peak season. I checked the official IRS Where's My Refund tool after reading these comments and everything looks normal there. It's amazing how much stress these third-party sites can cause when they're not working properly! Thanks to this community for sharing real experiences instead of just generic advice.

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

This is actually pretty common, especially during peak tax season! I work in tax prep and see this all the time. The $843 difference you're seeing could be due to several factors: **Most likely culprits:** • Business expense adjustments (IRS may have flagged certain deductions for review) • Estimated tax payment discrepancies • Prior year balance due that got offset • Math errors in tax software calculations **What to do next:** 1. Look for TC codes on your transcript - specifically TC 290 (account adjustment) or TC 570 (additional account action pending) 2. Check if you received any IRS notices in the mail (CP12, CP11, etc.) 3. Compare your 1040 line by line with what's on the transcript The transcript amount ($2,569) is what you'll actually receive - that's the IRS's final calculation after their processing. TurboTax's estimate is based on the data you entered, but the IRS may have made adjustments during processing. If you can't figure out the discrepancy from the codes, you might need to call the IRS for a detailed explanation. Fair warning though - hold times are brutal right now (2-3 hours minimum). The good news is if it's just a documentation issue, you can often get the difference back with proper supporting documents.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I was hoping to find! Thank you for explaining the TC codes - I had no idea what those meant when I was looking at my transcript. I just checked and I do see a TC 570 code on mine, which based on what you said means there's additional account action pending. I haven't received any CP notices in the mail yet, but I'll keep an eye out. The 2-3 hour hold time is definitely intimidating, but at least now I have a better understanding of what might be going on. Quick question - when you mention comparing the 1040 line by line with the transcript, are there specific lines that tend to have discrepancies more often than others? I want to focus my attention on the most likely problem areas first.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

@Jamal Wilson Great question! In my experience, the lines that get flagged most often are: **Schedule C business expenses Lines (8-27 :**)Especially meals, travel, and home office deductions - the IRS loves to scrutinize these **Estimated tax payments Line (26 :**)Software sometimes double-counts or miscalculates quarterly payments **Earned Income Credit Line (27a :**)Income thresholds change and software doesn t'always catch edge cases **Additional Child Tax Credit Schedule (8812 :**)Qualification rules are complex and frequently misapplied Since you have a TC 570, I d'bet money it s'related to your business expenses if you filed a Schedule C. The IRS probably wants to see receipts or documentation for specific deductions. Check your transcript for the dollar amount next to the TC 570 - that ll'tell you exactly how much they re'holding pending review. Also look for any TC 424 codes which indicate specific line items under examination. Once you know which line they re'questioning, you can gather the right documents to support your claim!

0 coins

I went through this exact same nightmare last year! The stress of seeing that difference between what you expect and what the IRS actually processes is real. Here's what I learned from my experience: **The transcript is always the truth** - whatever amount shows up there is what you're getting, period. TurboTax (and other software) can only work with the information you give them, but they can't predict IRS adjustments. **Check for these specific things:** • Look for TC 846 on your transcript - that's your actual refund amount • TC 570 means they're holding part of your refund for review • TC 971 often indicates they need additional documentation In my case, the $600 difference was because the IRS adjusted my home office deduction. They wanted more detailed records than what I initially provided. I ended up getting the full amount 8 weeks later after sending them my documentation. **Pro tip:** Don't spend your "expected" refund until you see the actual deposit in your account. I made that mistake once and had to scramble to cover expenses when my refund came in lower than TurboTax estimated. The waiting and uncertainty sucks, but most of these discrepancies get resolved if your deductions were legitimate. Hang in there!

0 coins

@Dylan Mitchell This is so reassuring to hear! I m'dealing with a similar situation right now and was starting to panic that I d'never see that missing money. The part about not spending your expected refund really hits home - I was already planning how to use that extra $843 and now I m'glad I didn t'make any purchases yet. Quick question: when you sent in your additional documentation for the home office deduction, did you send it to a specific IRS address or was there a form you had to fill out? I m'trying to get ahead of this process since I suspect my business expenses might be what s'causing the hold. Also, during those 8 weeks of waiting, were you able to check your transcript periodically to see if there were any updates or changes to the codes? Thanks for sharing your experience - it really helps to know others have gone through this successfully!

0 coins

Nathan Kim

•

I've been following this thread and wanted to share our experience as a mid-sized nonprofit that went through similar W9 confusion last year. We initially had our finance team requesting W9s for every vendor too, but quickly realized it was creating more problems than it solved. What worked for us was implementing a two-tier system: automatic W9 collection for any vendor we expect to pay over $300 annually (giving us a buffer), and quarterly reviews of all vendor payments to catch anyone approaching $600. We use a simple Excel tracker that flags vendors at $400 and $550 thresholds. The key insight was that most of our vendor relationships are either very small (under $100 annually) or clearly going to exceed $600 - there aren't many vendors in that middle ground where tracking becomes tricky. For the 5-10 vendors per year that unexpectedly approach $600, we just request W9s when we notice during our quarterly reviews. This approach reduced our W9 collection efforts by about 80% while maintaining full compliance. Our program staff can focus on service delivery instead of chasing gas stations for tax forms!

0 coins

Zoe Walker

•

@c65f4899104a This is such a practical solution! I'm definitely going to propose this two-tier approach to our board. One quick question - do you find that vendors are more cooperative about providing W9s when you explain it's part of your standard process for vendors over a certain threshold, rather than asking for it reactively after they've already hit $600? I imagine it comes across as more professional and less like you're scrambling to catch up on compliance. Our current ad-hoc approach makes us look disorganized when we suddenly ask established vendors for paperwork they've never heard us mention before.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

@c65f4899104a Thanks for the detailed breakdown of your two-tier system! To answer some of the questions others have asked - we set up our Excel tracker to manually pull quarterly data from QuickBooks, which takes about 30 minutes every three months. The $300 buffer has been sufficient in most cases, though we did lower it to $250 for a few vendor categories where spending can spike quickly (like IT services or emergency repairs). For vendor categorization, we typically flag any service contracts, recurring suppliers, or vendors where the initial purchase is over $100 as "likely to exceed $300." One-time small purchases (under $50) rarely make it to that level. You're absolutely right that explaining the W9 requirement upfront as part of our vendor onboarding process gets much better cooperation than asking retroactively. Vendors appreciate the transparency and it positions us as organized rather than scrambling. The seasonal vendor issue is a good point - we do run an additional mid-summer check for landscaping, HVAC, and other seasonal services to catch those irregular patterns. Has saved us from a few surprises!

0 coins

Dylan Baskin

•

This discussion has been incredibly helpful for our nonprofit! We were facing the exact same issue with our finance team wanting W9s for every transaction. Reading through everyone's experiences, especially Nathan's two-tier system, has given us a clear path forward. I'm planning to implement a similar approach - collecting W9s upfront for vendors we expect to exceed $300 annually, and doing quarterly reviews to catch others approaching the threshold. The idea of setting the flag at $250 for certain high-variance categories like IT and emergency repairs is particularly smart. One additional tip for other nonprofits dealing with resistant finance teams: I found it helpful to calculate the actual administrative cost of the "collect W9s from everyone" policy. When we showed our board that staff time spent chasing unnecessary W9s was costing us roughly $15,000 annually in lost productivity, they quickly approved a more reasonable approach. Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world solutions - this is exactly the kind of practical guidance nonprofits need!

0 coins

Amina Bah

•

@335d28e0e704 Your cost analysis approach is genius! We're facing the same resistance from our finance committee, and I'd love to know more details about how you calculated that $15,000 figure. Did you track the actual time staff spent on W9 collection over a specific period, or did you estimate based on the volume of transactions? Also, how did you present this to your board - was it part of a larger operational efficiency report or a standalone proposal? I'm thinking of doing a similar analysis for our organization. We process about 300 vendor transactions monthly, and our current "W9 for everything" policy is absolutely killing our program staff's productivity. Having real numbers to show the board would be incredibly valuable for getting approval for a more sensible approach like Nathan's two-tier system.

0 coins

@335d28e0e704 That cost analysis approach is really smart! I'm dealing with a similar situation where our finance director is being overly cautious about W9 collection. When you calculated the $15,000 figure, did you include training time for new staff who had to learn the excessive W9 procedures? We've noticed that onboarding program staff takes much longer when they have to understand all these unnecessary compliance steps that other nonprofits don't even do. Also, I'm curious if you tracked any impact on client services or program delivery. Our case workers are spending so much time on W9 paperwork that it's actually affecting how many clients we can serve. If we could quantify that impact alongside the direct staff costs, it might make an even stronger case for implementing a sensible system like the two-tier approach everyone's discussing here.

0 coins

Prev1...19661967196819691970...5644Next